1. Cell Biology
  2. Developmental Biology
Download icon

The recycling endosome protein Rab25 coordinates collective cell movements in the zebrafish surface epithelium

  1. Patrick Morley Willoughby
  2. Molly Allen
  3. Jessica Yu
  4. Roman Korytnikov
  5. Tianhui Chen
  6. Yupeng Liu
  7. Isis So
  8. Neil Macpherson
  9. Jennifer A Mitchell
  10. Rodrigo Fernandez-Gonzalez
  11. Ashley EE Bruce  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Canada
  2. Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Translational Biology and Engineering Program, University of Toronto, Canada
  3. Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada
Research Article
  • Cited 0
  • Views 1,391
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2021;10:e66060 doi: 10.7554/eLife.66060

Abstract

In emerging epithelial tissues, cells undergo dramatic rearrangements to promote tissue shape changes. Dividing cells remain interconnected via transient cytokinetic bridges. Bridges are cleaved during abscission and currently, the consequences of disrupting abscission in developing epithelia are not well understood. We show that the Rab GTPase Rab25 localizes near cytokinetic midbodies and likely coordinates abscission through endomembrane trafficking in the epithelium of the zebrafish gastrula during epiboly. In maternal-zygotic Rab25a and Rab25b mutant embryos, morphogenic activity tears open persistent apical cytokinetic bridges that failed to undergo timely abscission. Cytokinesis defects result in anisotropic cell morphologies that are associated with a reduction of contractile actomyosin networks. This slows cell rearrangements and alters the viscoelastic responses of the tissue, all of which likely contribute to delayed epiboly. We present a model in which Rab25 trafficking coordinates cytokinetic bridge abscission and cortical actin density, impacting local cell shape changes and tissue-scale forces.

Introduction

During metazoan development, epithelial cells are often organized into cohesive sheets that undergo large-scale cellular movements. In proliferative tissues, cell division is fundamental to the establishment of normal tissue architecture (Gibson et al., 2006). Cell division also poses a challenge for developing epithelia, as dividing cells must maintain cell-cell contacts while simultaneously coordinating shape changes with surrounding cells (Higashi et al., 2016). In the zebrafish embryo, the single-cell thick surface epithelium, the enveloping layer (EVL), undergoes rounds of proliferation during epiboly, a gastrulation movement describing the expansion and spreading of a tissue (Campinho et al., 2013). Thus, the zebrafish gastrula is an ideal system to investigate epithelial morphogenesis during gastrulation.

The multilayered zebrafish blastoderm is positioned on top of a large yolk cell. During epiboly, the blastoderm spreads vegetally to completely cover the yolk cell (reviewed in Bruce and Heisenberg, 2020). Epiboly initiates at dome stage when EVL spreading is triggered by a reduction in tissue surface tension, that enables vegetal directed tissue expansion (Morita et al., 2017). EVL cells thin apicobasally as the apical surface area expands, with cell divisions preferentially oriented along the animal-vegetal axis (Campinho et al., 2013). EVL proliferation slows as the blastoderm covers half of the yolk cell at 50% epiboly (Campinho et al., 2013).

At 6hpf, a contractile actomyosin ring assembles in the region of the yolk cell adjacent to the blastoderm, the yolk syncytial layer (YSL) (Behrndt et al., 2012). Contractile forces generated by the ring tow the tightly attached EVL vegetally. During the later stages of epiboly, as EVL cells continue to elongate and spread, EVL tension is highest, particularly in marginal regions closest to the yolk cell (Campinho et al., 2013). A subset of marginal EVL cells actively change shape and rearrange to leave the margin, enabling the tissue circumference to narrow and eventually close at the vegetal pole (Köppen et al., 2006). Overall, EVL morphogenesis involves coordination between local cell shape changes, rearrangements and tissue-scale forces.

Cell divisions play a critical and conserved role during epithelial morphogenesis in multiple systems (Campinho et al., 2013; Firmino et al., 2016; Lau et al., 2015; Wyngaarden et al., 2010). Following division, daughter cells either share a common interface or cell rearrangements occur (Firmino et al., 2016; Gibson et al., 2006). Both events can be viewed as multicellular processes as cell division impacts both the dividing cell and adjacent neighbors. For example, during the formation of de novo cell contacts between newly formed daughter cells, neighboring cells resist contractile forces to maintain shape as shown in the Xenopus gastrula and Drosophila pupal notum (Herszterg et al., 2013; Higashi et al., 2016).

Cell divisions also impact tissue scale forces. Oriented cell divisions have well-characterized roles in both propagating forces and dissipating anisotropic tensions (reviewed in Godard and Heisenberg, 2019). During zebrafish epiboly, oriented cell divisions relieve stresses in the EVL to facilitate tissue spreading (Campinho et al., 2013). More recently, cell divisions have been shown to contribute to the viscoelastic properties of cells. For example, the deep cells in the central region of the zebrafish blastoderm undergo a rapid decrease in tissue viscosity following mitotic rounding that is important for initiating epiboly (Petridou et al., 2019). Similarly, inhibiting cell division in amniote gastrulation resulted in high tissue viscosity, slowing cell Polonaise movements (Saadaoui et al., 2020). While our understanding of the effects of cell divisions on tissue development has advanced considerably, the role of the terminal step of cytokinesis, intercellular bridge abscission has not been examined in detail.

Following contraction of the cytokinetic ring, sister cells remain connected via intercellular bridges (Burgos and Fawcett, 1955). Actomyosin and microtubule networks constrict the bridges to 1–2 µM (Mierzwa and Gerlich, 2014) and subsequently, both cytoskeletal networks are removed from bridges which is followed by bridge cleavage adjacent to the cytokinetic midbody (Connell et al., 2009; Frémont et al., 2017; Mierzwa and Gerlich, 2014). The timing of bridge abscission can affect many biological processes. When abscission is delayed in cancer cell culture models, neighboring cell division events can tear open adjacent cytokinetic bridges resulting in the formation of binucleate cells (Dambournet et al., 2011). In mouse ES cells, abscission impacts cell fate by acting as a switch for pluripotency exit (Chaigne et al., 2020). Lastly, cytokinetic bridges act as landmarks for lumen development in both cell culture and zebrafish, with the timing of abscission critical for successful lumen expansion (Rathbun et al., 2020; Willenborg et al., 2011). More specifically, in Kupffer’s vesicle, the zebrafish left-right laterality organ, premature cytokinetic bridge cutting via laser ablation disrupted lumen morphogenesis (Rathbun et al., 2020). Open questions include what happens to cells if they remain interconnected by cytokinetic bridges during tissue morphogenesis and do cytokinesis failures hinder cell rearrangements or disrupt tissue-scale forces? Furthermore, what subcellular pathways are required for abscission during embryonic development?

Rab proteins are the largest family of small GTPases and are important for intracellular membrane trafficking (Hutagalung and Novick, 2011; Stenmark, 2009). Endocytic-membrane recycling is critical for both cell division and cytokinetic abscission. In cell culture, Rab11-positive recycling endosomes coordinate cell cycle progression and mitotic spindle positioning (Hehnly and Doxsey, 2014). Recycled membrane is trafficked to the midbody and impaired Rab11 or Rab35 endocytic-recycling pathways result in delayed or failed abscission (Dambournet et al., 2011; Frémont and Echard, 2018; Frémont et al., 2017; Kouranti et al., 2006). For example, disrupting Rab11 directed trafficking perturbs Kupffer’s vesicle morphogenesis during embryonic development in the zebrafish (Rathbun et al., 2020).

Here, we characterize Rab25, an epithelial specific membrane recycling protein that is a member of the Rab11 subfamily (Goldenring et al., 1993; Mitra et al., 2017). Rab25 has been implicated in cancer cell metastasis (Caswell et al., 2007; Mitra et al., 2017), but its role in embryonic tissue morphogenesis has not been examined. We demonstrate that maternal-zygotic Rab25a and Rab25b mutant embryos exhibit epithelial spreading delays. Here, we propose an EVL trafficking defect in mutant embryos resulted in delayed or failed intercellular bridge abscission during cytokinesis which slowed epiboly movements. Failure of timely bridge scission resulted in the progressive formation of multinucleate cells which remained mitotically active, resulting in heterogenous cell sizes with anisotropic cell shapes and spatial arrangements in the EVL. Abnormal EVL cells exhibited an overall reduction in cortical actin density during epiboly. Sparse actomyosin networks were associated with uncoordinated cell behaviors, balanced tensions, and altered viscoelastic responses during epiboly.

Results

Fluorescently tagged Rab25 localizes near the plasma membrane, centrosomes and cytokinetic midbody

In zebrafish, rab25a and rab25b transcripts are maternally deposited and their levels increase during gastrulation (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/home). Whole-mount in situ hybridization revealed ubiquitous expression of both genes in the blastoderm prior to epiboly initiation, followed by EVL restricted expression during epiboly (Figure 1A). No expression was detected using sense control probes (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). EVL expression is consistent with reported epithelial-specific function of Rab25 in mammals (Goldenring et al., 1993).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all
rab25a and rab25b expression pattern and subcellular localization.

(A) Bright field images of whole-mount in situ hybridizations for rab25a (top row) and rab25b (bottom row), in WT embryos; lateral views with animal pole positioned to the top. (A’) Section of a WT embryo showing rab25a expression restricted to the EVL (arrow, top row far right panel); transcripts absent from the deep cells (DEL) and yolk cell (YC). (B) Confocal z-projections of Venus-Rab25a and eGfp-Rab25b subcellular localization in WT embryos; red arrowheads denote perinuclear aggregates. Scale bar 20 μm. (C) Confocal z-projections of stills from time-lapse movies of transgenic Tubulin-GFP (green) embryos expressing mCherry-Rab25b (magenta). Arrowheads denote co-localization of mCherry-Rab25b at centrosomes. Scale bar 20 μm. (D) Confocal z-projections of eGfp-Rab25b (white) and mCherry-Mklp1 (teal) localization in WT embryos; box highlights enrichment of eGfp-Rab25b adjacent to the midbody. Scale bar 20 μm.

To examine the dynamic subcellular distribution of Rab25a and Rab25b in the EVL, N-terminally fluorescently tagged Rab25a and Rab25b constructs were expressed in WT embryos by RNA injection at the one-cell stage. By live confocal microscopy, Venus-Rab25a and eGfp-Rab25b were observed at the plasma membrane and in motile cytoplasmic puncta (Figure 1B; Video 1). Between dome and 50% epiboly, when the EVL is most proliferative, Venus-Rab25a and eGfp-Rab25b appeared to localize near centrosomes during mitosis and then moved toward the opposing poles of dividing cells (Figure 1B, arrowheads; Video 1). Injection of mcherry-rab25b mRNA into transgenic animals expressing Tubulin-Gfp (Fei et al., 2019) confirmed that mCherry-Rab25b localized near centrosomes and dissipated following cell division (Figure 1C; arrows). During cytokinetic abscission, co-expression of eGfp-Rab25b with the midbody marker mCherry-Mklp1 demonstrated that eGfp-Rab25b dynamically localized within intercellular bridges adjacent to the midbody (Figure 1D), the sites of bridge scission.

Video 1
N-terminally tagged-Rab25 constructs dynamics during cell proliferation and early epiboly.

WT embryo expressing Venus-Rab25a (left panel) and eGfp-Rab25b (right panel) beginning at 30% epiboly; Scale bar 20 μm.

Proliferation in the EVL largely subsides during late epiboly progression stages (Campinho et al., 2013). Consequently, both eGfp-Rab25b and Venus-Rab25a were primarily distributed near plasma membrane regions between 50 and 80% epiboly, as well as in small dynamic cytoplasmic puncta (Video 2). Notably, as marginal EVL cells intercalated into submarginal zones, Rab25 constructs became enriched at tricellular vertices contacting the yolk cell (Video 3). Overall, the redistribution of Rab25 constructs to centrosomes and the midbody are suggestive of a role in cell division. While Rab25 has not previously been shown to regulate these processes, the closely related Rab11 has well known functions in mitosis and cytokinesis (Hehnly and Doxsey, 2014; Rathbun et al., 2020). Furthermore, recruitment of fluorescent-Rab25 to cell vertices is similar to Rab11 distribution in the Xenopus laevis neuroepithelium (Ossipova et al., 2014), implicating Rab25 in cell shape changes during epiboly.

Video 2
eGfp-Rab25b live distribution at the plasma membrane and cell vertices during late epiboly.

