Whole-organism 3D quantitative characterization of zebrafish melanin by silver deposition micro-CT
- Division of Experimental Pathology, Department of Pathology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, United States
- The Jake Gittlen Laboratories for Cancer Research, Penn State College of Medicine, United States
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Penn State College of Medicine, United States
- Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Labs, United States
- Mobile Imaging Innovations, Inc, United States
- Zebrafish Functional Genomics Core, Penn State College of Medicine, United States
Figures
Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Ionic silver stains reproduce three-dimensional (3D) pigmentation patterns in X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) images.
(A) Schematic overview of staining procedure. Ammoniacal silver solution reacts with endogenous melanin to deposit solid silver, which attenuates X-rays in micro-CT imaging. (B) A representative cropped and rotated slice of a micro-CT reconstruction of a 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) wild-type zebrafish stained with silver. RPE = retinal pigment epithelium, P = body pigment, L = lens, r = resin, it = inner wall of sample tube, ot = outer wall of sample tube, b = air bubble. (C) 3D rendering of a 5 dpf wild-type zebrafish stained with silver with a heatmap to illustrate pigment density throughout the fish. (D) Corresponding light microscopy (left) and micro-CT (right) images exhibit the same pigmentation patterns. In the micro-CT image, a top-down 3D rendering of stained melanin is shown in grayscale with the dorsal-most melanin digitally colored red to aid comparison with the light micrograph. Some distinguishing shared features are highlighted with colored arrowheads. White arrows indicate deeper melanin obscured by soft tissue in the light micrograph that can be visualized by targeted 3D re-rendering. Scale bars = 200 µm. Unstained samples do not exhibit melanin-related attenuation (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Unstained zebrafish larvae do not exhibit pigment pattern intensity in X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) reconstructions.
A pigmented 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) wild-type larva (A) was prepared for micro-CT imaging without silver staining. (B) The sample (black arrowhead), embedded in resin within a polyimide tube, was surrounded by electrical tape to ensure proper positioning in the X-ray beam. (C) A 200-slice average intensity projection of the normalized micro-CT reconstruction from this unstained sample shows faint attenuation in the lenses (L) and at the edges of the eyes (white arrowheads), indicating that the sample was scanned. A 900-pixel × 25-pixel selection (yellow box) transecting the eyes was used to calculate an intensity profile for a single reconstructed slice of the unstained fish (D) showing virtually no intensity peaks above background. A similar selection (blue box) through a single reconstructed slice of a silver-stained 5 dpf wild-type larva (E) demonstrates intense melanin staining in the intensity profile (black arrows).
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Silver-based X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) enables segmentation and visualization of melanin microanatomy in three dimensions (3D).
(A) A light micrograph of the side of a 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) wild-type larva indicating the major regions of melanin pigment: dorsal, lateral, ventral, and yolk sac stripes and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). (B) A 3D rendering with orthoslice (C) of micro-CT volumes segmented into anatomical regions shows the organization of larval pigment into layers. Red = dorsal stripe, yellow = ventral stripe, green = yolk sac stripe, cyan = lateral stripes, white = RPE, gray = other body melanin, purple = lens. (C) Single slice of micro-CT data with color overlay corresponding to the indicated region in B. (D) 200-slice maximum intensity projection of dorsal stripe melanin exhibits transparencies in the staining indicating the position of large organelles (arrows) including potentially binucleated cells (circles). A sample of these transparencies was measured to estimate average size (Figure 2—figure supplement 1, Figure 2—source data 1). (E) View from the top-down of a volume rendering showing rostral melanin in the nose forming globular, dendritic cells (arrowheads). RPE-L = left RPE, RPE-R = right RPE. (F) Isolated volume rendering of the right eye with a clipping plane showing the villous inner surface and smooth outer surface of the RPE. The rendering has been falsely colored by intensity to highlight certain anatomical features, including local pigment thickness variability throughout the RPE, the egress of the optic nerve (arrowhead), and the fused choroidal fissure (arrows). L = lens.
