Flagella: A new kind of beat
Many organisms – ranging from single-cell protists to humans – rely on microscopic hair-like structures called cilia and flagella to perform a wide range of roles. In the human respiratory system, for example, large numbers of cilia work ceaselessly to remove dirt and pathogens from the lungs and airways (Sims et al., 2005): sometimes they move backwards and forwards in the plane, and sometimes they follow a more complicated trajectory (Figure 1A). Flagella are typically larger than cilia, and many single-cell organisms rely on the whip-like beating motion of flagella to propel them through the water in which they live.

Beating motion of flagella and cilia.
(A) Cilia and flagella stir fluid by moving back and forth in their own plane (top), or in a rotary fashion (bottom). (B) The flagella of single-celled organisms exhibit diverse beat patterns, sometimes on the same cell. For example, dinoflagellates have a transverse flagellum (red) which loops around the cell’s circumference and propagates helicoidal waves, and a longitudinal flagellum which moves back and forth behind the cell. (C) The alga Euglena gracilis has one short flagellum (inside the cell body), and one long flagellum, which contains a core axoneme (white) and a paraflagellar rod (lattice pattern). When the two incompatible structures ‘glue’ together via bonding links (right side image), this creates a mechanical frustration that forces both structures to bend together. As a result, the flagellum bends out of the plane and generates a lasso-like motion which pulls the alga along a helical path.
At the centre of most cilia and flagella is a structure called an axoneme, which consists of two central microtubules inside a circle formed of nine pairs of microtubules. Motor proteins, such as dynein, are able to bind to the microtubules and produce forces that cause the axoneme – and therefore the cilium or flagellum itself – to bend. A combination of mechanical feedback and active signalling coordinates the actions of the motor proteins, and through them, the overal pattern of the beating motion. Different organisms rely on different variations of this basic mechanism, with the greatest variety being found in protists (presumably because one billion years of evolution has provided them with ample opportunity to evolve highly-specialised adaptations to many environmental niches).
Single-celled organisms can have multiple flagella that can differ (sometimes dramatically) in length and/or shape, and even beat at different frequencies (Figure 1B). For example, an alga called Euglena gracilis has two flagella, including one that whirls around like a propeller or lasso in front of the cell and pulls it through the water along a helical path (Leedale et al., 1965). Many protists use this universal strategy to scan their environment (Cortese and Wan, 2021), but the mechanism underlying the lasso-like motion of flagella in Euglena has remained a mystery. Now, in eLife, Giancarlo Cicconofri, Giovanni Noselli and Antonio DeSimone – who are based at the Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numèrics a l’Enginyeria, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna – report how interactions between the axoneme and an unusual structure called the paraflagellar rod may be responsible (Cicconofri et al., 2021). The paraflagellar rod is only found in certain protist groups, where it runs parallel to the axoneme and has a similar diameter (Figure 1C). Moreover, it attaches to specific locations on the axoneme via elastic bonding links, which suggests that it has a role in motility (Melkonian et al., 1982).
Cicconofri et al. developed a detailed mathematical model of the flagellum that replicated the contrasting physical properties of the paraflagellar rod and axoneme. The model showed that when the paraflagellar rod and axoneme ‘glue’ together to form a single structure, the resulting mechanical frustration can cause the axoneme to bend out of plane (Figure 1C). The researchers then go on to show that when dynein motor proteins move in a way that causes a simple planar motion in the absence of the paraflagellar rod, this instead generates a three-dimensional lasso-like motion and helical swimming when the axoneme and paraflagellar rod are glued together. By uncovering a connection between the paraflagellar rod and flagellar motility, Cicconofri et al. may have arrived at a general principle for the generation of complex spatiotemporal dynamics: keeping the underlying control principles simple and harnessing mismatched mechanical properties.
Plants also exploit this approach to achieve surprising levels of speed and agility. For instance, the hair-like awn of Erodium plant seeds are wrapped in stiff cellulose fibres arranged in a tilted helical pattern, which help disperse the seed by uncoiling and coiling the awn in response to humidity (Geer et al., 2020). A similar intimate coupling exists between the internal flagellum and cell body of some spirochaete bacteria, which gives the bacteria their helical shape and determines their movement and virulence (Dombrowski et al., 2009).
