Ancient role of sulfakinin/cholecystokinin-type signalling in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes revealed in an echinoderm
- Queen Mary University of London, School of Biological & Behavioural Sciences, United Kingdom
- School of Life Sciences and Proteomics, Research Technology Platform, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Abstract
Sulfakinin (SK)/cholecystokinin (CCK)-type neuropeptides regulate feeding and digestion in protostomes (e.g. insects) and chordates. Here, we characterised SK/CCK-type signalling for the first time in a non-chordate deuterostome – the starfish Asterias rubens (phylum Echinodermata). In this species, two neuropeptides (ArSK/CCK1, ArSK/CCK2) derived from the precursor protein ArSK/CCKP act as ligands for an SK/CCK-type receptor (ArSK/CCKR) and these peptides/proteins are expressed in the nervous system, digestive system, tube feet, and body wall. Furthermore, ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 cause dose-dependent contraction of cardiac stomach, tube foot, and apical muscle preparations in vitro, and injection of these neuropeptides in vivo triggers cardiac stomach retraction and inhibition of the onset of feeding in A. rubens. Thus, an evolutionarily ancient role of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides as inhibitory regulators of feeding-related processes in the Bilateria has been conserved in the unusual and unique context of the extra-oral feeding behaviour and pentaradial body plan of an echinoderm.
Introduction
The peptide hormones cholecystokinin (CCK) and gastrin were discovered and named on account of their effects as stimulators of gall bladder contraction and gastric secretion of pepsin/acid, respectively, in mammals (Edkins, 1906; Ivy ACO and Goldberg, 1928). Determination of the structures of CCK and gastrin revealed that they have the same C-terminal structural motif (Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2), indicative of a common evolutionary origin (Gregory et al., 1964; Mutt and Jorpes, 1968). However, CCK and gastrin are derived from different precursor proteins, which are subject to cell/tissue-specific processing to give rise to bioactive peptides of varying length (e.g. CCK-8 and CCK-33; gastrin-17 and gastrin-34) (Boel et al., 1983; Deschenes et al., 1984; Rehfeld et al., 2007). Furthermore, CCK and gastrin have a tyrosine residue at positions 7 and 6 from the C-terminal amide, respectively, which can be sulphated post-translationally (Rehfeld et al., 2007). The effects of CCK and gastrin in mammals are mediated by two G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), CCK-A (CCKR1) and CCK-B (CCKR2), with both sulphated and non-sulphated forms of CCK and gastrin acting as ligands for the CCK-B receptor, whilst the CCK-A receptor is selectively activated by sulphated CCK (de Weerth et al., 1993; Dufresne et al., 2006; Kopin et al., 1992; Lee et al., 1993; Noble and Roques, 1999; Wank et al., 1992). Mediated by these receptors, gastrin and CCK have a variety of physiological/behavioural effects in mammals. Thus, in the gastrointestinal system, gastrin stimulates growth of the stomach lining, gastric contractions, and gastric emptying (Crean et al., 1969; Dockray et al., 2005; Gregory and Tracy, 1964; Vizi et al., 1973), whilst CCK stimulates pancreatic enzyme secretion, contraction of the pyloric sphincter, and intestinal motility (Chen et al., 2004; Gutiérrez et al., 1974; Harper and Raper, 1943; Rehfeld, 2017; Shaw and Jones, 1978; Vizi et al., 1973). Furthermore, CCK also has behavioural effects that include inhibition of food intake as a mediator of satiety and stimulation of aggression and anxiogenesis (Chandra and Liddle, 2007; Gibbs et al., 1973; Singh et al., 1991; Smith et al., 1981).
Phylogenomic studies indicate that genome duplication in a common ancestor of the vertebrates gave rise to genes encoding CCK-type and gastrin-type precursor proteins (Dupré and Tostivint, 2014). Accordingly, invertebrate chordates that are the closest extant relatives of vertebrates (e.g. the urochordate Ciona intestinalis) have a single gene encoding a ‘hybrid’ CCK/gastrin-like peptide (e.g. cionin) with a sulphated tyrosine residue at both positions 6 and 7 from the C-terminal amide (Johnsen and Rehfeld, 1990; Monstein et al., 1993; Thorndyke and Dockray, 1986). Furthermore, CCK-type peptides stimulate gastric enzyme secretion in the sea squirt Styela clava, providing evidence of evolutionarily ancient roles as regulators of gastrointestinal physiology in chordates (Bevis and Thorndyke, 1981; Thorndyke and Bevis, 1984).
Evidence that the phylogenetic distribution of CCK/gastrin-type peptides may extend beyond chordates to other phyla was first obtained with the detection of substances immunoreactive with antibodies to CCK and/or gastrin in a variety of invertebrates, including arthropods, annelids, molluscs, and cnidarians (Dockray et al., 1981; El-Salhy et al., 1980; Grimmelikhuijzen et al., 1980; Kramer et al., 1977; Larson and Vigna, 1983; Rzasa et al., 1982). However, molecular evidence of the evolutionary antiquity of CCK/gastrin-type signalling was obtained with the purification and sequencing of a CCK-like peptide named leucosulfakinin, which was isolated from the insect (cockroach) Leucophaea maderae (Nachman et al., 1986a). Subsequently, GPCRs that are homologs of the vertebrate CCKA/CCKB-type receptors have been identified and pharmacologically characterised as receptors for sulfakinin (SK)-type peptides in a variety of insects, including Drosophila melanogaster (Bloom et al., 2019; Kubiak et al., 2002; Yu et al., 2013b; Yu and Smagghe, 2014b). Furthermore, investigation of the physiological roles of SK-type signalling in insects has revealed similarities with findings from vertebrates. Thus, in several insect species SK-type peptides have myotropic effects on the gut (Al-Alkawi et al., 2017; Marciniak et al., 2011; Nachman et al., 1986a; Nachman et al., 1986b; Nichols, 2007; Palmer et al., 2007; Predel et al., 2001; Schoofs et al., 1990) and/or affect digestive enzyme release (Harshini et al., 2002a; Harshini et al., 2002b; Nachman et al., 1997; Zels et al., 2015). Furthermore, at a behavioural level there is evidence that SK-type peptides act as satiety factors (Al-Alkawi et al., 2017; Bloom et al., 2019; Downer et al., 2007; Maestro et al., 2001; Meyering-Vos and Müller, 2007; Nässel and Zandawala, 2019; Nichols et al., 2008; Wei, 2000; Yu et al., 2013a; Yu et al., 2013b; Yu and Smagghe, 2014b; Zels et al., 2015) and regulate locomotion and aggression in insects (Chen et al., 2012; Nässel and Williams, 2014; Nässel and Zandawala, 2019; Nichols et al., 2008).
The discovery and functional characterisation of SK-type signalling in insects and other arthropods indicated that the evolutionary origin SK/CCK-type signalling can be traced back to the common ancestor of the Bilateria. Consistent with this hypothesis, SK/CCK-type signalling systems have been discovered in a variety of protostome invertebrates, including the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, the mollusc Crassostrea gigas, and the annelid Capitella teleta (Janssen et al., 2008; Mirabeau and Joly, 2013; Schwartz et al., 2018). Furthermore, some insights into the physiological roles of SK/CCK-type signalling in non-arthropod protostomes have been obtained, including causing a decrease in the frequency of spontaneous contractions of the C. gigas hindgut (Schwartz et al., 2018), stimulation of digestive enzyme secretion in C. elegans and Pecten maximus (Nachman et al., 1997) and evidence of a role in regulation of feeding and energy storage in C. gigas (Schwartz et al., 2018).
Little is known about SK/CCK-type signalling in the Ambulacraria (echinoderms and hemichordates) – deuterostome invertebrates that occupy an ‘intermediate’ phylogenetic position with respect to protostomes and chordates (Furlong and Holland, 2002; Telford et al., 2015). Prior to the genome sequencing era, use of immunohistochemical methods revealed CCK-like immunoreactive cells in the intestine of sea cucumbers (phylum Echinodermata) and vertebrate CCK/gastrin-type peptides were found to cause relaxation of sea cucumber intestine (García-Arrarás et al., 1991). More recently, analysis of transcriptome/genome sequence data has enabled identification of transcripts/genes encoding SK/CCK-type peptide precursors and SK/CCK-type receptors in echinoderms and hemichordates (Burke et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2019; Jékely, 2013; Mirabeau and Joly, 2013; Semmens et al., 2016; Zandawala et al., 2017). However, functional characterisation of native SK/CCK-type peptides and receptors has yet to be reported for an echinoderm or hemichordate species. We have established the common European starfish Asterias rubens as an experimental model for molecular and functional characterisation of neuropeptides, obtaining novel insights into the evolution and comparative physiology of several neuropeptide signalling systems (Cai et al., 2018; Elphick et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2017a; Lin et al., 2018; Odekunle et al., 2019; Semmens and Elphick, 2017; Tian et al., 2017; Tian et al., 2016; Tinoco et al., 2018; Yañez-Guerra et al., 2018; Yañez-Guerra et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Accordingly, here we used A. rubens to enable the first detailed molecular, anatomical, and pharmacological analysis of SK/CCK-type signalling in an echinoderm.
Results
Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding ArSK/CCKP
Analysis of A. rubens neural transcriptome sequence data has revealed the presence of an SK/CCK-type precursor in A. rubens, which was originally named ArCCKP (Semmens et al., 2016). Henceforth we refer to this precursor protein as ArSK/CCKP to reflect the sequence similarity that its constituent neuropeptides share with protostome SK-type peptides and chordate CCK/gastrin-type peptides. Here, cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding ArSK/CCKP confirmed the sequence obtained from transcriptome data (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).
Identification of ArSK/CCKP-derived neuropeptides in extracts of A. rubens radial nerve cords
ArSK/CCKP comprises two putative SK/CCK-type neuropeptide sequences that are bounded by dibasic or tetrabasic cleavage sites. Both neuropeptide sequences have a C-terminal glycine residue, which is a potential substrate for post-translational amidation, and both neuropeptide sequences contain a tyrosine residue, which could be either sulphated or non-sulphated (ns) in the mature neuropeptides. Furthermore, an N-terminal glutamine residue (Q) in one of the neuropeptide sequences is a potential substrate for N-terminal pyroglutamylation (pQ) (Figure 1—figure supplement 1; Figure 1—figure supplement 2a).
LC-MS-MS analysis of A. rubens radial nerve cord extracts revealed the presence of four SK/CCK-type peptides derived from ArSK/CCKP: pQSKVDDY(SO3H)GHGLFW-NH2 (ArSK/CCK1; Figure 1—figure supplement 2b), pQSKVDDYGHGLFW-NH2 (ArSK/CCK1(ns); Figure 1—figure supplement 2c), GGDDQY(SO3H)GFGLFF-NH2 (ArSK/CCK2; Figure 1—figure supplement 2d), and GGDDQYGFGLFF-NH2 (ArSK/CCK2(ns); Figure 1—figure supplement 2e). Thus, mass spectrometry confirmed that (i) the peptides are C-terminally amidated, (ii) the peptides are detected with or without tyrosine sulphation, and (iii) an N-terminal glutamine is post-translationally converted to pyroglutamate in the mature ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK1(ns) peptides.
Having determined the structures of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides derived from ArSK/CCKP, the sequences of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 were aligned with the sequences of SK/CCK-type peptides that have been identified in other taxa (Figure 1). This revealed several evolutionarily conserved features, including a tyrosine residue (typically sulphated) and a C-terminal amide group that are separated by five to seven intervening residues. The C-terminal residue in most SK/CCK-type peptides, including ArSK/CCK2, is a phenylalanine residue. However, ArSK/CCK1 is atypical in having a C-terminal tryptophan residue, which is also a feature of an SK/CCK-type peptide in the bivalve mollusc C. gigas.
Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all
Comparison of the Asterias rubens sulfakinin/cholecystokinin (SK/CCK)-type neuropeptides ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 with SK/CCK-type neuropeptides from other taxa.
Conserved residues are highlighted, with conservation in more than 70% of sequences highlighted in black and conservative substitutions highlighted in grey. Experimentally verified conversion of an N-terminal glutamine residue (Q) to pyroglutamate in the mature peptide is indicated by the letter Q being shown in light blue. Tyrosine (Y) residues that are known or predicted to be subject to post-translational sulphation are shown in green. The C-terminal tryptophan (W) in ArSK/CCK1 and in a Crassostrea gigas SK/CCK-type peptide are shown in yellow to highlight that this feature is atypical of SK/CCK-type peptides. Predicted or experimentally verified C-terminal amides are shown as the letter ‘a’ in lowercase. Species names are highlighted in taxon-specific colours: grey (Chordata), blue (Ambulacraria), red (Lophotrochozoa), green (Arthropoda),and purple (Nematoda). Abbreviations are as follows: Acal (Aplysia californica), Arub (Asterias rubens), Cele (Caenorhabditis elegans), Cgig (Crassostrea gigas), Cint (Ciona intestinalis), Dmel (Drosophila melanogaster), Hsap (Homo sapiens), Ovic (Ophionotus victoriae), Pdum (Platynereis dumerilii), Shor (Stichopus horrens), Skow (Saccoglossus kowalevskii), Spur (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus), Tcas (Tribolium castaneum). The accession numbers of the sequences are listed in Figure 1—source data 1. The nucleotide sequence of a cloned cDNA encoding the A. rubens SK/CCK-type precursor is shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Mass spectroscopic analysis of the structures of the peptides derived from the A. rubens SK/CCK-type precursor is presented in Figure 1—figure supplement 2. The raw data for the results shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 2 can be found in Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 1.
-
Figure 1—source data 1
Accession numbers for precursors of the neuropeptides shown in the sequence alignment in Figure 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/65667/elife-65667-fig1-data1-v1.docx
Identification of an SK/CCK-type receptor in A. rubens
BLAST analysis of A. rubens neural transcriptome sequence data identified a transcript that encodes a 434-residue protein (ArSK/CCKR) that shares high sequence similarity with CCK-type receptors from other taxa (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that ArSK/CCKR groups within a clade including SK/CCK-type receptors that have been pharmacologically characterised in other taxa, including the human and mouse CCK/gastrin receptors CCKR1 and CCKR2, the C. intestinalis cionin receptors CioR1 and CioR2, the D. melanogaster sulfakinin receptors SKR1 and SKR2, and the recently characterised C. gigas receptors CCKR1 and CCKR2 (Figure 2). Thus, this demonstrates that ArSK/CCKR is an ortholog of SK/CCK-type receptors that have been characterised in other taxa. Furthermore, reflecting known animal phylogenetic relationships, ArSK/CCKR is positioned within a branch of the tree that comprises SK/CCK-type receptors from deuterostomes, and more specifically it is positioned within an ambulacrarian clade that comprises SK/CCK-type receptors from other echinoderms and from the hemichordate Saccoglossus kowalevskii.
Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all
Phylogenetic tree showing that the predicted Asterias rubens sulfakinin/cholecystokinin (SK/CCK)-type receptor (ArSK/CCKR) is an ortholog of SK/CCK-type receptors in other taxa, which include receptors (*) for which the peptide ligands have been identified experimentally.
The tree was generated using the maximum likelihood method (Guindon et al., 2009), with the percentage of replicate trees in which two or more sequences form a clade in a bootstrap test (1000 replicates) shown at the node of each clade (Zhaxybayeva and Gogarten, 2002). Orexin receptors were included as an outgroup. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. Evolutionary analyses were conducted using the IQ-tree server (Trifinopoulos et al., 2016). Taxa are colour-coded as explained in the key. Abbreviations of species names are as follows: Acal (Aplysia californica), Ajap (Apostichopus japonicus), Arub (Asterias rubens), Cbri (Caenorhabditis briggsae), Cele (Caenorhabditis elegans), Cgig (Crassostrea gigas), Cint (Ciona intestinalis), Ctel (Capitella teleta), Dmel (Drosophila melanogaster), Dpul (Daphnia pulex), Drer (Danio rerio), Ggal (Gallus gallus), Gpau (Glossoscolex paulistus), Hsap (Homo sapiens), Lgig (Lottia gigantea), Mmus (Mus musculus), Ovic (Ophionotus victoriae), Pame (Periplaneta americana), Pcau (Priapulus caudatus), Skow (Saccoglossus kowalevskii), Spur (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus), Tcas (Tribolium castaneum). The accession numbers of the sequences used for this phylogenetic tree are listed in Figure 2—source data 1. The nucleotide sequence and the predicted topology of ArSK/CCKR are shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1 and Figure 2—figure supplement 2, respectively.
-
Figure 2—source data 1
Accession numbers for the receptor sequences used for the phylogenetic tree in Figure 2.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/65667/elife-65667-fig2-data1-v1.docx
Analysis of the amino acid sequence of ArSK/CCKR using the Protter tool (Omasits et al., 2014) revealed seven predicted transmembrane domains, as expected for a GPCR, and three potential N-glycosylation sites in the predicted extracellular N-terminal region of the receptor (Figure 2—figure supplement 2).
ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 are ligands for ArSK/CCKR
Previous studies on other species have revealed that sulphation of the tyrosine residue in CCK-type peptides is often important for receptor activation and bioactivity (Dufresne et al., 2006; Kubiak et al., 2002; Schwartz et al., 2018; Sekiguchi et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2015). Accordingly, neuropeptides derived from ArSK/CCKP were detected in A. rubens radial nerve cord extracts with sulphated tyrosines (ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2; Figure 1—figure supplement 2b, d). Therefore, the sulphated peptides ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 were synthesized and tested as ligands for ArSK/CCKR. However, because non-sulphated forms of ArSK/CCK1 (ArSK/CCK1(ns)) and ArSK/CCK2 (ArSK/CCK(ns)) were also detected in A. rubens radial nerve extracts (Figure 1—figure supplement 2c, e), we also synthesized and tested ArSK/CCK2(ns) to investigate if absence of tyrosine sulphation affects receptor activation. Using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells expressing aequorin as an assay system, ArSK/CCK1, ArSK/CCK2, and ArSK/CCK2(ns) did not elicit luminescence responses when tested on cells transfected with an empty vector (Figure 3). However, all three peptides caused concentration-dependent stimulation of luminescence in CHO-K1 cells transfected with ArSK/CCKR (Figure 3). The EC50 values for ArSK/CCK1, ArSK/CCK2, and ArSK/CCK2(ns) were 0.25 nM (Figure 3a), 0.12 nM (Figure 3b), and 48 µM (Figure 3c), respectively. Thus, although activation of ArSK/CCKR was observed in vitro with ArSK/CCK2(ns) (Figure 3c), this peptide is five to six orders of magnitude less potent than ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 as a ligand for ArSK/CCKR. This indicates that the non-sulphated peptides ArSK/CCK1(ns) and ArSK/CCK2(ns) that were detected in A. rubens radial nerve extracts are unlikely to have physiological effects in vivo. Furthermore, two other A. rubens neuropeptides that share modest C-terminal sequence similarity with the A. rubens SK/CCK-type peptides – the SALMFamide neuropeptide S2 (SGPYSFNSGLTF-NH2) and the tachykinin-like peptide ArTK2 (GGGVPHVFQSGGIF-NH2; also referred to as ArGxFamide2) – were found to be inactive when tested as ligands for ArSK/CCKR at concentrations ranging from 10–12 to 10–4 M (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), demonstrating the specificity of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 as ligands for ArSK/CCKR.
Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Experimental demonstration that the Asterias rubens SK/CCK-type peptides ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 act as ligands for the A. rubens SK/CCK-type receptor ArSK/CCKR.
The sulphated peptides ArSK/CCK1 (a), ArSK/CCK2 (b), and the non-sulphated peptide ArSK/CCK2(ns) (c) trigger dose-dependent luminescence in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells stably expressing mitochondrial targeted apoaequorin (G5A) that were co-transfected with plasmids encoding the promiscuous human G-protein Gα16 and ArSK/CCKR (black). Control experiments where cells were transfected with an empty pcDNA 3.1(+) vector are shown in grey. Each point represents mean values (± s.e.m.) from at least four independent experiments performed in triplicate. Luminescence is expressed as a percentage of the maximal response observed in each experiment. The EC50 values for ArSK/CCK1 (a) and ArSK/CCK2 (b) are 0.25 and 0.12 nM, respectively. In comparison, the absence of tyrosine (Y) sulphation in ArSK/CCK2(ns) (c) causes a massive loss of potency (EC50 = 48 µM), indicating that the sulphated peptides act as ligands for ArSK/CCKR physiologically. A graph showing the selectivity of ArSK/CCKR as a receptor for ArSK/CCK-type peptides is presented in Figure 3—figure supplement 1. See Figure 3—source data 1 for source data.
-
Figure 3—source data 1
Data for the graphs shown in Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 1.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/65667/elife-65667-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx
Localisation of ArSK/CCKP expression in A. rubens using mRNA in situ hybridization
To gain anatomical insights into the physiological roles of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides in starfish, mRNA in situ hybridisation methods were employed to enable analysis of the distribution of the ArSK/CCKP transcript in A. rubens. As described below and illustrated in Figure 4, expression of ArSK/CCKP was observed in the central nervous system (CNS), digestive system, body wall, and tube feet.
Figure 4
Localisation of ArSK/CCKP expression in Asterias rubens using mRNA in situ hybridization.
(a) Using antisense probes, ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells are revealed in the ectoneural (black arrowheads) and hyponeural (grey arrowheads) regions of a radial nerve cord. The specificity of staining with antisense probes is demonstrated by the absence of staining in a radial nerve cord section incubated with sense probes (see inset). (b) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells in the circumoral nerve ring (see boxed area) and in the disk region of a peri-oral tube foot (black arrowhead). (c) High magnification image of the boxed area in (b), showing stained cells in the ectoneural (black arrowheads) and hyponeural (grey arrowheads) regions of the circumoral nerve ring. (d) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells in a lateral branch of the radial nerve cord (black arrowheads). (e) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells adjacent to the marginal nerve (black arrowhead) and in the stem of a tube foot (white arrowheads). (f) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells (black arrowheads) adjacent to the basal nerve ring in the disk region of a tube foot. (g) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells (black arrowheads) in the mucosal layer of the oesophagus. (h) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells (black arrowheads) in the mucosal layer of the cardiac stomach. (i) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells (black arrowheads) in the cardiac stomach and pyloric stomach, with the boxed regions shown at higher magnification in the insets. (j) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells (black arrowheads) in the pyloric duct and pyloric caeca, with the boxed regions shown at higher magnification in the insets. (k,l) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells (black arrowheads) in an oblique section of the intestine; the boxed region in (k) is shown at higher magnification in (l). (m,n) ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells (black arrowheads) in the external epithelium of the body wall. Abbreviations: conr, circumoral nerve ring; int, intestine; mn, marginal nerve; pc, pyloric caecum; pd, pyloric duct; ps, pyloric stomach; rc, rectal caeca; tf, tube foot. Scale bars: (b), (i), (j) = 120 μm; (a), (a-inset), (k) = 60 μm; (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (m) = 32 μm; (c), (i-insets), (j-insets), (l), (n) = 16 μm.
The CNS of A. rubens comprises radial nerve cords that extend along the oral side of each arm, with two rows of tube feet (locomotory organs) on either side. The five radial nerve cords are linked by a circumoral nerve ring in the central disk (Pentreath and Cobb, 1972). Analysis of ArSK/CCKP mRNA expression revealed stained cells in both the ectoneural and hyponeural regions of the radial nerve cords (Figure 4a) and circumoral nerve ring (Figure 4b and c). Furthermore, the specificity of staining observed with antisense probes was confirmed by an absence of staining in tests with sense probes (Figure 4a). Stained cells were also revealed in the ectoneural segmental branches of the radial nerve cords (Figure 4d) and in the marginal nerves (Figure 4e), which run parallel with the radial nerve cords lateral to the outer row of tube feet. ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells were also revealed in tube feet, with stained cells located in the podium proximal to its junction with the radial and marginal nerves (Figure 4e) and in the tube foot disk (Figure 4f). In the digestive system, ArSK/CCKP-expressing cells were revealed in the mucosa of the oesophagus (Figure 4g), cardiac stomach (Figure 4i and h), pyloric stomach (Figure 4i), pyloric ducts (Figure 4j), pyloric caeca (Figure 4j), and intestine (Figure 4k and l). ArSK/CCKP expressing cells were also revealed in the external epithelium of the body wall (Figure 4m and n).
Immunohistochemical localisation of ArSK/CCK1 in A. rubens
Use of mRNA in situ hybridisation (see above) revealed the location of cells expressing ArSK/CCKP in A. rubens. However, a limitation of this technique is that it does not reveal the axonal processes of peptidergic neurons. Therefore, to enable this using immunohistochemistry, we generated and affinity-purified rabbit antibodies to ArSK/CCK1. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis of antiserum revealed the presence of antibodies to the ArSK/CCK1 peptide antigen (Figure 5—figure supplement 1a) and ELISA analysis of affinity-purified antibodies to the ArSK/CCK1 antigen peptide revealed the specificity of these antibodies for ArSK/CCK1 because they do not cross-react with ArSK/CCK2, ArSK/CCK2(ns), or the starfish luqin-type neuropeptide ArLQ (Figure 5—figure supplement 1b). Immunohistochemical tests with affinity-purified ArSK/CCK1 antibodies revealed extensive immunostaining in sections of A. rubens, as described in detail below and illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all
Localisation of ArSK/CCK1 expression in Asterias rubens using immunohistochemistry.
(a) ArSK/CCK1-immunoreactivity (ArSK/CCK1-ir) in a transverse section of the V-shaped radial nerve cord, with bilaterally symmetrical regional variation in the density of immunostaining in the ectoneural neuropile. (b) High magnification image of the boxed region in (a), showing stained cell bodies in the hyponeural (grey arrowhead) and ectoneural (black arrowhead) regions of the radial nerve cord. Regions of the ectoneural neuropile containing a higher (*) and lower (+) densities of immunostained fibres can be seen here. (c) ArSK/CCK1-ir in the circumoral nerve ring, with stained cells present in the hyponeural region (grey arrowheads) and in the ectoneural epithelium (black arrowheads); in the ectoneural neuropile there is regional variation in the density of immunostained fibres. Immunostaining can also be seen here in the sub-epithelial nerve plexus and basal nerve ring of an adjacent peri-oral tube foot. (d) ArSK/CCK1-ir in cells and fibres in a lateral branch of the radial nerve cord; the inset shows immunostained cells in the boxed region at higher magnification. (e) ArSK/CCK1-ir in the marginal nerve, the sub-epithelial nerve plexus of an adjacent tube foot (black arrowhead) and in branches of the lateral motor nerve (grey arrowheads). (f) ArSK/CCK1-ir in the sub-epithelial nerve plexus (white arrowheads) and basal nerve ring (black arrowheads) of a tube foot. (g) ArSK/CCK1-ir in the basi-epithelial nerve plexus of the peristomial membrane (black arrowhead) and the oesophagus (white arrowhead); immunostaining in the circumoral nerve can also be seen here. (h) ArSK/CCK1-ir in the lateral pouches of the cardiac stomach; note that the density of immunostained fibres is highest (black arrowheads) in regions of the mucosa adjacent to the intrinsic retractor strand; immunostaining in the intrinsic retractor strand, nodule and extrinsic retractor strand can also be seen here (white arrowheads). (i,j) High magnification images of cardiac stomach tissue showing ArSK/CCK1-ir in cell bodies (black arrowheads) and their processes in the basi-epithelial nerve plexus (white arrowheads); note that in (j) a process emanating from an immunostained cell body can be seen projecting into the plexus. (k) ArSK/CCK1-ir in the cardiac stomach and pyloric stomach; the boxed region is shown at higher magnification in the inset, showing immunostaining in cells (black arrowheads) and the basi-epithelial nerve plexus (white arrowhead). (l) ArSK/CCK1-ir in the pyloric duct and pyloric caeca; the boxed regions are shown at higher magnification in the insets, where immunostained cells (black arrowheads) and fibres (white arrowheads) can be seen. (m) ArSK/CCK1-ir in an oblique section of the intestine, with immunostained cells in the mucosa (black arrowheads) and intense immunostaining in the basi-epithelial nerve plexus (white arrowheads). (n) ArSK/CCK1-ir in the basi-epithelial nerve plexus of the body wall external epithelium (white arrowhead) and in the lining of a papula (black arrowhead). (o) ArSK/CCK1-ir in nerve fibres projecting around the base of a tube foot at its junction with the neck of its ampulla. (p) ArSK/CCK1-ir in nerve fibres located in the coelomic lining of the lateral region of the body wall. (q) ArSK/CCK1-ir in inter-ossicular tissue of the body wall. Abbreviations: am, apical muscle; Amp, ampulla; bnr, basal nerve ring; conr, circumoral nerve ring; cs, cardiac stomach; Ect, ectoneural; ers, extrinsic retractor strand; Hyp, hyponeural; int, intestine; irs, intrinsic retractor strand; ln, lateral nerve; mn, marginal nerve; nod, nodule; oes, oesophagus; os, ossicle; pm, peristomial membrane; pc, pyloric caecum; pd, pyloric duct; ps, pyloric stomach; rhs, radial hemal strand; rnc, radial nerve cord; snp, sub-epithelial nerve plexus; tf, tube foot. Scale bars: (g), (k), (l) = 120 μm; (a), (c), (f), (h), (o), (p) = 60 μm; (d), (e), (m), (q) = 32 μm; (d-inset), (i), (j), (k-inset), (l-insets), (n) = 16 μm; (b) = 6 μm. Graphs showing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based characterisation of the antibodies to ArSK/CCK1 used here for immunohistochemistry are presented in Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
ArSK/CCK1-immunoreactive (ArSK/CCK1-ir) cells were revealed in the ectoneural and hyponeural regions of the radial nerve cords (Figure 5a and b). Furthermore, dense networks of immunostained fibres were revealed in the ectoneural neuropile, with bilaterally symmetrical regional variation in the density of immunostaining (Figure 5b). Likewise, ArSK/CCK1-ir cells were revealed in the ectoneural and hyponeural regions of the circumoral nerve ring, also with regional variation in the density of immunostained fibres in the ectoneural neuropile (Figure 5c). Immunostained cells and/or processes were also revealed in the segmental lateral branches of the radial nerve cords (Figure 5d) and in the marginal nerve cords (Figure 5e). Consistent with the expression of ArSK/CCKP/ArSK/CCK1 in the hyponeural region of radial nerve cords, ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres were revealed in the lateral motor nerves (Figure 5e). In tube feet, ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres were revealed in the sub-epithelial nerve plexus of the podium and in the basal nerve ring of the disk region (Figure 5c and f).
ArSK/CCK1-ir cells and/or fibres were revealed in the mucosa and basiepithelial nerve plexus, respectively, of many regions of the digestive system, including the peristomial membrane (Figure 5g), oesophagus (Figure 5g), cardiac stomach (Figure 5h, i and j), pyloric stomach (Figure 5k), pyloric ducts (Figure 5l), pyloric caeca (Figure 5l), and intestine (Figure 5m). Consistent with patterns of ArSK/CCKP transcript expression (see above), regional differences in the abundance of stained cells and fibres were observed. Regions of the digestive system containing denser populations of ArSK/CCK1-ir cells and/or fibres include the lateral pouches of the cardiac stomach (Figure 5h), the roof of the pyloric stomach (Figure 5k), and the intestine (Figure 5m).
Immunostaining was observed in the sub-epithelial nerve plexus of the external epithelium of the body wall (Figure 5n) and in papulae (Figure 5n), which are protractable appendages that penetrate through the body wall to enable gas exchange between external seawater and the coelomic fluid (Cobb, 1978). Immunostained fibres were also observed in branches of the lateral motor nerves located in the coelomic lining of the body wall (Figure 5o and p). However, no staining was observed in the apical muscle – a thickening of longitudinally orientated muscle that is located under the coelomic epithelial layer of the body wall along the aboral midline of each arm (Figure 5q). The bulk of the body wall in A. rubens is comprised of calcite ossicles that are interconnected by muscles and collagenous tissue and ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres were revealed in the inter-ossicular tissue (Figure 5q).
Comparison of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR expression in A. rubens using double immunofluorescence labelling
Having mapped expression ArSK/CCK1 in A. rubens using rabbit primary antibodies, we then generated antibodies to ArSK/CCKR in a guinea pig so that double labelling methods could be employed to directly compare the distribution of ArSK/CCK1 and its cognate receptor ArSK/CCKR in A. rubens. ELISA analysis of the guinea pig antiserum revealed the presence of antibodies to an antigen peptide corresponding to a 15 amino acid sequence at the C-terminus of ArSK/CCKR (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Antibodies to this peptide antigen were then affinity-purified and used together with affinity-purified rabbit antibodies to ArSK/CCK1 for double immunofluorescence labelling. As described below and illustrated in Figure 6, this enabled comparison of the distribution of ArSK/CCK1 (green) and ArSK/CCK-R (red) in the CNS, tube feet, apical muscle, and digestive system of A. rubens.
Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all
Comparison of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK receptor (ArSK/CCKR) expression in Asterias rubens using double immunofluorescence labelling.
(a) ArSK/CCK1-immunoreactivity (ArSK/CCK1-ir; green) and ArSK/CCKR immunoreactivity (ArSK/CCK-R-ir; red) in a transverse section of the circumoral nerve ring, with cell nuclei stained using DAPI (blue). Fibres exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir or ArSK/CCKR-ir can be seen throughout the neuropile of the ectoneural region. However, there is variation in the density of immunostained fibres/cells and a bracketed neuropile region containing a higher density of ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres is located proximal to a cluster of cells in the ectoneural epithelium that exhibit ArSK/CCK1-ir (green; white arrowheads) or ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCKR-ir (green and yellow; white arrowheads with asterisk). Cells exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir (white arrowhead) or ArSK/CCKR-ir (grey arrowhead) can be seen in the hyponeural region. (b) Longitudinal section of a radial nerve cord showing segmentally repeated clusters of labelled cells in the hyponeural region, with each segment bounded by transverse hemal strands. Note the distinct clusters of cells exhibiting ArSK/CCKR-ir (grey arrowhead) and cells exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir (white arrowhead). However, the presence of yellow regions in some of the cells exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir (asterisks) indicates that ArSK/CCKR may be co-expressed in these cells. As in the circumoral nerve (a), there is variation in the density of immunostained fibres in the ectoneural neuropile and a region with a high density of fibres exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir is bracketed. (c) High magnification image of a longitudinal section of a radial nerve cord showing a ‘salt and pepper’ pattern of labelling in the ectoneural neuropile, consistent with expression of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR in different but often adjacent populations of fibres (see white rectangles). However, the presence of yellow labelling (white arrowhead with asterisk) may be indicative of co-expression in a few fibres. (d) Immunostained processes exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir or ArSK/CCK-R-ir can be seen here in close proximity (white rectangles) within the sub-epithelial nerve plexus of a tube foot podium. (e) Immunostained cells/processes exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir (white arrowheads) or ArSK/CCKR-ir (grey arrowheads) can be seen here in the coelomic epithelial layer, sub-epithelial nerve plexus, or muscle fibre layer of an apical muscle. (f) High magnification image of the lateral pouches of cardiac stomach showing fibres exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir or ArSK/CCKR-ir in the basiepithelial nerve plexus. Cells exhibiting ArSK/CCKR-ir can be seen in the visceral muscle layer (grey arrowhead) and a cell that exhibits both ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCKR-ir can be seen in the mucosal layer (white arrowhead with asterisk). (g) Immunostained cells/processes exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir (white arrowhead) or ArSK/CCK-R-ir (grey arrowhead) or both ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCK-R-ir (white arrowhead with asterisks) in a nodule that links the cardiac stomach to extrinsic retractor strands. (h) High magnification image of pyloric stomach showing fibres exhibiting ArSK/CCK1-ir or ArSK/CCKR-ir in the basiepithelial nerve plexus. Cells exhibiting ArSK/CCKR-ir can be seen in the visceral muscle layer (grey arrowhead). Abbreviations: am, apical muscle; bnp, basiepithelial nerve plexus; bw, body wall; cc, coelomic cavity; conr, circumoral nerve ring; Ect, ectoneural; ep, epithelium; Hyp, hyponeural; ml, muscle layer; mu, mucosa; rhs, radial hemal strand; tf, tube foot; ths, transverse hemal strand; vm, visceral muscle layer. Scale bars: (b) = 70 μm; (a), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h) = 40 μm; (c) = 20 μm.