-
Figure 2—source data 1
Measurements of ovoid transparencies in melanin staining.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/68920/elife-68920-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Measurements of ovoid transparencies in melanin staining.
Volume renderings of the top of the head for three 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) wild-type zebrafish were examined for ovoid transparencies in the staining. For each fish, 25 random opacities were selected and manually measured on the long axis using the three-dimensional (3D) line measurement tool in Avizo (pink lines). Average length (n = 75) was 9.29 µm (SD = ±1.23 µm). Full list of measurements is provided in Figure 2—source data 1.
Figure 3
Quantification of silver-stained, X-ray microtomography (micro-CT)-scanned, and segmented larvae reveals wild-type melanin volume and content trends.
Wild-type (wt) 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) larvae (n = 3) were stained with silver and micro-CT imaged under the same conditions then segmented into major pigment regions as described in Figure 2: retinal pigment epithelium (RPE, right and left), dorsal stripe (DS), ventral stripe (VS), yolk sac stripe (YSS), lateral stripes (LS, right and left), and other melanin (other). (A) Volumes of the total pigmented regions and each segmented region are shown for the three fish. (B) Reconstructed stain intensity values are assumed to be proportional to melanin density; integrated intensity values for the segmented regions represents the melanin content of these regions. As proportions of total melanin content (summed across all segmented regions) the wt fish show high concordance between individual samples. Error bars = standard deviation from average.
Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Silver staining and X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) of mutant zebrafish enables comparison of melanin content and organization with wild-type larvae.
Volume renderings (A, D, G), segmented volumes (B, E, H), and representative single slices of micro-CT reconstructions through the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE; C, F, I) of representative 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) wild-type (A–C), slc24a5b1/b1 (golden; D–E), and mitfaw2/w2 (nacre or casper; G–I) larvae. In the segmented volumes, red = dorsal stripe, yellow = ventral stripe, green = yolk sac stripe, cyan = lateral stripes, white = RPE, gray = other body melanin, purple = lens. As compared to wild-type larvae, slc24a5b1/b1 mutant larvae exhibit a reduction in staining throughout the body and eyes (D) but retain the overall organization of pigment layers (E). The RPE in slc24a5b1/b1 larvae (F) is thinner than the wild-type RPE (C) with less intense staining. The mitfaw2/w2 mutant lacks all body pigment; staining is observed only in the RPE and some argentaffin material posterior to the eyes (G–H, arrow). The RPE of the mitfaw2/w2 mutant (I) is of similar thickness and staining intensity as the wild-type RPE (C). For each comparison, visualization settings were kept constant for the wild-type and mutant fish. § = head segment only shown. All stained samples analyzed in this study are shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Overview of all analyzed samples.
Light micrographs (before silver staining), X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) volume renderings, and segmented volumes of the wild-type, slc24a5b1/b1, and mitfaw2/w2 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) larvae (n=3 each) analyzed for this study. In the segmented volumes, red = dorsal stripe, yellow = ventral stripe, green = yolk sac stripe, cyan = lateral stripes, white = RPE, gray = other body melanin, purple = lens. Scale bars = 500 µm. § = head segment only analyzed by micro-CT and shown.
Figure 5
Silver-based X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) enables quantitative comparisons of wild-type and mutant pigmented samples.
Wild-type (wt, n = 3), slc24a5b1/b1 (n = 3), and mitfaw2/w2 (n = 3) 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) larvae were stained with silver and micro-CT imaged under the same conditions. Normalized reconstructed intensity values (norm. values) are assumed proportional to melanin density; integrated intensity values for the segmented regions represent the melanin content of these regions. Volume and melanin content from total pigmented regions (A–B), combined right and left retinal pigment epithelia (RPE) (C–D), and pigmented regions outside the eye (E–F) are shown for all samples with percent change of mean from wt indicated. p-Values were determined by Tukey post hoc test following one-way ANOVA and considered significant at p < 0.05 (shown in red). § = head segments only analyzed. Error bars = standard deviation from average.
Videos
Video 1
Wild-type zebrafish melanin.
