Integrative transcriptomic analysis of tissue-specific metabolic crosstalk after myocardial infarction

  1. Muhammad Arif
  2. Martina Klevstig
  3. Rui Benfeitas
  4. Stephen Doran
  5. Hasan Turkez
  6. Mathias Uhlén
  7. Maryam Clausen
  8. Johannes Wikström
  9. Damla Etal
  10. Cheng Zhang
  11. Malin Levin
  12. Adil Mardinoglu  Is a corresponding author
  13. Jan Boren  Is a corresponding author
  1. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
  2. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  3. KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
  4. King's College London, United Kingdom
  5. Atatürk University, Turkey
  6. AstraZeneca, Sweden

Abstract

Myocardial infarction (MI) promotes a range of systemic effects, many of which are unknown. Here, we investigated the alterations associated with MI progression in heart and other metabolically active tissues (liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose) in a mouse model of MI (induced by ligating the left ascending coronary artery) and sham-operated mice. We performed a genome-wide transcriptomic analysis on tissue samples obtained 6- and 24-hours post MI or sham operation. By generating tissue-specific biological networks, we observed: (1) dysregulation in multiple biological processes (including immune system, mitochondrial dysfunction, fatty-acid beta-oxidation, and RNA and protein processing) across multiple tissues post MI; and (2) tissue-specific dysregulation in biological processes in liver and heart post MI. Finally, we validated our findings in two independent MI cohorts. Overall, our integrative analysis highlighted both common and specific biological responses to MI across a range of metabolically active tissues.

Data availability

All raw RNA-sequencing data generated from this study can be accessed through accession number GSE153485.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Muhammad Arif

    Systems Biology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2261-0881
  2. Martina Klevstig

    Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Rui Benfeitas

    Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7972-0083
  4. Stephen Doran

    Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Hasan Turkez

    Department of Medical Biology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Mathias Uhlén

    Systems Biology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Maryam Clausen

    Discovery Sciences, Innovative Medicines and Early Development Biotech unit, AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden
    Competing interests
    Maryam Clausen, employee at AstraZeneca.
  8. Johannes Wikström

    Bioscience Cardiovascular, Research and Early Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism (CVRM), AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    Johannes Wikström, employee at AstraZeneca.
  9. Damla Etal

    Translational Genomics, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    Damla Etal, employee at AstraZeneca.
  10. Cheng Zhang

    Systems Biology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3721-8586
  11. Malin Levin

    Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Adil Mardinoglu

    Systems Biology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    For correspondence
    adil.mardinoglu@kcl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4254-6090
  13. Jan Boren

    Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    For correspondence
    Jan.Boren@wlab.gu.se
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse

  • Adil Mardinoglu
  • Jan Boren

Vetenskapsrådet

  • Jan Boren

Hjärt-Lungfonden

  • Jan Boren

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study were approved by the local animal ethics committee and conform to the guidelines from Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Copyright

© 2021, Arif et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,122
    views
  • 403
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Muhammad Arif
  2. Martina Klevstig
  3. Rui Benfeitas
  4. Stephen Doran
  5. Hasan Turkez
  6. Mathias Uhlén
  7. Maryam Clausen
  8. Johannes Wikström
  9. Damla Etal
  10. Cheng Zhang
  11. Malin Levin
  12. Adil Mardinoglu
  13. Jan Boren
(2021)
Integrative transcriptomic analysis of tissue-specific metabolic crosstalk after myocardial infarction
eLife 10:e66921.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66921

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66921

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jian Qiu, Margaritis Voliotis ... Martin J Kelly
    Research Article

    Hypothalamic kisspeptin (Kiss1) neurons are vital for pubertal development and reproduction. Arcuate nucleus Kiss1 (Kiss1ARH) neurons are responsible for the pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In females, the behavior of Kiss1ARH neurons, expressing Kiss1, neurokinin B (NKB), and dynorphin (Dyn), varies throughout the ovarian cycle. Studies indicate that 17β-estradiol (E2) reduces peptide expression but increases Slc17a6 (Vglut2) mRNA and glutamate neurotransmission in these neurons, suggesting a shift from peptidergic to glutamatergic signaling. To investigate this shift, we combined transcriptomics, electrophysiology, and mathematical modeling. Our results demonstrate that E2 treatment upregulates the mRNA expression of voltage-activated calcium channels, elevating the whole-cell calcium current that contributes to high-frequency burst firing. Additionally, E2 treatment decreased the mRNA levels of canonical transient receptor potential (TPRC) 5 and G protein-coupled K+ (GIRK) channels. When Trpc5 channels in Kiss1ARH neurons were deleted using CRISPR/SaCas9, the slow excitatory postsynaptic potential was eliminated. Our data enabled us to formulate a biophysically realistic mathematical model of Kiss1ARH neurons, suggesting that E2 modifies ionic conductances in these neurons, enabling the transition from high-frequency synchronous firing through NKB-driven activation of TRPC5 channels to a short bursting mode facilitating glutamate release. In a low E2 milieu, synchronous firing of Kiss1ARH neurons drives pulsatile release of GnRH, while the transition to burst firing with high, preovulatory levels of E2 would facilitate the GnRH surge through its glutamatergic synaptic connection to preoptic Kiss1 neurons.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    David B Blumenthal, Marta Lucchetta ... Martin H Schaefer
    Research Article

    Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study bias affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.