In the CNS, ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCKR-ir were revealed in both the ectoneural and hyponeural regions of the circumoral nerve ring (Figure 6a) and radial nerve cords (Figure 6b and c). Complementary patterns of immunostaining were observed, with ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCKR-ir generally detected in different populations of cells and fibres. Thus, distinct clusters of ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCKR-ir cell bodies can be observed in the hyponeural region of the radial nerve cord (Figure 6b). Furthermore, in the ectoneural neuropile a ‘salt and pepper’ pattern of immunolabelling can be observed, with ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres (green) interspersed with ArSK/CCKR-ir fibres (red) in the circumoral nerve ring (Figure 6a) and radial nerve cords (Figure 6b and c). However, the presence of yellow/orange labelling in some cells/fibres indicates that ArSK/CCKR may be co-expressed in a sub-population ArSK/CCK1-expressing neurons (Figure 6a–c).
In tube feet, ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCKR-ir processes were revealed in the sub-epithelial nerve plexus of the podium (Figure 6d) and in the basal nerve ring of the disk region (data not shown). In the apical muscle, ArSK/CCK1-ir processes and ArSK/CCKR-ir cells/processes were revealed predominantly in the coelomic epithelial layer and sub-epithelial nerve plexus, but ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCKR-ir processes were also found to be sparsely distributed in the underlying muscle fibre containing layer (Figure 6e).
In the cardiac stomach (Figure 6f) and pyloric stomach (Figure 6h), ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCKR-ir cells and/or fibres were revealed in the mucosa and basiepithelial nerve plexus, and prominent ArSK/CCKR-ir could also be observed in the visceral muscle layer. As in the CNS, tube feet, and apical muscle, analysis of immunostaining in the basiepithelial nerve plexus of the cardiac and pyloric stomach indicates that ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR are largely localised in different fibre populations but often in close proximity to each other (Figure 6f and h). However, in the nodule region that links the cardiac stomach to extrinsic retractor strands, evidence of co-expression of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR was also obtained (Figure 6f).
ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 cause concentration-dependent contraction of in vitro cardiac stomach, tube foot, and apical muscle preparations from A. rubens
Informed by the localisation of ArSK/CCKP/ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK-R expression in the cardiac stomach, tube feet, and apical muscle of A. rubens, we tested the effects of ArSK/CCKP-derived neuropeptides on in vitro preparations of these organs. Both ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 caused concentration-dependent contraction of cardiac stomach preparations when tested at concentrations ranging from 1 nM to 1 μM (Figure 7a and b). ArSK/CCK2(ns) caused modest contraction of cardiac stomach preparations by comparison with ArSK/CCK2 (Figure 7b), and comparison of the ArSK/CCK2 and ArSK/CCK2(ns) data using a two-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the effects of the peptides on cardiac stomach preparations, irrespective of concentration (p < 0.0001). However, two-way ANOVA revealed no significant difference in the effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 on cardiac stomach preparations. To enable normalisation of the effects of the ArSK/CCKP-derived peptides between experiments, the neuropeptide NGFFYamide was also tested on each preparation at a concentration of 100 nM (Figure 7a), and at this concentration the effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 (1 µM) were not significantly different (Student’s t-test; p > 0.05) to the effect of NGFFYamide (data not shown).
Figure 7
ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 cause concentration-dependent contraction of in vitro preparations of cardiac stomach, tube foot, and apical muscle from Asterias rubens.
(a) Representative recordings of the effects ArSK/CCK1 (1 µM; green arrowhead) and ArSK/CCK2 (1 µM; red arrowhead) in causing contraction of cardiac stomach preparations and compared with the effect of NGFFYamide (100 nM; black arrowhead) on the same preparation. The downward pointing grey arrowhead shows when a preparation was washed with seawater. Scale bar: vertical 0.5 mV; horizontal 1 min. (b) Concentration-response curves comparing the effects of ArSK/CCK1, ArSK/CCK2, and ArSK/CCK2(ns) on cardiac stomach preparations. The effects of peptides (means ± s.e.m.; n = 5–9) were normalized to the effect of 100 nM NGFFYamide (NGFFYa). (c) Representative recordings of the effects ArSK/CCK1 (1 µM; green arrowhead) and ArSK/CCK2 (1 µM; red arrowhead) in causing contraction of tube foot preparations and compared with the effect of acetylcholine (10 µM; black arrowhead) on the same preparation. The downward pointing grey arrowhead shows when a preparation was washed with seawater. Scale bar: vertical 0.08 mV; horizontal 1 min. (d) Concentration-response curves comparing the effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 on tube foot preparations. The effects of peptides (means ± s.e.m.; n = 8–10) were normalized to the effect of 10 µM acetylcholine (ACh). * indicates statistically significant differences between ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 when tested at concentrations of 25 and 100 nM (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) as determined by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. (e) Representative recordings of the effects ArSK/CCK1 (1 µM; green arrowhead) and ArSK/CCK2 (1 µM; red arrowhead) in causing contraction of apical muscle preparations and compared to the effect of acetylcholine (10 µM; black arrowhead) on the same preparation. The downward pointing grey arrowhead shows when a preparation was washed with seawater. Scale bar: vertical 0.4 mV; horizontal 1 min. (f) Concentration-response curves comparing the effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 on apical muscle preparations. The effects of peptides (means ± s.e.m; n = 20–23) were normalized to the effect of 10 µM acetylcholine (ACh).
-
Figure 7—source data 1
Data for graphs shown in Figure 7b, d and f.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/65667/elife-65667-fig7-data1-v1.xlsx
Consistent with the effects of ArSK/CCKP-derived neuropeptides on cardiac stomach preparations, ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 (1 nM to 1 µM) also caused concentration-dependent contraction of tube foot preparations (Figure 7c and d). Furthermore, comparison of the effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 on tube feet using a two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences, irrespective of concentration (p < 0.0001). In addition, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test showed that ArSK/CCK1 is significantly more effective than ArSK/CCK2 when tested at concentrations of 25 and 100 nM (p < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). Furthermore, ArSK/CCK2(ns) peptide did not cause contraction of tube foot preparations in vitro (data not shown).
Although ArSK/CCK1 expression was not detected in the apical muscle using immunohistochemistry with peroxidase-labelled secondary antibodies, double immunofluorescence labelling revealed the presence of both ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR (see above). Accordingly, and consistent with the effects of ArSK/CCKP-derived neuropeptides on cardiac stomach and tube foot preparations, both ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 caused contraction of apical muscle preparations (Figure 7e and f). However, by comparison with the effect of acetylcholine, which was tested at concentration of 10 µM to normalise effects of the peptides on different preparations, the contracting actions of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 were only ~40% of the effect of 10 µM acetylcholine at the highest concentration tested (1 µM; Figure 7f). In contrast, the mean effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 on tube foot preparations at 1 µM were ~220% and ~110%, respectively, of the effect of 10 µM acetylcholine (Figure 7d). No significant differences in the effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 on apical muscle preparations were observed (two-way ANOVA, p > 0.05) and, as was observed with tube feet, ArSK/CCK2(ns) had no effect on apical muscle preparations (data not shown).
ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 trigger cardiac stomach retraction in vivo
Previous studies have revealed that the starfish neuropeptide NGFFYamide causes contraction of cardiac stomach preparations in vitro and triggers retraction of the everted cardiac stomach in vivo (Semmens et al., 2013). Because both ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 also cause contraction of cardiac stomach preparations in vitro, it was of interest to investigate if these neuropeptides also trigger retraction of the everted cardiac stomach in vivo. As reported previously (Semmens et al., 2013), cardiac stomach eversion was induced by immersing starfish in seawater containing 2% added MgCl2. In control experiments where starfish were injected with water, no retraction of the cardiac stomach was observed (Figure 8). However, injection of ArSK/CCK1 or ArSK/CCK2 (10 nmol; 10 μl of 1 mM) triggered cardiac stomach retraction (p < 0.0001 for both peptides; two-way ANOVA) (Figure 8a, b and dFigure 8—videos 1; 2), consistent with the contracting action of these peptides in vitro (Figure 7a and b). ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 triggered cardiac stomach retraction in all animals tested but with some variability in the rate and extent of retraction. Consistent with the modest effect of ArSK/CCK2(ns) on cardiac stomach preparations in vitro (Figure 7b), injection of ArSK/CCK2(ns) (10 nmol; 10 μl of 1 mM) did not trigger cardiac stomach retraction in vivo (Figure 8c).
Figure 8 with 2 supplements see all
ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 trigger cardiac stomach retraction in Asterias rubens.
The graphs compare experiments where starfish were first injected with vehicle (black line; 10 µl of distilled water) and then injected with (a) ArSK/CCK1 (green line; 10 mol; 10 µl 1 mM), or (b) ArSK/CCK2 (red line; 10 mol; 10 µl 1 mM), or (c) ArSK/CCK2(ns) (blue line; 10 mol; 10 µl 1 mM). Stomach eversion was induced by placing starfish in seawater containing 2% MgCl2 and then the area of cardiac stomach everted (in 2D) at 30 s intervals (0–360 s) following injection of water (control) or peptide was measured, normalizing to the area of cardiac stomach everted at the time of injection (T0). Data (means ± s.e.m.) were obtained from 6 (ArSK/CCK1), 6 (ArSK/CCK2), or 8 (ArSK/CCK2(ns)) experiments. Both ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 cause retraction of the cardiac stomach, with >50% reduction in the area of cardiac stomach everted within 360 s (Figure 8—videos 1; 2), whereas ArSK/CCK2(ns) has no effect. (d) Photographs from representative experiments showing that injection of ArSK/CCK1 (10 mol; 10 µl 1 mM at T0) or ArSK/CCK2 (10 mol; 10 µl 1 mM at T0) causes retraction of the everted cardiac stomach (marked with white or black dots), which is reflected in a reduction in the area everted after 360 s (T360). By way of comparison, in a control experiment injection with vehicle (10 µl of distilled water at T0) does not trigger cardiac stomach retraction. See Figure 8—source data 1 for source data.
-
Figure 8—source data 1
Data for graphs shown in Figure 8a, b and c,.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/65667/elife-65667-fig8-data1-v1.xlsx
ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 inhibit feeding behaviour in A. rubens
The effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 in triggering cardiac stomach retraction in A. rubens (see above) suggested that SK/CCK-type signalling may have a physiological role in inhibition and/or termination of feeding behaviour in starfish, which would be consistent with the physiological roles of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides in other taxa (Al-Alkawi et al., 2017; Downer et al., 2007; Kang et al., 2011; Maestro et al., 2001; Meyering-Vos and Müller, 2007; Nachman et al., 1986b; Nässel et al., 2019; Rehfeld, 2017; Roman et al., 2017; Wei, 2000; Yu et al., 2013a; Zels et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017). Therefore, we performed experiments to specifically investigate if ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 have inhibitory effects on starfish feeding behaviour on prey (mussels). Injection of ArSK/CCK1 or ArSK/CCK2 (10 nmol; 10 µl of 1 mM) did not affect the time taken for starfish to make first contact with a mussel (time to touch; Figure 9a and b). However, compared to water-injected controls, the mean time taken for starfish to adopt a feeding posture (time to enclose) was higher in neuropeptide-injected animals, reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05) with ArSK/CCK2 treatment (p < 0.05; Figure 9d) but showing only a tendency to an increased time to enclose with ArSK/CCK1 treatment (p = 0.0523; Figure 9c). This increased time to enclose was also reflected in an increased number of advances to touch the mussel in the starfish treated with ArSK/CCK1 or ArSK/CCK2 (data not shown). Moreover, by comparison with control starfish (water-injected), fewer starfish injected with ArSK/CCK1 or ArSK/CCK2 proceeded to initiation of a feeding posture after the first touch (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01 for ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2, respectively; Figure 9e and f). Another observation indicative of an inhibitory effect on feeding behaviour was that four and two of the starfish from the ArSK/CCK1- and ArSK/CCK2-treated groups, respectively, did not initiate feeding on a mussel within the 5 hr (300 min) observation period of the experiment, although feeding was commenced later and within 24 hr of initiating the experiment.
Figure 9
Effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 on feeding behaviour in Asterias rubens.
To investigate if injection of ArSK/CCK1 and/or ArSK/CCK2 affects feeding behaviour, starved animals were presented with a mussel as prey and then behaviour was observed. By comparison with vehicle-injected animals (control; 10 µl of distilled water; shown in black), injection of ArSK/CCK1 (a; 10 mol or 10 µl of 1 mM; shown in green) or ArSK/CCK2 (b; 10 mol or 10 µl of 1 mM; shown in red) had no effect on the time taken for starfish to make first contact with the mussel. However, by comparison with vehicle-injected animals (control; 10 µl of distilled water; shown in black) injection of ArSK/CCK1 (c; 10 mol or 10 µl of 1 mM; shown in green) or ArSK/CCK2 (d; 10 mol or 10 µl of 1 mM; shown in red) causes an increase in the time elapsed before starfish enclose a mussel. Data are expressed as means ± s.e.m. (n = 13 for control- and 11 for ArSK/CCK1-treated groups; n = 19 for control- and 19 for ArSK/CCK2-treated groups). # indicates a nearly statistically significant difference (p = 0.0523) between vehicle-injected and ArSK/CCK1-injected groups, as determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. * indicates statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between vehicle-injected and ArSK/CCK2-injected groups, as determined by two-tailed Welch’s unequal variances t-test. Furthermore, injection of ArSK/CCK1 (e; 10 mol or 10 µl of 1 mM; shown in green) or ArSK/CCK2 (f; 10 mol or 10 µl of 1 mM; shown in red) causes a significant decrease in the percentage of starfish that initiate feeding after the mussel is touched for the first time, by comparison with vehicle-injected animals (control; 10 µl of distilled water; shown in black). * indicates statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01 for ArSK/CCK1- and ArSK/CCK2-treated groups, respectively) between vehicle-injected and ArSK/CCK1- or ArSK/CCK2-injected groups, as determined by Fisher’s exact test. See Figure 9—source data 1 for source data.
-
Figure 9—source data 1
Data for graphs shown in Figure 9.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/65667/elife-65667-fig9-data1-v1.xlsx
Discussion
The evolutionary origin of SK/CCK-type neuropeptide signalling has been traced to the common ancestor of the Bilateria, informed by the molecular characterisation of the CCK/gastrin-type and SK-type neuropeptide signalling systems in chordates and protostomes, respectively (Bloom et al., 2019; Janssen et al., 2008; Johnsen and Rehfeld, 1990; Kubiak et al., 2002; Mirabeau and Joly, 2013; Monstein et al., 1993; Nachman et al., 1986a; Schwartz et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2013b; Yu and Smagghe, 2014b). Here, we report the first molecular and functional characterisation of an SK/CCK-type neuropeptide signalling system in a non-chordate deuterostome – the starfish A. rubens (phylum Echinodermata). This provides a key ‘missing link’ in our knowledge of the evolution and comparative physiology of SK/CCK-type signalling, complementing previously reported investigations of CCK/gastrin-type signalling in chordates and SK-type signalling in protostome invertebrates (e.g. insects).
Molecular characterisation of SK/CCK-type signalling system in an echinoderm – the starfish A. rubens
Two SK/CCK-type neuropeptides (ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2) derived from the precursor protein ArSK/CCKP were detected by mass spectrometry in A. rubens radial nerve cord extracts. An evolutionarily conserved feature of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides is a tyrosine (Y) residue that is post-translationally modified by the addition of a sulphate group (Dufresne et al., 2006; Schwartz et al., 2018; Yu and Smagghe, 2014a) and accordingly both ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 have a sulphated tyrosine. However, non-sulphated forms of these two peptides, ArSK/CCK1(ns) and ArSK/CCK2(ns), were also detected in A. rubens nerve cord extracts. Analysis of A. rubens neural transcriptome sequence data identified a GPCR (ArSK/CCKR) that is an ortholog of SK/CCK-type receptors that have been characterised in other taxa. Furthermore, heterologous expression of ArSK/CCKR in CHO-K1 cells revealed that the sulphated forms of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 are potent agonists for ArSK/CCKR, whereas ArSK/CCK2(ns) exhibited little or no agonist activity on this receptor. Therefore, we conclude that the sulphated neuropeptides ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 and the GPCR ArSK/CCKR comprise the SK/CCK-type neuropeptide signalling system in the starfish A. rubens. The requirement for the tyrosine residues in ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 to be sulphated in order that these peptides can act as potent ligands for ArSK/CCK-R is consistent with the properties of many SK/CCK-type peptides in other taxa, including peptides that act as ligands for CCKR1 in mammals and SK-type peptides that act as ligands for the Drosophila receptor DSK-R1 (Dufresne et al., 2006; Kubiak et al., 2002). However, this is not a universal feature of SK/CCK-type signalling; for example, non-sulphated SK/CCK-type peptides act as potent ligands for CCK2R in mammals (Dufresne et al., 2006) and for CKR2a and CKR2b in the nematode C. elegans (Janssen et al., 2008).
Comparison of the sequences of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 with the sequences of SK/CCK-type peptides that have been identified in other taxa reveal several evolutionarily conserved features, including C-terminal amidation and the aforementioned tyrosine (Y) residue. The position of the tyrosine (Y) residue with respect to the C-terminal amide is variable amongst SK/CCK-type peptides, with between five and seven intervening residues. Accordingly, in ArSK/CCK1, ArSK/CCK2, and SK/CCK-type peptides from other echinoderms and hemichordates (collectively Ambulacraria), there are six intervening residues. In ArSK/CCK1 the tyrosine (Y) residue is preceded by an aspartate (D) residue and the tyrosine (Y) residue is followed by a glycine (G) residue; accordingly, a DYG motif is also a feature of many SK/CCK-type peptides in lophotrochozoans and arthropods, suggesting that this may be an ancestral characteristic that has been lost in some bilaterian taxa (e.g. chordates, nematodes). ArSK/CCK1, but not ArSK/CCK2, has an N-terminal pyroglutamate in its mature form and this post-translational modification is also predicted or known to occur in some SK/CCK-type peptides in other taxa – for example, the SK1 and SK2 peptides from the cockroach L. maderae (Predel et al., 1999) and the SK/CCK-type peptides in the molluscs Pinctata fucata and C. gigas (Schwartz et al., 2018; Stewart et al., 2014). The C-terminal residue of ArSK/CCK2 is a phenylalanine residue (F) and in this respect ArSK/CCK2 is like most SK/CCK-type peptides that have been identified in other taxa. It is noteworthy, therefore, that the C-terminal residue of ArSK/CCK1 is a tryptophan (W) residue, which is also a feature of an SK/CCK1-like peptide in another starfish species – the crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci (Smith et al., 2017). Furthermore, this unusual feature of one of the two SK/CCK-type peptides that occur in starfish species appears to be unique to this class of echinoderms (the Asteroidea) because SK/CCK-type peptides that have been identified in other echinoderms all have the more typical C-terminal phenylalanine (F) residue (Chen et al., 2019; Zandawala et al., 2017). Interestingly, however, it is not completely unique to starfish because in the bivalve mollusc C. gigas there are two SK/CCK-type peptides, one of which has a C-terminal phenylalanine (F) and another that has a tryptophan (W) residue (Schwartz et al., 2018). Thus, it appears that SK/CCK-type neuropeptides with a C-terminal tryptophan (W) residue evolved independently in starfish and in the bivalve mollusc C. gigas.