WT embryo expressing eGfp-Rab25b beginning at 6hpf; Scale bar 20 μm.

Video 3
Venus-Rab25a is dynamically recruited to vertices of rearranging marginal cells.

WT embryo expressing Venus-Rab25a beginning at 7hpf; Scale bar 20 μm.

Rab25a and Rab25b are required for normal epiboly movements

To explore the functions of Rab25a and Rab25b, CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing was used to generate maternal-zygotic (MZ) mutant lines. Guide RNAs were designed to target exon two which encodes the GTPase domain, the functional domain of Rab proteins (Mitra et al., 2017). We characterized two rab25a mutant alleles from two founder fish, a 13-base pair (bp) deletion (2.3) and 29 bp insertion (4). Each allele contained a premature stop codon that disrupted the GTPase domain (see Materials and methods). An 18 bp deletion was generated in rab25b which produced an in-frame mutation and deleted a portion of the GTPase domain (see Materials and methods). Quantitative PCR analysis of transcript levels at shield stage showed undetectable levels of rab25a transcripts and reduced rab25b transcripts in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos, respectively (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). Nonsense-mediated decay can result in genetic compensation of similar sequences hence we examined the levels of rab25a, rab25b and rab11a in mutant embryos (El-Brolosy and Stainier, 2017; Rossi et al., 2015). MZrab25a embryos had elevated levels of rab25b transcript, whereas MZrab25b mutants did not have elevated levels of rab25a transcript. rab11a transcript levels were similar to WT in both mutants. Thus, MZrab25a mutants appeared to exhibit genetic compensation in the form of transcriptional adaption of rab25b, whereas MZrab25b mutants did not. Double MZrab25a/rab25b embryos exhibited phenotypes similar to those of MZrab25b single mutants (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B) with moderate increases in the severity of the EVL defects compared to either MZrab25a or MZrab25b single mutants. These results support our hypothesis that genetic compensation by rab25b partially rescues MZrab25a mutant embryos, producing a milder phenotype than MZrab25b or MZrab25a/rab25b mutants.

To examine the mutant phenotypes, WT, MZrab25a, and MZrab25b embryos were time-matched and examined live by light microscopy. A subset of MZrab25a (36/100) and MZrab25b (30/100) embryos exhibited abnormal blastoderm morphology during early blastula stages (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D). Notably, the majority of MZrab25a (20/36) and MZrab25b (20/30) mutant embryos with early blastoderm defects recovered by 4.3hpf and MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos initiated epiboly on time (Figure 2A, 4.3hpf, dome). Following this, MZrab25a and MZrab25b mutants exhibited strong epiboly delays that worsened over time, with the greatest delays observed at late epiboly stages (Figure 2A, 6-9hpf, Figure 2B). The epiboly delay in MZrab25b embryos could be rescued by a transgenic construct expressing full length rab25b under the control of a ß-actin promoter, indicating that the phenotype results from the loss of Rab25b (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C).

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all
Epithelial spreading delays and heterogenous cell morphology, size and spatial arrangements in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos.

(A) Time-matched bright field images of lateral views of WT, MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos during epiboly. Arrowheads indicate blastoderm margin, asterisks denote embryonic organizer (shield). (B) Quantification of epiboly progression after 8hpf in: WT (n = 80), MZrab25a (2.3, n = 87), MZrab25a (4,n = 28); WT (n = 97), Mrab25a (2.3,n = 73), MZrab25a (4,n = 49); WT (n = 29), MZrab25b (n = 21), Mrab25b (n = 18). Means: SEM; Two-Way ANOVA; ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.(N = 3). (C) Confocal z-projections of time-matched lateral views of WT, MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos at 8hpf stained with phalloidin and corresponding apical surface area heat maps. Cooler colors represent smaller areas, warmer colors represent larger areas. Yellow boxes indicate cells with reduced apices. Red arrows denote cells with increased apical surface areas. White arrows indicate curved cell junctions. Scale bar 100 μm. (D) Frequency distribution of apical surface areas of WT (n = 817, N = 8), MZrab25a 2.3 (n = 651, N = 14), MZrab25a 4 (n = 654, N = 15) and MZrab25b (n = 503, N = 15) embryos at 6hpf. (E) EVL Cell number in WT (n = 8), MZrab25b (n = 8), MZrab25a 2.3 (n = 9) and MZrab25a 4 (n = 7) embryos at 6hpf. Means: SEM; Two-Way ANOVA; ***p<0.001. (F) Frequency distributions of EVL cellular contacts number at 6hpf in WT (n = 817, N = 8), MZrab25a 2.3 (n = 651, N = 14), MZrab25a 4 (n = 654, N = 15) and MZrab25b (n = 503, N = 15). (G) Circularity quantifications for WT and MZrab25b embryos during epiboly. 30% epiboly: WT (n = 7), Mrab25b (n=7). Shield: WT (n=14), Mrab25b (n=10). 80% epiboly: WT (n=8), Mrab25b (n=9). Means: SEM: One-way ANOVA, ****p<0.0001.

The mutant phenotypes apparently did not result from a general developmental delay, as the zebrafish organizer formed at the same time as time-matched WT embryos (Figure 2A, 6hpf, white asterisk). During epiboly, deep cells are positioned behind the leading edge of the EVL and do not move past the EVL margin (reviewed in Bruce and Heisenberg, 2020). Examination of deep cell and EVL epiboly revealed they were equally delayed, suggesting the blastoderm delay could be the result of an EVL-specific defect (Figure 2—figure supplement 1E). Overall, we found that MZrab25b phenotypes were more severe than either of the MZrab25a alleles. Despite the strong epiboly delay, most MZrab25a (87/100) and MZrab25b (99/100) embryos completed gastrulation and survived to adulthood.

We examined patterning and germ layer specification by in situ hybridization. EVL differentiation is required for normal epiboly (Fukazawa et al., 2010), and we found that expression of the EVL marker keratin4 (krt4) was similar in mutant and WT embryos (Figure 2—figure supplement 1F). Analysis of the mesoderm marker, goosecoid, and the endodermal marker sox17, also showed normal expression patterns (Figure 2—figure supplement 1F). Occasionally, sox17 staining showed that the dorsal forerunner cluster was disorganized in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos (Figure 2—figure supplement 1F). Overall, germ layer specification appeared to be largely normally in mutant embryos. Together these data suggested that Rab25a and Rab25b may have a specific role in epiboly during zebrafish gastrulation.

Cell shape and rearrangements indicative of epithelial defects in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos

The EVL restricted expression of rab25a and rab25b pointed to a primary defect in the EVL of Rab25 mutant embryos, consistent with the epithelial-specific role of Rab25 in mammals (Goldenring et al., 1993; Jeong et al., 2019). Consistent with an EVL defect, analysis of phalloidin stained Rab25 mutant embryos revealed striking cellular size and shape heterogeneity compared to wild type (Figure 2C). Our examination also revealed that yolk cell actin networks were perturbed in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos, suggesting yolk cell defects may contribute to the mutant phenotypes (Figure 2C). Disorganization of the yolk cell cytoskeleton can be the result of defective egg development and can impact the rate of epiboly (Li-Villarreal et al., 2016). Thus, we examined the cortical actin networks of four-cell stage mutant embryos by phalloidin staining to address this possibility.

While WT (8/8) and MZrab25a (10/10) yolk cell actin networks were comparable, a small number of MZrab25b (1/12) embryos displayed localized yolk cell cortical actin disorganization (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A). Thus, while we cannot exclude the possibility that actin defects in the egg contributed to the yolk cell phenotypes, it seemed unlikely that they produced the morphological defects in mutant EVL cells. In support of this, EVL cell morphology was normal at the onset of epiboly following cleavage stages in all mutant embryos examined (Figure 2—figure supplement 2C). By shield stage, mutant EVL cells exhibited a range of defects compared to wild type (Figure 2—figure supplement 2C). Furthermore, these defects preceded the greatest epiboly delays which occurred between 6-8hpf, suggesting a relationship between the EVL defects and the epiboly delays. Lastly, depolymerizing actin in the yolk cell of wild-type embryos failed to cause EVL defects that resembled those in Rab25 mutant embryos (Figure 2—figure supplement 2B,B’). Taken all together, these findings suggest that the EVL phenotypes in Rab25 mutant embryos are likely to be cell autonomous. Therefore, we focused our analysis on the EVL of MZrab25a and MZrab25b mutants during epiboly.

Stage-matched embryos at 60% epiboly were used to quantify the EVL defects. This stage was chosen because that was how far epiboly progressed in most mutants by 8hpf and it was also when embryos exhibited the largest delays (Figure 2A,B). EVL mean surface area measurements, heat maps, and frequency distributions were generated to assess the surface areas of cells in phalloidin stained mutant and WT embryos. MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos exhibited heterogenous cell surface areas (Figure 2C,D). In WT, EVL cells had apical surface areas between 750 and 1750 μm, while the distribution of EVL surface areas in MZrab25a and MZrab25b mutant embryos was broader, indicating both smaller and larger cell apices (Figure 2D).

Heterogeneity of apical surface area in mutants was associated with anisotropic cell shapes and disorganized spatial arrangements. While WT cells were pentagonal or hexagonal, as expected, MZrab25a and MZrab25b cells exhibited cell shape deviations and abnormal numbers of neighbors (Figure 2F,G). This was reflected by circularity measurements and cell-cell contact number, with larger circularity values indicating increased cell shape anisotropy (Figure 2G). Cells with increased apical surface area tended to have increased junctional curvature (Figure 2C, red arrows), whereas cells with reduced apices tended to be round (Figure 2C, yellow boxes). Notably, normally sized cells in mutants still displayed anisotropic cell shapes and non-linear cell contacts (Figure 2C, white arrows). Compared to WT embryos, the EVL defects were associated with reduced cell number in MZrab25b but not MZrab25a embryos (Figure 2E).

Cell size is reported to scale with nuclear number (Cao et al., 2017). Thus, we examined whether mutant cells with large apical surface areas were multinuclear by labeling WT, MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos with membrane-Gfp and the nuclear marker H2A-Rfp. Large cells in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos were bi- or multinucleate (Figure 3A), thus cell size scaled with nuclear number (Figure 3B). Overall, multinucleate large cells suggested cytokinesis failures in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos (Rathbun et al., 2020), consistent with the emergence of EVL defects following epiboly initiation, when the EVL is most proliferative (Campinho et al., 2013).

Unstable cytokinetic bridges and delayed abscission in MZrab25b embryos.

(A) Confocal z-projections of stage-matched WT and MZrab25b embryos at 50% epiboly expressing mGfp (green) and H2A-Rfp (magenta). Embryos positioned laterally. Scale bar 40 μm. (B) Apical surface area quantifications of WT mononucleate (n = 151, N = 6), MZrab25a binucleate (n = 10, N=6) and MZrab25b bi-(n = 3, N=4) and multinucleate (n = 9, N=4) at 80% epiboly. Mean: SEM; One-Way ANOVA; ****, p<0.0001. (C–C”) z-projection of stills from confocal time-lapses of WT and MZrab25b embryos labeled for microtubules (green), nuclei (magenta), and plasma membrane (magenta) starting at dome stage; white arrow marks WT bridge; yellow arrows marks bridge regression in MZrab25b cell. (C”) Red arrowheads indicate cytokinetic bridge torn open by neighboring morphogenic stress. Scale bar 20 μm. (D) Intercellular bridge duration in WT (n = 17, N = 3) and MZrab25b (n = 15, N = 4) embryos during epiboly initiation in EVL marginal regions. Mean: SEM; Mann- Whitney Test; ***, p<0.001. (E) Intercellular bridge length following formation in WT (n = 17,N = 3) and MZrab25b (n = 26,N = 4) embryos during epiboly initiation in EVL marginal regions. Mean: SEM; Mann-Whitney Test; *p<0.05.

Cytokinetic abscission defects during epiboly in MZrab25b mutants

Localization of eGfp-Rab25b near the cytokinetic midbody and the presence of large multinuclear EVL cells in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos indicated that Rab25 may function in cytokinesis. To investigate potential abscission defects in Rab25 mutants, we focused on MZrab25b embryos because they exhibited more severe defects than MZrab25a embryos. Cytokinetic bridges were characterized by labeling microtubules, nuclei and membrane in WT and mutant embryos. Following mitosis in WT cells, equatorial midzone microtubules were organized into apical cytokinetic bridges (Figure 3C, white arrows, Video 4). Initially, cytokinetic bridges underwent a fast phase of bridge narrowing and shortening, over approximately 10–12 min (Figure 3C, t = 16:36 m-27:40 m). Intercellular bridges then remained connected for an additional 15–20 min, in which bridge length did not change significantly before abscission (Figure 3C, t = 27:40-38:48 min).

