Structural insights into hormone recognition by the human glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor

  1. Fenghui Zhao
  2. Chao Zhang
  3. Qingtong Zhou
  4. Kaini Hang
  5. Xinyu Zou
  6. Yan Chen
  7. Fan Wu
  8. Qidi Rao
  9. Antao Dai
  10. Wanchao Yin
  11. Dan-Dan Shen
  12. Yan Zhang
  13. Tian Xia
  14. Raymond C Stevens
  15. Eric Xu  Is a corresponding author
  16. Dehua Yang  Is a corresponding author
  17. Lihua Zhao  Is a corresponding author
  18. Ming-Wei Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Fudan University, China
  2. ShanghaiTech University, China
  3. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
  4. Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, China
  5. Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China

Abstract

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a peptide hormone that exerts crucial metabolic functions by binding and activating its cognate receptor, GIPR. As an important therapeutic target, GIPR has been subjected to intensive structural studies without success. Here, we report the cryo-EM structure of the human GIPR in complex with GIP and a Gs heterotrimer at a global resolution of 2.9 Å. GIP adopts a single straight helix with its N terminus dipped into the receptor transmembrane domain (TMD), while the C-terminus is closely associated with the extracellular domain and extracellular loop 1. GIPR employs conserved residues in the lower half of the TMD pocket to recognize the common segments shared by GIP homologous peptides, while uses non-conserved residues in the upper half of the TMD pocket to interact with residues specific for GIP. These results provide a structural framework of hormone recognition and GIPR activation.

Data availability

Atomic coordinates of the GIP-GIPR-Gs complex have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 7DTY and Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) accession code EMD-30860.All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figure 2, Figure 1-figure supplement 1 and Figure 4-figure supplement 4.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Fenghui Zhao

    School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chao Zhang

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Qingtong Zhou

    School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kaini Hang

    School of Life Science and Technology,, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xinyu Zou

    School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yan Chen

    School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fan Wu

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Qidi Rao

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Antao Dai

    The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Wanchao Yin

    The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Dan-Dan Shen

    Department of Biophysics and Department of Pathology of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yan Zhang

    Department of Biophysics and Department of Pathology of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Tian Xia

    School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Raymond C Stevens

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Eric Xu

    The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    eric.xu@simm.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Dehua Yang

    The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    dhyang@simm.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3028-3243
  17. Lihua Zhao

    The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, China, China
    For correspondence
    zhaolihuawendy@simm.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Ming-Wei Wang

    The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    mwwang@simm.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6550-9017

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872915)

  • Ming-Wei Wang

Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2019SHZDZX02)

  • Eric Xu

Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB37030103)

  • Eric Xu

Shanghai Municipality Science and Technology Development Fund (18430711500)

  • Ming-Wei Wang

Novo Nordisk-CAS Research Fund (NNCAS-2017-1-CC)

  • Dehua Yang

Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation (18ZR1447800)

  • Dehua Yang

The Young Innovator Association of CAS (2018325)

  • Lihua Zhao

SA-SIBS Scholarship Program

  • Dehua Yang
  • Lihua Zhao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071203)

  • Lihua Zhao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773792)

  • Dehua Yang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973373)

  • Dehua Yang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (21704064)

  • Qingtong Zhou

National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2018ZX09735-001)

  • Ming-Wei Wang

National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2018ZX09711002-002-005)

  • Dehua Yang

National Key Basic Research Program of China (2018YFA0507000)

  • Ming-Wei Wang

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2018YFA0507002)

  • Eric Xu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. David Drew, Stockholm University, Sweden

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: March 19, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: March 24, 2021
  3. Accepted: July 6, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 13, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: July 22, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Zhao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,458
    views
  • 603
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Fenghui Zhao
  2. Chao Zhang
  3. Qingtong Zhou
  4. Kaini Hang
  5. Xinyu Zou
  6. Yan Chen
  7. Fan Wu
  8. Qidi Rao
  9. Antao Dai
  10. Wanchao Yin
  11. Dan-Dan Shen
  12. Yan Zhang
  13. Tian Xia
  14. Raymond C Stevens
  15. Eric Xu
  16. Dehua Yang
  17. Lihua Zhao
  18. Ming-Wei Wang
(2021)
Structural insights into hormone recognition by the human glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor
eLife 10:e68719.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68719

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68719

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marco van den Noort, Panagiotis Drougkas ... Bert Poolman
    Research Article

    Bacteria utilize various strategies to prevent internal dehydration during hypertonic stress. A common approach to countering the effects of the stress is to import compatible solutes such as glycine betaine, leading to simultaneous passive water fluxes following the osmotic gradient. OpuA from Lactococcus lactis is a type I ABC-importer that uses two substrate-binding domains (SBDs) to capture extracellular glycine betaine and deliver the substrate to the transmembrane domains for subsequent transport. OpuA senses osmotic stress via changes in the internal ionic strength and is furthermore regulated by the 2nd messenger cyclic-di-AMP. We now show, by means of solution-based single-molecule FRET and analysis with multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling, that the SBDs transiently interact in an ionic strength-dependent manner. The smFRET data are in accordance with the apparent cooperativity in transport and supported by new cryo-EM data of OpuA. We propose that the physical interactions between SBDs and cooperativity in substrate delivery are part of the transport mechanism.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Xiao-Ru Chen, Karuna Dixit ... Tatyana I Igumenova
    Research Article

    Regulated hydrolysis of the phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol(4,5)-bis-phosphate to diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-P3 defines a major eukaryotic pathway for translation of extracellular cues to intracellular signaling circuits. Members of the lipid-activated protein kinase C isoenzyme family (PKCs) play central roles in this signaling circuit. One of the regulatory mechanisms employed to downregulate stimulated PKC activity is via a proteasome-dependent degradation pathway that is potentiated by peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. Here, we show that contrary to prevailing models, Pin1 does not regulate conventional PKC isoforms α and βII via a canonical cis-trans isomerization of the peptidyl-prolyl bond. Rather, Pin1 acts as a PKC binding partner that controls PKC activity via sequestration of the C-terminal tail of the kinase. The high-resolution structure of full-length Pin1 complexed to the C-terminal tail of PKCβII reveals that a novel bivalent interaction mode underlies the non-catalytic mode of Pin1 action. Specifically, Pin1 adopts a conformation in which it uses the WW and PPIase domains to engage two conserved phosphorylated PKC motifs, the turn motif and hydrophobic motif, respectively. Hydrophobic motif is a non-canonical Pin1-interacting element. The structural information combined with the results of extensive binding studies and experiments in cultured cells suggest that non-catalytic mechanisms represent unappreciated modes of Pin1-mediated regulation of AGC kinases and other key enzymes/substrates.