Functional characterization of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides in an echinoderm – the starfish A. rubens
Having identified the molecular components of an SK/CCK-type neuropeptide signalling system in A. rubens, comprising the sulphated neuropeptides ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 and their receptor ArSK/CCKR, our next objective was to gain insights into the physiological roles of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides in starfish. Using mRNA in situ hybridisation, we examined the anatomical expression patterns of ArSK/CCKP transcripts and using immunohistochemistry we analysed and compared the anatomical expression patterns of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR. This revealed a widespread pattern of expression, including the CNS, tube feet, and other body wall associated structures and the digestive system, as discussed below. This pattern of expression can be interpreted with reference to the anatomy of the starfish nervous system (Cobb, 1970; Mashanov et al., 2016; Smith, 1937), digestive system (Anderson, 1953; Anderson, 1954), and body wall (Blowes et al., 2017).
The starfish CNS consists of radial nerve cords and a circumoral nerve ring, where cells expressing ArSK/CCKP and ArSK/CCK1 were revealed in both the ectoneural and hyponeural regions. The presence of an extensive network of immunostained fibres in the neuropile of the ectoneural region is consistent with neuronal expression of ArSK/CCKP and ArSK/CCK1. Furthermore, regional variation in the density of ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres in the ectoneural neuropile was observed. The ectoneural region is thought to largely contain sensory neurons and interneurons (Mashanov et al., 2016; Cobb, 1970; Smith, 1937), but the functional identity of neuronal cell types and the neural circuitry are not known. Therefore, it is not possible at present to determine the functional properties of neurons expressing the ArSK/CCKP gene in the ectoneural region of the CNS. However, comparative immunohistochemical analysis of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR expression revealed a ‘salt and pepper’ pattern of labelling of fibres in the ectoneural neuropile, indicative of intercellular SK/CCK-type peptidergic signalling in this region of the CNS.
The hyponeural region of the starfish CNS only comprises motoneurons and the projection pathways of the axons of these motoneurons have been reported (Lin et al., 2017a; Smith, 1950). Thus, the axons of hyponeural motor neurons project around the tube feet and coalesce as a fibre bundle known as the lateral motor nerve (Lin et al., 2017a; Smith, 1937). Consistent, with the expression of ArSK/CCKP in hyponeural cells, ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres can be seen in the lateral motor nerves. Branches of the lateral motor nerves project into the coelomic lining of the body wall in starfish (Smith, 1937; Smith, 1950) and accordingly ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres were observed in coelomic lining of the body wall in A. rubens. Furthermore, the presence of ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres in inter-ossicular tissue of the body wall in A. rubens suggests that ArSK/CCKP-expressing hyponeural cells may include motoneurons that innervate inter-ossicular muscles and/or inter-ossicular mutable collagenous tissue (Blowes et al., 2017). Interestingly, double immunofluorescence labelling indicates that there are distinct clusters of hyponeural motoneurons that express ArSK/CCK1 or ArSK/CCKR, although ArSK/CCKR appears to be co-expressed with ArSK/CCK1 in some hyponeural motoneurons. The functional significance of these findings is at present unknown, but they can be interpreted in the context of the complex patterns of neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor expression/co-expression that have been reported in the CNS of other taxa (Smith et al., 2019).
ArSK/CCKP and ArSK/CCK1 are widely expressed in the digestive system of A. rubens, including the oesophagus, peristomial membrane, cardiac stomach, pyloric stomach, pyloric duct, pyloric caeca, intestine, and rectal caeca. Furthermore, in vitro pharmacological experiments revealed that ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 cause concentration-dependent contraction of cardiac stomach preparations. ArSK/CCKP and ArSK/CCK1 expressing cells are present in the mucosal wall of the cardiac stomach and a dense network of ArSK/CCK1-ir fibres is present in the basiepithelial nerve plexus of the cardiac stomach, particularly in the highly folded lateral pouches of the cardiac stomach. Accordingly, analysis of ArSK/CCKR expression revealed immunostaining in the basiepithelial nerve plexus and visceral muscle layer of the pyloric and cardiac stomach and in the nodule that links the cardiac stomach to extrinsic retractor strands. Therefore, SK/CCK-type neuropeptides released by the axonal processes of mucosal neurons located in the basiepithelial nerve plexus may cause stomach contraction by acting directly on visceral muscle and/or indirectly by triggering the release of other myoactive substances from the basiepithelial nerve plexus.
Starfish exhibit one of the most remarkable feeding behaviours in the animal kingdom – they evert their stomach out of their mouth and digest large prey externally, and once the prey has been digested, the stomach is withdrawn. Extra-oral feeding in starfish requires relaxation of muscle in the wall of the cardiac stomach and in intrinsic and extrinsic retractor strands to enable stomach eversion. Then when external digestion and ingestion of prey tissue is completed, contraction of the musculature enables cardiac stomach retraction (Anderson, 1954). Previous studies have identified neuropeptides that cause relaxation of the cardiac stomach in vitro and trigger cardiac stomach eversion when injected in vivo; for example, the SALMFamide neuropeptide S2 (Melarange et al., 1999) and the vasopressin/oxytocin-type neuropeptide asterotocin (Odekunle et al., 2019). Conversely, NGFFYamide has been identified as a neuropeptide in A. rubens that triggers contraction of the cardiac stomach in vitro and retraction of the everted stomach when injected in vivo (Semmens et al., 2013). The in vitro effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 in causing contraction of the cardiac stomach and the presence of ArSK/CCK1-ir and ArSK/CCKR-ir in the cardiac stomach, nodule, and retractor strands suggested that SK/CCK-type peptides may participate in mechanisms of cardiac stomach retraction physiologically. Accordingly, injection of 10 nmol of ArSK/CCK1 or ArSK/CCK2 triggered partial or complete retraction of the cardiac stomach within a test period of 6 min. These experiments indicate that SK/CCK-type peptides may be involved in physiological mechanisms of cardiac stomach retraction in starfish. Furthermore, to investigate the importance of tyrosine (Y) sulphation for the bioactivity of SK/CCK-type peptides in A. rubens, we also tested the non-sulphated peptide ArSK/CCK2(ns) on cardiac stomach preparations. By comparison with ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2, ArSK/CCK2(ns) had a modest contracting effect on cardiac stomach preparations in vitro and did not trigger cardiac stomach retraction in vivo. This is consistent with the low potency of ArSK/CCK2(ns) as an agonist on ArSK/CCKR expressed in CHO cells and indicates that non-sulphated SK/CCK-type peptides are not bioactive physiologically in starfish.
The in vivo effect of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides in triggering cardiac stomach retraction is indicative of a role in physiological mechanisms that control termination of feeding behaviour in starfish. By way of comparison, the neuropeptide NGFFYamide that triggers retraction of the everted stomach of A. rubens also causes a significant delay in the onset of feeding on prey (mussels) when injected in vivo (Tinoco et al., 2018). Accordingly, here we observed that starfish injected with SK/CCK-type neuropeptides took longer to enclose prey compared to control animals injected with water. Furthermore, in animals injected with SK/CCK-type neuropeptides the proportion of starfish that successfully consumed prey was fewer than in control animals that were injected with water. Thus, collectively these findings indicate that SK/CCK-type signalling acts as a physiological regulator that inhibits and/or terminates feeding behaviour in starfish. Further investigation of how SK/CCK-type signalling regulates feeding-related processes in starfish may be facilitated by use of gene-knockdown methods (e.g. RNA interference; Alicea-Delgado et al., 2021).
Lastly, informed by detection of ArSK/CCKP, ArSK/CCK1, and ArSK/CCKR expression in the tube feet and apical muscle of A. rubens, we also tested ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 on in vitro preparations of these organs/tissues and found that both peptides cause concentration-dependent contraction. Thus, SK/CCK-type neuropeptides appear to have a general role as myoexcitatory agents in starfish.
Comparative and evolutionary physiology of SK/CCK-type neuropeptide signalling in the Bilateria
The myoexcitatory effects of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides in A. rubens are consistent with findings from previous studies on vertebrates and protostome invertebrates. For example, CCK causes pyloric and gall bladder contraction in mammals (Gutiérrez et al., 1974; Rehfeld, 2017; Shaw and Jones, 1978; Vizi et al., 1973) and gut contraction in other vertebrates (Tinoco et al., 2015). Likewise, SK-type peptides also have myoexcitatory effects in insects (Al-Alkawi et al., 2017; Maestro et al., 2001; Marciniak et al., 2011; Nachman et al., 1986b; Nichols, 2007; Palmer et al., 2007; Predel et al., 2001). However, SK/CCK-type peptides are not exclusively myoexcitatory because, for example, CCK causes relaxation of the proximal stomach in mammals; however, this myoinhibitory effect of CCK is indirect and mediated by vagal and splanchnic afferents (Takahashi and Owyang, 1999). Accordingly, both inhibitory and excitatory effects of CCK-8 on the stomach of a non-mammalian vertebrate, the rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, have been reported (Olsson et al., 1999) and an SK/CCK-type peptide causes a decrease in the frequency of hindgut contraction in the mollusc C. gigas (Schwartz et al., 2018). Furthermore, and directly relevant to this study, it has been reported that mammalian CCK-8 causes in vitro relaxation of intestine preparations from the sea cucumber of Holothuria glaberrima (García-Arrarás et al., 1991). With the determination of the amino acid sequences of native SK/CCK-type neuropeptides in sea cucumbers (Chen et al., 2019; Zandawala et al., 2017), it will now be possible to specifically investigate their pharmacological effects in these animals to make direct comparisons with the findings reported here for starfish.
As discussed below, SK/CCK-type neuropeptides are perhaps best known for their roles as inhibitory regulators of feeding. However, in common with other neuropeptides, they are pleiotropic in their physiological roles. Thus, linked to regulation feeding, SK/CCK-type neuropeptides stimulate secretion of gastric acid and/or digestive enzymes in mammals, insects, nematodes, ascidians, and molluscs (Bevis and Thorndyke, 1981; Chen et al., 2004; Harper and Raper, 1943; Harshini et al., 2002b; Janssen et al., 2008; Nachman et al., 1997; Shaw and Jones, 1978; Thorndyke and Bevis, 1984; Zels et al., 2015). Accordingly, expression of SK/CCK-type peptides by cells in several regions of the digestive system in A. rubens may be indicative of a similar role in starfish. Furthermore, CCK precursor transcripts are detected in rat spinal motoneurons (Cortés et al., 1990) and SK-type neuropeptides act as positive growth regulators for neuromuscular junction formation and promote locomotion in larval Drosophila (Chen and Ganetzky, 2012). In this context, it is noteworthy that SK/CCK-type neuropeptides cause contraction of body wall-associated muscles (apical muscle) and organs (tube feet) in starfish. Accordingly, the expression of SK/CCK-type peptides in hyponeural motoneurons, the lateral motor nerve, and inter-ossicular tissue of the body wall of A. rubens may reflect evolutionarily ancient and conserved roles of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides as regulators of skeletal muscle function. It is also noteworthy that CCK is one of the most abundantly expressed neuropeptides in the cortex of the mammalian brain, where it is expressed by sub-populations of GABAergic interneurons and acts as a multi-functional molecular switch to regulate the output of cortical neuronal circuits (Lee and Soltesz, 2011). Furthermore, evidence that expression of CCK in GABAergic neurons is an evolutionarily ancient association was provided by a recent study reporting co-localisation of CCK-8 and GABA in several different neuronal populations in the brain of the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus (Sobrido-Cameán et al., 2020). GABA-immunoreactive neurons have been revealed in the ectoneural region of the radial nerve cord in A. rubens (Newman and Thorndyke, 1994) and sub-populations of these neurons may correspond with cells expressing SK/CCK-type neuropeptides reported in this study.
The key functional insights from this study are our observations that in the starfish A. rubens SK/CCK-type neuropeptides trigger cardiac stomach contraction and retraction and induce a delay in the onset of feeding and a reduction in predation. These findings are of general interest because of the previously reported evidence that SK/CCK-type neuropeptides mediate physiological mechanisms of satiety and/or regulate feeding behaviour in vertebrates, insects, and the mollusc C. gigas (Al-Alkawi et al., 2017; Downer et al., 2007; Himick and Peter, 1994; Kang et al., 2011; Maestro et al., 2001; Meyering-Vos and Müller, 2007; Nachman et al., 1986a; Nachman et al., 1986b; Nässel and Zandawala, 2019; Rehfeld, 2017; Roman et al., 2017; Schwartz et al., 2018; Wei, 2000; Yu et al., 2013a; Yu and Smagghe, 2014b; Zels et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017). Furthermore, insights into the mechanisms by which SK/CCK-type neuropeptides regulate feeding behaviour in mammals and insects have been obtained. In mammals CCK released by intestinal endocrine cells acts on vagal afferents, which is thought to then lead to activation of calcitonin gene-related peptide-expressing neurons in the parabrachial nucleus that supress feeding and inhibition of Agouti-related peptide-expressing hypothalamic neurons that promote feeding (Beutler et al., 2017; Essner et al., 2017). In Drosophila, SK-type neuropeptides are expressed by a sub-population median neurosecretory cells in the brain that also produce insulin-like peptides and results from a variety of experimental studies indicate that release of SK-type neuropeptides by these neurons induces satiety in both larval and adult flies (Nässel and Williams, 2014). Thus, an evolutionarily conserved physiological role of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides as inhibitory regulators of feeding are mediated by different mechanisms in mammals and insects, which may reflect evolutionary divergence in the anatomy of these taxa. It is interesting, therefore, that in the unique context of the evolutionary and developmental replacement of bilateral symmetry with pentaradial symmetry in adult echinoderms, an ancient role of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides as inhibitory regulators of feeding-related processes has been retained in starfish. Furthermore, because feeding in starfish is accomplished by stomach eversion, there is a direct link between the action of SK/CCK-type neuropeptides on the gastro-intestinal system and inhibition/termination of feeding behaviour. Thus, our findings from starfish reported here for SK/CCK-type neuropeptides and previously for other neuropeptides (Cai et al., 2018; Odekunle et al., 2019; Tian et al., 2017; Tinoco et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020) reveal how ancient roles of neuropeptide signalling systems have been preserved in spite of unique and radical evolutionary and developmental changes in the anatomy of echinoderms amongst bilaterian animals.
Materials and methods
Key resources table
| Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence-based reagent | 5’-TCGCTACTGTTTCTCTCGCA-3’5’-AAAGGCGTCAACAACTGCTT-3’ | Custom synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich | Oligonucleotide primers for cloning of ArSK/CCKP cDNA (Asterias rubens) | |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | Zero Blunt Topo | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat. no. 450,159 | |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pBluescript SKII (+) | Agilent Technologies | Cat. no. 212,205 | |
| Recombinant DNA reagent | pcDNA 3.1+ vector with neomycin selectable marker (mammalian expression vector) | Invitrogen | Cat. no. V790-20 | |
| Transfected construct (Asterias rubens) | Asterias rubens ArSK/CCKR cDNA cloned in expression vector pcDNA 3.1+ | This paper | GenBank: MW261740 | See Materials and methods section ‘Cell lines and pharmacological characterization of ArSK/CCKR’ |
| Cell line (Cricetus griseus) | Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1) | Sigma-Aldrich | RRID: CVCL_0214 | Cat. no. 85051005 |
| Antibody | (Rabbit polyclonal) antibodies to ArSK/CCK1 | This paper | RRID: AB_2877176 | Antibodies generated by Elphick group at QMUL (m.r.elphick@qmul.ac.uk) – see Materials and methods section ‘Generation and characterisation of antibodies to ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR’. Affinity-purified antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry (1:10 or 1:15). |
| Antibody | (Guinea pig polyclonal) antibodies to ArSK/CCKR | This paper | RRID: AB_2891354 | Antibodies generated by Elphick group at QMUL (m.r.elphick@qmul.ac.uk) – see Materials and methods section ‘Generation and characterisation of antibodies to ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR’. Affinity-purified antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry (1:3.3). |
| Antibody | (Sheep polyclonal)Sheep alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated anti-DIG antibody | Roche | Cat. no. 11093274910 | Used for mRNA in situ hybridisation (1:3000). |
| Antibody | (Goat polyclonal)Peroxidase-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Horseradish Peroxidase conjugated | Jackson ImmunoResearch | RRID: AB_2313567Cat. no. 111-035-003 | Used for immunohistochemistry (1:1000). |
| Antibody | (Goat polyclonal)Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) | Jackson ImmunoResearch | RRID: AB_2338046Cat. no. 111-545-003 | Used for immunohistochemistry (1:500). |
| Antibody | (Goat polyclonal)Cy3-conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Guinea Pig IgG (H + L) | Jackson ImmunoResearch | RRID: AB_2337423Cat. no. 106-165-003 | Used for immunohistochemistry (1:300). |
| Commercial assay, kit | AminoLink Plus Immobilization Kit | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat. no. 44,894 | |
| Commercial assay, kit | MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit | Lonza | LT07-118 | |
| Software, algorithm | MSConvert | ProteoWizard Toolkit | Version 3.0.5759 | doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn323 |
| Software, algorithm | Scaffold | Proteome Software Inc | Version 4.6.1RRID:SCR_014345 | |
| Software, algorithm | MAFFT | MAFFT | Version 7RRID:SCR_011811 | http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/ |
| Software, algorithm | IQ-tree web server | http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at | ||
| Software, algorithm | MUSCLE | https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/ | RRID:SCR_011812 | |
| Software, algorithm | Volocity | PerkinElmer | Version 6.3.1 | |
| Software, algorithm | Adobe Photoshop CC | Adobe | Version 19.1.4, ×64RRID:SCR_014199 | |
| Software, algorithm | Leica Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence (LAS AF) | Leica | Version 2.6.0.7266 | |
| Software, algorithm | LabChart | ADInstruments | Version 8.0.7RRID:SCR_017551 | |
| Software, algorithm | ImageJ | http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij | Version 1.0RRID:SCR_003070 | |
| Software, algorithm | Prism | GraphPad | Version 6.0RRID:SCR_002798 |
Animals
Adult starfish (A. rubens, Linnaeus, 1758) were collected at low tide near Margate (Kent, UK) or obtained from a fisherman based at Whitstable (Kent, UK). The starfish were maintained in a circulating seawater aquarium under a 12 hr–12 hr light-dark cycle (lights on at 8 a.m.) at a temperature of ~12°C and salinity of 32‰, located in the School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences at Queen Mary University of London. Animals were fed on mussels (Mytilus edulis) that were collected at low tide near Margate (Kent, UK). Additionally, juvenile specimens of A. rubens (diameter 0.5–1.5 cm) used for anatomical studies were collected at the University of Gothenburg Sven Lovén Centre for Marine Infrastructure (Kristineberg, Sweden).
