β2-subunit alternative splicing stabilizes Cav2.3 Ca2+ channel activity during continuous midbrain dopamine neuron-like activity

Abstract

In dopaminergic (DA) substantia nigra (SN) neurons Cav2.3 R-type Ca2+-currents contribute to somatodendritic Ca2+-oscillations. This activity may contribute to the selective degeneration of these neurons in Parkinson's disease (PD) since Cav2.3-knockout is neuroprotective in a PD mouse model. Here we show that in tsA-201-cells the membrane-anchored β2-splice variants β2a and β2e are required to stabilize Cav2.3 gating properties allowing sustained Cav2.3 availability during simulated pacemaking and enhanced Ca2+-currents during bursts. We confirmed the expression of β2a- and β2e-subunit transcripts in the mouse SN and in identified SN DA neurons. Patch-clamp recordings of mouse DA midbrain neurons in culture and SN DA neurons in brain slices revealed SNX-482-sensitive R-type Ca2+-currents with voltage-dependent gating properties that suggest modulation by β2a- and/or β2e-subunits. Thus, β-subunit alternative splicing may prevent a fraction of Cav2.3 channels from inactivation in continuously active, highly vulnerable SN DA neurons, thereby also supporting Ca2+ signals contributing to the (patho)physiological role of Cav2.3 channels in PD.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Raw data have been provided for mean population data shown in Figures and Tables.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anita Siller

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nadja T Hofer

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Giulia Tomagra

    Department of Drug Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nicole Wiederspohn

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Simon Hess

    Institute for Zoology, Biocenter, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Julia Benkert

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Aisylu Gaifullina

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Desiree Spaich

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Johanna Duda

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Christina Poetschke

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Kristina Vilusic

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Eva Maria Fritz

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Toni Schneider

    Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Peter Kloppenburg

    Institute for Zoology, Biocenter, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4554-404X
  15. Birgit Liss

    Institute of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Valentina Carabelli

    Department of Drug Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Emilio Carbone

    Department of Drug Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2239-6280
  18. Nadine Jasmin Ortner

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    nadine.ortner@uibk.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Jörg Striessnig

    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    joerg.striessnig@uibk.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9406-7120

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (P27809,P35722,CavX-DOC 30 doc.fund)

  • Jörg Striessnig

Tyrolean Science Fund (UNI-0404/2345)

  • Nadine Jasmin Ortner

Italian Miur (2015FNWP34)

  • Emilio Carbone

Compagnia di San Paolo (CSTO165284)

  • Emilio Carbone

Austrian Science Fund (P35087)

  • Nadine Jasmin Ortner

Hamburg Institute for Advanced Study (Research Fellowship)

  • Birgit Liss

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments and procedures were performed in strict accordance with the European Community's Council Directive 2010/63/UE and approved by the Italian Ministry of Health and the Local Organism responsible for animal welfare at the University of Torino (authorization DGSAF 0011710-P-26/07/2017) and the local authorities at the University of Ulm (Regierungspräsidium Tübingen, Ref: 35/9185.81-3; Reg. Nr. o.147) and University of Cologne (LANUV NRW, Recklinghausen, Germany (84-02.05.20.12.254).

Copyright

© 2022, Siller et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,320
    views
  • 353
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67464

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    J Daniel Obray, Erik T Wilkes ... L Judson Chandler
    Research Article

    Binge drinking is common among adolescents despite mounting evidence linking it to various adverse health outcomes that include heightened pain perception. The prelimbic (PrL) cortex is vulnerable to insult from adolescent alcohol exposure and receives input from the basolateral amygdala (BLA) while sending projections to the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) – two brain regions implicated in nociception. In this study, adolescent intermittent ethanol (AIE) exposure was carried out in male and female rats using a vapor inhalation procedure. Assessments of mechanical and thermal sensitivity revealed that AIE exposure-induced protracted mechanical allodynia. To investigate synaptic function at BLA inputs onto defined populations of PrL neurons, retrobeads and viral labeling were combined with optogenetics and slice electrophysiology. Recordings from retrobead labeled cells in the PrL revealed AIE reduced BLA-driven feedforward inhibition of neurons projecting from the PrL to the vlPAG, resulting in augmented excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance and increased intrinsic excitability. Consistent with this finding, recordings from virally tagged PrL parvalbumin interneurons (PVINs) demonstrated that AIE exposure reduced both E/I balance at BLA inputs onto PVINs and PVIN intrinsic excitability. These findings provide compelling evidence that AIE alters synaptic function and intrinsic excitability within a prefrontal nociceptive circuit.

    1. Neuroscience
    Tao He, Xizi Gong ... Fang Fang
    Research Article

    The ability of cortical circuits to adapt in response to experience is a fundamental property of the brain. After exposure to a moving dot sequence, flashing a dot as a cue at the starting point of the sequence can elicit successive elevated responses even in the absence of the sequence. These cue-triggered elevated responses have been shown to play a crucial role in predicting future events in dynamic environments. However, temporal sequences we are exposed to typically contain rich feature information. It remains unknown whether the elevated responses are feature-specific and, more crucially, how the brain organizes sequence information after exposure. To address these questions, participants were exposed to a predefined sequence of four motion directions for about 30 min, followed by the presentation of the start or end motion direction of the sequence as a cue. Surprisingly, we found that cue-triggered elevated responses were not specific to any motion direction. Interestingly, motion direction information was spontaneously reactivated, and the motion sequence was backward replayed in a time-compressed manner. These effects were observed even after brief exposure. Notably, no replay events were observed when the second or third motion direction of the sequence served as a cue. Further analyses revealed that activity in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) preceded the ripple power increase in visual cortex at the onset of replay, implying a coordinated relationship between the activities in the MTL and visual cortex. Together, these findings demonstrate that visual sequence exposure induces twofold brain plasticity that may simultaneously serve for different functional purposes. The non-feature-specific elevated responses may facilitate general processing of upcoming stimuli, whereas the feature-specific backward replay may underpin passive learning of visual sequences.