This video shows an overview of melanin staining with silver by X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) imaging in a representative wild-type 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) zebrafish larva. The three-dimensional (3D) volume is generated from a series of 0.52 µm slices and reproduces pigmentation patterns seen by light microscopy (colored arrowheads). In a view of the top layer of the dorsal melanin stripe (false colored for clarity), ovoid transparencies are observed representing large organelles lacking melanin (circles). An isolated volume of the retinal pigment epithelia (RPE) exhibits the fused choroidal fissure and the optic nerve egress. Finally, a 360° view of the larval melanin, colored by anatomic region, is shown. Background music by DJ Vanselow.
Video 2
Wild-type vs. mutant melanin patterns.
This video shows a comparison between a representative wild-type 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) zebrafish larva and two representative pigmentation mutant 5 dpf larvae which have been stained with silver and X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) imaged. Visualization settings have been kept constant to facilitate direct comparisons between normalized samples. In volume renderings, the golden mutant (slc24a5b1/b1) shows markedly reduced melanin content throughout the body and eyes. The nacre mutant (mitfaw2/w2, head scan rendering only) shows essentially no body pigment but near-normal retinal pigment epithelia (RPE). Finally, stained volumes segmented by anatomic regions show the golden mutant exhibiting wild-type overall pigment organization while the nacre mutant (head scan rendering only) lacks the body stripes. Background music by DJ Vanselow.
Tables
Key resources table
| Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain, strain background (Danio rerio) | Wild-type Tu | Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC) | RRID:ZIRC_ZL57 | |
| Strain, strain background (Danio rerio) | Wild-type WIK | Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC) | RRID:ZIRC_ZL84 | |
| Strain, strain background (Danio rerio) | golden (slc24a5b1/b1) | Lamason et al., 2005 | RRID:ZFIN_ZDB-GENO-071214-1 | |
| Strain, strain background (Danio rerio) | nacre (mitfaw2/w2) | Lister et al., 1999 | RRID:ZFIN_ZDB-GENO-990423-18 | |
| Strain, strain background (Danio rerio) | casper (mitfaw2/w2; mpv17a9/a9) | D’Agati et al., 2017; White et al., 2008 | RRID:ZFIN_ZDB-GENO-160210-11 | |
| Strain, strain background (Danio rerio) | crystal (mitfaw2/w2; mpv17a9/a9; slc45a2b4/b4) | Antinucci and Hindges, 2016 | RRID:ZFIN_ZDB-GENO-160927-1 | |
| Commercial assay or kit | Fontana-Masson Staining Kit | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat#:HT200 | Included gold chloride not used |
| Chemical compound, drug | Tricaine-S | Syndel USA | Cat#:MS-222 | |
| Chemical compound, drug | 10% Neutral buffered formalin | Fisher Scientific | Cat#:SF100 | |
| Chemical compound, drug | LR White resin, catalyzed | Electron Microscopy Sciences | Cat#:14,383 | |
| Software, algorithm | TomoPy | Gürsoy et al., 2014 | RRID:SCR_021359 | |
| Software, algorithm | Gridrec | Dowd et al., 1999; Rivers, 2012 | RRID:SCR_021358 | |
| Software, algorithm | Fiji/ImageJ2 | Schindelin et al., 2012 | RRID:SCR_002285 | |
| Software, algorithm | Avizo 3D Software | Thermo Fisher Scientific | RRID:SCR_014431 | Versions 2020.1, 2020.2 |
| Software, algorithm | IBM SPSS Statistics | IBM | RRID:SCR_019096 | Version 27.0.1.0 |
| Software, algorithm | Three.js | https://threejs.org/ | RRID:SCR_021357 | For online viewer at http://3d.fish/stains/silver/ |
| Other | Polyimide tubing | Small Parts, Inc | Inner diameter 0.0403″ |
Table 1
Quantification of volume and cumulative sum of intensity for wild-type samples for segmented pigment regions.