Cloning of a cDNA encoding the A. rubens SK/CCK-type precursor ArSK/CCKP
Request a detailed protocolA cDNA encoding the ArSK/CCK precursor (ArSK/CCKP), including 5’ and 3’ untranslated regions and the complete open reading frame, was amplified by PCR (Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix, NEB, Hitchin, Hertfordshire, UK) using specific oligonucleotide primers (5’-TCGCTACTGTTTCTCTCGCA-3’ and 5’-AAAGGCGTCAACAACTGCTT-3’), which were designed using Primer3 software (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/) with reference to the ArSK/CCKP transcript sequence (contig 1124413; GenBank accession number KT601716) obtained from A. rubens radial nerve cord transcriptome data (Semmens et al., 2016). The PCR product was gel-extracted and purified (QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit, Qiagen, Manchester, UK) before being blunt-end cloned into pBluescript SKII (C) (Agilent Technologies, Stockport, Cheshire, UK) or Zero Blunt Topo PCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) vectors. The clones were sequenced (Eurofins Genomics GmbH, Ebersberg, Germany) using the T7 and T3 sequencing primer sites.
Localisation of ArSK/CCKP expression in A. rubens using mRNA in situ hybridization
Request a detailed protocolTo enable visualisation of ArSK/CCKP transcripts in A. rubens using mRNA in situ hybridization, digoxygenin-labelled RNA probes were synthesised. Zero Blunt Topo or pBluescript SKII (+) vectors containing the ArSK/CCKP cDNA were purified (Qiagen Maxiprep, Qiagen, Manchester, UK) and 5 μg of the vector was linearized using restriction enzymes (NEB, Hitchin, Hertfordshire, UK). Linearized vector containing the ArSK/CCKP cDNA were cleaned using phenol-chloroform (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) and chloroform-isomylalcohol (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) extractions and then precipitated using 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate and 2.5 volume of 100% ethanol (Honeywell, Fisher Scientific UK Ltd, Loughborough, UK) at –80°C. The pellet was washed with 70% ice-cold ethanol before air drying and re-suspending in autoclaved water. Sense and antisense RNA probes were synthesized using digoxigenin nucleotide triphosphate (DIG-NTP) mix (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), 5× transcription buffer (NEB, Hitchin, Hertfordshire, UK), 0.2 M dithiothreitol (Promega, Madison, WI), placental ribonuclease inhibitor (10 U/μl) (Promega, Madison, WI), and T7 polymerase (50 U/μl) or T3 polymerase (50 U/μl) (NEB, Hitchin, Hertfordshire, UK) with 1 μg of linearised vector containing the ArSK/CCKP cDNA. Template DNA was then digested with RNase free DNase (NEB, Hitchin, Hertfordshire, UK). RNA probes were stored in 25% formamide/2× saline-sodium citrate (25% FA/2× SSC; VWR Chemicals, Leicestershire, UK) at –20°C for long-term storage.
To prepare specimens of A. rubens for mRNA in situ hybridisation, animals were fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C. Specimens were washed in PBS, dissected and placed in Morse’s solution (10% sodium citrate; 20% formic acid in autoclaved water) to enable decalcification of ossicles in the body wall of starfish. Decalcified specimens were then washed in autoclaved water, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, and then immersed in xylene (Honeywell, Fisher Scientific UK Ltd, Loughborough, UK) before being embedded in paraffin wax; 14 μm sections of A. rubens arms and central disk were prepared using an RM 2145 microtome (Leica Microsystems [UK], Milton Keynes, UK). Sections were collected on poly-L-lysine coated slides (VWR Chemicals, Lutterworth, Leicestershire, UK) that had been placed on a hot plate and covered with autoclaved water. Slides were left to dry before proceeding with probe hybridization and immunodetection.
Slides were kept at 60°C for 1 hr to allow excess wax to melt before leaving to cool at room temperature. Sections were then deparaffinised in xylene and hydrated through a graded ethanol series before being washed in PBS. Sections were then post-fixed in 4% PFA/PBS before washing with buffer containing Proteinase K (PK; Qiagen UK Ltd, Manchester, UK) (1 µg/ml PK, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]; 6.25 mM EDTA in autoclaved water; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Oxford, UK) at 37°C for 12 min. Sections were then post-fixed in 4% PFA/PBS before washing with PBS/Tween 0.1% and then acetylated (1.325% triethanolamine [pH 7–8]; 0.25% acetic anhydride; 0.175% HCl in autoclaved water; VWR Chemicals, Lutterworth, UK) for 10 min. Sections were washed in PBS/0.1% Tween-20 and in 5× SSC. Then sections were dried, placed in a humidified chamber, and covered with hybridisation buffer (50% formamide; 5× SSC; 500 μg/ml yeast total RNA; 50 μg/ml heparin; 0.1% Tween-20 in autoclaved water) at room temperature for 2 hr. ArSK/CCK precursor sense and antisense probes (500–1000 ng/ml) were denatured in hybridisation buffer at 80°C and placed on ice before adding remaining hybridisation buffer and applying 100 μl probe solution per slide. Slides were covered with a piece of Parafilm (Bemis, Terre Haute, IN) and then placed in a humidified chamber at 65°C overnight. Sections were then washed in 0.2× SSC at 65°C, in 0.2× SSC at room temperature and equilibrated in buffer B1 (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]; 150 mM NaCl in autoclaved water). Sections were covered in buffer B1/5% goat serum and placed in a humidified chamber at room temperature for 2 hr. Sections were then dried and covered in an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG antibody (1:3000; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) in buffer B1/2.5% goat serum at 4°C overnight. Slides were washed in buffer B1 and then equilibrated in buffer B3 (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 9.5]; 100 mM NaCl; 50 mM MgCl2 in autoclaved water). Sections were then covered in buffer B3/0.1% Tween-20 with nitro-blue tetrazolium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) (75 mg/ml in 70% dimethylformamide) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3'-indolylphosphate-p-toluidine salt (BCIP; Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) substrate solution (50 mg/ml BCIP in autoclaved water) until strong staining was observed. The slides were washed in distilled water to stop the staining reaction and then were dried on a hot plate before rinsing in 100% ethanol and Histo-Clear (National Diagnostics, Fisher Scientific UK Ltd, Loughborough, UK). Sections were mounted with a coverslip on HistoMount solution (National Diagnostics, Fisher Scientific UK Ltd, Loughborough, UK) for long-term storage.
Mass spectrometry
Request a detailed protocolExtracts of A. rubens radial nerve cords were prepared and analysed using mass spectrometry (NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS), as described in detail previously for the A. rubens relaxin-like gonad stimulating peptide, which contains disulphide bridges (Lin et al., 2017b). Aliquots of radial nerve cord extract were not treated with trypsin but were subjected to reduction to break disulphide bridges (using 100 mM dithiothreitol; Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) followed by alkylation of cysteine residues (using 200 mM iodoacetamide; Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK). Raw data were converted to Mascot generic format using MSConvert in ProteoWizard Toolkit (version 3.0.5759) (Kessner et al., 2008). MS spectra were searched with Mascot engine (Matrix Science, version 2.4.1) (Nesvizhskii et al., 2003) against a database comprising 40 A. rubens neuropeptide precursor proteins, including ArSK/CCKP (Semmens et al., 2016), all proteins in GenBank from species belonging to the family Asteriidae and the common Repository of Adventitious Proteins Database (http://www.thegpm.org/cRAP/index.html). A no-enzyme search was performed with up to two missed cleavages and carbamidomethyl as a fixed modification. Post-translational amidation of C-terminal glycine residues, pyroglutamylation of N-terminal glutamine residues, sulphation of tyrosine residues, and oxidation were included as variable modifications. Precursor mass tolerance was 10 ppm and product ions were searched at 0.8 Da tolerances.
Scaffold (RRID:SCR_014345; version Scaffold_4.6.1, Proteome Software Inc) was used to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95.0% probability by the scaffold local FDR algorithm. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95.0% probability and contained at least two identified peptides.
Alignment of the A. rubens SK/CCK-type neuropeptides ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 with SK/CCK-type peptides from other taxa
Request a detailed protocolHaving used mass spectrometry to confirm the structures of the mature peptides ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 that are derived from ArSK/CCKP, the sequences of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 were aligned with SK/CCK-type peptides from other taxa to investigate the occurrence of evolutionarily conserved residues. The alignment was generated using MAFFT (RRID:SCR_011811; version 7) with the following parameters (BLOSUM62, 200 PAM/K = 2) and highlighted using BOXSHADE (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html) using 70% conservation as a minimum for highlighting. The accession numbers for the sequences used for this analysis are shown in Figure 1—source data 1.
Identification of a transcript encoding an A. rubens SK/CCK-type receptor
Request a detailed protocolA transcript encoding an A. rubens SK/CCK-type receptor (ArSK/CCKR) was identified by tBLASTn analysis of the A. rubens radial nerve cord transcriptome data (Semmens et al., 2016), using SequenceServer (https://www.sequenceserver.com; Priyam et al., 2015) and a Strongylocentrotus purpuratus SK/CCK-type receptor (accession number XP_782630.3) as the query sequence. To investigate in more detail the relationship of ArSK/CCKR with SK/CCK-type receptors that have been identified in other taxa, phylogenetic analyses were performed using the maximum likelihood method. The sequences of ArSK/CCKR and SK/CCK-type receptors from a variety of taxa were aligned using MUSCLE (RRID:SCR_011812; iterative, 10 iterations, UPGMB as clustering method) (Edgar, 2004). The maximum likelihood tree was generated using IQ-tree web server (1000 bootstrap replicates, LG + F + I + G4 substitution model; Trifinopoulos et al., 2016). The accession numbers of the protein sequences that were used for this analysis are listed in Figure 2—source data 1.
Cell lines and pharmacological characterization of ArSK/CCKR
Request a detailed protocolTo enable testing of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 as candidate ligands for ArSK/CCKR, a full-length cDNA encoding ArSK/CCKR was synthesized by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ) and cloned into pcDNA 3.1+ vector (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). A partial Kozak translation initiation sequence (CACC) was introduced upstream to the start codon (ATG). CHO-K1 cells stably expressing the mitochondrial targeted calcium-sensitive bioluminescent reporter GFP-aequorin fusion protein (G5A) (Baubet et al., 2000) were used as a heterologous expression system for ArSK/CCKR. These cells have been used previously for neuropeptide receptor deorphanisation (Bauknecht and Jékely, 2015) and were generously supplied to us by Dr Gáspár Jékely (University of Exeter). The cell line was generated using the CHO-K1 cell line from Sigma-Aldrich (85051005; RRID: CVCL_0214), which is certified by the European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (ECACC), and expression of the GFP-aequorin fusion protein (G5A) in the cell line was determined by functionality in displaying calcium-activated luminescence. Using the MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza; LT07-118) cells were tested and found not to be contaminated with mycoplasma. Cells were cultured, co-transfected with the pcDNA 3.1+ vector containing the ArSK/CCKR cDNA sequence and plasmids encoding the promiscuous human G-protein Gα16. Then bioluminescence-based receptor assays were performed, as described previously for A. rubens luqin-type receptors (Yañez-Guerra et al., 2018).
SK/CCK-type peptides in other taxa have a sulphated tyrosine residue that is important for bioactivity and therefore the ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 peptides were synthesized (Peptide Protein Research Ltd, Fareham, UK) with sulphated tyrosine residues: pQSKVDDY(SO3H)GHGLFW-NH2 (ArSK/CCK1), and GGDDQY(SO3H)GFGLFF-NH2 (ArSK/CCK2). Furthermore, to assess the requirement of tyrosine sulphation for receptor activation and bioactivity, a non-sulphated form of ArSK/CCK2 was also synthesized: GGDDQYGFGLFF-NH2 [ArSK/CCK2(ns)]. The peptides were diluted in distilled water and tested as candidate ligands for ArSK/CCKR at concentrations ranging from 3 × 10−17 to 10−4 M. Concentration-response data were determined as a percentage of the highest response for each peptide (100% activation). EC50 values were calculated from concentration-response curves based on four to six independent transfections and averaging two to three replicates in each transfection using Prism 6.0 (RRID:SCR_002798; GraphPad software, La Jolla, CA). Cells transfected with an empty vector were used for control experiments. Other A. rubens neuropeptides (Luqin: EEKTRFPKFMRW-NH2 (ArLQ); tachykinin-like peptide 2: GGGVPHVFQSGGIFG-NH2 (ArTK2); Semmens et al., 2016; Yañez-Guerra et al., 2018) were tested at a concentration of 10 μM to assess the specificity of receptor activation.
Generation and characterisation of antibodies to ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR
Request a detailed protocolTo generate antibodies to ArSK/CCK1, an N-terminally truncated peptide analog of ArSK/CCK1 with the addition of a reactive N-terminal lysine residue was synthesized (KY(SO3H)GHGLFW-NH2 , Peptide Protein Research Ltd, Fareham, UK). To generate antibodies to ArSK/CCKR, a peptide corresponding to the C-terminal 15 amino acids of ArSK/CCK-R with addition of an N-terminal reactive lysine residue was synthesized (KPSPTNYTNVSSDSSV, Peptide Protein Research Ltd, Fareham, UK). These peptides were conjugated to porcine thyroglobulin (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) as a carrier protein using 5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) in phosphate buffer (0.1 M; pH 7.2) and the conjugate was used for immunisation of a rabbit for ArSK/CCK1 (70-day protocol; Charles River Biologics, Romans, France) and a guinea pig for ArSK/CCKR (56-day protocol; Charles River Biologics, Romans, France). The antigens were emulsified in Freund’s complete adjuvant for primary immunisations (~100 nmol antigen peptide) and in Freund’s incomplete adjuvant for three booster immunisations (~50 nmol antigen peptide). The presence of antibodies to the antigen peptides in post-immunisation serum samples was assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), in comparison with pre-immune serum (Figure 5—figure supplement 1a; Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Antibodies to the antigen peptides were purified from the final bleed antiserum by affinity purification using the AminoLink Plus Immobilization Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), with bound antibodies eluted using glycine elution buffer (6.3 ml of 100 mM glycine [VWR Chemicals, Leicestershire, UK] and 0.7 ml of Tris [1 M, pH = 7.0]) and trimethylamine (TEA) elution buffer (6.3 ml of TEA [Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK] and 0.7 ml of Tris [1 M, pH = 7.0]). Eluates were dialyzed and sodium azide (0.1%) was added for long-term storage of the affinity-purified antibodies at 4°C. The specificity of ArSK/CCK1 antibodies eluted with TEA, which were subsequently used for immunohistochemistry (see below), was assessed by ELISA by testing them at a concentration of 1:10 with the following synthetic peptides (100 µl at a concentration of 1 µM dissolved in carbonate/bicarbonate buffer [25 mM sodium carbonate, 25 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH = 9.8]): ArSK/CCK1, ArSK/CCK2, ArSK/CCK2(ns) and the A. rubens luqin-type peptide ArLQ (Figure 5—figure supplement 1b). The rabbit antiserum to ArSK/CCK1 has been assigned the RRID:AB_2877176 and the guinea pig antiserum to ArSK/CCKR has been assigned the RRID:AB_2891354.
Immunohistochemical localisation of ArSK/CCK1 in A. rubens
Request a detailed protocolSmall specimens of A. rubens (<6 cm diameter) were fixed by immersion in seawater Bouin’s fluid (75% saturated picric acid [Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK] in seawater, 25% formaldehyde, 5% acetic acid) for 3–4 days at 4°C and then were decalcified for a week using a 2% ascorbic acid/0.3 M sodium chloride solution, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of the arms and the central disk region (8 μm; transverse or horizontal) were cut using a microtome (RM 2145, Leica Microsystems [UK], Milton Keynes, UK) and mounted on chrome alum/gelatin-coated microscope slides. Paraffin wax was removed by immersion of slides in xylene, and then slides were immersed in 100% ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched using a 0.3% hydrogen peroxide (VWT Chemicals, Leicestershire, UK)/methanol solution for 30 min. Subsequently, the slides were rehydrated through a graded ethanol series (90%, 70%, and 50%) and distilled water, blocked in 5% goat serum (NGS; Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) made up in PBS containing 0.1% Tween (PBST). Then, the slides were incubated overnight with affinity-purified rabbit antibodies to ArSK/CCK1 (TEA fraction diluted 1:10 in 5% NGS/PBST). Following a series of washes in PBST, indirect immunohistochemical detection was carried out using Peroxidase-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) conjugated to Horseradish Peroxidase (RRID: AB_2313567; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) diluted 1:1000 in 2% NGS/PBST. Bound antibodies were revealed using a solution containing 0.015% hydrogen peroxide, 0.05% diaminobenzidine (VWR Chemicals, Leicestershire, UK) and 0.05% nickel chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) in PBS. When strong staining was observed, sections were washed in distilled water, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%), and washed in xylene before being mounted with coverslips on DPX mounting medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Immunostaining was not observed in negative control tests without the primary antibodies or with primary antibodies that had been pre-adsorbed with the antigen peptide at a concentration of 20 µM (data not shown).
