rβ2-subunit alternative splicing stabilizes Cav2.3 Ca2+ channel activity during continuous midbrain dopamine neuron-like activity

Abstract

In dopaminergic (DA) substantia nigra (SN) neurons Cav2.3 R-type Ca2+-currents contribute to somatodendritic Ca2+-oscillations. This activity may contribute to the selective degeneration of these neurons in Parkinson's disease (PD) since Cav2.3-knockout is neuroprotective in a PD mouse model. Here we show that in tsA-201-cells the membrane-anchored β2-splice variants β2a and β2e are required to stabilize Cav2.3 gating properties allowing sustained Cav2.3 availability during simulated pacemaking and enhanced Ca2+-currents during bursts. We confirmed the expression of β2a- and β2e-subunit transcripts in the mouse SN and in identified SN DA neurons. Patch-clamp recordings of mouse DA midbrain neurons in culture and SN DA neurons in brain slices revealed SNX-482-sensitive R-type Ca2+-currents with voltage-dependent gating properties that suggest modulation by β2a- and/or β2e-subunits. Thus, β-subunit alternative splicing may prevent a fraction of Cav2.3 channels from inactivation in continuously active, highly vulnerable SN DA neurons, thereby also supporting Ca2+ signals contributing to the (patho)physiological role of Cav2.3 channels in PD.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Raw data have been provided for mean population data shown in Figures and Tables.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anita Siller

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nadja T Hofer

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Giulia Tomagra

    Department of Drug Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nicole Wiederspohn

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Simon Hess

    Institute for Zoology, Biocenter, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Julia Benkert

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Aisylu Gaifullina

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Desiree Spaich

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Johanna Duda

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Christina Poetschke

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Kristina Vilusic

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Eva Maria Fritz

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Toni Schneider

    Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Peter Kloppenburg

    Institute for Zoology, Biocenter, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4554-404X
  15. Birgit Liss

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Valentina Carabelli

    Department of Drug Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Emilio Carbone

    Department of Drug Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2239-6280
  18. Nadine Jasmin Ortner

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    nadine.ortner@uibk.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Jörg Striessnig

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    joerg.striessnig@uibk.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9406-7120

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (P27809,P35722,CavX-DOC 30 doc.fund)

  • Jörg Striessnig

Tyrolean Science Fund (UNI-0404/2345)

  • Nadine Jasmin Ortner

Italian Miur (2015FNWP34)

  • Emilio Carbone

Compagnia di San Paolo (CSTO165284)

  • Emilio Carbone

Austrian Science Fund (P35087)

  • Nadine Jasmin Ortner

Hamburg Institute for Advanced Study (Research Fellowship)

  • Birgit Liss

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments and procedures were performed in strict accordance with the European Community's Council Directive 2010/63/UE and approved by the Italian Ministry of Health and the Local Organism responsible for animal welfare at the University of Torino (authorization DGSAF 0011710-P-26/07/2017) and the local authorities at the University of Ulm (Regierungspräsidium Tübingen, Ref: 35/9185.81-3; Reg. Nr. o.147) and University of Cologne (LANUV NRW, Recklinghausen, Germany (84-02.05.20.12.254).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Henry M Colecraft, Columbia University, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: February 10, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: February 11, 2021
  3. Accepted: July 4, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 6, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: July 8, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: July 22, 2022 (version 3)
  7. Version of Record updated: July 27, 2022 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2022, Siller et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,068
    Page views
  • 311
    Downloads
  • 7
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anita Siller
  2. Nadja T Hofer
  3. Giulia Tomagra
  4. Nicole Wiederspohn
  5. Simon Hess
  6. Julia Benkert
  7. Aisylu Gaifullina
  8. Desiree Spaich
  9. Johanna Duda
  10. Christina Poetschke
  11. Kristina Vilusic
  12. Eva Maria Fritz
  13. Toni Schneider
  14. Peter Kloppenburg
  15. Birgit Liss
  16. Valentina Carabelli
  17. Emilio Carbone
  18. Nadine Jasmin Ortner
  19. Jörg Striessnig
(2022)
rβ2-subunit alternative splicing stabilizes Cav2.3 Ca2+ channel activity during continuous midbrain dopamine neuron-like activity
eLife 11:e67464.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67464

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67464

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Athina Keramidioti, Sandra Schneid ... Charles N David
    Research Article

    The Hydra nervous system is the paradigm of a ‘simple nerve net’. Nerve cells in Hydra, as in many cnidarian polyps, are organized in a nerve net extending throughout the body column. This nerve net is required for control of spontaneous behavior: elimination of nerve cells leads to polyps that do not move and are incapable of capturing and ingesting prey (Campbell, 1976). We have re-examined the structure of the Hydra nerve net by immunostaining fixed polyps with a novel antibody that stains all nerve cells in Hydra. Confocal imaging shows that there are two distinct nerve nets, one in the ectoderm and one in the endoderm, with the unexpected absence of nerve cells in the endoderm of the tentacles. The nerve nets in the ectoderm and endoderm do not contact each other. High-resolution TEM (transmission electron microscopy) and serial block face SEM (scanning electron microscopy) show that the nerve nets consist of bundles of parallel overlapping neurites. Results from transgenic lines show that neurite bundles include different neural circuits and hence that neurites in bundles require circuit-specific recognition. Nerve cell-specific innexins indicate that gap junctions can provide this specificity. The occurrence of bundles of neurites supports a model for continuous growth and differentiation of the nerve net by lateral addition of new nerve cells to the existing net. This model was confirmed by tracking newly differentiated nerve cells.

    1. Neuroscience
    Anna-Maria Grob, Hendrik Heinbockel ... Lars Schwabe
    Research Article

    Maintaining an accurate model of the world relies on our ability to update memory representations in light of new information. Previous research on the integration of new information into memory mainly focused on the hippocampus. Here, we hypothesized that the angular gyrus, known to be involved in episodic memory and imagination, plays a pivotal role in the insight-driven reconfiguration of memory representations. To test this hypothesis, participants received continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the left angular gyrus or sham stimulation before gaining insight into the relationship between previously separate life-like animated events in a narrative-insight task. During this task, participants also underwent EEG recording and their memory for linked and non-linked events was assessed shortly thereafter. Our results show that cTBS to the angular gyrus decreased memory for the linking events and reduced the memory advantage for linked relative to non-linked events. At the neural level, cTBS targeting the angular gyrus reduced centro-temporal coupling with frontal regions and abolished insight-induced neural representational changes for events linked via imagination, indicating impaired memory reconfiguration. Further, the cTBS group showed representational changes for non-linked events that resembled the patterns observed in the sham group for the linked events, suggesting failed pruning of the narrative in memory. Together, our findings demonstrate a causal role of the left angular gyrus in insight-related memory reconfigurations.