Video 4
WT EVL Mitosis.

WT embryo injected with mrfp (magenta) and gal4 mRNA and H2A-rfp(magenta)-dUAS-dcx-gfp (green) plasmid imaged beginning at dome stage. Scale bar 20 μm.

During mononucleate cytokinesis in MZrab25b embryos, the plasma membrane at the cleavage furrow underwent ingression similar to WT embryos (Figure 3C’, C”). Following cleavage, two types of abscission defects were detected. The first occurred during the initial, fast phase of bridge formation when bridge regression occurred in a small proportion of mutant cells during cytokinesis (5/23), leading to the formation of binucleate cells (Figure 3C’, yellow arrows, Video 5). In these instances, MZrab25b embryos expressing the midbody marker mCherry-Mklp1, showed a failure of mCherry-Mklp1 coalescence in unstable cytokinetic bridges, which preceded bridge regression (Video 6; WT (left panel), MZrab25b (right panel)).

Video 5
Cytokinetic bridge regression in Mrab25b mutant.

Mrab25b embryo injected with mrfp (magenta) and gal4 mRNA and H2A-rfp(magenta)-dUAS-dcx-gfp (green) plasmid imaged beginning at dome stage. Scale bar 20 μm.

Video 6
Failed formation of the cytokinetic midbody in MZrab25b embryos.

Left panel: Tg:(Dcx-Gfp) (magenta) expressing mCherry-Mklp1 (green) imaged beginning at dome stage showing formation of midbody in wild-type embryo. Right panel: Apical z-projection of Mrab25b embryo expressing mRfp (magenta) and mCherry-Mklp1 (green); coalescence of the cytokinetic midbody which precedes bridge regression; Scale bar 20 μm.

The second defect occurred later during the abscission process. Despite being initially longer following their formation (Figure 3E), cytokinetic bridges in these contexts appeared to shorten and narrow normally (Figure 3C'', red arrowhead). In WT embryos, daughter cells remained interconnected for ~26.23 min before bridge scission (n = 17), while in mutants, bridges persisted almost twice as long, suggesting abscission either failed or was delayed (Figure 3D) (~50.35 mins; n = 15). While some bridges were still present at the end of the time-lapses, most long-lasting intercellular bridges appeared to be pulled open by morphogenetic stress in adjacent EVL regions, such as mitosis or basal cell extrusion, resulting in multinucleation (Figure 3C”, red arrowheads, Video 7). Overall, these observations are similar to in vitro work showing intracellular membrane trafficking regulates both cytokinetic bridge stability and timing of abscission (Dambournet et al., 2011).

Video 7
Torn open intercellular bridge during multipolar mitosis.

Mrab25b embryo injected with mrfp (magenta) and gal4 mRNA and H2A-rfp (magenta)-dUAS-dcx-gfp (green) plasmids imaged beginning at dome stage. Scale bar 20 μm.

Multipolar cytokinesis in MZrab25b embryos

Binucleate cells remained mitotically active in MZrab25b embryos, resulting in continuous cytokinesis failures which produced multinucleated cells. Notably, in MZrab25b embryos, spindles in mono- and multinucleated EVL cells deviated from both the long axis of the cell and the animal-vegetal axis (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A,A’). Thus, misoriented spindles likely contributed to the disorganized EVL cell arrangements (Campinho et al., 2013). During multipolar cytokinesis, both cleavage and abscission failures were seen. In some multinucleated cells, the plasma membrane appeared to snap back following furrow ingression, suggesting that the F-actin cytokinetic ring might be unstable (6/21) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1D). To investigate actin dynamics during cytokinesis, embryos were co-injected with RNAs encoding membrane-Rfp and Gfp-Utrophin. Cytokinetic rings progressed from basal to apical, as in other vertebrate epithelia (Figure 4A,BHigashi et al., 2016). During multinucleate cell cleavage in mutant embryos, we often observed failed contraction of the actin cytokinetic ring of EVL cells followed by cytokinesis failures (Figure 4C).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all
Multipolar cytokinesis failure in MZrab25b embryos.

(A–A”) Confocal z-projections of stills from time-lapse of a WT EVL cell during mitosis expressing Gfp-Utrophin (green) and mRfp (magenta). Scale bar 20 μm. (B) Lateral views with apical to the top of stills from single-plane confocal time-lapses of WT EVL cells during mitosis expressing Gfp-Utrophin (green) and mRfp (magenta). Arrowheads denote cleavage furrow ingression from basal to apical. (C) Confocal z-projections of stills from time-lapse of MZrab25b multipolar cleavage failure. F-actin labeled with Gfp-Utrophin. Scale bar 20 μm. (C’) Confocal z-projections of time-lapse of MZrab25b Tg (Myl1.1-Gfp) (Fire-LUT) during multipolar cytokinesis failure. White arrows indicate Myosin-Gfp foci. (D) Confocal z-projection of MZrab25b embryo showing an array of EVL cells interconnected via cytokinetic bridges at 30% epiboly. Microtubules (green), nuclei (magenta), and plasma membrane (magenta), arrows and numbers denote connected cells and cytokinetic bridges. Scale bar 20 μm.

When multinucleate cells in MZrab25b mutants successfully completed cleavage (15/21), multiple daughter cells were generated that typically had reduced apical surface areas compared to surrounding cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 1D). Thus, successful cleavage during multipolar cytokinesis likely explains the presence of cells with reduced apical surface areas in mutant embryos. Most, but not all, daughter cells contained nuclei (not shown). Multipolar cytokinesis resulted in arrays of daughter cells interconnected through cytokinetic bridges across the EVL in MZrab25b embryos (Figure 4D, numerals and arrowheads, Video 8). As seen in mononuclear cell divisions, in multipolar divisions, intercellular bridges were not observed to undergo abscission but instead appeared to be torn open due to morphogenic stress, causing cytokinesis failures (Video 8). Following multipolar division failures, Myosin-Gfp foci were often observed along individual cell junctions, suggesting myosin was unevenly distributed along these EVL cell contacts (Figure 4C’, white arrows). Myosin-Gfp foci were apparently remnants of de novo tricellular vertices that are normally established along newly formed daughter cell interfaces, as observed in Xenopus during ectoderm cell divisions (Higashi et al., 2016).

Video 8
EVL cells interconnected by long cytokinetic bridges in Mrab25b embryos.

Mrab25b embryo injected with mrfp (magenta) and gal4 mRNA and H2A-rfp(magenta)-dUAS-dcx-gfp (green) plasmid imaged beginning at dome stage. Scale bar 20 μm.

We observed that cytokinetic intercellular bridge abscission failures resulted in the progressive formation of bi-and multinucleate cells during epiboly in MZrab25b embryos. The abscission defects disrupted EVL organization in mutant embryos, as cells exhibited variable sizes, shapes, and number. Contributing to the tissue defects were basal cell extrusion events, cell-cell fusions and misoriented mitotic spindles (Figure 4—figure supplement 1E,F). Cytokinesis defects causing epithelial spreading delays aligns with previous work implicating cell division in epithelial cell rearrangements and epiboly (Campinho et al., 2013; Higashi et al., 2016).

Marginal EVL cell rearrangements are disrupted during epiboly progression in MZrab25b embryos

The cellular defects in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos appeared largely to be the product of cytokinesis failures. We next sought to characterize cell behaviors during later epiboly stages, when the epiboly delay was greatest. During epiboly progression, marginal EVL cells elongate along the animal-vegetal axis and a subset of cells rearrange and intercalate into submarginal regions which enables the marginal circumference to narrow to eventually close the blastopore (Keller and Trinkaus, 1987; Köppen et al., 2006). To analyze EVL cell shape changes, live imaging of wild type and mutant embryos expressing mRfp and Gfp-Utrophin was performed starting at 7 hpf.

In wild-type embryos, marginal EVL cells elongated as expected and a few cells changed shape by shortening their contacts with the yolk cell along the EVL margin (Figure 5A, green cells). Following these shape changes, three to four cells share one vertex with the underlying yolk cell (Figure 5A, red circle, t = 25:26 m), akin to a multicellular rosette. Resolution of rosettes in other contexts is linked to cell intercalation rates and tissue-shape changes (Blankenship et al., 2006; Zallen and Blankenship, 2008). Multicellular-yolk vertices resolved on average 22 min following their formation (Figure 5E). Resolution of marginal EVL rosettes resulted in de novo junctions formed between cells adjacent to intercalating cells as they exited into submarginal EVL regions (Figure 5A, orange cells, dotted line). Enrichment of cortical actin was observed when EVL cells intercalated into submarginal zones (Figure 5A’, Video 9, left panel).

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all
Aberrant EVL cell rearrangements in MZrab25b embryos.

(A) Confocal z-projections of stills from a time-lapse of a WT embryo expressing mGfp starting at 7hpf. Lateral view focused on the margin. Green shaded cells shrink the EVL-YC junction and intercalate into submarginal zones. Orange shaded cells establish new cell-cell contacts following intercalation events (denoted by red dotted line). Circle denotes shared vertex with underlying yolk cell. Scale bar 20 μm (A’) Confocal z-projection time-lapse of WT embryo labeled for F-actin; (Fire-LUT) (Gfp-Utrophin) starting at 7hpf; lateral view; scale bar 20 μm. (B) Confocal z-projection of stills from a confocal time-lapse starting at 7hpf of an MZrab25b embryo expressing membrane-Gfp. Purple shaded cells exit EVL marginal region. Scale bar 20 μm (B’) Confocal z-projection of stills from time-lapse starting at 7hpf of an MZrab25b embryo labeled for F-actin (Fire-LUT) (Gfp-Utrophin); scale bar 20 μm. Shaded cells denote an EVL circumferential stretching event. Scale bar 20 μm. (C–D) EVL-YC mean contact length or shortening rate over time in rearranging EVL marginal cells in WT (N = 5) and MZrab25b embryos (N = 5). Mean:SEM. Each color indicates a separate trial of a single embryo. Each line represents the average of the contact length or junction shrink rate in each trial (n = 2–5). (E) Resolution times following formation of EVL-YC multicellular vertices. Mean: SEM. WT (n = 20,N = 4) and MZrab25b (n = 12,N = 5), unresolved MZrab25b vertices (red) (n = 6,N = 5). Mann-Whitney, *p<0.05.

Video 9
Heterogenous distribution of F-actin in MZrab25b EVL cells during late epiboly.

Left Panel: WT embryo expressing Gfp-Utrophin (Fire-LUT) imaged beginning at 7hpf; Enrichment of cortical F-actin during marginal EVL cell rearrangements. Right panel: MZrab25b embryo expressing Gfp-Utrophin (Fire-LUT) imaged beginning at 7hpf. Cells with reduced and large apices shorten their EVL-YC contact; Scale bar 20 μm.

Overall, EVL-YC junction shortening took longer in MZrab25b embryos compared to wild-type embryos (Figure 5C). Additionally, while WT EVL-YC contact shrink rates were initially fast and slowed over time, MZrab25b contacts displayed more uniform, slower rates of shortening during epiboly (Figure 5D). Cells of all sizes were observed to shorten their yolk cell contacts in mutant embryos (Video 9, right panel). However, compared to wild-type, mutant cells with normal and large apical surface areas were slower to shrink their yolk cell contact, while cells with reduced apices did so more quickly (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A). This data suggests that the cell size defects impacted the rate of EVL cell shape changes, contributing to the slowed rate of epiboly in mutant embryos.

Resolution of multicellular-yolk vertices was significantly slower in mutant embryos compared to wild type (Figure 5E). A large proportion of rosettes in marginal regions persisted for up to 2 hr following their formation (Figure 5E, red data points), preventing timely intercalation of cells into submarginal zones and potentially slowing overall EVL marginal circumference narrowing. Additionally, marginal rosettes in MZrab25b embryos appeared to deform the EVL-YC boundary, causing the margin to buckle animally, resulting in an uneven EVL margin (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B) and potentially hindering epiboly progression. Given that normal sized cells exhibit both slow vertex resolution and intercalation rates compared to wild type and that tagged-Rab25 constructs localized to vertices during marginal EVL rearrangement events (Video 3), suggests that Rab25 may have an additional direct role in promoting EVL cell intercalation events during epiboly.