Localisation of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR in A. rubens using double immunofluorescence labelling
Request a detailed protocolTo visualise and compare expression of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR in A. rubens, sections of arms and the central disk region were prepared as described above and then were first incubated with affinity-purified rabbit antibodies to ArSK/CCK1 (TEA fraction diluted 1:15 in 5% NGS/PBST) overnight at 4°C. Then, following washes in PBST, the sections were incubated with affinity-purified guinea pig antibodies to ArSK/CCKR (TEA fraction diluted 1:3.3 in 5% NGS/PBST) for 3–5 days at 4°C. Then, following washes in PBST, the sections were incubated for 3 hr with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (RRID: AB_2338046; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) and Cy3-conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Guinea Pig IgG (H + L) (RRID: AB_2337423; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA), which were diluted 1:500 and 1:300 respectively in 2% normal goat serum in PBST. Following washes in PBST, the slides were mounted with coverslips using Abcam Fluoroshield Mounting Medium with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Imaging
Request a detailed protocolPhotographs of sections processed for mRNA in situ hybridization or peroxidase-based immunohistochemistry were captured using a QIClick CCD Color Camera (Qimaging, British Columbia, CA) linked to a DMRA2 light microscope (Leica), utilising Volocity version 6.3.1 image analysis software (PerkinElmer, Seer Green, UK) running on iMac computer (27-inch, Late 2013 model with OS X Yosemite, version 10.10). To capture images of sections labelled using fluorescence immunohistochemistry, a Leica SP5 confocal microscope was used in combination with the Leica Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence (LAS AF; version 2.6.0.7266) programme. The settings for capturing images were as follows: image format, 1024 × 1024; scan speed, 200 Hz; frame average, 6; and line average accumulation, 3. Images were acquired using sequential scanning and then merged, with contrast and level adjustment, using ImageJ (RRID:SCR_003070). Representative photographs, based on analysis of sections from at least three animals for each technique, were assembled as montages using Adobe Photoshop CC (RRID:SCR_014199; version 19.1.4, ×64) running on a MacBook Pro computer (13-inch, early 2015 model with OS Mojave version 10.14.3).
In vitro pharmacology
Request a detailed protocolInformed by analysis of the expression of ArSK/CCKP transcripts, ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCKR in A. rubens, both ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 were tested for myoactivity on cardiac stomach, tube foot, and apical muscle preparations dissected from specimens of A. rubens (n = 5–9, 8–10, and 20–23, respectively) and set up in a 20 ml organ bath, as described previously (Elphick et al., 1995; Melarange and Elphick, 2003; Tian et al., 2017). Effects of peptides on preparations were tested and recorded using an isotonic transducer (MLT0015, ADInstruments Pty Ltd) connected to a bridge amplifier (FE221 Bridge Amp, ADInstruments Pty Ltd) linked to PowerLab data acquisition hardware (2/36, ADInstruments Pty Ltd). Data were collected and analysed using LabChart (RRID:SCR_017551; v8.0.7) software installed on a laptop computer (Lenovo E540, Windows 7 Professional). Stock solutions of synthetic peptides were prepared in distilled water and added to the organ bath to achieve final concentrations ranging from 0.1 nM to 1 μM. To assess the viability of preparations and to enable normalization of responses to ArSK/CCK1 or ArSK/CCK2, the starfish neuropeptide NGFFYamide (100 nM) was tested on cardiac stomach preparations and acetylcholine (10 µM) was tested on tube foot and apical muscle preparations. To assess the importance of tyrosine sulphation for peptide bioactivity, a non-sulphated analog of ArSK/CCK2 (ArSK/CCK2(ns)) was also tested on cardiac stomach (n = 5), tube foot, and apical muscle preparations (data not shown).
In vivo pharmacology: testing ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 as cardiac stomach retractants
Request a detailed protocolIn vitro pharmacological experiments revealed that both ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 cause contraction of cardiac stomach preparations. Previous studies have revealed that the neuropeptide NGFFYamide causes cardiac stomach contraction in vitro and also triggers retraction of the everted cardiac stomach when injected into A. rubens in vivo (Semmens et al., 2013). Therefore, experiments were performed to investigate if ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 also trigger cardiac stomach retraction in A. rubens. Twenty specimens of A. rubens, which had been withheld from a food supply for 1 week, were placed in a glass tank containing 2% magnesium chloride (MgCl2; Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) dissolved in seawater, which acts as a muscle relaxant in marine invertebrates (Mayer, 1909). This treatment conveniently and reproducibly causes eversion of the cardiac stomach in A. rubens, typically within a period of ~30 min (Semmens et al., 2013). Hamilton 75 N 10 μl syringes (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) were used to inject test compounds into the perivisceral coelom of animals, inserting the needle through the aboral body wall of the arms proximal to the junctions with the central disk region. Care was taken to inject neuropeptides (ArSK/CCK1, ArSK/CCK2 and ArSK/CCK2(ns)) or distilled water (control) into the perivisceral coelom and not into the cardiac stomach. All animals were first injected with 10 μl of distilled water (control) and video-recorded for 6 min. The same animals were then injected with 10 μl of 1 mM peptide (10 nmol) and video-recorded for 6 min. Static images from video recordings were captured at 30 s intervals from the time of injection. Then the two-dimensional area of everted cardiac stomach was measured from the images using the ImageJ software (version 1.0; http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij) and normalized as a percentage of the area of cardiac stomach everted at the time of injection (T0).
In vivo pharmacology: testing effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 on feeding behaviour
Request a detailed protocolPrevious studies have revealed that the starfish neuropeptide NGFFYamide inhibits the onset of feeding behaviour of A. rubens on a prey species – the mussel Mytilus edulis (Tinoco et al., 2018). Here, the same methods employed by Tinoco et al., 2018 were used to investigate if ArSK/CCK1 and/or ArSK/CCK2 affect feeding behaviour in starfish. Sixty-two adult starfish (n = 24 for ArSK/CCK1; n = 38 for ArSK/CCK2) that met the following criteria were used: (i) all five arms were intact, (ii) exhibited a normal righting response (Lawrence and Cowell, 1996), and (iii) after 24 days of starvation, exhibited normal feeding behaviour on a mussel. Then, starfish were fasted for 24 days and transferred to and kept individually in Plexiglas aquaria, as described previously (Tinoco et al., 2018). After 3 days of acclimation (27 days of starvation at this point) and at 10 a.m., these animals were then divided into a control group (to be injected with distilled water), with 13 animals used for the ArSK/CCK1 experiment (mean diameter of 12.4 ± 0.3 cm) and 19 animals used for the ArSK/CCK2 experiment (mean diameter of 12.9 ± 0.4 cm), and a test group (to be injected with ArSK/CCK1 or ArSK/CCK2), with 11 animals used for the ArSK/CCK1 experiment (mean diameter of 12.6 ± 0.3 cm) and 19 animals used for the ArSK/CCK2 experiment (mean diameter of 12.9 ± 0.5 cm). The starfish were then injected with 10 µl of distilled water (control group) or 10 µl of 1 mM ArSK/CCK1 or ArSK/CCK2 peptides (test group) to achieve an estimated final concentration in the perivisceral coelom of ~1 µM, which is the concentration at which ArSK/CCK peptides were found to have a maximal effect when tested on in vitro preparations of the cardiac stomach. The time taken for starfish to make first contact with a mussel (tube feet touching the mussel or time to touch the mussel), the number of attempts to touch, as well as the time to enclose the mussel (indicated by a feeding posture) were recorded. Starfish that were feeding after 24 hr were included in data analysis and any starfish in the control or test group that had not fed on a mussel after 24 hr were discarded from data analysis.
Statistical analyses
Request a detailed protocolData were presented as means ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). The in vitro or in vivo pharmacological effects of starfish SK/CCK-type peptides on cardiac stomach, apical muscle, and tube foot preparations were analysed by two-way ANOVA, using type of substance tested and concentration/time as independent factors and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. Apical muscle and tube foot data were transformed to logarithms to obtain a normal distribution and homogeneity of variances. The in vitro effects of ArSK/CCK1 and ArSK/CCK2 (1 µM) on cardiac stomach preparations were compared with the in vitro effect of NGFFYamide (100 nM) using a two-tailed Student’s t-test. The effect of ArSK/CCK1 on feeding behaviour was analysed by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test (time to touch and time to enclose) because these data did not follow a normal distribution when analysed using the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test. The effect of ArSK/CCK2 on feeding behaviour was analysed by two-tailed Student’s t-test (time to touch) or Welch’s unequal variances t-test (time to enclose). Fisher’s exact test was used to analyse the percentage of successful feeding after the first touch for control and treated starfish. Statistical analyses were carried out using Prism 6.0 (GraphPad software, La Jolla, CA) and differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Data availability
The sequences of cDNAs encoding ArSK/CCKP and ArSK/CCKR have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers, KT601716 and MW261740, respectively. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1,2,3,7,8 and 9.
-
NCBI GenBankID KT601716. Asterias rubens cholecystokinin-type precursor, mRNA, complete cds.
-
NCBI GenBankID MW261740. Asterias rubens cholecystokinin-type receptor (CCKR) mRNA, complete cds.
References
-
BookRNA Interference on Regenerating Holothurian Gut TissuesIn: Carroll DJ, Stricker SA, editors. Developmental Biology of the Sea Urchin and Other Marine Invertebrates: Methods and Protocols. Springer. pp. 241–252.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0974-3_15
-
Structure and Function in the Pyloric Caeca of Asterias forbesiThe Biological Bulletin 105:47–61.https://doi.org/10.2307/1538555
-
Studies on the Cardiac Stomach of the Starfish, Asterias forbesiThe Biological Bulletin 107:157–173.https://doi.org/10.2307/1538604
-
Stimulation of gastric enzyme secretion by porcine cholecystokinin in the ascidian Styela clavaGeneral and Comparative Endocrinology 45:458–464.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(81)90049-6
-
Body wall structure in the starfish Asterias rubensJournal of Anatomy 231:325–341.https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12646
-
A genomic view of the sea urchin nervous systemDevelopmental Biology 300:434–460.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.007
-
CholecystokininCurrent Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Obesity 14:63–67.https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0b013e3280122850
-
A neuropeptide signaling pathway regulates synaptic growth in DrosophilaThe Journal of Cell Biology 196:529–543.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201109044
-
The significance of the radial nerve cords in asteroids and echinoidsZeitschrift Fur Zellforschung Und Mikroskopische Anatomie 108:457–474.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00339653
-
In situ hybridization studies on mRNAs for cholecystokinin, calcitonin gene-related peptide and choline acetyltransferase in the lower brain stem, spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia of rat and guinea pig with special reference to motoneuronsJournal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 3:467–485.
-
Molecular cloning, functional expression and chromosomal localization of the human cholecystokinin type a receptorBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 194:811–818.https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1993.1894
-
Immunochemical characterization of gastrin/cholecystokinin-like peptides in the brain of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoriaGeneral and Comparative Endocrinology 45:491–496.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(81)90053-8
-
Gastrin: Old hormone, new functionsPflugers Archiv 449:344–355.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-004-1347-5
-
Cholecystokinin and gastrin receptorsPhysiological Reviews 86:805–847.https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00014.2005
-
Evolution of the gastrin-cholecystokinin gene family revealed by synteny analysisGeneral and Comparative Endocrinology 195:164–173.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.10.019
-
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughputNucleic Acids Research 32:1792–1797.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
-
The chemical mechanism of gastric secretionThe Journal of Physiology 34:133–144.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1906.sp001146
-
Distribution and action of SALMFamide neuropeptides in the starfish Asterias rubensThe Journal of Experimental Biology 198:2519.
-
Evolution of neuropeptide signalling systemsThe Journal of Experimental Biology 221:3.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.151092
-
Cells in the intestinal system of holothurians (Echinodermata) express cholecystokinin-like immunoreactivityGeneral and Comparative Endocrinology 83:233–242.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(91)90026-3
-
Estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyMLMethods in Molecular Biology 537:113–137.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_6
-
Pancreozymin, a stimulant of the secretion of pancreatic enzymes in extracts of the small intestineThe Journal of Physiology 102:115–125.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1943.sp004021
-
Inhibition of digestive enzyme release by neuropeptides in larvae of Opisina arenosella (Lepidoptera: CryptophasidaeComparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 132:353–358.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-4959(02)00047-7
-
CCK/gastrin-like immunoreactivity in brain and gut, and CCK suppression of feeding in goldfishThe American Journal of Physiology 267:R841–R851.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1994.267.3.R841
-
A hormone mechanism for gall-bladder contraction & evacuationThe American Journal of Physiology 86:599–613.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1928.86.3.599
-
Cionin: a disulfotyrosyl hybrid of cholecystokinin and gastrin from the neural ganglion of the protochordate Ciona intestinalisJournal of Biological Chemistry 265:3054–3058.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39732-7
-
Immunochemical evidence for a gastrin-like peptide in insect neuroendocrine systemGeneral and Comparative Endocrinology 32:423–426.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(77)90224-6
-
Cloning and functional expression of the first Drosophila melanogaster sulfakinin receptor DSK-R1Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 291:313–320.https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2002.6459
-
Species and tissue distribution of cholecystokinin/gastrin-like substances in some invertebratesGeneral and Comparative Endocrinology 50:469–475.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(83)90268-x
-
The righting response as an indication of stress in Stichaster striatus (Echinodermata, asteroidea)Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 27:239–248.https://doi.org/10.1080/10236249609378969
-
The human brain cholecystokinin-B/gastrin receptor Cloning and CharacterizationThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 268:8164–8169.
-
Cholecystokinin: a multi-functional molecular switch of neuronal circuitsDevelopmental Neurobiology 71:83–91.https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20815
-
Pedal peptide/orcokinin-type neuropeptide signaling in a deuterostome: The anatomy and pharmacology of starfish myorelaxant peptide in Asterias rubensThe Journal of Comparative Neurology 525:3890–3917.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24309
-
Cellular localization of relaxin-like gonad-stimulating peptide expression in Asterias rubens: New insights into neurohormonal control of spawning in starfishThe Journal of Comparative Neurology 525:1599–1617.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24141
-
Functional characterization of a second pedal peptide/orcokinin-type neuropeptide signaling system in the starfish Asterias rubensThe Journal of Comparative Neurology 526:858–876.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24371
-
Screening of antifeedant activity in brain extracts led to the identification of sulfakinin as a satiety promoter in the German cockroach Are arthropod sulfakinins homologous to vertebrate gastrins-cholecystokinins?European Journal of Biochemistry 268:5824–5830.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02527.x
-
New physiological activities of myosuppressin, sulfakinin and NVP-like peptide in Zophobas atratus beetleJournal of Comparative Physiology. B, Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology 181:721–730.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-011-0563-5
-
BookEchinodermata in Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous SystemsOxford, UK: Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682201.001.0001
-
On the use of magnesium in stupefying marine animalsThe Biological Bulletin 17:341–342.https://doi.org/10.2307/1536056
-
SALMFamide neuropeptides cause relaxation and eversion of the cardiac stomach in starfishProceedings. Biological Sciences 266:1785.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0847
-
Comparative analysis of nitric oxide and SALMFamide neuropeptides as general muscle relaxants in starfishJournal of Experimental Biology 206:893–899.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00197
-
RNA interference suggests sulfakinins as satiety effectors in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatusJournal of Insect Physiology 53:840–848.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.04.003
-
Structure of Porcine Cholecystokinin-PancreozyminEuropean Journal of Biochemistry 6:156–162.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1968.tb00433.x
-
Leucosulfakinin-II, a blocked sulfated insect neuropeptide with homology to cholecystokinin and gastrinBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 140:357–364.https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291x(86)91098-3
-
Cholecystokinin-Like Peptide (DSK) in Drosophila, Not Only for Satiety SignalingFrontiers in Endocrinology 5:219.https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2014.00219
-
Neuropeptides in modulation of Drosophila behavior: how to get a grip on their pleiotropic actionsCurrent Opinion in Insect Science 36:1–8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2019.03.002
-
A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometryAnalytical Chemistry 75:4646–4658.https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0341261
-
Localisation of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)-like immunoreactivity in the echinoderm Asterias rubensCell and Tissue Research 278:177–185.https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00305790
-
CCK-B receptor: chemistry, molecular biology, biochemistry and pharmacologyProgress in Neurobiology 58:349–379.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(98)00090-2
-
Cholecystokinin affects gastric emptying and stomach motility in the rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykissThe Journal of Experimental Biology 202:161–170.
-
Neurobiology of echinodermataBiological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 47:363–392.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1972.tb00977.x
-
The biology of cholecystokinin and gastrin peptidesCurrent Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 7:1154–1165.https://doi.org/10.2174/156802607780960483
-
Cholecystokinin-from local gut hormone to ubiquitous messengerFrontiers in Endocrinology 8:47.https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00047
-
Immunochemical evidence for a gastrin-like peptide in the intestinal tissues of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestrisComparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 71:631–634.https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(82)90216-X
-
Discovery of a novel neurophysin-associated neuropeptide that triggers cardiac stomach contraction and retraction in starfishThe Journal of Experimental Biology 216:4047–4053.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.092171
-
The evolution of neuropeptide signalling: insights from echinodermsBriefings in Functional Genomics 16:288–298.https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elx005
-
The choleretic action of cholecystokinin and cholecystokinin octapeptide in dogsSurgery 84:622–625.
