Preexisting memory CD4 T cells in naïve individuals confer robust immunity upon hepatitis B vaccination

  1. George Elias  Is a corresponding author
  2. Pieter Meysman
  3. Esther Bartholomeus
  4. Nicolas De Neuter
  5. Nina Keersmaekers
  6. Arvid Suls
  7. Hilde Jansens
  8. Aisha Souquette
  9. Hans De Reu
  10. Marie-Paule Emonds
  11. Evelien Smits
  12. Eva Lion
  13. Paul G Thomas
  14. Geert Mortier
  15. Pierre Van Damme
  16. Philippe Beutels
  17. Kris Laukens
  18. Viggo Van Tendeloo
  19. Benson Ogunjimi
  1. University of Antwerp, Belgium
  2. Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium
  3. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
  4. Rode Kruis-Vlaanderen, Belgium
  5. Johnson and Johnson, Belgium

Abstract

Antigen recognition through the T cell receptor (TCR) αβ heterodimer is one of the primary determinants of the adaptive immune response. Vaccines activate naïve T cells with high specificity to expand and differentiate into memory T cells. However, antigen-specific memory CD4 T cells exist in unexposed antigen-naïve hosts. In this study, we use high-throughput sequencing of memory CD4 TCRβ repertoire and machine learning to show that individuals with preexisting vaccine-reactive memory CD4 T cell clonotypes elicited earlier and higher antibody titers and mounted a more robust CD4 T cell response to hepatitis B vaccine. In addition, integration of TCRβ sequence patterns into a hepatitis B epitope-specific annotation model can predict which individuals will have an early and more vigorous vaccine-elicited immunity. Thus, the presence of preexisting memory T cell clonotypes has a significant impact on immunity and can be used to predict immune responses to vaccination.

Data availability

The sequencing data that support the findings of this study have been deposited on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3989144).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. George Elias

    Laboratory of Experimental Hematology (LEH), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    For correspondence
    igeorgeelias@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8419-9544
  2. Pieter Meysman

    Biomedical Informatics Research Network Antwerp, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5903-633X
  3. Esther Bartholomeus

    Department of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Nicolas De Neuter

    Antwerp Unit for Data Analysis and Computation in Immunology and Sequencing, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6011-6457
  5. Nina Keersmaekers

    Centre for Health Economics Research & Modeling Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Arvid Suls

    Antwerp Unit for Data Analysis and Computation in Immunology and Sequencing, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Hilde Jansens

    Department of Clinical Microbiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Aisha Souquette

    Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Hans De Reu

    Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Marie-Paule Emonds

    Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Rode Kruis-Vlaanderen, Mechelen, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Evelien Smits

    Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Eva Lion

    Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Paul G Thomas

    Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Geert Mortier

    Antwerp Unit for Data Analysis and Computation in Immunology and Sequencing, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Pierre Van Damme

    Antwerp Unit for Data Analysis and Computation in Immunology and Sequencing, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Philippe Beutels

    Antwerp Unit for Data Analysis and Computation in Immunology and Sequencing, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Kris Laukens

    Antwerp Unit for Data Analysis and Computation in Immunology and Sequencing, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Viggo Van Tendeloo

    Janssen Research and Development, Immunosciences WWDA, Johnson and Johnson, Beerse, Belgium
    Competing interests
    Viggo Van Tendeloo, is an employee of Johnson & Johnson since 1/11/2019 and remains currently employed at the University of Antwerp.
  19. Benson Ogunjimi

    Antwerp Unit for Data Analysis and Computation in Immunology and Sequencing, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0831-2063

Funding

University of Antwerp

  • George Elias
  • Esther Bartholomeus
  • Nicolas De Neuter

Research Foundation Flanders

  • Pieter Meysman
  • Kris Laukens
  • Benson Ogunjimi

American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities

  • Aisha Souquette
  • Paul G Thomas

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

  • Aisha Souquette
  • Paul G Thomas

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Armita Nourmohammad, University of Washington, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: Protocols involving the use of human tissues were approved by the Ethics Committee of Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp (Antwerp, Belgium), and all of the experiments were performed in accordance with the protocols

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: August 25, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: March 14, 2021
  3. Accepted: January 7, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 25, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: January 26, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: February 8, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Elias et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,985
    views
  • 300
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. George Elias
  2. Pieter Meysman
  3. Esther Bartholomeus
  4. Nicolas De Neuter
  5. Nina Keersmaekers
  6. Arvid Suls
  7. Hilde Jansens
  8. Aisha Souquette
  9. Hans De Reu
  10. Marie-Paule Emonds
  11. Evelien Smits
  12. Eva Lion
  13. Paul G Thomas
  14. Geert Mortier
  15. Pierre Van Damme
  16. Philippe Beutels
  17. Kris Laukens
  18. Viggo Van Tendeloo
  19. Benson Ogunjimi
(2022)
Preexisting memory CD4 T cells in naïve individuals confer robust immunity upon hepatitis B vaccination
eLife 11:e68388.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68388

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68388

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.