Despite the epiboly delay in MZrab25b embryos, EVL cells were able to rearrange into submarginal zones (Figure 5B, purple cells), with adjacent cells with large apices being stretched toward the site of intercalation (Figure 5B’, colored cells). Marginal EVL cell stretching was in contrast to wild-type cell shape changes and would be predicted to slow the rate of epiboly, as cells normally maintain their shape or narrow and elongate along the embryonic AV axis (Köppen et al., 2006).

Actomyosin network organization in MZrab25b embryos

Our observations that EVL cells in mutant embryos exhibit misoriented and uncoordinated cell shape changes prompted us to examine F-actin and myosin in more detail, given their fundamental roles in cell shape and rearrangements (Jewett et al., 2017). A gradual reduction in cortical actin over the course of epiboly was observed in phalloidin stained mutant embryos, which was first detected at 30% epiboly in MZrab25b embryos (Figure 6A–A’, Figure 6—figure supplement 1A). While cells of all sizes exhibited reduced F-actin signal intensity (Figure 6A, red arrows, Figure 6—figure supplement 1B), as cell size increased, cortical actin further decreased (Figure 6A, yellow arrows).

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all
Reduced cortical actin and pMyosin associated with less tension and more viscous tissue responses in mutant embryos.

(A) Lateral views with animal pole to the top of z-confocal projections of phalloidin stained WT, MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos stage-matched at 80% epiboly; red arrows show reduced cortical actin in normal sized cells; yellow arrows show reduced actin in large cells; Scale bar 20 μm. (A’) Quantification of normalized tricellular and bicellular F-actin intensity at 80% epiboly. WT (n = 90,N = 9), MZrab25a (n = 90,N = 9) and MZrab25b (n = 90,N = 9). Means: SEM; Mann-Whitney, **,p<0.001. (B) Confocal z-confocal projections of WT and MZrab25b embryos at 80% epiboly antibody stained for pMyosin. Red arrows denote uneven distribution of pMyosin along individual MZrab25b cellular junctions. Scale bar 20 μm. (C–D’) Confocal z-confocal projections of WT or MZrab25a Tg(Myl1.1-Gfp) at 60% epiboly; lateral positioned embryo focused on EVL margin; red line marks the ablated junction. Scale bar 5 μm. (E–G’) Initial recoil velocity, relaxation time and distance retracted in WT and MZrab25a embryos following junction laser cutting (see Materials and methods). WT and MZrab25a perpendicular and parallel cuts (n = 26,23);(n = 21,25).

Antibody staining for phosphorylated myosin (pMyosin), the active form of myosin and a proxy for contractility, revealed that most EVL cells in MZrab25b embryos exhibited reduced junctional pMyosin compared to wild-type embryos at 80% epiboly (Figure 6B,B’). In MZrab25b embryos, we occasionally observed some EVL cells with elevated levels of cortical pMyosin (Figure 6B”). Furthermore, while junctional pMyosin was uniformly distributed along individual cell-cell contacts in wild-type embryos (Figure 6A), in MZrab25b mutants, it was often diffuse and fragmented along cell-cell contacts (Figure 6B’–B”, arrows). Overall, reduced cortical actin was associated with weak junctional pMyosin in MZrab25b embryos, with some localized increases in pMyosin in individual cells.

We next characterized the distribution of actin and myosin in live embryos. In MZrab25b embryos transgenic for Myosin light chain 12, genome duplicate 1-gfp (Myl12.1-Gfp) myosin intensity was often weak at shield stage compared to wild type and became heterogeneously distributed in the EVL, as some cells contained elevated levels of cortical myosin following aberrant shape changes (Video 10). Gfp-Utrophin was also disorganized in MZrab25b EVL cells following aberrant cell behaviors (Video 9, right panel). Collectively, these data indicated that ectopic activation of actomyosin in localized EVL regions are likely the result of disorderly cell movements and rearrangements. This is similar to the accumulation of actomyosin in the Drosophila germband during unorganized cell rearrangements (West et al., 2017). We propose the abnormal cell shape changes and behaviors in MZrab25b mutant embryos are likely the product of the overall reduction of contractile actomyosin networks and disrupted tissue architecture.

Video 10
Myosin-Gfp distribution in MZrab25b embryo during epiboly progression.

Left Panel: WT Tg(Myl1.1-Gfp) (Fire-LUT) embryo imaged starting at 7hpf. Right Panel: MZrab25b Tg(Myl1.1-Gfp) (Fire-LUT) embryo imaged starting at 7hpf; Myosin-Gfp becomes heterogeneously distributed in EVL marginal regions Scale bar 20 μm.

Altered viscoelastic responses in MZrab25a mutant EVL cells

The initial recoil velocity of laser ablated junctions is a measure of tension (Hutson et al., 2003). Reduced cortical actin and pMyosin suggested decreased contractility in the EVL of MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos. To examine this, junctions perpendicular and parallel to the EVL-YSL margin were ablated in WT and MZrab25a mutant embryos that were transgenic for Myosin-Gfp. We analyzed cells near the EVL margin in embryos at 60–70% epiboly, when EVL tension is highest (Campinho et al., 2013) and epiboly was the most delayed in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos. To eliminate potential effects of contact length on tension, only cell junctions with similar lengths were quantified.

In WT embryos, cell vertices at the ends of contacts parallel to the margin recoiled faster than perpendicular vertices (Figure 6C,C’, E). Cells behave as viscoelastic materials; thus, tissue viscosity can impact junctional recoil velocities. Laser ablation results can be modeled as the damped recoil of an elastic fibre, using a Kelvin-Voigt element to represent the junction (Kumar et al., 2006). In this context, the maximum distance retracted after ablation is proportional to the stress sustained by the junction, while the rate at which that maximum distance is attained (measured by a relaxation time) is proportional to the viscoelastic properties of the tissue. The relaxation times of parallel and perpendicular junctions following ablation were not significantly different, suggesting that the difference in initial recoil velocities can be attributed to differences in tension, not viscosity (Figure 6F). Stress modeling was consistent with the initial recoil velocities (Figure 6G). Elongating junctions perpendicular to the yolk cell having slow recoil velocity is similar to tensions reported for fluidizing, growing junctions during wound healing (Tetley et al., 2019). Overall, our data suggests that as the yolk-cell begins pulling the EVL between 60 and 75% epiboly, mechanical stresses are anisotropic, being highest along cell contacts oriented parallel to the EVL-YC boundary in marginal EVL regions.

In MZrab25a embryos, the initial recoil velocities of parallel and perpendicular junctions were significantly different, but this difference was diminished compared to wild-type embryos (Figure 6D–E). Additionally, both parallel and perpendicular junctions in MZrab25a mutants exhibited slower recoil velocities compared to wild type (Figure 6E). Stress modeling was consistent with both these results (Figure 6G’). However, the relaxation time of the EVL following the initial recoil was much longer in mutant embryos compared to wild type, suggesting a more viscous response following laser ablation (Figure 6F’).

Overall, this suggests that forces are more balanced in the EVL and that viscoelastic responses are defective in Rab25 mutant embryos. Anisotropic tensions and contraction drive epithelial wound closure in Drosophila and epithelial monolayers in culture (Zulueta-Coarasa and Fernandez-Gonzalez, 2018). Thus, balanced forces would be predicted to disrupt force patterns in the EVL that drive oriented cell shape changes required for tissue elongation during epiboly progression. The overall reduction in actomyosin density and contractile networks likely contributes to the relaxation of tensions within the EVL of mutant embryos. Importantly, force is propagated across tissues through the actomyosin cytoskeleton. Accordingly, reduced actomyosin and tension would also be predicted to impact force transmission across the EVL during epiboly, disrupting the rate of tissue spreading. Lastly, inhibition of cell divisions in amniotes has been shown to increase viscosity, lending support to our data suggesting an association between cytokinesis failures and increased tissue viscosity (Saadaoui et al., 2020). Increased viscosity would slow the rate of EVL deformation in response to yolk cell pulling forces, given that viscous responses are slower than elastic deformations (Petridou and Heisenberg, 2019).

MZrab25a and MZrab25b mutants exhibit endocytic trafficking defects

Rab25 is reported to direct recycling endosome pathways (Casanova et al., 1999). While our previous analysis of fluorescent Rab25 dynamics supports Rab25 trafficking in the EVL, we wanted to determine Rab25’s position in the endocytic-recycling pathway. To do this, Venus-Rab25a or eGfp-Rab25b were co-expressed with mCherry-Rab11a, a marker of recycling endosomes (Mavor et al., 2016). Spatiotemporally, mCherry-Rab11a dynamics largely overlapped with Venus-Rab25a and eGfp-Rab25b over the duration of epiboly, with Rab11 and Rab25 constructs colocalizing within the cytosol and at the plasma membrane (Figure 7A, Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). During cell division, mCherry-Rab11a became enriched at centrosomes in parallel with fluorescently tagged Rab25 (Video 11, Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, black arrows). Given Rab11’s established association with recycling endosomes (REs) (van Ijzendoorn, 2006), localization of Rab25 with Rab11 compartments during cell division and epiboly implies Rab25 localizes to REs in the zebrafish.

Figure 7 with 2 supplements see all
Co-localization of tagged-Rab25 with mCherry-Rab11a and MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos exhibit trafficking defects.

(A) z-projection stills of a wild-type embryo at 80% epiboly co-expressing mCherry-Rab11a (green) and eGfp-Rab25b (magenta); arrowhead denotes overlap. (B) Live WT, MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos expressing Lyn-eGfp (green) and containing cytoplasmic pHRodo dextran puncta (magenta) following incubation. Scale bar 20 μm. (C,D) Rhodamine phalloidin stained (magenta) and Rab11b antibody (green) stained WT and MZrab25b embryos at 80% epiboly; arrowheads denote large Rab11b endosomes. Scale bar 20 μm (E) Schematic of pHRodo dextran apical endocytosis (F) Mean number of Lyn-eGfp- or pHRodo-positive vesicles/cell. WT, MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos (N = 7,7,6). Fluorescence intensity measured over a 1 μm line in pHRodo-positive vesicles; WT (n = 15); MZrab25a (n = 46); MZrab25b (n = 54). Mean surface area of pHRodo vesicles; WT(n = 6); MZrab25a and MZrab25b (n = 23,13). Means: SEM; significance using Mann-Whitney test. Scale bars, (A–C) 20 μm.

Video 11
mCherry-Rab11a spatiotemporally overlaps with Venus-Rab25a in the cytosol, plasma membrane, and at centrosomes.

Left Panel: Confocal time-lapse of a WT embryo expressing mCherry-Rab11a (magenta) and Venus-Rab25a (green) beginning at 30% epiboly. Middle Panel: Venus-Rab25a. Right Panel: mCherry-Rab11a. Scale Bar 20 μm.

We next postulated that a vesicular trafficking defect may underlie the mutant phenotypes. To analyze this, Lyn-eGfp expressing WT and MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos were incubated in pHRodo dextran. The fluorescently tagged peptide Lyn-eGfp labels intracellular membrane compartments during trafficking (Sonal et al., 2014). pHRodo dextran can only be internalized by EVL cells through apical endocytosis (Figure 7E), labeling endosomes positioned in endocytic pathways. In WT cells, we detected a small number of Lyn-eGfp cytoplasmic vesicular bodies with faint pHRodo dextran signal (Figure 7B). In contrast, both Lyn-eGfp- and pHRodo-positive vesicles accumulated in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos, consistent with defects in apical-endocytic membrane trafficking (Figure 7B,F). We also observed reduced junctional Lyn-eGfp in mutants compared to wild type, perhaps representing reduced fusion of vesicles with the plasma membrane, which we speculate could reflect recycling defects. Notably, the greatest accumulation of intracellular vesicles was observed in cells with large apices. Vesicles also accumulated in cells with normal morphologies and small apices, although to a lesser extent. These findings led us to hypothesize that the MZrab25a and MZrab25b phenotypes could be associated with trafficking defects and that these defects at least partially reflect the loss of Rab25 in mutant embryos as opposed to a secondary effect from changes in EVL cell morphology.