-
On the Nervous System of the Starfish Marthasterias glacialis (LPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 227:111–173.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1937.0002
-
The motor nervous system of the starfish, Astropecten irregularis (Pennant), with special reference to the innervation of the tube feet and ampullaePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 234:521–558.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1950.0010
-
The neuropeptidome of the Crown-of-Thorns Starfish, Acanthaster planciJournal of Proteomics 165:61–68.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2017.05.026
-
Mechanism of cholecystokinin-induced relaxation of the rat stomachJournal of the Autonomic Nervous System 75:123–130.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1838(98)00181-7
-
Phylogenomic Insights into Animal EvolutionCurrent Biology 25:R876–R877.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.060
-
Two cholecystokinin receptor subtypes are identified in goldfish, being the CCKAR involved in the regulation of intestinal motilityComparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 187:193–201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.05.027
-
W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysisNucleic Acids Research 44:W232–W235.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256
-
Sulfakinins reduce food intake in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregariaJournal of Insect Physiology 46:1259–1265.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1910(00)00046-9
-
Characterization of sulfakinin and sulfakinin receptor and their roles in food intake in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneumGeneral and Comparative Endocrinology 188:196–203.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.03.006
-
CCK(-like) and receptors: structure and phylogeny in a comparative perspectiveGeneral and Comparative Endocrinology 209:74–81.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.05.003
-
Sulfakinin is an important regulator of digestive processes in the migratory locust, Locusta migratoriaInsect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 61:8–16.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.03.008
Decision letter
-
Kristin Tessmar-RaibleReviewing Editor; University of Vienna, Austria
-
K VijayRaghavanSenior Editor; National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India
-
Simon WebsterReviewer
In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.
Acceptance summary:
The study provides new insight into the evolution and comparative physiology of SK/CCK-type neuropeptide signalling in Bilateria. It is thus of interest to neuroscientists, endocrinologists and evolutionary biologists. More specifically, the paper covers detailed localization analyses based on the prepropeptide transcript, as well as the immunohistochemistry of Aru-SK/CCK1 and Aru-SK/CCKR receptor. It furthermore includes Mass Spec verification of the peptides, receptor deorphanization and functional tests that reveal an involvement in the regulation of feeding behaviors in the starfish Asterias rubens.
Decision letter after peer review:
Thank you for submitting your article "Ancient role of cholecystokinin-type signaling in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes revealed in an echinoderm" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and K VijayRaghavan as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in the review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Simon Webster (Reviewer #2).
The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission. Major concerns to be addressed in a revised version of the manuscript:
1. Given the rather general effects of Arub-CCKs on muscle contractions, data showing the spatial and temporal expression profiles of Arub-CCKR in target tissues would be highly beneficial to interpret the presented physiological data.
If the authors have meanwhile acquired a functioning antibody against the receptor, we would ask them to add such data. If this is not the case then whole-mount in situ hybridization and qPCR would already add very valuable insight. We do understand that there may be technical difficulties for whole-mount in situs in this case, in which case, do see if qRTPCR is feasible.
2. In Figure 3, the authors used CHO-K1 cells expressing aequorin as an assay system to determine the Arub-CCK1 and Arub-CCK-induced ca2+ response. What can the authors state about the ligand specificity/selectivity of Arub-CCKR in comparison with other neuropeptides from the starfish Asterias rubens and other cholecystokinin-type neuropeptides from different species?
3. There are substantial questions if naming the system "CCKs" is correct.
Mammals have two structurally related peptide hormones, cholecystokinin and gastrin, which can be further processed to smaller peptides of variable lengths. For these peptides to be active they need to have their C-terminal sequence GWMDFamide intact, which is, therefore, the hallmark of these gastrin/CCK peptide hormones. Also other chordates like amphibians and the tunicate Ciona intestinalis produce peptides (caerulein, respectively cionin) having the C-terminal GWMDFamide sequence. In addition to this C-terminal GWMDFamide hallmark, all chordate neuropeptides have a sulfated tyrosin residue located either one or two residues before the GWMDFamide sequence. Surprisingly, the GWMDFamide hallmark is absent in the two starfish peptides (none of these residues are there at corresponding positions), although a sulfated tyrosine is present at the correct position. The same situation is found in protostome invertebrates, such as insects, mollusks, and annelids. In these protostomes, however, the peptides are correctly named sulfakinins, due to a sulfated tyrosine residue located seven residues away from the C-terminus. Because the starfish peptides lack the GWMDFamide hallmark and, thus, much more resemble the protostome sulfakinins than mammalian CCKs, there is no justification to name them CCK's in the manuscrpt. Instead, they should be called sulfakinins. Sulfakinin is also a more appropriate name, because it refers to a structure, while CCK refers to a physiological action, namely the emptying of the gall bladder, which, of course, is not relevant in a starfish. Calling the starfish peptides CCK's is also leading to confusions, because it insinuates that the peptides would act like CCK and this is what is actually happening in the title of the manuscript: "Ancient role of cholecystokinin-type signalling in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes revealed in an echinoderm". Figures 6 and 7 of the manuscript show that living starfish contract their stomach after injection of the Arub -CCK's. However, also isolated muscle preparations that don't have any relation to feeding, such as tube foot preparations do contract after the addition of Arub -CCKs (Figure 6). This tells the reader of the manuscript that the Arub -CCK's are myoexcitatory, or in other words that they are"kinins", just like numerous other invertebrate and vertebrate neuropeptides are kinins. However, in the Discussion (line 824) the authors of this manuscript argue that the Arub -CCK's act like a human CCK. Their reasoning: Arub -CCK's in starfish fulfill the role of mammalian CCK, because both peptides are myoexitatory. But these arguments are, of course, not acceptable. In mammals , substance P, neuromedin, oxytocin, endothelin, acetylcholine, prostaglandin and many other neurohormones and transmitters activate smooth muscles. In insects about half of all isolated neuropeptides stimulate muscle contraction. Myoexcitation is a very unspecific property of neuropeptides and cannot be used as a criterium to establish a functional or evolutionary link or an evolutionarily conserved property between peptides. The conclusion that Arub-CCKs are the functional equivalents of human CCK, therefore, is not supported by the experiments from Figures 6 and 7. These experiments only show that the Arub-CCKs are kinins, which stimulate smooth muscle cells and inhibit feeding.
Therefore the following points are requested:
– re-name these peptides sulfakinins (Arub-SKs) or at least Arub-SKs/CCKs.
– Both in the Title and in the Discussion, the authors should omit suggesting a functional identity between Arub-CCKs and human CCK, because this leads to misunderstandings.
4. Resolutions of Figure 4 and 5. Make improved Figures 4 and 5, with a higher resolution. Alternatively, for Figure 5, the authors may consider improving their staining technique, for example by considering other fixation/permeabilization methods and by applying fluorescent secondary antibodies.
As the RNA localization also serves as a control that the antibody against Arub-CCK1 is likely specific, a more direct comparative juxtaposition of the whole-mount in situ images vs. antibody staining should be considered.
5. Please justify why a lot of gaps are introduced in the alignment of Figure 1. Gaps are often introduced to suggest (often in a biased way) structural similarities. For peptide ligands of GPCRs, the length of the peptides or the distance between two residues are often of crucial importance for binding to the receptor. The authors should also consider to provide an alignment with no gaps, which gives a better impression of structural relationships.
6. The Discussion is very verbose and unnecessarily narrative. Reduce it by 33% (from 9 to 6 manuscript pages) to make it more readable. For instance, the authors write that the DYG motiv seen in the Arub-CCKs is occurring in many other CCK's from other animal taxa (line 669). However, it is not present in the canonical human CCK's, gastrins, frog caerulein, and tunicate cionin. Therefore, omit this part of the Discussion.
Below are the individual reviews for your information only. There is no need to address them individually beyond what has been stated in our consensus summary above.
Reviewer #1:
Tinoco and colleagues describe the characterization of the cholecystokinin-type signaling system in the starfish Asterias rubens. Using bioinformatic and LC-MS-MS analysis, two neuropeptides, ArCCK1 and ArCCK2, derived from the precursor protein ArCCKP, were identified, and further experiments showed their expression in the nervous system, digestive system, tube feet and body wall. In addition, in a heterologous expression system of CHO-K1 cells, a CCK/SK-type receptor, ArCCKR, was identified as a cognate receptor for the sulphated neuropeptides, ArCCK1 and ArCCK2. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo bioassays demonstrated the biological activities of ArCCK1 and ArCCK2 to induce dose-dependent contraction of cardiac stomach, tube foot and body wall apical muscle and inhibit feeding behaviour in A. rubens.
Strengths:
1. There is the potential that identification of a CCK/SK-type receptor for the sulphated forms of ArCCK1 and ArCCK2 from the starfish Asterias rubens may be a step forward in understanding the novel signaling mechanisms and the physiological functions of cholecystokinin-type signaling.
2. The data derived from the in vitro and in vivo bioassays showing significant effects of neuropeptides, ArCCK1 and ArCCK2, on contraction of cardiac stomach, tube foot and body wall apical muscle and feeding behaviour in A. rubens represent the novel aspect of this manuscript, providing insights into the evolution and comparative physiology of several neuropeptide signalling systems.
Weaknesses:
1. The same CCK/SK-type neuropeptide signalling system has been well characterized in the nematode C. elegans (Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1163: 428-432), the mollusc C. gigas (Sci Rep. 2018, 8:16424) and the ascidian C. intestinalis (J Endocrinol. 2012, 213, 99-106), this makes the novelty of this work uncertain.
2. Figure 3: the data showed that the sulphated ArCCK1 and ArCCK2 induced ca2+ mobilization in CHO-K1 cells co-expressing mitochondrial targeted apoaequorin (G5A) and the promiscuous human G-protein Gα16 and ArCCKR, however, more data such as binding activity and ligand specificity are necessary to substantiate the conclusions.
3. ArCCKR has been identified as a cognate receptor for the sulphated ArCCK1 and ArCCK2, it would be good to show the G protein coupling and downstream signaling cascades.
4. To understand the physiological roles of the CCK-type signalling system in A. rubens, the data showing the spatial and temporal expression profiles of ArCCKR in target tissues are more important than that of neuropeptides, ArCCK1 and ArCCK2.
5. Figure 6, 7 and 8: the in vitro and in vivo bioassays showed effects of neuropeptides, ArCCK1 and ArCCK2 on the contraction of cardiac stomach, tube foot and apical muscle, cardiac stomach retraction and feeding behavior in A. rubens, however, there is no data to show that these effects are mediated by ArCCKR.
6. In Figure 3, the authors used CHO-K1 cells expressing aequorin as an assay system to determine the ArCCK1 and ArCCK-induced ca2+ response. The authors should use this same assay system to check the ligand specificity/selectivity of ArCCKR in comparison with other neuropeptides from the starfish Asterias rubens and other cholecystokinin-type neuropeptides from different species.
7. To further confirm the direct interaction between ArCCKR and neuropeptides, ArCCK1 and ArCCK, the authors should perform fluorescent-labeled ligand-based binding assay.
8. Like the data shown in Figure 4 and 5, it will be better for authors to generate antibodies against ArCCKR, and to combine with qRT-PCR to investigate the distribution and expression of ArCCKR in different tissues and different development stages. These data of ArCCKR distribution and expression will substantiate the conclusions.
9. In Figure 6, 7 and 8, the authors used in vitro and in vivo bioassays to determine effects of neuropeptides ArCCK1 and ArCCK on contraction of cardiac stomach, tube foot and apical muscle, cardiac stomach retraction and feeding behavior, however, if the authors can use siRNA-based knockdown of ArCCKR or anti-ArCCKR antibodies as controls, it will more convincing.
Reviewer #2:
Tinoco and colleagues investigated the occurrence of cholecystokinin type (CCK) peptides and have functionally deorphaned their cognate receptor in an invertebrate deuterostome, the starfish, Asterias rubens. Of interest are the findings that both identified CCKs activate the identified CCK-type receptor, but only in their sulfated forms, a phenomenon that is also seen in the bioassays. The work further details the wide distribution of these peptides in the nervous system and body tissues of this organism by detailed in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, techniques which are technically demanding in these animals, and often difficult to interpret, given the unusual morphology of these organisms. The morphology of CCK expressing neurons, strongly suggests further pleiotropic functions, that await discovery. Some beautifully compelling behavioral and pharmacologically-based results, have been presented in a novel way, which convincingly show that the very unusual feeding behaviors of starfish, whereby the stomach is everted, can be inhibited by these CCK-type peptides, at physiologically relevant levels and the onset of feeding can likewise be inhibited. These important results beautifully link analogous processes involved in feeding, digestion and satiety in vertebrates, thus highlighting conservation of structure with function across the Bilateria from the viewpoint of evolution of peptides and receptors. The data have been faultlessly collected, to an exceptional standard, and the work nicely integrates a variety of techniques from the molecule to whole organism- this type of comprehensive work is rarely performed or appreciated- and adds interest to a broad readership.
The paper has been faultlessly written in a comprehensive and engaging style: I very much enjoyed reading it. Whilst there are many references, I believe that these are all justified, particularly since the paper will be of broad interest to vertebrate and invertebrate neuroscientists and evolutionary biologists.
The statistical tests have been properly applied, and there is clear justification for the tests used, when, for example, criteria for normality have not been met.
I particularly liked the highly detailed and comprehensive Materials and methods section.
Reviewer #3:
This is an interesting paper that identifies two peptides (Arub-CCK-1 and -2; also called arCCK1 and -2 in the paper), and one associated G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in the starfish Asterias rubens that appear to play a major role in feeding in that animal. The GPCR is functionally expressed in mammalian (Chinese Hamster Ovary) cells and gets activated by nanomolar concentrations of the two peptides, thereby proving that the GPCR is indeed the intrinsic receptor for Arub-CCK-1 and -2. Based on the phylogenetic position of starfishes in the Animal Kingdom, this paper will be a valuable contribution to understanding the evolution of the neuropeptide transmitters and their receptors that control feeding.
The major strength of this paper is that it proves that the starfish GPCR (named by the authors ArCCKR) is indeed the receptor for the two peptides, Arub-CCK-1 and -2. Their dose-response curves in Figure 3 very clearly show this. Also, the phylogenetic tree given in Figure 2, nicely shows that the starfish receptor ArCCKR is an orthologue of the human receptors for cholecystokinin (CCKR1) and gastrin (CCKR2), which are classical and well-established human neuroendocrine peptide hormones involved in feeding and digestion. These data, therefore, strongly suggest that also the starfish receptor ArCCKR might be involved in feeding. This idea has subsequently been tested by physiological in vitro and in vivo studies on whole living starfish and various isolated starfish preparations, including the animal's stomach. The results (Figures 6 and 7) show that, after addition or injection of the peptides, starfishes stop eating (=retract their everted stomachs, which is a sign of feeding cessation) and stop approaching and attacking prey.
The manuscript, however, also has major weaknesses. Mammals have two structurally related peptide hormones, cholecystokinin and gastrin, which can be further processed to smaller peptides of variable lengths. For these peptides to be active they need to have their C-terminal sequence GWMDFamide intact, which is, therefore, the hallmark of these gastrin/CCK peptide hormones. Also other chordates like amphibians and the tunicate Ciona intestinalis produce peptides (caerulein, respectively cionin) having the C-terminal GWMDFamide sequence. In addition to this C-terminal GWMDFamide hallmark, all chordate neuropeptides have a sulfated tyrosin residue located either one or two residues before the GWMDFamide sequence. Surprisingly, the GWMDFamide hallmark is absent in the two starfish peptides (none of these residues are there at corresponding positions), although a sulfated tyrosine is present at the correct position. The same situation is found in protostome invertebrates, such as insects, mollusks, and annelids. In these protostomes, however, the peptides are correctly named sulfakinins, due to a sulfated tyrosine residue located seven residues away from the C-terminus. Because the starfish peptides lack the GWMDFamide hallmark and, thus, much more resemble the protostome sulfakinins than mammalian CCKs, there is no justification to name them CCK's in the manuscript. Instead, they should be called sulfakinins. Sulfakinin is also a more appropriate name, because it refers to a structure, while CCK refers to a physiological action, namely the emptying of the gall bladder, which, of course, is not relevant in a starfish. Calling the starfish peptides CCK's is also leading to confusions, because it insinuates that the peptides would act like CCK and this is what is actually happening in the title of the manuscript: "Ancient role of cholecystokinin-type signalling in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes revealed in an echinoderm". Figures 6 and 7 of the manuscript show that living starfish contract their stomach after injection of the arub-CCK's. However, also isolated muscle preparations that don't have any relation to feeding, such as tube foot preparations do contract after addition of arub-CCKs (Figure 6). As a reader of this manuscript, this tells me that the arub-CCK's are myoexcitatory, or in other words that they are"kinins", just like numerous other invertebrate and vertebrate neuropeptides are kinins. However, in the Discussion (line 824) the authors of this manuscript argue that the arub-CCK's act like a human CCK. Their reasoning: arub-CCK's in starfish fulfill the role of mammalian CCK, because both peptides are myoexitatory. But these arguments are, of course, not acceptable. In mammals , substance P, neuromedin, oxytocin, endothelin, acetylcholine, prostaglandin and many other neurohormones and transmitters activate smooth muscles. In insects about half of all isolated neuropeptides stimulate muscle contraction. Myoexcitation is a very unspecific property of neuropeptides and cannot be used as a criterium to establish a functional or evolutionary link or an evolutionarily conserved property between peptides. The conclusion that arub-CCKs are the functional equivalents of human CCK, therefore, is not supported by the experiments from Figures 6 and 7. These experiments only tell us, that the arub-CCKs are kinins, which stimulate smooth muscle cells and inhibit feeding.
Other weaknesses concern Figure 4 and Figure 5, which have very low (pixel) resolution and are, therefore, hard to interpret. In Figure 5, which should show the immunocytochemical staining of arub-CCK-1 and -2 in the nervous system of various parts of the starfish, it is difficult for me to recognize neurons. Here, the authors have used an inappropriate method or a low-affinity (inappropriate) antibody, as immunocytochemistry is a well-established technique, normally giving excellent staining results.
I have the following recommendations for improving the submitted manuscript:
1. Because the claim by the authors that the arub-CCK's are the functional equivalents of human CCK is not supported by their data (see Public Review), I recommend to name these peptides sulfakinins (arub-SK's).
2. Both in the Title and in the Discussion, the authors should omit suggesting a functional identity between arub-CCK's and human CCK, because this leads to confusion and misunderstandings.
3. The Discussion is very verbose and unnecessarily narrative. Reduce it by 33% (from 9 to 6 manuscript pages) to make it more readable and preventing the audience from falling asleep.
4. In the Discussion, the authors write that the DYG motiv seen in the arub-CCKs is occurring in many other CCK's from other animal taxa (line 669). However, it is not present in the canonical human CCK's, gastrins, frog caerulein, and tunicate cionin. Therefore, omit this part of the Discussion.