| Wild-type specimen | #1 | #2 | #3 | Average | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pigment region | Segmented volume (µm3) | ||||
| Total | 4.81 × 106 | 4.52 × 106 | 5.27 × 106 | 4.87 × 106 | ±3.78 × 105 |
| RPE (right) | 1.20 × 106 | 1.02 × 106 | 1.28 × 106 | 1.17 × 106 | ±1.31 × 105 |
| RPE (left) | 1.25 × 106 | 9.65 × 105 | 1.46 × 106 | 1.23 × 106 | ±2.49 × 105 |
| Dorsal stripe | 5.45 × 105 | 4.87 × 105 | 5.11 × 105 | 5.15 × 105 | ±2.93 × 104 |
| Ventral stripe | 1.41 × 106 | 1.56 × 106 | 1.62 × 106 | 1.53 × 106 | ±1.10 × 105 |
| Yolk sac stripe | 2.29 × 105 | 3.63 × 105 | 2.06 × 105 | 2.66 × 105 | ±8.52 × 104 |
| Lateral stripe (right) | 5.24 × 104 | 4.10 × 104 | 6.73 × 104 | 5.36 × 104 | ±1.32 × 104 |
| Lateral stripe (left) | 5.91 × 104 | 2.96 × 104 | 6.16 × 104 | 5.01 × 104 | ±1.78 × 104 |
| Other | 6.72 × 104 | 5.89 × 104 | 6.79 × 104 | 6.47 × 104 | ±5.02 × 103 |
| Pigment region | Cumulative sum of intensity (normalized units) | ||||
| Total | 5.05 × 1011 | 4.71 × 1011 | 4.73 × 1011 | 4.83 × 1011 | ±1.94 × 1010 |
| RPE (right) | 1.48 × 1011 | 1.43 × 1011 | 1.40 × 1011 | 1.44 × 1011 | ±4.45 × 109 |
| RPE (left) | 1.74 × 1011 | 1.47 × 1011 | 1.57 × 1011 | 1.59 × 1011 | ±1.39 × 1010 |
| Dorsal stripe | 4.88 × 1010 | 4.02 × 1010 | 4.01 × 1010 | 4.30 × 1010 | ±5.00 × 109 |
| Ventral stripe | 1.01 × 1011 | 1.06 × 1011 | 1.06 × 1011 | 1.05 × 1011 | ±3.20 × 109 |
| Yolk sac stripe | 1.67 × 1010 | 2.33 × 1010 | 1.42 × 1010 | 1.81 × 1010 | ±4.66 × 109 |
| Lateral stripe (right) | 5.30 × 109 | 3.64 × 109 | 5.52 × 109 | 4.82 × 109 | ±1.03 × 109 |
| Lateral stripe (left) | 5.14 × 109 | 2.33 × 109 | 4.58 × 109 | 4.02 × 109 | ±1.49 × 109 |
| Other | 5.73 × 109 | 4.91 × 109 | 5.21 × 109 | 5.28 × 109 | ±4.17 × 108 |
-
Raw data provided in Table 1—source data 1.
-
Table 1—source data 1
Source data for quantification of volume and cumulative sum of intensity for wild-type samples for segmented pigment regions.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/68920/elife-68920-table1-data1-v1.xlsx
Table 2
Statistical analysis of wild-type, slc24a5b1/b1, and mitfaw2/w2 samples for segmented pigment regions.