While accumulated dextran in mutants suggested internalized material was trapped in endosomes, we sought to further characterize these compartments in mutant embryos. We previously showed that Rab25 co-localized with Rab11, suggesting the excess vesicles may reflect recycling endosomes. To test this hypothesis, we used a Rab11 antibody to label recycling endosomes in WT and MZrab25b embryos. Rab11b positive compartments were observed more frequently in EVL cells of MZrab25b mutant embryos (40% of cells, n = 46/114, N = 8) compared to WT (6% of cells, n = 12/206, N = 6) (Figure 7C,D, yellow arrows). The size of Rab11-positive endosomes was also significantly increased in MZrab25b embryos (Figure 7—figure supplement 2). Interestingly, in other systems, enlarged Rab11 recycling endosomes can be the result of reduced trafficking from REs to the cell surface (Langevin et al., 2005; Mavor et al., 2016). We also observed increased pHRodo dextran fluorescence intensity in some of the compartments in MZrab25b mutant embryos, indicating they were acidic in nature (Figure 7B,F). This suggested that a subset of the accumulated vesicles may represent late endosomes or lysosomes, which could be the downstream result of an overall trafficking defect in mutant embryos. While further investigation is required, these data suggested that the increased number and size of vesicles in mutant embryos could partially be explained by an increase in recycling endosomes, which we postulate could result from a recycling defect.

Discussion

Rab GTPases comprise the largest family of small GTPases and are an important class of membrane trafficking regulators (reviewed in Nassari et al., 2020). Recently, several Rabs have been shown to play roles in morphogenesis and embryonic development (Jewett et al., 2017; Ossipova et al., 2014; Ossipova et al., 2015; Rathbun et al., 2020). Rab25 is reported to be epithelial specific in mammals and is a member of the Rab11 subfamily (Casanova et al., 1999; Goldenring et al., 1993), which has been implicated in apical recycling, cytokinesis, junction reinforcement, and turnover (Iyer et al., 2019; Langevin et al., 2005; Rathbun et al., 2020; Woichansky et al., 2016). Rab25 mutant mice are viable but exhibit defects in skin homeostasis suggesting role in epidermal formation (Nam et al., 2010; Jeong et al., 2019). The function of Rab25 during development is largely unexplored and here we present the first characterization of two rab25 genes in the zebrafish embryo.

Zebrafish rab25a and rab25b are expressed in the surface epithelial layer, the EVL, during gastrulation. MZrab25a and MZrab25b mutant embryos exhibit epiboly delays and EVL cellular morphology defects. As described further below, we propose that the heterogeneous EVL cell sizes in mutant embryos, resulting from cytokinesis failures, impairs epiboly in two ways: by hindering local cell rearrangements and altering the viscoelastic properties of cells.

Role for Rab25 in cytokinetic abscission

The overall subcellular distribution of Rab25 constructs is consistent with a function in trafficking (Hehnly and Doxsey, 2014; van Ijzendoorn, 2006; Langevin et al., 2005). Rab25 constructs were highly motile in the cytoplasm as puncta and transited toward the plasma membrane, suggestive of membrane and/or cargo delivery. During mitosis, Rab25 localized near centrosomes, where recycling endosomes are positioned to direct membrane to the intercellular bridge during cytokinesis (Frémont and Echard, 2018). Lastly, Rab25 co-localized with the known recycling protein Rab11.

MZrab25b embryos exhibited a range of cytokinesis defects during epiboly which led to the formation of bi-and multinucleate cells. Unstable cytokinetic bridges were associated with failed formation of cytokinetic midbodies while persistent apical cytokinetic bridges experienced either failed or delayed abscission. Binucleate cells remained mitotically active generating large, multinucleate cells with reduced cortical actin which continued to exhibit abscission defects leading to an array of interconnected cells across the EVL. These observations point to a previously uncharacterized role for Rab25 in cell division.

Cell division and cytokinesis are multicellular processes (Herszterg et al., 2013), and morphogenic stress in the form of neighboring cell divisions or basal cell extrusion events appeared to tear open persisting cytokinetic bridges in mutant embryos. In cell culture, when abscission is delayed through siRNA knockdown of Rab35, mitosis similarly tears open cytokinetic bridges (Frémont et al., 2017). Our observations of a few cells failing to initially form bridges and a large proportion of cells experiencing delayed abscission in MZrab25b mutants is highly similar to the phenotypes of Rab11 and Rab35 knockdown experiments in vitro (Frémont et al., 2017; Kouranti et al., 2006; Mierzwa and Gerlich, 2014). Furthermore, optogenetic clustering of Rab11 during Kupffer’s vesicle morphogenesis in zebrafish resulted in abscission failure (Rathbun et al., 2020). Therefore, our data implicates Rab25 in having a direct role in cytokinesis.

Current models of membrane dynamics during intercellular bridge cleavage suggest coordination amongst many Rab recycling pathways (Frémont and Echard, 2018). Rab11 and Rab35 are thought to act in a redundant manner in regulating bridge scission in vitro (Frémont et al., 2017), although whether this is the case in animal models has yet to be determined. Our evidence suggests Rab25a and Rab25b have similar functions during epiboly. We propose this as rab25b transcripts were upregulated in MZrab25a embryos which was associated with less severe EVL cytokinesis defects.

Rab11 vesicle trafficking has been shown to be important for cytokinesis during zebrafish KV development (Rathbun et al., 2020). As the KV is an EVL derived organ (Oteíza et al., 2008), it is likely Rab11 has an abscission function during epiboly. Previous Rab11 dominant negative or morpholino approaches have not produced phenotypes similar to MZrab25b mutant embryos, but this can likely be attributed to maternally expressed Rab11 family members rescuing the depletion of zygotic Rab11 in these experiments (Clark et al., 2011). Rab11 and Rab25 may be acting stepwise in vesicle delivery toward the cytokinetic midbody to regulate abscission or may regulate separate trafficking pathways altogether. A more attractive hypothesis is that Rab11 and Rab25 work as a complex to regulate abscission or have partially overlapping trafficking pathways, a proposal consistent with both constructs co-localization and parallel dynamics during epiboly. Coregulation of Rab proteins in trafficking pathways is observed in in vitro models (reviewed in Stenmark, 2009).

An open question is why Rab25a or Rab11 cannot compensate for loss of Rab25b in MZrab25b mutant embryos. A possible explanation may be that more Rab25b protein is maternally deposited compared to Rab11a or Rab25a, thus, disruption of Rab25b without transcriptional adaptation of rab25a or rab11a may not be able to rescue the abscission phenotypes. Given the lack of Rab25b antibody this is difficult to determine. Membrane trafficking becomes increasingly important in morphogenetically active tissues, as a higher degree of plasma membrane remodeling occurs (reviewed in Pinheiro and Bellaïche, 2018). This is exemplified in the related teleost fish Fundulus, where membrane turnover in the EVL was shown to steadily increase as epiboly progressed (Fink and Cooper, 1996), suggesting that membrane recycling may similarly increase. Thus, having high amounts of Rab trafficking molecules during epiboly is most likely needed for normal cytokinesis.

Cytokinesis failures disrupt EVL morphogenesis

Cell division appears to have two major roles in epithelial morphogenesis. Cell-division-mediated intercalations (CMI) power epithelial rearrangements in chick, quail, and Xenopus embryos during gastrulation (Firmino et al., 2016; Higashi et al., 2016; Saadaoui et al., 2020). In general, cell rearrangements have well-defined roles in tissue morphogenesis and embryonic development (reviewed in Zallen and Blankenship, 2008). Thus, failed CMI disrupts rearrangements critical for tissue development, as shown in amniote gastrulation and mouse limb bud development (Firmino et al., 2016; Lau et al., 2015; Saadaoui et al., 2020; Wyngaarden et al., 2010). A second role of cell divisions is the regulation of tissue fluidity and viscoelasticity (reviewed in Petridou and Heisenberg, 2019). Recent experiments using laser ablation and micropipette assays on amniote epiblast cells and zebrafish deep cells have shown that inhibiting cell division increases tissue viscosity, effectively slowing tissue shape changes (Petridou et al., 2019; Saadaoui et al., 2020). Our data in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos suggests that failed cytokinesis disrupted cell intercalation events during epithelial epiboly and increased tissue viscosity, with both likely contributing to slow EVL spreading.

Marginal epithelial cell rearrangements are required for normal epiboly movements of surface epithelia in zebrafish, Fundulus, and Tribolium embryos (Jain et al., 2019; Keller and Trinkaus, 1987; Köppen et al., 2006). Similar to T1 transitions and rosette resolution described in the Drosophila germband (Blankenship et al., 2006), marginal EVL cell intercalations bring into contact initially non-neighboring cells. Marginal intercalation leads to EVL circumference narrowing needed to close the blastopore (Köppen et al., 2006). The EVL cell shape heterogeneity in mutant embryos led to an overall slowing of marginal cell intercalation events, which likely impaired EVL circumference narrowing and the rate of epiboly in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos. While we investigated cell rearrangement events predominantly in EVL marginal regions, our time-lapses of wild-type embryos revealed EVL cell neighbor exchanges throughout most regions of the epithelium, which to date has not been reported.

Rab proteins and cytoskeletal dynamics

Tension anisotropy promotes tissue shape changes during morphogenesis. For example, heterogenous contractile networks are required for timely wound healing and apical cell extrusion (Ap et al., 2020; Zulueta-Coarasa and Fernandez-Gonzalez, 2018). Our laser cutting analysis revealed polarized tensions within the EVL, with cell junctions aligned parallel to the EVL-YC boundary having high recoil velocities compared to perpendicular junctions elongating during epiboly progression. Higher tensions along parallel contacts indicate cells may dynamically narrow along the circumferential embryonic axis during late-phase epiboly, consistent with the tissue narrowing and elongating. It may also mean some junctions are resisting external forces to maintain their initial length. In support of our notion that tension heterogeneity drives EVL morphogenesis, the overall relaxation of tensions in mutant embryos disrupted polarized force patterns which was associated with disorganized and stochastic cell behaviors that hindered collective cell movements and epiboly.

Similar to what has been described in several different Drosophila epithelia (Lecuit et al., 2011), we found that abnormal cell shape changes were associated with a global reduction of cortical actomyosin networks in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos. We observed that enlarged, multinucleated cells had the largest depletions of cortical actomyosin. This reduction in cortical actomyosin provides a likely explanation for the significant slowing of cell rearrangements exhibited by multinucleate cells compared to neighboring cells with normal or reduced apical surface areas. Furthermore, this finding aligns with the observation that greater epiboly delays were associated with the increased presence of multinucleated cells. Reduced cortical actin also explains the tension defects shown via laser ablation, which we also propose results in perturbed force transmission across the EVL. Despite the relationship observed between cell size and cortical actin density, cytokinesis failures do not explain weak actomyosin intensity throughout the EVL in normal sized cells in both mutant backgrounds. This suggests that Rab25 may regulate the cortical actin network independently of its role in abscission.

Rab proteins have conserved roles in actomyosin network maintenance. During Drosophila mesectoderm invagination and germband extension, Rab35 localizes to actomyosin networks and is required for sustained cell-cell interface contraction (Jewett et al., 2017). Disruption of Rab35 impairs cell shape changes and overall tissue morphogenesis in Drosophila (Jewett et al., 2017). In Xenopus bottle cell ingression and neuroepithelial folding, Rab11 similarly promotes actomyosin contractility to drive both developmental programs (Ossipova et al., 2014; Ossipova et al., 2015). Thus, Rab25 having a role in actomyosin regulation during epiboly is consistent with Rab protein functions in other systems.

The mechanism for Rab25 cortical actomyosin maintenance is currently unclear and requires further study. Rab proteins promote cytoskeletal changes at subcellular sites by delivering actin remodeling proteins. For example, during abscission, Rab11 delivers p50RhoGAP to depolymerize intercellular bridge actin networks (Schiel and Prekeris, 2013). Additionally, a Rab11 effector, Nuf, is involved in actin polymerization during Drosophila cellularization (Cao et al., 2008). Rab25 vesicles may also contain lipids involved in signaling pathways which reorganize actin networks. For example, Rab35 vesicles contain the PtdIns(4,5)P2 phosphatase OCRL which remodels F-actin during abscission (Dambournet et al., 2011).

Alternatively, junctional reinforcement at cell vertices may lead to downstream actomyosin polymerization and contractility. In Drosophila, recycling pathways have well defined roles in cell contact reinforcement, thus Rab25 may regulate the actomyosin cytoskeleton during epiboly in a similar fashion. Studies in Xenopus have shown that Rab11 recruitment to vertices is modulated by tension (Ossipova et al., 2014). In a positive feedback loop, Rab11 then further promotes actomyosin contractility at these sites to drive apical constriction (Ossipova et al., 2014). Given that tagged-Rab25 localized to vertices, which are known to be under high tension during cell rearrangements (Bosveld and Bellaïche, 2020), Rab25 may similarly redistribute in response to tension, with the downstream effect of promoting contractility and actin polymerization. Future endeavours will help determine this mode of Rab25 function during epiboly.

