The cooperative binding of TDP-43 to GU-rich RNA repeats antagonizes TDP-43 aggregation

  1. Juan Carlos Rengifo-Gonzalez
  2. Krystel El Hage
  3. Marie-Jeanne Clément
  4. Emilie Steiner
  5. Vandana Joshi
  6. Pierrick Craveur
  7. Dominique Durand
  8. David Pastré  Is a corresponding author
  9. Ahmed Bouhss  Is a corresponding author
  1. Université Evry-val-d'Essonne, France
  2. Genopole, France
  3. université Evry, France
  4. INSERM, France
  5. Synsight company, France
  6. Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule, France
  7. CNRS, France

Abstract

TDP-43 is a nuclear RNA-binding protein that forms neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions in two major neurodegenerative diseases, ALS and FTLD. While the self-assembly of TDP-43 by its structured N-terminal and intrinsically disordered C-terminal domains has been widely studied, the mechanism by which mRNA preserves TDP-43 solubility in the nucleus has not been addressed. Here, we demonstrate that tandem RNA Recognition Motifs of TDP-43 bind to long GU-repeats in a cooperative manner through intermolecular interactions. Moreover, using mutants whose cooperativity is impaired, we found that the cooperative binding of TDP-43 to mRNA may be critical to maintain the solubility of TDP-43 in the nucleus and the miscibility of TDP-43 in cytoplasmic stress granules. We anticipate that the knowledge of a higher order assembly of TDP-43 on mRNA may clarify its role in intron processing and provide a means of interfering with the cytoplasmic aggregation of TDP-43.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Juan Carlos Rengifo-Gonzalez

    SABNP, Université Evry-val-d'Essonne, Evry, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Krystel El Hage

    SABNP, Genopole, Evry, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marie-Jeanne Clément

    SABNP, Université Evry-val-d'Essonne, Evry, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Emilie Steiner

    laboratoire structure activité des biomolécules normales et pathologiques, université Evry, Evry, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Vandana Joshi

    laboratoire structure activité des biomolécules normales et pathologiques, INSERM, Evry, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Pierrick Craveur

    SABNP, Synsight company, Evry, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Dominique Durand

    UMR 9198, Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule, ORSAY, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9414-5857
  8. David Pastré

    SABNP, Université Evry-val-d'Essonne, Evry, France
    For correspondence
    david.pastre@univ-evry.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Ahmed Bouhss

    91, CNRS, Evry, France
    For correspondence
    ahmed.bouhss@univ-evry.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6492-1429

Funding

Genopole (SATURNE 2018-SABNP)

  • Ahmed Bouhss

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Rengifo-Gonzalez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,547
    views
  • 745
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Juan Carlos Rengifo-Gonzalez
  2. Krystel El Hage
  3. Marie-Jeanne Clément
  4. Emilie Steiner
  5. Vandana Joshi
  6. Pierrick Craveur
  7. Dominique Durand
  8. David Pastré
  9. Ahmed Bouhss
(2021)
The cooperative binding of TDP-43 to GU-rich RNA repeats antagonizes TDP-43 aggregation
eLife 10:e67605.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67605

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67605

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marina Dajka, Tobias Rath ... Benesh Joseph
    Research Article

    Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) confer resistance against harsh conditions, including antibiotics, in Gram-negative bacteria. The lipopolysaccharide transport (Lpt) complex, consisting of seven proteins (A-G), exports LPS across the cellular envelope. LptB2FG forms an ATP-binding cassette transporter that transfers LPS to LptC. How LptB2FG couples ATP binding and hydrolysis with LPS transport to LptC remains unclear. We observed the conformational heterogeneity of LptB2FG and LptB2FGC in micelles and/or proteoliposomes using pulsed dipolar electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Additionally, we monitored LPS binding and release using laser-induced liquid bead ion desorption mass spectrometry. The β-jellyroll domain of LptF stably interacts with the LptG and LptC β-jellyrolls in both the apo and vanadate-trapped states. ATP binding at the cytoplasmic side is allosterically coupled to the selective opening of the periplasmic LptF β-jellyroll domain. In LptB2FG, ATP binding closes the nucleotide binding domains, causing a collapse of the first lateral gate as observed in structures. However, the second lateral gate, which forms the putative entry site for LPS, exhibits a heterogeneous conformation. LptC binding limits the flexibility of this gate to two conformations, likely representing the helix of LptC as either released from or inserted into the transmembrane domains. Our results reveal the regulation of the LPS entry gate through the dynamic behavior of the LptC transmembrane helix, while its β-jellyroll domain is anchored in the periplasm. This, combined with long-range ATP-dependent allosteric gating of the LptF β-jellyroll domain, may ensure efficient and unidirectional transport of LPS across the periplasm.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Jaskamaljot Kaur Banwait, Liana Islam, Aaron L Lucius
    Research Article

    Escherichia coli ClpB and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp104 are AAA+ motor proteins essential for proteome maintenance and thermal tolerance. ClpB and Hsp104 have been proposed to extract a polypeptide from an aggregate and processively translocate the chain through the axial channel of its hexameric ring structure. However, the mechanism of translocation and if this reaction is processive remains disputed. We reported that Hsp104 and ClpB are non-processive on unfolded model substrates. Others have reported that ClpB is able to processively translocate a mechanically unfolded polypeptide chain at rates over 240 amino acids (aa) per second. Here, we report the development of a single turnover stopped-flow fluorescence strategy that reports on processive protein unfolding catalyzed by ClpB. We show that when translocation catalyzed by ClpB is challenged by stably folded protein structure, the motor enzymatically unfolds the substrate at a rate of ~0.9 aa s−1 with a kinetic step-size of ~60 amino acids at sub-saturating [ATP]. We reconcile the apparent controversy by defining enzyme catalyzed protein unfolding and translocation as two distinct reactions with different mechanisms of action. We propose a model where slow unfolding followed by fast translocation represents an important mechanistic feature that allows the motor to rapidly translocate up to the next folded region or rapidly dissociate if no additional fold is encountered.