| Pigment region | Segmented volume statistics | |
|---|---|---|
| One-way ANOVA F-statistic | p-Value | |
| Total | F(2,6) = 178.43 | 0.000005 |
| RPE (right) | F(2,6) = 36.37 | 0.000442 |
| RPE (left) | F(2,6) = 21.77 | 0.002 |
| RPE (total) | F(2,6) = 29.64 | 0.001 |
| Dorsal stripe | F(1,4) = 145.98 | 0.000269 |
| Ventral stripe | F(1,4) = 376.02 | 0.000042 |
| Yolk sac stripe | F(1,4) = 22.04 | 0.009 |
| Lateral stripe (right) | F(1,4) = 39.01 | 0.003 |
| Lateral stripe (left) | F(1,4) = 17.48 | 0.014 |
| Other | F(2,6) = 52.86 | 0.000155 |
| Body (total) | F(2,6) = 939.89 | 0.000000032209 |
| Pigment region | Cumulative sum of intensity statistics | |
| One-way ANOVA F-statistic | p-Value | |
| Total | F(2,6) = 185.76 | 0.000004 |
| RPE (right) | F(2,6) = 54.69 | 0.000141 |
| RPE (left) | F(2,6) = 70.40 | 0.000068 |
| RPE (total) | F(2,6) = 70.50 | 0.000068 |
| Dorsal stripe | F(1,4) = 138.02 | 0.000300 |
| Ventral stripe | F(1,4) = 1770.94 | 0.000002 |
| Yolk sac stripe | F(1,4) = 35.30 | 0.004 |
| Lateral stripe (right) | F(1,4) = 56.79 | 0.002 |
| Lateral stripe (left) | F(1,4) = 17.62 | 0.014 |
| Other | F(2,6) = 166.28 | 0.000006 |
| Body (total) | F(2,6) = 3690.79 | 0.00000000049447 |
-
F-statistics for each comparison are reported as F(degrees of freedom between groups, degrees of freedom within groups)= F-statistic. p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between groups. While the melanin stripes were compared between the wild-type and golden samples, total melanin, RPE melanin, and other melanin were compared between all three genotypes. For these regions, Tukey post hoc tests were used to determine which groups differed significantly from wild type.
Table 3
Quantification of volume and cumulative sum of intensity for slc24a5b1/b1 samples for segmented pigment regions.
| slc24a5b1/b1 specimen | #1 | #2 | #3 | Average | SD | % Change from wt | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pigment region | Segmented volume (µm3) | ||||||
| Total | 1.14 × 106 | 1.32 × 106 | 1.14 × 106 | 1.20 × 106 | ± 1.06 x 105 | –75.3 | 0.000005* |
| RPE (right) | 3.45 × 105 | 4.60 × 105 | 4.49 × 105 | 4.18 × 105 | ± 6.38 x 104 | –64.2 | 0.000362* |
| RPE (left) | 4.08 × 105 | 4.16 × 105 | 4.05 × 105 | 4.10 × 105 | ± 5.45 x 103 | –66.6 | 0.002* |
| Dorsal stripe | 9.70 × 104 | 1.74 × 105 | 8.36 × 104 | 1.18 × 105 | ± 4.87 x 104 | –77.0 | 0.000269** |
| Ventral stripe | 2.33 × 105 | 2.06 × 105 | 1.44 × 105 | 1.94 × 105 | ± 4.56 x 104 | –87.3 | 0.000042** |
| Yolk sac stripe | 3.97 × 104 | 3.93 × 104 | 2.07 × 104 | 3.32 × 104 | ± 1.09 x 104 | –87.5 | 0.009** |
| Lateral stripe (right) | 4.80 × 103 | 7.58 × 103 | 4.53 × 103 | 5.63 × 103 | ± 1.69 x 103 | –89.5 | 0.003** |
| Lateral stripe (left) | 7.16 × 103 | 9.09 × 103 | 3.99 × 103 | 6.75 × 103 | ± 2.58 x 103 | –86.5 | 0.014** |
| Other | 6.83 × 103 | 1.32 × 104 | 3.01 × 104 | 1.67 × 104 | ± 1.20 x 104 | –74.2 | 0.001* |
| Pigment region | Cumulative sum of intensity (normalized units) | ||||||
| Total | 7.54 × 1010 | 8.51 × 1010 | 7.50 × 1010 | 7.85 × 1010 | ± 5.74 x 109 | –83.7 | 0.000004* |
