Evolution: Unraveling the history of limb bones
Ancient fossils give clues as to when features of modern tetrapod bones emerged.
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, United States
Any land creature with a backbone and four limbs is related to a fish that started to crawl over 360 million years ago (Niedźwiedzki et al., 2010). Since then, evolutionary processes have shaped this ancestor into a brethren of four-legged ‘tetrapods’, from frogs to lizards to your pet dog. The fossil record, and in particular limb bones, provide scant but tantalizing clues about the stepwise changes that helped the early descendants of this fish to acquire the traits which allowed them to become fully terrestrial 300 million years ago.
Limbs first evolved as a way to adapt to life in shallow waters, but they became a game changer for land travel (Ahlberg, 2018). Over time, they acquired characteristic features; for instance, in modern tetrapods, limb growth generally takes place in the metaphysis – the ‘neck’ area near the end of long bones, which hosts a mineralized region known as the growth plate. There, cartilage cells organize into calcified columns, forming a characteristic three-dimensional fan-like meshwork (Hall, 2005). Today, limb bones also serve additional roles. While fish create red blood cells in the liver and kidney for example, most current species of tetrapods carry out this process in the marrow of their long bones (Akiyoshi and Inoue, 2012). Now, in eLife, Sophie Sanchez and colleagues based at Uppsala University, the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Flinders University and Comenius University – including Jordi Estefa (Uppsala) as first author – report new insights into when these characteristics of limb bones emerged in tetrapods during the water-to-land transition (Estefa et al., 2021).
To explore how limb bones developed in early tetrapods, the team harnessed synchrotron micro-computed tomography, a technique that uses a high-powered particle beam scanner to virtually ‘slice’ up and image thin layers of fossilized bone. The resulting images are then stacked together using computer processing to produce a detailed three-dimensional model of the internal structure of the limb bone.
The analyses revealed that the fan-like structures that form the growth plate in the metaphysis were present both in the ancient amphibian Metoposaurus – which mainly lived in water – and two ‘amniote’ species, Seymouria and Discosauriscus, which could reproduce on land. This suggests that growing bone by calcifying cartilage columns is a process that appeared in earlier, water-bound tetrapods, and has a shared origin between amphibians and amniotes. The way that tetrapod limbs grow today was therefore already present in our earliest four-limbed ancestors, long before the transition to land (Figure 1).
Figure 1
How tetrapods acquired new bone characteristics as they transitioned from water to land.
(A) About 380 million years ago, lobe-finned tetrapods were still water-bound (top). Yet, lengthwise cross sections of their forelimb bones (bottom) show that they had already evolved limbs that elongate through calcified cartilage columns (dark blue) within the metaphysis – the area near the extremities of the bones that features a ‘growth plate’ formed of cartilage (light blue). Marrow processes — the blood vessels (red) between the mineralized columns in the growth plate — were also present at this stage. However they did not communicate freely with the open cavity inside the shaft. (B) Tetrapods that first ventured onto land 360 million years ago (top) also elongated their limbs at the growth plate. Their bones do show evidence of marrow processes occurring within the metaphysis (bottom), but they still produce red blood cells via their liver and kidney. Indeed, a trait necessary for red blood cell production in the bone is missing: the blood vessels of the marrow processes open into small connected cavities in the bone rather than communicating with the open marrow cavity. (C) Fully terrestrial tetrapods appeared 300 million years ago (top), and they retained the fan-like growth plate of their ancestors (bottom). However, the cavities within their bones indicate that the marrow processes were interconnected via blood vessels, and that they communicated with the bone marrow. This suggests that red blood cells were now produced within bone.
In most current tetrapods, the columns in the metaphysis host stem cell niches that produce the precursor cells which mature into red blood cells (Orkin and Zon, 2008). For this arrangement to work, the niches need to be connected to the primary blood vessels that invade the marrow cavity: this allows red blood cells to be released from the bone into the systemic circulation (Calvi et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2003; Tanaka, 1976). However, Estefa et al. found that in older, water-bound tetrapods, the spaces within columnar meshwork did not communicate with the bone marrow cavity. In fact, the earliest evidence of communication between these two structures was found in fully terrestrial tetrapods that could reproduce on land 300 million years ago. Crucially there was no evidence of this connection in tetrapods from 360 million years ago, even though these creatures could already explore land (Figure 1). Producing red blood cells inside the bone marrow was thought to be required for life out of water (e.g., Kapp et al., 2018), but these results indicate that this may not be the case. Instead, they suggest that bone marrow and red cell production appeared successively rather than simultaneously during evolution, even though these characteristics are intimately linked in tetrapods today.
Next, the team endeavors to discover exactly at what point the site of red blood cell production migrated to bone marrow – and why. If this event took place in the first tetrapods to explore land, then all their descendants could have inherited this trait. If the migration happened later, when terrestrial tetrapods had already started to occupy distinct habitats, then red blood cell production in bone marrow may have evolved several times independently. Finally, pinning down when or in which taxon red blood cell production first relocated to the marrow will help to understand the environmental or biological factors that triggered this migration. In turn, this could shed light on the subsequent biological innovations that became unlocked when red blood cells started to be produced inside bones.
References
-
Follow the footprints and mind the gaps: a new look at the origin of tetrapodsEarth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 109:115–137.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755691018000695
-
Architecture of the marrow vasculature in three amphibian species and its significance in hematopoietic developmentAmerican Journal of Anatomy 145:485–497.https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001450407
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2021, Woodward
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,688
- views
-
- 175
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Evolution: Unraveling the history of limb bones
eLife 10:e66506.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66506
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
A major question in animal evolution is how genotypic and phenotypic changes are related, and another is when and whether ancient gene order is conserved in living clades. Chitons, the molluscan class Polyplacophora, retain a body plan and general morphology apparently little changed since the Palaeozoic. We present a comparative analysis of five reference quality genomes, including four de novo assemblies, covering all major chiton clades, and an updated phylogeny for the phylum. We constructed 20 ancient molluscan linkage groups (MLGs) and show that these are relatively conserved in bivalve karyotypes, but in chitons they are subject to re-ordering, rearrangement, fusion, or partial duplication and vary even between congeneric species. The largest number of novel fusions is in the most plesiomorphic clade Lepidopleurida, and the chitonid Liolophura japonica has a partial genome duplication, extending the occurrence of large-scale gene duplication within Mollusca. The extreme and dynamic genome rearrangements in this class stands in contrast to most other animals, demonstrating that chitons have overcome evolutionary constraints acting on other animal groups. The apparently conservative phenome of chitons belies rapid and extensive changes in genome.
-
- Evolutionary Biology
Mammalian gut microbiomes are highly dynamic communities that shape and are shaped by host aging, including age-related changes to host immunity, metabolism, and behavior. As such, gut microbial composition may provide valuable information on host biological age. Here, we test this idea by creating a microbiome-based age predictor using 13,563 gut microbial profiles from 479 wild baboons collected over 14 years. The resulting ‘microbiome clock’ predicts host chronological age. Deviations from the clock’s predictions are linked to some demographic and socio-environmental factors that predict baboon health and survival: animals who appear old-for-age tend to be male, sampled in the dry season (for females), and have high social status (both sexes). However, an individual’s ‘microbiome age’ does not predict the attainment of developmental milestones or lifespan. Hence, in our host population, gut microbiome age largely reflects current, as opposed to past, social and environmental conditions, and does not predict the pace of host development or host mortality risk. We add to a growing understanding of how age is reflected in different host phenotypes and what forces modify biological age in primates.
