Correlative all-optical quantification of mass density and mechanics of sub-cellular compartments with fluorescence specificity

  1. Raimund Schlüßler  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kyoohyun Kim  Is a corresponding author
  3. Martin Nötzel
  4. Anna Taubenberger
  5. Shada Abuhattum
  6. Timon Beck
  7. Paul Müller
  8. Shovamaye Maharana
  9. Gheorghe Cojoc
  10. Salvatore Girardo
  11. Andreas Hermann
  12. Simon Alberti
  13. Jochen Guck  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Germany
  3. University of Rostock, Germany

Abstract

Quantitative measurements of physical parameters become increasingly important for understanding biological processes. Brillouin microscopy (BM) has recently emerged as one technique providing the 3D distribution of viscoelastic properties inside biological samples - so far relying on the implicit assumption that refractive index (RI) and density can be neglected. Here, we present a novel method (FOB microscopy) combining BM with optical diffraction tomography and epi-fluorescence imaging for explicitly measuring the Brillouin shift, RI and absolute density with specificity to fluorescently labeled structures. We show that neglecting the RI and density might lead to erroneous conclusions. Investigating the nucleoplasm of wild-type HeLa cells, we find that it has lower density but higher longitudinal modulus than the cytoplasm. Thus, the longitudinal modulus is not merely sensitive to the water content of the sample - a postulate vividly discussed in the field. We demonstrate the further utility of FOB on various biological systems including adipocytes and intracellular membraneless compartments. FOB microscopy can provide unexpected scientific discoveries and shed quantitative light on processes such as phase separation and transition inside living cells.

Data availability

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from figshare under the following link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5347778

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Raimund Schlüßler

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    raimund.schluessler@tu-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3752-2382
  2. Kyoohyun Kim

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    kyoohyun.kim@mpl.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1808-775X
  3. Martin Nötzel

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6442-9899
  4. Anna Taubenberger

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Shada Abuhattum

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Timon Beck

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Paul Müller

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shovamaye Maharana

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Gheorghe Cojoc

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Salvatore Girardo

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Andreas Hermann

    Translational Neurodegeneration Section 'Albrecht Kossel', University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7364-7791
  12. Simon Alberti

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4017-6505
  13. Jochen Guck

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    jochen.guck@mpl.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (419138906)

  • Simon Alberti
  • Jochen Guck

Volkswagen Foundation (92847)

  • Simon Alberti
  • Jochen Guck

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

  • Jochen Guck

NOMIS Stiftung

  • Andreas Hermann

Hermann und Lilly Schilling-Stiftung

  • Andreas Hermann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Rohit V Pappu, Washington University in St Louis, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: October 30, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: March 17, 2021
  3. Accepted: January 8, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 10, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 4, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Schlüßler et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,539
    views
  • 466
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Raimund Schlüßler
  2. Kyoohyun Kim
  3. Martin Nötzel
  4. Anna Taubenberger
  5. Shada Abuhattum
  6. Timon Beck
  7. Paul Müller
  8. Shovamaye Maharana
  9. Gheorghe Cojoc
  10. Salvatore Girardo
  11. Andreas Hermann
  12. Simon Alberti
  13. Jochen Guck
(2022)
Correlative all-optical quantification of mass density and mechanics of sub-cellular compartments with fluorescence specificity
eLife 11:e68490.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68490

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68490

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Camille Dantzer, Justine Vaché ... Violaine Moreau
    Research Article

    Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced encouraging results in cancer patients. However, the majority of ß-catenin-mutated tumors have been described as lacking immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy. The mechanisms by which oncogenic ß-catenin affects immune surveillance remain unclear. Herein, we highlighted the involvement of ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway and, by extension, in immune/cancer cell communication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses expression of SDC4 and RAB27A, two main actors in exosome biogenesis, in both liver cancer cell lines and HCC patient samples. Using nanoparticle tracking analysis and live-cell imaging, we further demonstrated that activated ß-catenin represses exosome release. Then, we demonstrated in 3D spheroid models that activation of β-catenin promotes a decrease in immune cell infiltration through a defect in exosome secretion. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that oncogenic ß-catenin plays a key role in exosome biogenesis. Our study gives new insight into the impact of ß-catenin mutations on tumor microenvironment remodeling, which could lead to the development of new strategies to enhance immunotherapeutic response.

    1. Cell Biology
    Zhongyun Xie, Yongping Chai ... Wei Li
    Research Article

    Asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs) generate two daughter cells with identical genetic information but distinct cell fates through epigenetic mechanisms. However, the process of partitioning different epigenetic information into daughter cells remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex is asymmetrically segregated into the surviving daughter cell rather than the apoptotic one during ACDs in Caenorhabditis elegans. The absence of NuRD triggers apoptosis via the EGL-1-CED-9-CED-4-CED-3 pathway, while an ectopic gain of NuRD enables apoptotic daughter cells to survive. We identify the vacuolar H+–adenosine triphosphatase (V-ATPase) complex as a crucial regulator of NuRD’s asymmetric segregation. V-ATPase interacts with NuRD and is asymmetrically segregated into the surviving daughter cell. Inhibition of V-ATPase disrupts cytosolic pH asymmetry and NuRD asymmetry. We suggest that asymmetric segregation of V-ATPase may cause distinct acidification levels in the two daughter cells, enabling asymmetric epigenetic inheritance that specifies their respective life-versus-death fates.