| RPE (right) | 2.43 × 1010 | 3.17 × 1010 | 3.11 × 1010 | 2.90 × 1010 | ± 4.07 x 109 | –79.8 | 0.000125* |
| RPE (left) | 2.98 × 1010 | 3.17 × 1010 | 2.84 × 1010 | 3.00 × 1010 | ± 1.69 x 109 | –81.2 | 0.000056* |
| Dorsal stripe | 5.89 × 109 | 8.87 × 109 | 5.28 × 109 | 6.68 × 109 | ± 1.92 x 109 | –84.5 | 0.000300** |
| Ventral stripe | 1.16 × 1010 | 9.44 × 109 | 7.10 × 109 | 9.39 × 109 | ± 2.26 x 109 | –91.0 | 0.000002** |
| Yolk sac stripe | 2.59 × 109 | 1.84 × 109 | 1.26 × 109 | 1.90 × 109 | ± 6.66 x 108 | –89.5 | 0.004** |
| Lateral stripe (right) | 3.11 × 108 | 4.07 × 108 | 2.75 × 108 | 3.31 × 108 | ± 6.85 x 107 | –93.1 | 0.002** |
| Lateral stripe (left) | 4.81 × 108 | 4.52 × 108 | 2.44 × 108 | 3.92 × 108 | ± 1.30 x 108 | –90.2 | 0.014** |
| Other | 4.21 × 108 | 7.36 × 108 | 1.37 × 109 | 8.43 × 108 | ± 4.84 x 108 | –84.0 | 0.000015* |
-
*p-Values determined by Tukey post hoc test following one-way ANOVA. **p-Values determined directly by one-way ANOVA. p-Values were considered significant <0.05. Raw data provided in Table 3—source data 1.
-
Table 3—source data 1
Source data for quantification of volume and cumulative sum of intensity for slc24a5b1/b1 samples for segmented pigment regions.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/68920/elife-68920-table3-data1-v1.xlsx
Table 4
Quantification of volume and cumulative sum of intensity for mitfaw2/w2 samples for segmented pigment regions.
| mitfaw2/w2 specimen | #1§ | #2§ | #3§ | Average | SD | % Change from wt | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pigment region | Segmented volume (µm3) | ||||||
| Total | 1.64 × 106 | 2.03 × 106 | 1.72 × 106 | 1.80 × 106 | ± 2.04 x 105 | –63.1 | 0.000015* |
| RPE (right) | 7.99 × 105 | 1.00 × 106 | 7.93 × 105 | 8.64 × 105 | ± 1.18 x 105 | –26.0 | 0.032* |
| RPE (left) | 8.41 × 105 | 1.02 × 106 | 9.21 × 105 | 9.28 × 105 | ± 9.09 x 104 | –24.2 | 0.120* |
| Other | 4.22 × 103 | 5.02 × 103 | 5.29 × 103 | 4.84 × 103 | ± 5.57 x 102 | –92.5 | 0.000169* |
| Pigment region | Cumulative sum of intensity (normalized units) | ||||||
| Total | 1.97 × 1011 | 2.64 × 1011 | 1.91 × 1011 | 2.17 × 1011 | ± 4.05 x 1010 | –55.0 | 0.000040* |
| RPE (right) | 1.01 × 1011 | 1.33 × 1011 | 8.80 × 1010 | 1.07 × 1011 | ± 2.30 x 1010 | –25.4 | 0.040* |
| RPE (left) | 9.54 × 1010 | 1.31 × 1011 | 1.03 × 1011 | 1.10 × 1011 | ± 1.86 x 1010 | –31.2 | 0.010* |
| Other | 2.40 × 108 | 2.70 × 108 | 2.77 × 108 | 2.62 × 108 | ± 1.98 x 107 | –95.0 | 0.000007* |
-
*p-Values determined by Tukey post hoc test following one-way ANOVA. § = head segment only analyzed. p-Values were considered significant <0.05. Raw data provided in Table 4—source data 1.
-
Table 4—source data 1
Source data for quantification of volume and cumulative sum of intensity for mitfaw2/w2 samples for segmented pigment regions.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/68920/elife-68920-table4-data1-v1.xlsx
Additional files
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Whole-organism 3D quantitative characterization of zebrafish melanin by silver deposition micro-CT
eLife 10:e68920.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68920
