Population receptive fields in non-human primates from whole-brain fMRI and large-scale neurophysiology in visual cortex

  1. Peter Christiaan Klink  Is a corresponding author
  2. Xing Chen
  3. Vim Vanduffel
  4. Pieter Roelfsema
  1. Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Netherlands
  2. KU Leuven Medical School, Belgium

Abstract

Population receptive field (pRF) modeling is a popular fMRI method to map the retinotopic organization of the human brain. While fMRI-based pRF-maps are qualitatively similar to invasively recorded single-cell receptive fields in animals, it remains unclear what neuronal signal they represent. We addressed this question in awake non-human primates comparing whole-brain fMRI and large-scale neurophysiological recordings in areas V1 and V4 of the visual cortex. We examined the fits of several pRF-models based on the fMRI BOLD-signal, multi-unit spiking activity (MUA) and local field potential (LFP) power in different frequency bands. We found that pRFs derived from BOLD-fMRI were most similar to MUA-pRFs in V1 and V4, while pRFs based on LFP gamma power also gave a good approximation. FMRI-based pRFs thus reliably reflect neuronal receptive field properties in the primate brain. In addition to our results in V1 and V4, the whole-brain fMRI measurements revealed retinotopic tuning in many other cortical and subcortical areas with a consistent increase in pRF-size with increasing eccentricity, as well as a retinotopically specific deactivation of default-mode network nodes similar to previous observations in humans.

Data availability

- All data and code are available on GIN: https://doi.org/10.12751/g-node.p8ypgv- Unthresholded fMRI model fitting results are available on Neurovault: https://identifiers.org/neurovault.collection:8082

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Peter Christiaan Klink

    Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    c.klink@nin.knaw.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6784-7842
  2. Xing Chen

    Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3589-1750
  3. Vim Vanduffel

    KU Leuven Medical School, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Pieter Roelfsema

    Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1625-0034

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (VENI 451.13.023)

  • Peter Christiaan Klink

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (STW-Perspectief P15-42 NESTOR"")

  • Xing Chen
  • Pieter Roelfsema

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (ERC 339490 Cortic_al_gorithms"")

  • Pieter Roelfsema

Human Brain Project ((agreements 720270 and 785907,Human Brain Project SGA1 and SGA2"")

  • Vim Vanduffel
  • Pieter Roelfsema

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Crossover Program 17619 INTENSE"")

  • Peter Christiaan Klink
  • Pieter Roelfsema

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Kristine Krug, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal care and experimental procedures were in accordance with the ILAR's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, the European legislation (Directive 2010/63/EU) and approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Central Authority for Scientific Procedures on Animals (CCD) in the Netherlands (License numbers AVD8010020173789 and AVD8010020171046).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: September 8, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: February 7, 2021
  3. Accepted: October 24, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 3, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: November 4, 2021 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: December 3, 2021 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2021, Klink et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,486
    views
  • 344
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Peter Christiaan Klink
  2. Xing Chen
  3. Vim Vanduffel
  4. Pieter Roelfsema
(2021)
Population receptive fields in non-human primates from whole-brain fMRI and large-scale neurophysiology in visual cortex
eLife 10:e67304.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67304

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67304

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Alyssa D Huff, Marlusa Karlen-Amarante ... Jan-Marino Ramirez
    Research Advance

    Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep-related breathing disorder that results in multiple bouts of intermittent hypoxia. OSA has many neurological and systemic comorbidities, including dysphagia, or disordered swallow, and discoordination with breathing. However, the mechanism in which chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) causes dysphagia is unknown. Recently, we showed the postinspiratory complex (PiCo) acts as an interface between the swallow pattern generator (SPG) and the inspiratory rhythm generator, the preBötzinger complex, to regulate proper swallow-breathing coordination (Huff et al., 2023). PiCo is characterized by interneurons co-expressing transporters for glutamate (Vglut2) and acetylcholine (ChAT). Here we show that optogenetic stimulation of ChATcre:Ai32, Vglut2cre:Ai32, and ChATcre:Vglut2FlpO:ChR2 mice exposed to CIH does not alter swallow-breathing coordination, but unexpectedly disrupts swallow behavior via triggering variable swallow motor patterns. This suggests that glutamatergic–cholinergic neurons in PiCo are not only critical for the regulation of swallow-breathing coordination, but also play an important role in the modulation of swallow motor patterning. Our study also suggests that swallow disruption, as seen in OSA, involves central nervous mechanisms interfering with swallow motor patterning and laryngeal activation. These findings are crucial for understanding the mechanisms underlying dysphagia, both in OSA and other breathing and neurological disorders.

    1. Neuroscience
    Vezha Boboeva, Alberto Pezzotta ... Athena Akrami
    Research Article

    The central tendency bias, or contraction bias, is a phenomenon where the judgment of the magnitude of items held in working memory appears to be biased toward the average of past observations. It is assumed to be an optimal strategy by the brain and commonly thought of as an expression of the brain’s ability to learn the statistical structure of sensory input. On the other hand, recency biases such as serial dependence are also commonly observed and are thought to reflect the content of working memory. Recent results from an auditory delayed comparison task in rats suggest that both biases may be more related than previously thought: when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) was silenced, both short-term and contraction biases were reduced. By proposing a model of the circuit that may be involved in generating the behavior, we show that a volatile working memory content susceptible to shifting to the past sensory experience – producing short-term sensory history biases – naturally leads to contraction bias. The errors, occurring at the level of individual trials, are sampled from the full distribution of the stimuli and are not due to a gradual shift of the memory toward the sensory distribution’s mean. Our results are consistent with a broad set of behavioral findings and provide predictions of performance across different stimulus distributions and timings, delay intervals, as well as neuronal dynamics in putative working memory areas. Finally, we validate our model by performing a set of human psychophysics experiments of an auditory parametric working memory task.