Correlative all-optical quantification of mass density and mechanics of sub-cellular compartments with fluorescence specificity

  1. Raimund Schlüßler  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kyoohyun Kim  Is a corresponding author
  3. Martin Nötzel
  4. Anna Taubenberger
  5. Shada Abuhattum
  6. Timon Beck
  7. Paul Müller
  8. Shovamaye Maharana
  9. Gheorghe Cojoc
  10. Salvatore Girardo
  11. Andreas Hermann
  12. Simon Alberti
  13. Jochen Guck  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Germany
  3. University of Rostock, Germany

Abstract

Quantitative measurements of physical parameters become increasingly important for understanding biological processes. Brillouin microscopy (BM) has recently emerged as one technique providing the 3D distribution of viscoelastic properties inside biological samples - so far relying on the implicit assumption that refractive index (RI) and density can be neglected. Here, we present a novel method (FOB microscopy) combining BM with optical diffraction tomography and epi-fluorescence imaging for explicitly measuring the Brillouin shift, RI and absolute density with specificity to fluorescently labeled structures. We show that neglecting the RI and density might lead to erroneous conclusions. Investigating the nucleoplasm of wild-type HeLa cells, we find that it has lower density but higher longitudinal modulus than the cytoplasm. Thus, the longitudinal modulus is not merely sensitive to the water content of the sample - a postulate vividly discussed in the field. We demonstrate the further utility of FOB on various biological systems including adipocytes and intracellular membraneless compartments. FOB microscopy can provide unexpected scientific discoveries and shed quantitative light on processes such as phase separation and transition inside living cells.

Data availability

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from figshare under the following link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5347778

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Raimund Schlüßler

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    raimund.schluessler@tu-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3752-2382
  2. Kyoohyun Kim

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    kyoohyun.kim@mpl.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1808-775X
  3. Martin Nötzel

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6442-9899
  4. Anna Taubenberger

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Shada Abuhattum

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Timon Beck

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Paul Müller

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shovamaye Maharana

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Gheorghe Cojoc

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Salvatore Girardo

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Andreas Hermann

    Translational Neurodegeneration Section 'Albrecht Kossel', University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7364-7791
  12. Simon Alberti

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4017-6505
  13. Jochen Guck

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    jochen.guck@mpl.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (419138906)

  • Simon Alberti
  • Jochen Guck

Volkswagen Foundation (92847)

  • Simon Alberti
  • Jochen Guck

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

  • Jochen Guck

NOMIS Stiftung

  • Andreas Hermann

Hermann und Lilly Schilling-Stiftung

  • Andreas Hermann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Schlüßler et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,692
    views
  • 493
    downloads
  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Raimund Schlüßler
  2. Kyoohyun Kim
  3. Martin Nötzel
  4. Anna Taubenberger
  5. Shada Abuhattum
  6. Timon Beck
  7. Paul Müller
  8. Shovamaye Maharana
  9. Gheorghe Cojoc
  10. Salvatore Girardo
  11. Andreas Hermann
  12. Simon Alberti
  13. Jochen Guck
(2022)
Correlative all-optical quantification of mass density and mechanics of sub-cellular compartments with fluorescence specificity
eLife 11:e68490.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68490

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68490

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Mitsuhiro Abe, Masataka Yanagawa ... Yasushi Sako
    Research Article

    Anionic lipid molecules, including phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2), are implicated in the regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, the role of the spatiotemporal dynamics of PI(4,5)P2 in the regulation of EGFR activity in living cells is not fully understood, as it is difficult to visualize the local lipid domains around EGFR. Here, we visualized both EGFR and PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains in the plasma membrane of HeLa cells using super-resolution single-molecule microscopy. The EGFR and PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains aggregated before stimulation with epidermal growth factor (EGF) through transient visits of EGFR to the PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains. The degree of coaggregation decreased after EGF stimulation and depended on phospholipase Cγ, the EGFR effector hydrolyzing PI(4,5)P2. Artificial reduction in the PI(4,5)P2 content of the plasma membrane reduced both the dimerization and autophosphorylation of EGFR after stimulation with EGF. Inhibition of PI(4,5)P2 hydrolysis after EGF stimulation decreased phosphorylation of EGFR-Thr654. Thus, EGFR kinase activity and the density of PI(4,5)P2 around EGFR molecules were found to be mutually regulated.

    1. Cell Biology
    Wonjo Jang, Kanishka Senarath ... Nevin A Lambert
    Tools and Resources

    Classical G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling takes place in response to extracellular stimuli and involves receptors and heterotrimeric G proteins located at the plasma membrane. It has recently been established that GPCR signaling can also take place from intracellular membrane compartments, including endosomes that contain internalized receptors and ligands. While the mechanisms of GPCR endocytosis are well understood, it is not clear how well internalized receptors are supplied with G proteins. To address this gap, we use gene editing, confocal microscopy, and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to study the distribution and trafficking of endogenous G proteins. We show here that constitutive endocytosis is sufficient to supply newly internalized endocytic vesicles with 20–30% of the G protein density found at the plasma membrane. We find that G proteins are present on early, late, and recycling endosomes, are abundant on lysosomes, but are virtually undetectable on the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and the medial-trans Golgi apparatus. Receptor activation does not change heterotrimer abundance on endosomes. Our findings provide a subcellular map of endogenous G protein distribution, suggest that G proteins may be partially excluded from nascent endocytic vesicles, and are likely to have implications for GPCR signaling from endosomes and other intracellular compartments.