Integrative transcriptomic analysis of tissue-specific metabolic crosstalk after myocardial infarction

  1. Muhammad Arif
  2. Martina Klevstig
  3. Rui Benfeitas
  4. Stephen Doran
  5. Hasan Turkez
  6. Mathias Uhlén
  7. Maryam Clausen
  8. Johannes Wikström
  9. Damla Etal
  10. Cheng Zhang
  11. Malin Levin
  12. Adil Mardinoglu  Is a corresponding author
  13. Jan Boren  Is a corresponding author
  1. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
  2. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  3. KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
  4. King's College London, United Kingdom
  5. Atatürk University, Turkey
  6. AstraZeneca, Sweden

Abstract

Myocardial infarction (MI) promotes a range of systemic effects, many of which are unknown. Here, we investigated the alterations associated with MI progression in heart and other metabolically active tissues (liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose) in a mouse model of MI (induced by ligating the left ascending coronary artery) and sham-operated mice. We performed a genome-wide transcriptomic analysis on tissue samples obtained 6- and 24-hours post MI or sham operation. By generating tissue-specific biological networks, we observed: (1) dysregulation in multiple biological processes (including immune system, mitochondrial dysfunction, fatty-acid beta-oxidation, and RNA and protein processing) across multiple tissues post MI; and (2) tissue-specific dysregulation in biological processes in liver and heart post MI. Finally, we validated our findings in two independent MI cohorts. Overall, our integrative analysis highlighted both common and specific biological responses to MI across a range of metabolically active tissues.

Data availability

All raw RNA-sequencing data generated from this study can be accessed through accession number GSE153485.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Muhammad Arif

    Systems Biology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2261-0881
  2. Martina Klevstig

    Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Rui Benfeitas

    Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7972-0083
  4. Stephen Doran

    Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Hasan Turkez

    Department of Medical Biology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Mathias Uhlén

    Systems Biology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Maryam Clausen

    Discovery Sciences, Innovative Medicines and Early Development Biotech unit, AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden
    Competing interests
    Maryam Clausen, employee at AstraZeneca.
  8. Johannes Wikström

    Bioscience Cardiovascular, Research and Early Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism (CVRM), AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    Johannes Wikström, employee at AstraZeneca.
  9. Damla Etal

    Translational Genomics, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    Damla Etal, employee at AstraZeneca.
  10. Cheng Zhang

    Systems Biology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3721-8586
  11. Malin Levin

    Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Adil Mardinoglu

    Systems Biology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    For correspondence
    adil.mardinoglu@kcl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4254-6090
  13. Jan Boren

    Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    For correspondence
    Jan.Boren@wlab.gu.se
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse

  • Adil Mardinoglu
  • Jan Boren

Vetenskapsrådet

  • Jan Boren

Hjärt-Lungfonden

  • Jan Boren

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Edward D Janus, University of Melbourne, Australia

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study were approved by the local animal ethics committee and conform to the guidelines from Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Version history

  1. Received: January 26, 2021
  2. Accepted: April 25, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 11, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 8, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Arif et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,781
    views
  • 332
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Muhammad Arif
  2. Martina Klevstig
  3. Rui Benfeitas
  4. Stephen Doran
  5. Hasan Turkez
  6. Mathias Uhlén
  7. Maryam Clausen
  8. Johannes Wikström
  9. Damla Etal
  10. Cheng Zhang
  11. Malin Levin
  12. Adil Mardinoglu
  13. Jan Boren
(2021)
Integrative transcriptomic analysis of tissue-specific metabolic crosstalk after myocardial infarction
eLife 10:e66921.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66921

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66921

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Weichen Song, Yongyong Shi, Guan ning Lin
    Tools and Resources

    We propose a new framework for human genetic association studies: at each locus, a deep learning model (in this study, Sei) is used to calculate the functional genomic activity score for two haplotypes per individual. This score, defined as the Haplotype Function Score (HFS), replaces the original genotype in association studies. Applying the HFS framework to 14 complex traits in the UK Biobank, we identified 3619 independent HFS–trait associations with a significance of p < 5 × 10−8. Fine-mapping revealed 2699 causal associations, corresponding to a median increase of 63 causal findings per trait compared with single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based analysis. HFS-based enrichment analysis uncovered 727 pathway–trait associations and 153 tissue–trait associations with strong biological interpretability, including ‘circadian pathway-chronotype’ and ‘arachidonic acid-intelligence’. Lastly, we applied least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to integrate HFS prediction score with SNP-based polygenic risk scores, which showed an improvement of 16.1–39.8% in cross-ancestry polygenic prediction. We concluded that HFS is a promising strategy for understanding the genetic basis of human complex traits.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Qianmu Yuan, Chong Tian, Yuedong Yang
    Tools and Resources

    Revealing protein binding sites with other molecules, such as nucleic acids, peptides, or small ligands, sheds light on disease mechanism elucidation and novel drug design. With the explosive growth of proteins in sequence databases, how to accurately and efficiently identify these binding sites from sequences becomes essential. However, current methods mostly rely on expensive multiple sequence alignments or experimental protein structures, limiting their genome-scale applications. Besides, these methods haven’t fully explored the geometry of the protein structures. Here, we propose GPSite, a multi-task network for simultaneously predicting binding residues of DNA, RNA, peptide, protein, ATP, HEM, and metal ions on proteins. GPSite was trained on informative sequence embeddings and predicted structures from protein language models, while comprehensively extracting residual and relational geometric contexts in an end-to-end manner. Experiments demonstrate that GPSite substantially surpasses state-of-the-art sequence-based and structure-based approaches on various benchmark datasets, even when the structures are not well-predicted. The low computational cost of GPSite enables rapid genome-scale binding residue annotations for over 568,000 sequences, providing opportunities to unveil unexplored associations of binding sites with molecular functions, biological processes, and genetic variants. The GPSite webserver and annotation database can be freely accessed at https://bio-web1.nscc-gz.cn/app/GPSite.