Cdc4 phospho-degrons allow differential regulation of Ame1CENP-U protein stability across the cell cycle

  1. Miriam Böhm
  2. Kerstin Killinger
  3. Alexander Dudziak
  4. Pradeep Pant
  5. Karolin Jänen
  6. Simone Hohoff
  7. Karl Mechtler
  8. Mihkel Örd
  9. Mart Loog
  10. Elsa Sanchez-Garcia
  11. Stefan Westermann  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
  2. Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Austria
  3. University of Tartu, Estonia

Abstract

Kinetochores are multi-subunit protein assemblies that link chromosomes to microtubules of the mitotic and meiotic spindle. It is still poorly understood how efficient, centromere-dependent kinetochore assembly is accomplished from hundreds of individual protein building blocks in a cell cycle dependent manner. Here, by combining comprehensive phosphorylation analysis of native Ctf19CCAN subunits with biochemical and functional assays in the model system budding yeast, we demonstrate that Cdk1 phosphorylation activates phospho-degrons on the essential subunit Ame1CENP-U which are recognized by the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex SCF-Cdc4. Gradual phosphorylation of degron motifs culminates in M-Phase and targets the protein for degradation. Binding of the Mtw1Mis12 complex shields the proximal phospho-degron, protecting kinetochore-bound Ame1 from the degradation machinery. Artificially increasing degron strength partially suppresses the temperature-sensitivity of a cdc4 mutant, while overexpression of Ame1-Okp1 is toxic in SCF mutants, demonstrating the physiological importance of this mechanism. We propose that phospho-regulated clearance of excess CCAN subunits facilitates efficient centromere-dependent kinetochore assembly. Our results suggest a novel strategy for how phospho-degrons can be used to regulate the assembly of multi-subunit complexes.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Miriam Böhm

    Molecular Genetics I, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6054-1912
  2. Kerstin Killinger

    Molecular Genetics I, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexander Dudziak

    Molecular Genetics I, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5082-3468
  4. Pradeep Pant

    Computational Biochemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3890-1958
  5. Karolin Jänen

    Molecular Genetics I, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Simone Hohoff

    Molecular Genetics I, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Karl Mechtler

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mihkel Örd

    Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Mart Loog

    Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Elsa Sanchez-Garcia

    Computational Biochemisty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9211-5803
  11. Stefan Westermann

    Molecular Genetics I, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    For correspondence
    Stefan.Westermann@uni-due.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6921-9113

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WE-2886/2)

  • Miriam Böhm
  • Stefan Westermann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC1093)

  • Elsa Sanchez-Garcia
  • Stefan Westermann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC1430)

  • Elsa Sanchez-Garcia
  • Stefan Westermann

H2020 European Research Council (ERC consolidator grant 649124)

  • Mart Loog

Estonian Science Agency (Grant PRG550)

  • Mart Loog

Centre of Excellence for Molecular Cell Technologies (TK143)

  • Mart Loog

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Silke Hauf, Virginia Tech, United States

Version history

  1. Received: February 9, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: February 16, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: July 24, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 26, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 5, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Böhm et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,095
    views
  • 153
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Miriam Böhm
  2. Kerstin Killinger
  3. Alexander Dudziak
  4. Pradeep Pant
  5. Karolin Jänen
  6. Simone Hohoff
  7. Karl Mechtler
  8. Mihkel Örd
  9. Mart Loog
  10. Elsa Sanchez-Garcia
  11. Stefan Westermann
(2021)
Cdc4 phospho-degrons allow differential regulation of Ame1CENP-U protein stability across the cell cycle
eLife 10:e67390.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67390

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67390

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Lucie Crhak Khaitova, Pavlina Mikulkova ... Karel Riha
    Research Article

    Heat stress is a major threat to global crop production, and understanding its impact on plant fertility is crucial for developing climate-resilient crops. Despite the known negative effects of heat stress on plant reproduction, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of elevated temperature on centromere structure and chromosome segregation during meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Consistent with previous studies, heat stress leads to a decline in fertility and micronuclei formation in pollen mother cells. Our results reveal that elevated temperature causes a decrease in the amount of centromeric histone and the kinetochore protein BMF1 at meiotic centromeres with increasing temperature. Furthermore, we show that heat stress increases the duration of meiotic divisions and prolongs the activity of the spindle assembly checkpoint during meiosis I, indicating an impaired efficiency of the kinetochore attachments to spindle microtubules. Our analysis of mutants with reduced levels of centromeric histone suggests that weakened centromeres sensitize plants to elevated temperature, resulting in meiotic defects and reduced fertility even at moderate temperatures. These results indicate that the structure and functionality of meiotic centromeres in Arabidopsis are highly sensitive to heat stress, and suggest that centromeres and kinetochores may represent a critical bottleneck in plant adaptation to increasing temperatures.