We propose a two branched model by which Rab25 functions during epithelial epiboly in the zebrafish gastrula. Rab25 trafficking coordinates cytokinetic abscission to ensure successful EVL cell divisions, which is critical for proper cell size, shape and number. In parallel, Rab25 regulates cortical actomyosin network density in the EVL. Increases in cell size from failed cytokinesis led to sparse cortical actin density, thus both Rab25 pathways impact cortical cytoskeleton density in the EVL. Maintenance of the actin cytoskeleton is required for orderly cell rearrangements, polarized force patterns, and viscoelastic responses to ensure normal epiboly progression.

Materials and methods

Zebrafish handling

Request a detailed protocol

Animals were maintained under standard conditions in accordance with the policies and procedures of the University of Toronto animal care committee. Fish stocks were housed at 28–29°C in an Aquaneering Zebrafish Housing System with a pH from 7.2 to 7.8 and conductivity between 500 and 700 µS. Adults used were on average 1 year old with no prior manipulations or apparent health issues. Embryos were collected from natural spawnings using a tea strainer and rinsed and stored in facility water or E3 medium at 28.5–30°C. Embryos were staged as described by Kimmel et al., 1995.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Quantifications represent data collected from cells visualized within a given area illuminated by confocal microscopy and not estimates of embryo wide measurements.

Epiboly Progression

Request a detailed protocol

To assess the extent of epiboly progression, the leading edge of the blastoderm was labeled using either phalloidin or by in situ hybridization against ta (ntla). Embryos were photographed and ImageJ was used to measure the distance from the animal pole to EVL leading edge and compared to the overall length of the embryo along the animal-vegetal axis (AV) (SF 1D).

Cell contact analysis

Request a detailed protocol

The number of bicellular contacts between an EVL cell and its neighbors EVL cells or the YC was counted.

Apical surface area, circularity, and heat maps

Request a detailed protocol

Surface area, circularity and heat maps were calculated and generated using SIESTA and custom scripts written in MATLAB (Zuluerta-Coarasa et al., 2017).

Circularity=p2/4πa,

where p is the cell apical surface perimeter and α is cell apical surface area. Circularity is one for circles and larger than one for non-circular shapes.

Phalloidin fluorescence intensity

Request a detailed protocol

Phalloidin levels were measured in fixed embryos in EVL marginal regions at the stages described using a 2 µM line at bicellular and tricellular contacts. For each experiment, all measurements were then corrected and normalized to ZO-1 levels in the same regions using the measure tool in ImageJ.

Myosin intensity

Request a detailed protocol

Myosin levels were measured across a 2 µM line in the middle of bicellular junctions in live embryos expressing Myl12.1-eGFP pre-ablation. For each experiment, all measurements were then corrected and normalized to myosin intensity at tricellular contacts along the same junction using the measure tool in ImageJ.

pHRodo dextran and Lyn-eGFP vesicle counts and fluorescence intensity

Request a detailed protocol

In each experiment, vesicles > 0.75 µM were counted in images from live confocal z-projections of EVL cells. To measure the fluorescence intensity of pHRodo positive vesicles, intensity across a line spanning the diameter of the vesicles was measured. Analysis was done using the measure tool in ImageJ.

Cytokinetic bridge length and duration

Request a detailed protocol

Bridge length and duration in wild-type embryos was quantified in marginal and animal regions in live AB embryos expressing Dcx-Gfp from plasmid injection; Tg:(XIEef1a:eGFP-tubα8I) or; Tg:(XIEef1a1:Dclk2DeltaK-GFP). All methods produced similar bridge lengths and durations. Mutants embryos expressing Dcx-Gfp from plasmid injection were used for bridge analysis. Bridge length for all genotypes were measured following intercellular bridge formation. Bridge duration analysis began following cleavage, when microtubules were first organized into bridges. Duration analysis ended when microtubules were no longer visible, indicating abscission. Duration analysis also ended in mutants if bridges were present at the end of time-lapses or when bridges regressed or were torn open. Initial bridge length following formation was measured using the measure tool on ImageJ.

Spindle orientation

Request a detailed protocol

The angle of EVL mitotic spindles was compared to the long axis of the cell in live wild-type and mutant embryos in marginal and animal regions using the measure tool in ImageJ. Microtubules in wild-type embryos were labeled by Dcx-Gfp from plasmid injection; Tg:(XIEef1a:eGfp-tubα8I) or; Tg:(XIEef1a1:dclk2DeltaK-Gfp). In mutant embryos, microtubules were labeled with Dcx-Gfp from plasmid injection. Embryos also expressed membrane-Rfp and H2A-Rfp.

EVL-YC contact shortening

Request a detailed protocol

The length of EVL-yolk cell contact was measured each frame over the duration of time-lapses using the measure tool in ImageJ.

Multicellular EVL-YC vertex resolution

Request a detailed protocol

Following formation of multicellular vertices along the EVL-YC boundary, resolution of rosettes was determined when a new cell contact was observed to form between cells adjacent to intercalating cells.

Rab11b recycling endosome number and size

Request a detailed protocol

To assess the number of Rab11b-positive compartments, Rab11b-positive endosomes with diameters > 1 µM were counted in individual EVL cells of WT and MZrab25b embryos stained with Rab11b antibodies and phalloidin. The diameter of Rab11 compartments was measured to compare the sizes of Rab11 positive endosomes between genotypes and was performed using the measure tool in ImageJ.

Statistics

Statistical Analysis was performed using PRISM software. Sample means p values were compared to infer significance, with the type of test indicated in figure captions.

CRISPR/Cas9 mutant generation

Request a detailed protocol

To determine Cas9 target sites against rab25a and rab25b (ZFIN ID: ZDB-Gene-041212–69; ZDB-Gene-050706–113), the CHOPCHOP tool was used (https://chopchop-cbu-uib-no.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca). The following target sites were chosen for rab25a: Exon 2 (Rab GTPase Domain), 5’-AGTGGTTTTAATTGGAGAATCAGG-3’; for rab25b: Exon 2 (Rab GTPAse Domain), 5’-CTGGATTGGAGCGGTACCGC −3’. To generate gRNA’s, sgDNA templates were generated using PCR without cloning:

  • Oligo 1

  • T7 Promoter PAM rab25a Target Site Overlap with oligo 2

  • 5’TTAATACGACTCACTATA|GGA|GTGGTTTTAATTGGAGAATCAGGGG|GTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAG-3’

  • T7 Promoter PAM rab25b Target Site Overlap with oligo 2

  • 5’-TTAATACGACTCACTATA|GGC|GTGCGCTCCGTTCCTACAGAGG|GTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAG

  • Oligo 2-

  • 5’-AAA AGC ACC GACTCG GTG CCA CTT TTT CAA GTT GAT AAC GGA CTA GCCTTATTT TAA CTT GCT ATT TCT AGCTCT AAA AC-3’

The Ambion MegaScript T7 kit was used to transcribe sgRNA in vitro. gRNA (50 pg) was coinjected with cas9 mRNA (300 pg)(pT3TS-nCas9 [Xba1 digest] Addgene plasmid: #46757 Jao et al., 2013; transcribed using mMESSAGE mMachine T3 kit Life technologies [AM1348]).

To determine indel frequencies, genomic DNA from 24hpf injected embryos was extracted using Lysis Buffer and Phenol Chloroform purification with the following primer pairs used for amplification target sites:

  • rab25a

  • Forward-5’- TATTTATTCACCAAGCGGTTG-3’

  • Reverse-5’- GAGTGGTTCTGGGTGTGAGTC-3’

  • rab25b

  • Forward- 5’-TGTTTGCAGTGGTTCTTATTGGAG-3’

  • Reverse- 5’-ATTACGTTCGCTTGCAGAATTT-3’

rab25a and rab25b PCR products were digested with Hinf1 and Kpn1, respectively. PCR products which could not be cut were then sequenced using the respective forward primers above. This led to the identification of two rab25a mutations from two different founder fish and one rab25b mutation:

  • rab25a2.313 BP Deletion 5’-TTGCTTTCAGTGGTTTTAATTGGAGAA-------------AG-3’ rab25a4- 29 BP Insertion

  • 5’TTGCTTTCAGTGGTTTTAATTGGAGAATTGGAAAGTTGGAAAGCGCAACTTTGGGTTGGGTTGGAAAG-3’ rab25b- 9 BP Deletion 5’-TG---------CCATCACCTCTGCGTGAGTTTG-3’

We had difficulty rescuing the mutant phenotypes by RNA injection, likely due to the required maternal contribution of rab25a and rab25b. We also observed that rab25a mutant alleles produced more severe phenotypes over successive generations of in-crossing.

Cloning

Request a detailed protocol

AB, MZrab25a, or MZrab25b embryos at 24hpf were dechorionated and RNA was extracted from 60 to 80 embryos using Trizol (Invitrogen). cDNA was generated using Postscript II first strand cDNA synthesis kit (NEB). Coding sequences were PCR amplified from cDNA or vectors with Q5 high-fidelity Taq Polymerase (NEB) using the following primers:

  • rab25a: pGEM

  • Forward: 5’ATGGGGACAGATTTAGCCTACAAC-3’

  • Reverse: 5’CGAAGCTGCTGCAAAAACTCCTGA-3’

PCR products were gel purified and A-tailed by incubation with dATP and Taq Polymerase (NEB) for 30 min and ligated into pGEM-T-Easy (Promega).

rab25a: pCS2+ rab25a was PCR amplified from pGEM with PCR primers containing Cla1/Stu1 restriction sequences for forward and reverse primers, respectively. PCR fragments were digested with either Cla/Stu1, gel extracted and ligated into pCS2+. Constructs were confirmed by sequencing.

  • rab25a: venus-pCS2+

  • Forward: 5’-CTCGAGGGCGCCACCATGGGGACAGATTTAGCCTACAAC-3’

  • Reverse: 5’- CTCGAGCGAAGCTGCTGCAAAAACTCCTGA-3’

N-terminal venus fusion protein was generated by digesting vector and insert with Xho1 and ligated. Sequencing was used to validate ligation of venus and rab25a. rab25b:

  • Forward:

  • 5'-GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCATGGGGTCTGATGAGGCCTA-3’

  • Reverse:

  • 5'-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTGTCACAAGTTTTTACAGCAGG-3’

rab25b PCR products were gel extracted and recombined with pDONR221 using BP clonase. Clones were validated by sequencing. Fusion proteins and transgenic vectors were generated by gateway recombination using LR Clonase.

mRNA synthesis and microinjections

Request a detailed protocol

Unless specified otherwise, Not1-digested plasmids were used as templates for in vitro transcription using the SP6 mMessage mMachine Kit (Ambion). mRNA was purified using MEGAclear kit or NucAway Spin Columns (Ambion). RNAs were injected into the yolk cell or blastoderm of one-cell stage embryos, as described (Bruce et al., 2003). Doses of injected RNA were: h2a-rfp (50 pg), mrfp/gfp (50 pg), lyn-egfp (50 pg), gfp-Utrch (100 pg), mcherry-rab11a (300 pg), egfp-rab25b (300 pg), venus-rab25a (300 pg), mcherry-rab25b (300 pg), mcherry-mklp1 (150–200 pg). Plasmids were injected at doses ranging from 10 to 20 pg.

Whole-mount immunohistochemistry

Request a detailed protocol

Antibody staining was performed as previously described (Lepage et al., 2014). Dilutions were as follows: rhodamine-phalloidin (1:200), anti-E-cadherin (Abcam, 1:1000), anti-ZO-1 (1:500), anti-phospho-myosin-light chain 2 Ser 19 (cell signaling, 1:100). Embryos were mounted in either 80% glycerol or 0.05% low-melt agarose. Secondary antibodies used were goat-anti-mouse Alexa 488 (Invitrogen, 1:500) and goat anti-rabbit-Cy3 (Jackson immunoresearch,1:500). Sytox green (Invitrogen) was dilution to 0.5 µM in fixative.