5. Make improved Figures 4 and 5, with a higher resolution. For Figure 5, use a better primary antibody and a better staining technique, for example by applying fluorescent secondary antibodies.
6. I don't like alignments as given in Figure 1, where a lot of gaps are introduced to suggest (often in a biased way) structural similarities. For peptide ligands of GPCRs, the length of the peptides or the distance between two residues are often of crucial importance for binding to the receptor. Therefore make an alignment with no gaps, which is free of bias and, therefore, more realistic. This gives a better impression of structural relationships.
[Editors' note: further revisions were suggested prior to acceptance, as described below.]
The manuscript has been improved significantly, however there is one remaining issue that we would ask you to address, as outlined below:
Reviewer 3 brought up the aspect of re-naming again (for detailed argumentation see their comment). In essence the request is to change the name from CCK/SKP to SK/CCK, as this request then also gained support in the discussion among reviewers/RE. We acknowledge that the name CCK had already been used in 2016, but think that the recognition won't be hampered by switching the order.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65667.sa1Author response
The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission. Major concerns to be addressed in a revised version of the manuscript:
1. Given the rather general effects of Arub-CCKs on muscle contractions, data showing the spatial and temporal expression profiles of Arub-CCKR in target tissues would be highly beneficial to interpret the presented physiological data.
If the authors have meanwhile acquired a functioning antibody against the receptor, we would ask them to add such data. If this is not the case then whole-mount in situ hybridization and qPCR would already add very valuable insight. We do understand that there may be technical difficulties for whole-mount in situs in this case, in which case, do see if qRTPCR is feasible.
In response to this feedback, we have investigated the expression of ArCCKR in A. rubens (now referred to as ArCCK/SKR; see below) and compared its expression with ArCCK1 (now referred to as ArCCK/SK1; see below) using double immunofluorescence labelling. To accomplish this, antibodies to a C-terminal region of ArCCK/SKR generated in guinea pig (Figure 6 —figure supplement 1) were affinity-purified and used in combination with affinity-purified rabbit antibodies to ArCCK/SK1 (see lines 901-930 for details of methods). Importantly, this has revealed the expression pattern of ArCCK/SKR and its relationship to ArCCK/SK1 expression in the CNS (circumoral nerve ring and radial nerve cords) and in organs where ArCCK/SK1 exhibits myoactivity – tube feet, apical muscle and cardiac stomach. These new data are presented in Figure 6 and text describing and interpreting the functional significance of the data has been added to the results (lines 292-329) and discussion (lines 483-583).
2. In Figure 3, the authors used CHO-K1 cells expressing aequorin as an assay system to determine the Arub-CCK1 and Arub-CCK-induced ca2+ response. What can the authors state about the ligand specificity/selectivity of Arub-CCKR in comparison with other neuropeptides from the starfish Asterias rubens and other cholecystokinin-type neuropeptides from different species?
We agree that it is important to assess the ligand specificity/selectivity of ArCCK/SKR in starfish as a basis for assessment of the pharmacological actions of ArCCK/SK1 and ArCCK/SK2. Evidence of the specificity/selectivity of ArCCK/SKR for the sulphated peptides ArCCK/SK1 and ArCCK/SK2 is provided by our finding that the EC50 for the non-sulphated form ArCCK/SK2 [ArCCK/SK29(ns)] is 48 µM, a more than 100,000 fold reduction in potency compared to the sulphated peptides (see Figure 3). Furthermore, we also tested two A. rubens neuropeptides that share some C-terminal sequence similarity with ArCCK/SK1 and ArCCK/SK2 – the SALMFamide-type neuropeptide S2 (SGPYSFNSGLTF-NH2) and an A. rubens tachykinin-like peptide GxFamide2 (GGGVPHVFQSGGIF-NH2). Importantly, neither of these peptides caused activation of ArCCK/SKR, even at concentrations as high as 10 µM (Figure 3 —figure supplement 1), providing important evidence of the selectivity/specificity of ArCCK/SKR as a receptor for ArCCK/SK1 and ArCCK/SK2. Investigation if CCK/SK-type peptides from other taxa can act as ligands for ArCCK/SKR was not investigated in this study because of its lack of physiological relevance; however, it would be of interest for a future study that specifically investigates the structure-activity relationships of CCK/SK-type peptides as ligands for CCK/SK-type receptors from different taxa from a comparative/evolutionary perspective.
3. There are substantial questions if naming the system "CCKs" is correct.
Mammals have two structurally related peptide hormones, cholecystokinin and gastrin, which can be further processed to smaller peptides of variable lengths. For these peptides to be active they need to have their C-terminal sequence GWMDFamide intact, which is, therefore, the hallmark of these gastrin/CCK peptide hormones. Also other chordates like amphibians and the tunicate Ciona intestinalis produce peptides (caerulein, respectively cionin) having the C-terminal GWMDFamide sequence. In addition to this C-terminal GWMDFamide hallmark, all chordate neuropeptides have a sulfated tyrosin residue located either one or two residues before the GWMDFamide sequence. Surprisingly, the GWMDFamide hallmark is absent in the two starfish peptides (none of these residues are there at corresponding positions), although a sulfated tyrosine is present at the correct position. The same situation is found in protostome invertebrates, such as insects, mollusks, and annelids. In these protostomes, however, the peptides are correctly named sulfakinins, due to a sulfated tyrosine residue located seven residues away from the C-terminus. Because the starfish peptides lack the GWMDFamide hallmark and, thus, much more resemble the protostome sulfakinins than mammalian CCKs, there is no justification to name them CCK's in the manuscrpt. Instead, they should be called sulfakinins. Sulfakinin is also a more appropriate name, because it refers to a structure, while CCK refers to a physiological action, namely the emptying of the gall bladder, which, of course, is not relevant in a starfish. Calling the starfish peptides CCK's is also leading to confusions, because it insinuates that the peptides would act like CCK and this is what is actually happening in the title of the manuscript: "Ancient role of cholecystokinin-type signalling in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes revealed in an echinoderm". Figures 6 and 7 of the manuscript show that living starfish contract their stomach after injection of the Arub -CCK's. However, also isolated muscle preparations that don't have any relation to feeding, such as tube foot preparations do contract after the addition of Arub -CCKs (Figure 6). This tells the reader of the manuscript that the Arub -CCK's are myoexcitatory, or in other words that they are"kinins", just like numerous other invertebrate and vertebrate neuropeptides are kinins. However, in the Discussion (line 824) the authors of this manuscript argue that the Arub -CCK's act like a human CCK. Their reasoning: Arub -CCK's in starfish fulfill the role of mammalian CCK, because both peptides are myoexitatory. But these arguments are, of course, not acceptable. In mammals , substance P, neuromedin, oxytocin, endothelin, acetylcholine, prostaglandin and many other neurohormones and transmitters activate smooth muscles. In insects about half of all isolated neuropeptides stimulate muscle contraction. Myoexcitation is a very unspecific property of neuropeptides and cannot be used as a criterium to establish a functional or evolutionary link or an evolutionarily conserved property between peptides. The conclusion that Arub-CCKs are the functional equivalents of human CCK, therefore, is not supported by the experiments from Figures 6 and 7. These experiments only show that the Arub-CCKs are kinins, which stimulate smooth muscle cells and inhibit feeding.
Therefore the following points are requested:
– re-name these peptides sulfakinins (Arub-SKs) or at least Arub-SKs/CCKs.
– Both in the Title and in the Discussion, the authors should omit suggesting a functional identity between Arub-CCKs and human CCK, because this leads to misunderstandings.
Thank you for this helpful feedback on the nomenclature of the starfish CCK/SK-type neuropeptides. We agree that the names ArCCKP, ArCCK1, ArCCK2 and ArCCKR are potentially misleading if interpreted as being indicative of greater sequence similarity with vertebrate CCK/gastrin-type peptides than with protostome SK-type peptides. Therefore, we have renamed the precursor, peptides and receptor as ArCCK/SKP, ArCCK/SK1, ArCCK/SK2 and ArCCK/SKR, which accurately reflects the sequence similarity that the starfish precursor/peptides/receptor share with vertebrate CCK/gastrin-type precursors/peptides/receptors and protostome SK-type precursors/peptides/receptors, respectively. This change in nomenclature has been implemented throughout the text and in all the figures.
Accordingly, the title of the paper has been changed from:
“Ancient role of cholecystokinin-type signalling in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes revealed in an echinoderm”
To
“Ancient role of cholecystokinin/sulfakinin-type signalling in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes revealed in an echinoderm”
This change in the title makes it clear that we are not proposing that the starfish CCK/SK-type neuropeptides are functionally more closely related to CCK in humans or vertebrates than to sulfakinins (SKs) in protostomes. Sulfakinins have been shown to exert inhibitory effects on feeding behaviour in insects. Therefore, we (and others) have concluded that inhibitory regulation of feeding processes is an evolutionarily ancient role of CCK/SK-type neuropeptides that can be traced back to the common ancestor of the Bilateria. Our study provides further evidence of this for the first time in an echinoderm and in the context of a pentaradially symmetrical animal that exhibits extra-oral feeding behaviour. We agree that myoexcitatory effects of neuropeptides in vitro alone are not sufficient to infer evolutionary conservation of a physiological/behavioural role for a neuropeptide family. However, we have obtained in vivo behavioural evidence that CCK/SK-type peptides regulate feeding behaviour in starfish. Firstly, we show that CCK/SK-type peptides trigger cardiac stomach retraction in starfish, mimicking the natural process of stomach retraction that occurs when starfish terminate feeding on prey (new Figure 8). Secondly, we show that CCK/SK-type peptides have inhibitory effects on the initiation of feeding behaviour in starfish (new Figure 9). It is based on these behavioural effects that we conclude that CCK/SK-type peptides are involved in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes in starfish.
In response to this feedback we have also changed the Impact Statement that we have provided for this paper:
Old Impact statement: Evolutionarily ancient role of the “satiety hormone” cholecystokinin is discovered in starfish, marine invertebrates that evert their stomach out of their mouth to feed on prey.
New Impact statement: Starfish feed by everting their stomach out of their mouth over prey and, interestingly, this unusual feeding mechanism is inhibited by substances similar to hormones that regulate feeding in humans.
4. Resolutions of Figure 4 and 5. Make improved Figures 4 and 5, with a higher resolution. Alternatively, for Figure 5, the authors may consider improving their staining technique, for example by considering other fixation/permeabilization methods and by applying fluorescent secondary antibodies.
As the RNA localization also serves as a control that the antibody against Arub-CCK1 is likely specific, a more direct comparative juxtaposition of the whole-mount in situ images vs. antibody staining should be considered.
The poor resolution is, unfortunately, a consequence of embedding these figures within a single pdf document, as recommended for submissions to eLife. The original tif files for these figures were prepared at a resolution of 600 pixels/inch but unfortunately it appears that these were not made available to reviewers with the original submission, for which we apologise. With the revised submission, we have uploaded all the figures for the paper in their original high-resolution formats.
Regarding presentation of the in situ hybridisation data and the immunohistochemistry, we did consider presenting these side-by-side. However, we decided not to because there would be a mismatch in the number of figure panels; this is because immunohistochemistry reveals the expression of ArCCK/SK1 in the axons of motoneurons, whereas mRNA in situ hybridisation only reveals expression in the hyponeural cell bodies of motoneurons. This mismatch does not apply to neuropeptides that are only expressed in ectoneural neurons (e.g. Asterotocin – see Odekunle et al., 2019 BMC Biology).
5. Please justify why a lot of gaps are introduced in the alignment of Figure 1. Gaps are often introduced to suggest (often in a biased way) structural similarities. For peptide ligands of GPCRs, the length of the peptides or the distance between two residues are often of crucial importance for binding to the receptor. The authors should also consider to provide an alignment with no gaps, which gives a better impression of structural relationships.
Inclusion of gaps is often necessary to optimally align orthologous neuropeptides from different taxa because lineage specific deletions/insertions of amino acids are a common feature of neuropeptide evolution. Accordingly, previously publications that have compared the sequences of CCK/SK-type peptides in different bilaterian taxa have included gaps in the alignments (see, for example, Figure 3B of Schwartz et al., 2018; Sci. Rep. 8, 16424). An alignment of CCK/SK-type peptides from different bilaterian phyla without gaps would not be informative in showing those residues that are conserved between taxa.
6. The Discussion is very verbose and unnecessarily narrative. Reduce it by 33% (from 9 to 6 manuscript pages) to make it more readable. For instance, the authors write that the DYG motiv seen in the Arub-CCKs is occurring in many other CCK's from other animal taxa (line 669). However, it is not present in the canonical human CCK's, gastrins, frog caerulein, and tunicate cionin. Therefore, omit this part of the Discussion.
We agree that the discussion was quite long and to reduce its length we have removed sections of text where we made comparisons with the expression and actions of other neuropeptides that have been functionally characterised in A. rubens, which is not essential material for this paper with its focus on CCK/SK-type neuropeptides. With removal of this text, the length of the manuscript has been substantially reduced. However, because of the change of peptide/precursor/receptor nomenclature and inclusion of discussion of new receptor expression data, in response to reviewer feedback, it was not possible to reduce the length of the discussion by as much as 33%.
Regarding the DYG motif, it does appear to be an evolutionarily ancient characteristic of CCK/SK-type peptides that has been conserved in insects, lophotrochozoans and echinoderms, but lost in chordates and nematodes. Therefore, in response to reviewer feedback we have modified the discussion text (lines 460-463): “In ArCCK/SK1 the tyrosine (Y) residue is preceded by an aspartate (D) residue and followed by a glycine (G) residue; accordingly, a DYG motif is also a feature of many CCK/SK-type peptides in lophotrochozoans and arthropods, suggesting that this may be an ancestral characteristic that has been lost in some bilaterian taxa (e.g. chordates, nematodes).
[Editors' note: further revisions were suggested prior to acceptance, as described below.]
The manuscript has been improved significantly, however there is one remaining issue that we would ask you to address, as outlined below:
Reviewer 3 brought up the aspect of re-naming again (for detailed argumentation see their comment). In essence the request is to change the name from CCK/SKP to SK/CCK, as this request then also gained support in the discussion among reviewers/RE. We acknowledge that the name CCK had already been used in 2016, but think that the recognition won't be hampered by switching the order.
We have changed the peptide/precursor/receptor names used from CCK/SK to SK/CCK throughout the manuscript and we have changed the title of the paper to “Ancient role of sulfakinin/ cholecystokinin-type signalling in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes revealed in an echinoderm.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65667.sa2Article and author information
Author details
Antón Barreiro-Iglesias
Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra
Cleidiane G Zampronio
Funding
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M001644/1)
- Maurice R Elphick
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M001032/1)
- Alexandra M Jones
Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2018-200)
- Maurice R Elphick
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (518612)
- Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra
China Scholarship Council
- Ya Zhang
Fund for Scientific Research - FNRS
- Jérôme Delroisse
Queen Mary University of London
- Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra
- Ya Zhang
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants awarded to MRE by BBSRC (BB/M001644/1) and the Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2018–200) and to AMJ by BBSRC (BB/M001032/1). LAYG was supported by a PhD studentship awarded by the Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT studentship no. 518612) and Queen Mary University of London. YZ was supported by a PhD studentship awarded by the China Scholarship Council and Queen Mary University of London. JD is currently a postdoctoral researcher supported by Fund for Scientific Research of Belgium (FRS-FNRS).
Senior Editor
- K VijayRaghavan, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India
Reviewing Editor
- Kristin Tessmar-Raible, University of Vienna, Austria
Reviewer
- Simon Webster
Publication history
- Preprint posted: December 11, 2020 (view preprint)
- Received: December 11, 2020
- Accepted: August 18, 2021
- Version of Record published: September 7, 2021 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2021, Tinoco et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,093
- Page views
-
- 102
- Downloads
-
- 10
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Ancient role of sulfakinin/cholecystokinin-type signalling in inhibitory regulation of feeding processes revealed in an echinoderm
eLife 10:e65667.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65667
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Increasing numbers of small proteins with diverse physiological roles are being identified and characterized in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems, but the origins and evolution of these proteins remain unclear. Recent genomic sequence analyses in several organisms suggest that new functions encoded by small open reading frames (sORFs) may emerge de novo from noncoding sequences. However, experimental data demonstrating if and how randomly generated sORFs can confer beneficial effects to cells are limited. Here, we show that by upregulating hisB expression, de novo small proteins (≤50 amino acids in length) selected from random sequence libraries can rescue Escherichia coli cells that lack the conditionally essential SerB enzyme. The recovered small proteins are hydrophobic and confer their rescue effect by binding to the 5′ end regulatory region of the his operon mRNA, suggesting that protein binding promotes structural rearrangements of the RNA that allow increased hisB expression. This study adds RNA regulatory elements as another interacting partner for de novo proteins isolated from random sequence libraries and provides further experimental evidence that small proteins with selective benefits can originate from the expression of nonfunctional sequences.
-
- Evolutionary Biology
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Many bacterial genomes carry prophages whose induction can eliminate competitors. In response, bacteria may become resistant by modifying surface receptors, by lysogenization, or by other poorly known processes. All these mechanisms affect bacterial fitness and population dynamics. To understand the evolution of phage resistance, we co-cultivated a phage-sensitive strain (BJ1) and a poly-lysogenic Klebsiella pneumoniae strain (ST14) under different phage pressures. The population yield remained stable after 30 days. Surprisingly, the initially sensitive strain remained in all populations and its frequency was highest when phage pressure was strongest. Resistance to phages in these populations emerged initially through mutations preventing capsule biosynthesis. Protection through lysogeny was rarely observed because the lysogens have increased death rates due to prophage induction. Unexpectedly, the adaptation process changed at longer time scales the frequency of capsulated cells in BJ1 populations increased again, because the production of capsule was fine-tuned, reducing the ability of phage to absorb. Contrary to the lysogens, these capsulated resistant clones are pan-resistant to a large panel of phages. Intriguingly, some clones exhibited transient non-genetic resistance to phages, suggesting an important role of phenotypic resistance in coevolving populations. Our results show that interactions between lysogens and sensitive strains are shaped by antagonistic co-evolution between phages and bacteria. These processes may involve key physiological traits, such as the capsule, and depend on the time frame of the evolutionary process. At short time scales, simple and costly inactivating mutations are adaptive, but in the long-term, changes drawing more favorable trade-offs between resistance to phages and cell fitness become prevalent.
