Two different cell-cycle processes determine the timing of cell division in Escherichia coli

  1. Alexandra Colin
  2. Gabriele Micali
  3. Louis Faure
  4. Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino  Is a corresponding author
  5. Sven van Teeffelen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut Pasteur, France
  2. ETH Zürich, Switzerland
  3. Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  4. IFOM Foundation and University of Milan, Italy
  5. Université de Montréal, Canada

Abstract

Cells must control the cell cycle to ensure that key processes are brought to completion. In Escherichia coli, it is controversial whether cell division is tied to chromosome replication or to a replication-independent inter-division process. A recent model suggests instead that both processes may limit cell division with comparable odds in single cells. Here, we tested this possibility experimentally by monitoring single-cell division and replication over multiple generations at slow growth. We then perturbed cell width, causing an increase of the time between replication termination and division. As a consequence, replication became decreasingly limiting for cell division, while correlations between birth and division and between subsequent replication-initiation events were maintained. Our experiments support the hypothesis that both chromosome replication and a replication-independent inter-division process can limit cell division: the two processes have balanced contributions in non-perturbed cells, while our width perturbations increase the odds of the replication-independent process being limiting.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in supplemental datasets provided for each figure. Average quantities and sample sizes for each biological replicate can be found in Supplementary file 1. Supplementary file 2 contains all single-cell data used in this study.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexandra Colin

    Microbial Morphogenesis and Growth Laboratory, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9144-3282
  2. Gabriele Micali

    Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Louis Faure

    Department of Neuro-Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4621-586X
  4. Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino

    Quantitative Biology and Physics, IFOM Foundation and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
    For correspondence
    marco.cosentino-lagomarsino@ifom.eu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0235-0445
  5. Sven van Teeffelen

    Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
    For correspondence
    sven.vanteeffelen@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0877-1294

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (679980)

  • Sven van Teeffelen

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID)

  • Sven van Teeffelen

Mairie de Paris Emergence program

  • Sven van Teeffelen

Volkswagen Foundation Life program

  • Sven van Teeffelen

Italian Association for Cancer Research AIRC-IG (23258)

  • Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino

National Science Foundationce Foundation (310030_188642)

  • Gabriele Micali

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Colin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,222
    views
  • 403
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexandra Colin
  2. Gabriele Micali
  3. Louis Faure
  4. Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino
  5. Sven van Teeffelen
(2021)
Two different cell-cycle processes determine the timing of cell division in Escherichia coli
eLife 10:e67495.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67495

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67495

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Ecology
    Lenore Pipes, Rasmus Nielsen
    Tools and Resources

    Environmental DNA (eDNA) is becoming an increasingly important tool in diverse scientific fields from ecological biomonitoring to wastewater surveillance of viruses. The fundamental challenge in eDNA analyses has been the bioinformatical assignment of reads to taxonomic groups. It has long been known that full probabilistic methods for phylogenetic assignment are preferable, but unfortunately, such methods are computationally intensive and are typically inapplicable to modern Next-Generation Sequencing data. We here present a fast approximate likelihood method for phylogenetic assignment of DNA sequences. Applying the new method to several mock communities and simulated datasets, we show that it identifies more reads at both high and low taxonomic levels more accurately than other leading methods. The advantage of the method is particularly apparent in the presence of polymorphisms and/or sequencing errors and when the true species is not represented in the reference database.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Natanael Spisak, Gabriel Athènes ... Aleksandra M Walczak
    Tools and Resources

    B-cell repertoires are characterized by a diverse set of receptors of distinct specificities generated through two processes of somatic diversification: V(D)J recombination and somatic hypermutations. B cell clonal families stem from the same V(D)J recombination event, but differ in their hypermutations. Clonal families identification is key to understanding B-cell repertoire function, evolution and dynamics. We present HILARy (High-precision Inference of Lineages in Antibody Repertoires), an efficient, fast and precise method to identify clonal families from single- or paired-chain repertoire sequencing datasets. HILARy combines probabilistic models that capture the receptor generation and selection statistics with adapted clustering methods to achieve consistently high inference accuracy. It automatically leverages the phylogenetic signal of shared mutations in difficult repertoire subsets. Exploiting the high sensitivity of the method, we find the statistics of evolutionary properties such as the site frequency spectrum and 𝑑𝑁∕𝑑𝑆 ratio do not depend on the junction length. We also identify a broad range of selection pressures spanning two orders of magnitude.