Whole-mount in situ hybridization

Request a detailed protocol

Whole mount in situ hybridizations were performed as previously described (Jowett and Lettice, 1994). keratin4, ta, rab25a, rab25b, gsc, sox17 probes were generated by linearizing pBS vectors and transcribing using T7 RNA polymerase (ThermoFisher Scientific). Probes were purified using NucAway Spin Columns (Ambion).

pHRodo dextran assay

Request a detailed protocol

Embryos were injected into the yolk cell at the one-cell stage with lyn-egfp mRNA, dechorionated and bathed in pHRodo red dextran (Invitrogen, P10361) dissolved in E3 medium (100 µg/ml). WT and MZrab25b embryos were incubated in the same media, while MZrab25a embryos were in a separate dish. Treatments were performed in petri dishes and embryos were incubated from high stage until 90% epiboly at 30°C. MZrab25b embryos were identified by their phenotype and mounted laterally in 0.05% low-melt agarose on glass bottom dishes (Matek).

Laser ablations

Request a detailed protocol

Tg:(actb1:myl12.1-eGfp) and MZrab25a Tg:(actb1:myl12.1-eGfp) embryos at 60% epiboly were dechorionated and mounted laterally in 0.05% low-melt agarose on glass bottom dishes (Matek). Imaging was done at room temperature using a Revolution XD spinning disk confocal microscope (Andor Technology) with an iXon Ultra 897 camera (Andor Technology), a 40X (NA1.35; Olympus) oil-immersion lens and Metamorph software (Molecular Devices). Ablations were performed in marginal regions, 2–3 cell rows back from the EVL-yolk cell margin on junctions parallel and perpendicular to the margin. Junctions were cut using a pulsed Micropoint nitrogen laser (Andor technology) tuned to 365 nm. The tissue was imaged immediately before and after ablation in which 10 laser pulses were delivered. 16-bit z-stacks were acquired every 3 s at 3 µm stacks and projected for analysis.

qPCR

Request a detailed protocol

Total RNA was purified from shield stage of zebrafish embryos using Trizol, and an additional DNase I (Turbo DNaseI from Thermo Fisher Scientific) step was used to remove genomic DNA. RNA was reverse-transcribed with random primers using the high-capacity cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gene expression was monitored by quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) using primers that distinguish individual transcripts (Key Resources Table). The standard curve method was used to calculate expression levels, with zebrafish genomic DNA used to generate the standard curves. Levels of lsm12b RNA were used to normalize expression values; primer sequences are shown in the Key Resources Table. All samples were confirmed not to have DNA contamination by generating a reverse transcriptase negative sample and confirming there was no lsm12b amplification. At least three biological replicates were analyzed for each experiment. Significant differences in gene expression between shield stage embryos were determined by t-test.

Imaging

Request a detailed protocol

Imaging was performed on a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope unless otherwise specified.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1—key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Chemical compound
rhodamine-phalloidinInvitrogenCat #R415(1:200)
Chemical compoundsytox greenInvitrogenCat #S7020(1:1000)
Chemical compoundpHrodo Red DextranInvitrogenCat# P10361(1mg/ml)
Antibodyanti-phospho-myosin-light chain 2 Ser 19 (Rabbit polyclonal)Cell SignallingCat #3671
IF(1:100)
Antibodyanti-Cdh1 (Rabbit polyclonal)
AnaSpecCat# 55527s
IF (1:1000)
Commercial assay or kitMEGAscript T7-Transcription KitAmbionCat#AMB1334 
Commercial assay or kitMegaClear Clean Up KitAmbionCat#AM1908
Commercial assay or kitmMessage mMachine T3 Transcription Kit
ThermoFisher Scientific Cat#AM1348
Commercial assay or kitNucAway Spin ColumnAmbionCat#AM10070
Strain (D. rerio)AB wildtypeZebrafish International Resource CentreRRID:BDSC_5138
Strain (D. rerio)Tg:(XIEef1a1:dclk2DeltaK-GFP)Sepich et al., 2011 
Strain (D. rerio)Tg:(XIEef1a:eGFP-tubα8I)Fei et al., 2019
Strain (D. rerio)Tg:(actb1:myl12.1-eGFP)
Maître et al., 2012
Strain (D. rerio)MZrab25a4This studyhttps://zfin.org/ZDB-ALT-201221-11
Strain (D. rerio)MZrab25a2.3This studyhttps://zfin.org/ZDB-ALT-201221-10
Strain (D. rerio)MZrab25bThis studyhttps://zfin.org/ZDB-ALT-201221-12
 
Strain (D. rerio)MZrab25b Tg:(actb1:rab25b)This study 
Strain (D. rerio)MZrab25a4 Tg:(actb1:myl12.1-eGFP)This study 
Strain (D. rerio)MZrab25b Tg:(actb1:myl12.1-eGFP)This study 
Sequence-based reagent

rab25a_F
This studyPCR PrimersForward: TATTTATTCACCAAGCGGTTG
(for genotyping)

Sequence-based reagent

rab25a_R
This studyPCR PrimersReverse: GAGTGGTTCTGGGTGTGAGTC
(for genotyping)

Sequence-based reagentrab25b_FThis studyPCR PrimersForward: TGTTTGCAGTGGTTCTTATTGGAG
(for genotyping)
Sequence-based reagentrab25b_RThis studyPCR PrimersReverse: ATTACGTTCGCTTGCAGAATTT
(for genotyping)
Sequence-based reagentrab25a_FThis studyPCR PrimersForward: ATGGGGACAGATTTAGCCTACAAC
(for cDNA)
Sequence-based reagentrab25a_RThis studyPCR PrimersReverse: CGAAGCTGCTGCAAAAACTCCTGA
(for cDNA)
Sequence-based reagentrab25a_FThis studyPCR primersForward: GGATCCATGGGGACAGATTTAGCCTACAAC
(ligation into pCS2+ via restriction
digest via BamH1, Xho1)
Sequence-based reagentrab25a_RThis studyPCR primersReverse: CTGGAGCGAAGCTGCTGCAAAAACTCCTGA
(ligation into pCS2+ via restriction
digest via BamH1, Xho1)
Sequence-based reagentrab25a_FThis studyPCR PrimersForward: CTCGAGGGCGCCACCAT GGGGACAGATTTAGCCTACAAC
(ligation with into pCS2+ venus via Xho1
restriction digest)
Sequence-based reagentrab25a_RThis studyPCR PrimersReverse: CTCGAGCGAAGCTGCTGC AAAAACTCCTGA (ligation with into pCS2+ venus via Xho1
restriction digest)
Sequence-based reagentrab25b_FThis studyPCR PrimersForward: GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAA AGCAGGCT TCATGGGGTCTGATGAGGCCTA (rab25b with attb1 for recombination into pDONR221)
Sequence-based reagentrab25b_RThis studyPCR PrimersReverse: GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAG CTGGGT GTCACAAGTTTTTACAGCAGG
(rab25b with attb1 for recombination into pDONR221)
Sequence-based reagentrab11a_FThis studyPCR PrimersForward: AGAAAAACGGTCTGTCCTTC
(qPCR)
Sequence-based reagentrab11a_RThis studyPCR PrimersReverse: TCAGGATGGTCTGAAAAGCA
(qPCR)
Sequence-based reagentrab25a_FThis studyPCR PrimersForward: GAAGTGACCAGAGGCTCGAT
(qPCR)
Sequence-based reagentrab25a_RThis studyPCR PrimersReverse: GGAGTTTTTGCAGCAGCTT
(qPCR)
Sequence-based reagentrab25b_FThis studyPCR PrimersForward: TCGGAGCTCTGCTGGTTTAT
(qPCR)
Sequence-based reagentrab25b_RThis studyPCR PrimersReverse: GCGTGATCGTAGAGCTCCTT
(qPCR)
Sequence-based reagentLsm12_FThis studyPCR PrimersForward: AGTTGTCCCAAGCCTATGCAATCAG
(qPCR)
Sequence-based reagentLsm12_RThis studyPCR PrimersReverse: CCACTCAGGAGGATAAAGACGAGTC
(qPCR)
Recombinant DNA reagentpCS2+ (plasmid)Rupp et al., 1994SP6/T7 based backbone
Recombinant DNA reagentpCS2+egfp-rab25b (plasmid)This studyegfp-Rab25b version of pCS2+
Recombinant DNA reagentpCS2+mcherry-rab25b (plasmid)This studymcherry-rab25b version of pCS2+
Recombinant DNA reagentpCS2+venus-rab25a (plasmid)This studyvenus-rab25a version of pCS2+
Recombinant DNA reagentpCS2+-mcherry-Rab11a (plasmid)Rathbun et al., 2020mcherry-Rab11a version of pCS2+
Recombinant DNA reagentpCS2+-mcherry-Mklp1 (plasmid)Rathbun et al., 2020mCherry-Mklp1 version of pCS2+
Recombinant DNA reagentpCS2+ lyn-eGfpA gift from Brian Cirunalyn-eGfp version of pCS2+
Recombinant DNA reagentpTol2-actb1A gift from Brian CirunaTol2 transgenics
Recombinant DNA reagentpTol2-actb1:rab25bThis studyrab25b version of pTol2-actb1
Recombinant DNA reagentpCS2+- Gfp-UtrophinAddgeneRRID: Addgene_26737Gfp-Utrophin version of pCS2+
Recombinant DNA reagentFP2Narayanan and Lekven, 2012Wnt8a enhancer based backbone
Recombinant DNA reagentFP2-GS1Fei et al., 2019GS1 version of FP2
Recombinant DNA reagentFP2-SPVBFei et al., 2019SPVB version of FP2
Recombinant DNA reagentFP2-DN-RhoAThis studyDN-RhoA version of FP2
Recombinant DNA reagentPT3TS-nCas9Jao et al., 2013RRID: Addgene_46757T3 based backbone

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

References

  1. Book
    1. Jain A
    2. Ulman V
    3. Mukherjee A
    4. Prakash M
    5. Pimpale L
    6. Muenster S
    7. Panfilio KA
    8. Jug F
    9. Grill SW
    10. Tomancak P
    11. Pavlopoulos A
    (2019)
    Regionalized Tissuefluidization by an Actomyosin Cable Is Required for Epithelial Gapclosure During Insect Gastrulation Max-Planck-Institute of MolecularCell Biology and Genetics
    Technische Universität Dresden.

Decision letter

  1. Michel Bagnat
    Reviewing Editor; Duke University, United States
  2. Didier YR Stainier
    Senior Editor; Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany
  3. Michel Bagnat
    Reviewer; Duke University, United States

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Acceptance summary:

The authors examined the role of Rab25 during cell division within a developing epithelium. Strikingly, they found that the RabGTPase, Rab25, localized to mitotic structures such as centrosomes and cytokinetic midbodies in dividing cells of the developing zebrafish embryo. They went on to create maternal-zygotic Rab25a and Rab25b mutant embryos where they clearly demonstrate that apical cytokinetic bridges fail to undergo abscission leading to anisotropic cell morphologies that likely contribute to a delayed epiboly. The identification that a Rab11 paralog, Rab25, regulates cytokinesis and abscission when Rab11 is present suggests that Rab25 likely has developed a unique function to Rab11 during abscission.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "The recycling endosome protein Rab25 coordinates collective cell movements in the zebrafish surface epithelium" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, including Michel Bagnat as the Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen by Didier Stainier as the Senior Editor.

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission. et al.

Essential revisions:

1. Because mz mutants need to be used to examine early embryonic processes it is possible that some of the defects observed are due to impaired processes during oogenesis that may depend or Rab25a or b function.

1A. Are mcherry-Rab25b, Venus-Rab25a and eGFP-Rab25b functional?

1B. Does injection of mRNA for the tagged versions, if functional, or un-tagged Rab25a/b rescue the mz mutant?

2. Genetic compensation is an interesting idea to explain the subtle phenotype. Can mz-rab25a; mz-rab25b double mutants be generated? or at least knock-down rab25b in MZrab25a?

3. Introduce some colocalization studies between Rab25a and/or Rab25b with Rab11 demonstrating that they are on the same compartment during division. Specifically, to compare the spatial and temporal dynamics of both Rab25a and Rab25b with Rab11 and examine the localization of Rab11 in rab25 mutants.

4. Given the seeming strong early phenotype, e.g. multinucleated and highly dysmorphic cells, it is surprising that mz-rab25b survive gastrulation. How consistent is the pattern seen in for example Figure 2C and 3A? do embryos that show that early phenotype survive ? or do surviving embryos present milder early phenotype?

5. The authors suggest Rab25 is implicated in membrane recycling. However, the internalization assay only reflects endocytic events and not recycling.

6A. Could the authors examine the trafficking of membrane proteins involved in cytokinesis?

