Endothelial junctional membrane protrusions serve as hotspots for neutrophil transmigration

  1. Janine JG Arts
  2. Eike K Mahlandt
  3. Max Grönloh
  4. Lilian Schimmel
  5. Ivar Noordstra
  6. Emma Gordon
  7. Abraham CI van Steen
  8. Simon Tol
  9. Barbara Walzog
  10. Jos van Rijssel
  11. Martijn A Nolte
  12. Marten Postma
  13. Satya Khuon
  14. John M Heddleston
  15. Eric Wait
  16. Teng Leong Chew
  17. Mark Winter
  18. Eloi Montanez
  19. Joachim Goedhart
  20. Jaap D van Buul  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Netherlands
  2. SILS/UvA, Netherlands
  3. Uppsala University, Sweden
  4. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
  5. Janelia Research Campus, United States
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  7. University of Haifa, Israel
  8. University of Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Upon inflammation, leukocytes rapidly transmigrate across the endothelium to enter the inflamed tissue. Evidence accumulates that leukocytes use preferred exit sites, though it is not yet clear how these hotspots in the endothelium are defined and how they are recognized by the leukocyte. Using lattice light sheet microscopy, we discovered that leukocytes prefer endothelial membrane protrusions at cell junctions for transmigration. Phenotypically, these junctional membrane protrusions are present in an asymmetric manner, meaning that one endothelial cell shows the protrusion and the adjacent one does not. Consequently, leukocytes cross the junction by migrating underneath the protruding endothelial cell. These protrusions depend on Rac1 activity and by using a photo-activatable Rac1 probe, we could artificially generate local exit-sites for leukocytes. Overall, we have discovered a new mechanism that uses local induced junctional membrane protrusions to facilitate/steer the leukocyte escape/exit from inflamed vessel walls.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files will be provided for Figures 4 and 6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Janine JG Arts

    Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Eike K Mahlandt

    Molecular Cytology, SILS/UvA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Max Grönloh

    Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0109-8225
  4. Lilian Schimmel

    Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0569-0464
  5. Ivar Noordstra

    Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Emma Gordon

    Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Abraham CI van Steen

    Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Simon Tol

    Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Barbara Walzog

    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg- Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jos van Rijssel

    Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8077-1371
  11. Martijn A Nolte

    Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Marten Postma

    Molecular Cytology, SILS/UvA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Satya Khuon

    Advanced Imaging Center, Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. John M Heddleston

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Eric Wait

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Teng Leong Chew

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Mark Winter

    Department of Marine Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1180-1957
  18. Eloi Montanez

    Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4059-5056
  19. Joachim Goedhart

    Molecular Cytology, SILS/UvA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0630-3825
  20. Jaap D van Buul

    Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    j.vanbuul@sanquin.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0054-7949

Funding

LSBR (1649)

  • Abraham CI van Steen

NWO-ZonMW Vici (91819632)

  • Max Grönloh
  • Jaap D van Buul

Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (PID2019-108902GB-I00)

  • Eloi Montanez

NWO ALW-OPEN (ALWOP.306)

  • Eike K Mahlandt

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 914/A02)

  • Barbara Walzog

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with German federal animal protection laws and were approved by the Bavarian Government (Regierung von Oberbayern, Munich, Germany)

Copyright

© 2021, Arts et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,995
    views
  • 417
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Janine JG Arts
  2. Eike K Mahlandt
  3. Max Grönloh
  4. Lilian Schimmel
  5. Ivar Noordstra
  6. Emma Gordon
  7. Abraham CI van Steen
  8. Simon Tol
  9. Barbara Walzog
  10. Jos van Rijssel
  11. Martijn A Nolte
  12. Marten Postma
  13. Satya Khuon
  14. John M Heddleston
  15. Eric Wait
  16. Teng Leong Chew
  17. Mark Winter
  18. Eloi Montanez
  19. Joachim Goedhart
  20. Jaap D van Buul
(2021)
Endothelial junctional membrane protrusions serve as hotspots for neutrophil transmigration
eLife 10:e66074.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66074

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66074

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Zewei Zhao, Longyun Hu ... Zhonghan Yang
    Research Article

    The induction of adipose thermogenesis plays a critical role in maintaining body temperature and improving metabolic homeostasis to combat obesity. β3-adrenoceptor (β3-AR) is widely recognized as a canonical β-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that plays a crucial role in mediating adipose thermogenesis in mice. Nonetheless, the limited expression of β3-AR in human adipocytes restricts its clinical application. The objective of this study was to identify a GPCR that is highly expressed in human adipocytes and to explore its potential involvement in adipose thermogenesis. Our research findings have demonstrated that the adhesion G-protein-coupled receptor A3 (ADGRA3), an orphan GPCR, plays a significant role in adipose thermogenesis through its constitutively active effects. ADGRA3 exhibited high expression levels in human adipocytes and mouse brown fat. Furthermore, the knockdown of Adgra3 resulted in an exacerbated obese phenotype and a reduction in the expression of thermogenic markers in mice. Conversely, Adgra3 overexpression activated the adipose thermogenic program and improved metabolic homeostasis in mice without exogenous ligand. We found that ADGRA3 facilitates the biogenesis of beige human or mouse adipocytes in vitro. Moreover, hesperetin was identified as a potential agonist of ADGRA3, capable of inducing adipocyte browning and ameliorating insulin resistance in mice. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the overexpression of constitutively active ADGRA3 or the activation of ADGRA3 by hesperetin can induce adipocyte browning by Gs-PKA-CREB axis. These findings indicate that the utilization of hesperetin and the selective overexpression of ADGRA3 in adipose tissue could serve as promising therapeutic strategies in the fight against obesity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bethany M Bartlett, Yatendra Kumar ... Wendy A Bickmore
    Research Article Updated

    During oncogene-induced senescence there are striking changes in the organisation of heterochromatin in the nucleus. This is accompanied by activation of a pro-inflammatory gene expression programme – the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) – driven by transcription factors such as NF-κB. The relationship between heterochromatin re-organisation and the SASP has been unclear. Here, we show that TPR, a protein of the nuclear pore complex basket required for heterochromatin re-organisation during senescence, is also required for the very early activation of NF-κB signalling during the stress-response phase of oncogene-induced senescence. This is prior to activation of the SASP and occurs without affecting NF-κB nuclear import. We show that TPR is required for the activation of innate immune signalling at these early stages of senescence and we link this to the formation of heterochromatin-enriched cytoplasmic chromatin fragments thought to bleb off from the nuclear periphery. We show that HMGA1 is also required for cytoplasmic chromatin fragment formation. Together these data suggest that re-organisation of heterochromatin is involved in altered structural integrity of the nuclear periphery during senescence, and that this can lead to activation of cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensing, NF-κB signalling, and activation of the SASP.