Like many other single-celled organisms, Euglena swim along helical paths to scan their local environment (Rossi et al., 2017). In the case of Euglena this is augmented with photoreception, so that the alga can navigate efficiently towards or away from light for photosynthesis. It is possible that the paraflagellar rod can actively deform and alter the beat pattern of the flagellum based on light intensity (Piccinni, 1975), perhaps in combination with a photoreceptor located at its base (Rosati et al., 1991). The mathematical model developed by Cicconofri et al. could be used to test this hypothesis.
Major open questions still remain, such as how and when the paraflagellar rod evolved, and whether it arose in a similar way in different species (Lukes et al., 2009)? For example, the paraflagellar rod is also found in closely-related organisms called kinetoplastids, which includes several parasitic flagellates that cause infectious diseases in humans. Euglena is a useful and versatile model system for answering these questions. The curious features that Euglena and other single-celled organisms evolved over billions of years could be applied to the generation of intelligent materials in soft robotics. This goes to show that no matter whether you are a mathematician or a biologist, nature continues to inspire.
References
-
Control of helical navigation by three-dimensional flagellar beatingPhysical Review Letters 126:088003.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.088003
-
The elastic basis for the shape of Borrelia burgdorferiBiophysical Journal 96:4409–4417.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.066
-
Pneumatic coiling actuator inspired by the awns of Erodium cicutariumFrontiers in Robotics and AI 7:17.https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00017
-
Structure and physiology of Euglena spirogyra III-VIArchiv für Mikrobiologie 50:133–155.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00409124
-
Flagellar membrane specializations and their relationship to mastigonemes and microtubules in Euglena gracilisJournal of Cell Science 55:115–135.
-
ATPase activity in flagella from Euglena gracilis localization of the enzyme and effects of detergentsThe Journal of Protozoology 22:331–335.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1975.tb05182.x
-
Ultrastructure of the apical zone of Euglena gracilis: photoreceptors and motor apparatusElectron Microscopy Reviews 4:319–342.https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-0354(91)90008-Z
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2021, Wan
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,626
- views
-
- 142
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Physics of Living Systems
In social behavior research, the focus often remains on animal dyads, limiting the understanding of complex interactions. Recent trends favor naturalistic setups, offering unique insights into intricate social behaviors. Social behavior stems from chance, individual preferences, and group dynamics, necessitating high-resolution quantitative measurements and statistical modeling. This study leverages the Eco-HAB system, an automated experimental setup that employs radiofrequency identification tracking to observe naturally formed mouse cohorts in a controlled yet naturalistic setting, and uses statistical inference models to decipher rules governing the collective dynamics of groups of 10–15 individuals. Applying maximum entropy models on the coarse-grained co-localization patterns of mice unveils social rules in mouse hordes, quantifying sociability through pairwise interactions within groups, the impact of individual versus social preferences, and the effects of considering interaction structures among three animals instead of two. Reproducing co-localization patterns of individual mice reveals stability over time, with the statistics of the inferred interaction strength capturing social structure. By separating interactions from individual preferences, the study demonstrates that altering neuronal plasticity in the prelimbic cortex – the brain structure crucial for sociability – does not eliminate signatures of social interactions, but makes the transmission of social information between mice more challenging. The study demonstrates how the joint probability distribution of the mice positions can be used to quantify sociability.
-
- Physics of Living Systems
Chromosome structure is complex, and many aspects of chromosome organization are still not understood. Measuring the stiffness of chromosomes offers valuable insight into their structural properties. In this study, we analyzed the stiffness of chromosomes from metaphase I (MI) and metaphase II (MII) oocytes. Our results revealed a tenfold increase in stiffness (Young’s modulus) of MI chromosomes compared to somatic chromosomes. Furthermore, the stiffness of MII chromosomes was found to be lower than that of MI chromosomes. We examined the role of meiosis-specific cohesin complexes in regulating chromosome stiffness. Surprisingly, the stiffness of chromosomes from three meiosis-specific cohesin mutants did not significantly differ from that of wild-type chromosomes, indicating that these cohesins may not be primary determinants of chromosome stiffness. Additionally, our findings revealed an age-related increase of chromosome stiffness for MI oocytes. Since aging is associated with elevated levels of DNA damage, we investigated the impact of etoposide-induced DNA damage on chromosome stiffness and found that it led to a reduction in stiffness in MI oocytes. Overall, our study underscores the dynamic and cyclical nature of chromosome stiffness, modulated by both the cell cycle and age-related factors.