6B. E-cadherin turn-over is required for cell morphology and cell migration in early zebrafish development. It seems to be worth investigating if the i.e., endocytosis phenotype they observe in MZRab25a/b (Figure 7) is linked to E-cadherin function as the E-cad/half baked mutant phenotype seems to be very similar concerning the EVL (Kane et al.2005).

6C. Could they perform a recycling assay?

[Editors' note: further revisions were suggested prior to acceptance, as described below.]

Thank you for resubmitting your work entitled "The recycling endosome protein Rab25 coordinates collective cell movements in the zebrafish surface epithelium" for further consideration by eLife. Your revised article has been evaluated by Didier Stainier as the Senior Editor, and a Reviewing Editor.

Summary:

The authors examined the role of Rab25 during cell division within a developing epithelium. Strikingly, they found that the RabGTPase, Rab25, localized to mitotic structures such as centrosomes and cytokinetic midbodies in dividing cells of the developing zebrafish embryo. They went on to create maternal-zygotic Rab25a and Rab25b mutant embryos where they clearly demonstrate that apical cytokinetic bridges fail to undergo abscission leading to anisotropic cell morphologies that likely contribute to a delayed epiboly. The identification that a Rab11 paralog, Rab25, regulates cytokinesis and abscission when Rab11 is present suggests that Rab25 likely has developed a unique function to Rab11 during abscission.

The reviewers agree in that the manuscript has been significantly improved but there are remaining issues that need to be addressed, as outlined below:

1. The data presented in Figure 7 reporting the intracellular accumulation of Rab11 in rab25 mutants needs quantification to determine whether Rab11+ structures are increased, enlarged or altered in any way in the mutants.

2. Does E-Cadherin accumulate in Rab11 vesicles?

3. It is difficult to appreciate the altered pattern of E-Cadherin the authors describe for Supp. Figure 7. Please provide a clear and quantitative assessment of that phenotype or else remove the data from the manuscript as they currently do not seem to support the claims about it.

If the evidence available is not strong enough to demonstrate membrane recycling defects, claims about such a process being affected should be tempered accordingly as their relative weakness detracts attention from other findings that are well supported and much more compelling.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66060.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1. Because mz mutants need to be used to examine early embryonic processes it is possible that some of the defects observed are due to impaired processes during oogenesis that may depend or Rab25a or b function.

Given the strong maternal phenotype, as the reviewer notes, we investigated this interesting possibility. We observed mild yolk cell actin defects shortly after fertilization in a small number (N=1/12) of MZrab25b embryos, while all MZrab25a embryos were normal (10/10) at the 4-cell stage. This data is now included in Figure 2—figure supplement 2A and referred to in the text. We observed somewhat abnormal blastoderm morphology in both MZrab25a (36/100) and MZrab25b (30/100) embryos at 3hpf (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D), but these defects resolved by 4.0hpf in the majority of mutant embryos (numbers are now included in the text section titled “Rab25a and Rab25b are required for normal epiboly movements”). These early defects do not appear to explain the EVL defects observed during epiboly based on the findings that (1) EVL morphology is normal at the onset of epiboly in mutants (Figure 2—figure supplement 2C) (2) experimental disruption of yolk actin does not produce the EVL defects seen in mutants (Figure 2—figure supplement 2B and B’). The data can be found in the section titled “Cell Shape and rearrangements indicative of epithelial defects in MZrab25a and MZrab25b embryos.

1A. Are mcherry-Rab25b, Venus-Rab25a and eGFP-Rab25b functional?

1B. Does injection of mRNA for the tagged versions, if functional, or un-tagged Rab25a/b rescue the mz mutant?

We apologize if these details were not clear in the text. We had difficulties rescuing the mutant phenotypes by RNA injection, which is likely due to the required maternal contributions of rab25a and rab25b, as has been observed in other zebrafish maternal mutants (Chen et al., 2017; Li-villarreal et al., 2016; Schwayer et al., 2019). For these reasons we rescued MZrab25b phenotypes using a transgenic rescue construct expressed under the control of a ß-actin promoter (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C). This promoter was previously shown to have high maternal activity making it an ideal approach to rescue maternal mutants (Chen et al., 2017). Therefore, to address the functionality of the tagged Rab25a and Rab25b constructs, maternal mutant lines transgenic for these constructs would have to be generated, which would take in the range of 6-8 months and thus is beyond the scope of this manuscript. Given the documented widespread functionality of N-terminally tagged Rab proteins in zebrafish, mammalian and invertebrate systems (Mavor et al., 2016; Rathbun et al., 2020; Song et al., 2013), we would expect the zebrafish Rab25 constructs to be functional. For example, N-terminally tagged Rab11 has been shown to be functional in the EVL of zebrafish embryos during epiboly (Song et al., 2013) and more recently in Kupfer vesicle formation (Rathbun et al., 2020).

2. Genetic compensation is an interesting idea to explain the subtle phenotype. Can mz-rab25a; mz-rab25b double mutants be generated? or at least knock-down rab25b in MZrab25a?

We now include data in Figure 2—figure supplement 1B showing MZrab25a/rab25b double mutant embryos. Double homozygous mutant fish are difficult to generate but the ones we have analyzed consistently display phenotypes resembling MZrab25b embryos with some increase in the severity of the EVL morphology defects. With regards to the issue of genetic compensation, the double mutant phenotype is consistent with our conclusion that Rab25b partially rescues MZrab25a embryos, resulting in a milder phenotype than that seen in MZrab25b embryos. This has now been added to the text.

3. Introduce some colocalization studies between Rab25a and/or Rab25b with Rab11 demonstrating that they are on the same compartment during division. Specifically, to compare the spatial and temporal dynamics of both Rab25a and Rab25b with Rab11 and examine the localization of Rab11 in rab25 mutants.

Given the similarities between Rab25 and Rab11 we agree colocalization experiments would be informative to characterize Rab25’s function. We previously included stills of confocal time lapses of fluorescently taggedRab25a and Rab25b with mCherry-Rab11a in the EVL (Figure 7A, Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, black arrows).

These results showed that Rab25 overlapped with Rab11 positive compartments during epiboly and cell division. To address the temporal comparison, we have added new videos of the time lapses of venus-Rab25a and mCherry-Rab11a during EVL cell division (Video 11). The spatiotemporal association of Rab25 with Rab11 endosomes is similar to observations in mammalian cell culture (Casanova et al., 1999).

4. Given the seeming strong early phenotype, e.g. multinucleated and highly dysmorphic cells, it is surprising that mz-rab25b survive gastrulation. How consistent is the pattern seen in for example Figure 2C and 3A? do embryos that show that early phenotype survive ? or do surviving embryos present milder early phenotype?

We agree that it is surprising that almost all mutant embryos survive. Our live confocal time lapses and phalloidin staining showed that the EVL exhibited highly abnormal cellular phenotypes in nearly 100% of the MZrab25b mutant embryos examined. We have added the data that 99/100 mutant embryos survived gastrulation and thus it not the case that only embryos with mild phenotypes successfully complete gastrulation. How the embryos recover from these severe early defects will be a focus of future studies.

5. The authors suggest Rab25 is implicated in membrane recycling. However, the internalization assay only reflects endocytic events and not recycling.

We have now included results of E-cadherin antibody staining in MZrab25b embryos (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B and C). E-cadherin is a transmembrane protein known to be recycled in the zebrafish EVL (Song et al., 2013), and that therefore can be used to provide some indication of recycling defects. We observed fragmented and reduced E-cadherin at cell-cell contacts in MZrab25b embryos, consistent with a potential recycling defect in mutant embryos. In support of this, we showed that accumulation of lyn-Egfp-positive cytoplasmic membrane compartments in mutant embryos was associated with reduced lyn-egfp fluorescence intensity at the plasma membrane, which could be indicative of reduced fusion of trapped vesicles with the plasma membrane as a consequence of recycling defects. Furthermore, large intracellular Rab11b aggregates shown in Figure 7D are consistent with defective recycling endosome trafficking pathways. These data, taken together with Rab25’s spatiotemporal overlap with Rab11 and the reported role of Rab25 in recycling in other systems, provide some evidence supporting a recycling defect. While we have not performed recycling assays, some of which are technically challenging to do in the zebrafish embryo, we have provided some support for our hypothesis. We make it clear in the text, that our data so far are suggestive but not conclusive of recycling defects in the mutants. We plan to perform FRAP analysis of plasma membrane proteins, including E-cadherin, to more directly address recycling in future studies, which have been delayed due to the pandemic.

6A. Could the authors examine the trafficking of membrane proteins involved in cytokinesis?

Currently, the molecular mechanisms of cytokinesis in zebrafish are not well understood. Thus, while we agree that identifying targets of Rab25 trafficking in cytokinesis is important, we suggest that it is beyond the scope of this manuscript and is something we plan to examine in future work.

6B. E-cadherin turn-over is required for cell morphology and cell migration in early zebrafish development. It seems to be worth investigating if the i.e., endocytosis phenotype they observe in MZRab25a/b (Figure 7) is linked to E-cadherin function as the E-cad/half baked mutant phenotype seems to be very similar concerning the EVL (Kane et al.2005).

See response to comment #5.

6C. Could they perform a recycling assay?

See response to comment #5.

[Editors' note: further revisions were suggested prior to acceptance, as described below.]

[…] The reviewers agree in that the manuscript has been significantly improved but there are remaining issues that need to be addressed, as outlined below:

1. The data presented in Figure 7 reporting the intracellular accumulation of Rab11 in rab25 mutants needs quantification to determine whether Rab11+ structures are increased, enlarged or altered in any way in the mutants.

We have now included this data in the section titled “MZrab25a and MZrab25b mutants exhibit endocytic trafficking defects”. We observed increased frequency of Rab11 positive endosomes in EVL cells of MZrab25b embryos (40% of cells, n=46/114, N=8) compared to WT (6% of cells, n=12/206, N=6). This is consistent with the excess of vesicles in MZrab25b embryos observed in Figure 7B, F. The size of Rab11 positive endosomes was also significantly increased in MZrab25b embryos, as shown in the quantification in figure 7—figure supplement 2. We previously observed fluorescently taggedRab25 constructs co-localizing with mCherry-Rab11a in the EVL (Figure 7A). Thus, defects in recycling endosome number and size is consistent with the observed subcellular localization of tagged-Rab25 in the EVL and Rab25’s association with REs in mammalian systems (Casanova et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2000).

2. Does E-Cadherin accumulate in Rab11 vesicles?

3. It is difficult to appreciate the altered pattern of E-Cadherin the authors describe for Supp. Figure 7. Please provide a clear and quantitative assessment of that phenotype or else remove the data from the manuscript as they currently do not seem to support the claims about it.

We agree with the reviewers that despite showing increased recycling endosome number and size, our experiments do not directly test whether there are recycling defects in the mutant embryos, which we will explore in future work. Accordingly, as suggested, we have removed the E-cadherin data and tempered our assertions about recycling defects throughout the text.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66060.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Patrick Morley Willoughby

    Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9051-8916
  2. Molly Allen

    Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Investigation, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2419-0000
  3. Jessica Yu

    1. Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Translational Biology and Engineering Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    2. Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Present address
    School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  4. Roman Korytnikov

    Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Investigation, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  5. Tianhui Chen

    Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Investigation, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2236-2224
  6. Yupeng Liu

    Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Investigation, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  7. Isis So

    Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Investigation, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6232-2644
  8. Neil Macpherson

    Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Investigation, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  9. Jennifer A Mitchell

    Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7147-4604
  10. Rodrigo Fernandez-Gonzalez

    1. Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    2. Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Translational Biology and Engineering Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    3. Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0770-744X
  11. Ashley EE Bruce

    Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing
    For correspondence
    ashley.bruce@utoronto.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0567-2928

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2018-04862)

  • Ashley EE Bruce

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (156279)

  • Rodrigo Fernandez-Gonzalez

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2020-05972)

  • Jennifer A Mitchell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Heidi Hehnly for the Rab11 constructs. We thank Curtis Boswell for technical advice. For helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript, we thank Rudi Winklbauer, Tony Harris, Vince Tropepe, Ulli Tepass and members of the Bruce lab.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines on the Care and Use of Fish in Research. All the animals were handled and maintained according to a protocol (Protocol Number: 20012462) approved by the Biological Sciences Local Animal Care Committee at the University of Toronto.

Senior Editor

  1. Didier YR Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany

Reviewing Editor

  1. Michel Bagnat, Duke University, United States

Reviewer

  1. Michel Bagnat, Duke University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: December 23, 2020
  2. Accepted: March 22, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 23, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 9, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Willoughby et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,391
    Page views
  • 157
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)