UBTD1 regulates ceramide balance and endolysosomal positioning to coordinate EGFR signaling

  1. Stéphanie Torrino  Is a corresponding author
  2. Victor Tiroille
  3. Bastien Dolfi
  4. Maeva Dufies
  5. Charlotte Hinault
  6. Laurent Bonesso
  7. Sonia Dagnino
  8. Jennifer Uhler
  9. Marie Irondelle
  10. Anne-sophie Gay
  11. Lucile Fleuriot
  12. Delphine Debayle
  13. Sandra Lacas-Gervais
  14. Mireille Cormont
  15. Thomas Bertero
  16. Frederic Bost
  17. Jerome Gilleron
  18. Stephan Clavel  Is a corresponding author
  1. IPMC, France
  2. C3M, France
  3. Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco
  4. CHU, France
  5. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  6. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  7. UFR Sciences, Université Côte d'Azur, France

Abstract

To adapt in an ever-changing environment, cells must integrate physical and chemical signals and translate them into biological meaningful information through complex signaling pathways. By combining lipidomic and proteomic approaches with functional analysis, we have shown that UBTD1 (Ubiquitin domain-containing protein 1) plays a crucial role in both the EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) self-phosphorylation and its lysosomal degradation. On the one hand, by modulating the cellular level of ceramides through ASAH1 (N-Acylsphingosine Amidohydrolase 1) ubiquitination, UBTD1 controls the ligand-independent phosphorylation of EGFR. On the other hand, UBTD1, via the ubiquitination of SQSTM1/p62 (Sequestosome 1) by RNF26 and endolysosome positioning, participates in the lysosomal degradation of EGFR. The coordination of these two ubiquitin-dependent processes contributes to the control of the duration of the EGFR signal. Moreover, we showed that UBTD1 depletion exacerbates EGFR signaling and induces cell proliferation emphasizing a hitherto unknown function of UBTD1 in EGFR-driven human cell proliferation.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Stéphanie Torrino

    CNRS, IPMC, VALBONNE, France
    For correspondence
    stephanie.torrino@unice.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8280-5907
  2. Victor Tiroille

    INSERM, C3M, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bastien Dolfi

    INSERM, C3M, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Maeva Dufies

    Biomedical Department, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1732-0388
  5. Charlotte Hinault

    INSERM, C3M, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Laurent Bonesso

    Biochemistry Laboratory, CHU, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sonia Dagnino

    MRC-PHE Centre for Environment & Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6846-7190
  8. Jennifer Uhler

    Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marie Irondelle

    INSERM, C3M, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Anne-sophie Gay

    CNRS, IPMC, VALBONNE, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Lucile Fleuriot

    CNRS, IPMC, VALBONNE, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Delphine Debayle

    CNRS, IPMC, VALBONNE, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2807-9198
  13. Sandra Lacas-Gervais

    CCMA, UFR Sciences, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Mireille Cormont

    INSERM, C3M, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Thomas Bertero

    CNRS, IPMC, VALBONNE, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Frederic Bost

    INSERM, C3M, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4509-4701
  17. Jerome Gilleron

    INSERM, C3M, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Stephan Clavel

    INSERM, C3M, Nice, France
    For correspondence
    Stephan.CLAVEL@univ-cotedazur.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-IDEX-01)

  • Stephan Clavel

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR18-CE14-0035-01-GILLERON)

  • Jerome Gilleron

Fondation de France

  • Stéphanie Torrino

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Roger J Davis, University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States

Version history

  1. Received: March 12, 2021
  2. Accepted: April 20, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 22, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 13, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Torrino et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,114
    views
  • 230
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Stéphanie Torrino
  2. Victor Tiroille
  3. Bastien Dolfi
  4. Maeva Dufies
  5. Charlotte Hinault
  6. Laurent Bonesso
  7. Sonia Dagnino
  8. Jennifer Uhler
  9. Marie Irondelle
  10. Anne-sophie Gay
  11. Lucile Fleuriot
  12. Delphine Debayle
  13. Sandra Lacas-Gervais
  14. Mireille Cormont
  15. Thomas Bertero
  16. Frederic Bost
  17. Jerome Gilleron
  18. Stephan Clavel
(2021)
UBTD1 regulates ceramide balance and endolysosomal positioning to coordinate EGFR signaling
eLife 10:e68348.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68348

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68348

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Yangzi Zhao, Lijun Ren ... Zhukuan Cheng
    Research Article

    Cohesin is a multi-subunit protein that plays a pivotal role in holding sister chromatids together during cell division. Sister chromatid cohesion 3 (SCC3), constituents of cohesin complex, is highly conserved from yeast to mammals. Since the deletion of individual cohesin subunit always causes lethality, it is difficult to dissect its biological function in both mitosis and meiosis. Here, we obtained scc3 weak mutants using CRISPR-Cas9 system to explore its function during rice mitosis and meiosis. The scc3 weak mutants displayed obvious vegetative defects and complete sterility, underscoring the essential roles of SCC3 in both mitosis and meiosis. SCC3 is localized on chromatin from interphase to prometaphase in mitosis. However, in meiosis, SCC3 acts as an axial element during early prophase I and subsequently situates onto centromeric regions following the disassembly of the synaptonemal complex. The loading of SCC3 onto meiotic chromosomes depends on REC8. scc3 shows severe defects in homologous pairing and synapsis. Consequently, SCC3 functions as an axial element that is essential for maintaining homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis during meiosis.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Ivan Castello-Serrano, Frederick A Heberle ... Ilya Levental
    Research Article

    The organelles of eukaryotic cells maintain distinct protein and lipid compositions required for their specific functions. The mechanisms by which many of these components are sorted to their specific locations remain unknown. While some motifs mediating subcellular protein localization have been identified, many membrane proteins and most membrane lipids lack known sorting determinants. A putative mechanism for sorting of membrane components is based on membrane domains known as lipid rafts, which are laterally segregated nanoscopic assemblies of specific lipids and proteins. To assess the role of such domains in the secretory pathway, we applied a robust tool for synchronized secretory protein traffic (RUSH, Retention Using Selective Hooks) to protein constructs with defined affinity for raft phases. These constructs consist solely of single-pass transmembrane domains (TMDs) and, lacking other sorting determinants, constitute probes for membrane domain-mediated trafficking. We find that while raft affinity can be sufficient for steady-state PM localization, it is not sufficient for rapid exit from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which is instead mediated by a short cytosolic peptide motif. In contrast, we find that Golgi exit kinetics are highly dependent on raft affinity, with raft preferring probes exiting the Golgi ~2.5-fold faster than probes with minimal raft affinity. We rationalize these observations with a kinetic model of secretory trafficking, wherein Golgi export can be facilitated by protein association with raft domains. These observations support a role for raft-like membrane domains in the secretory pathway and establish an experimental paradigm for dissecting its underlying machinery.