Cross-Species analysis defines the conservation of anatomically-segregated VMH neuron populations

  1. Alison H Affinati
  2. Paul V Sabatini
  3. Cadence True
  4. Abigail J Tomlinson
  5. Melissa Kirigiti
  6. Sarah R Lindsley
  7. Chien Li
  8. David P Olson
  9. Paul Kievit
  10. Martin G Myers Jr  Is a corresponding author
  11. Alan C Rupp  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan, United States
  2. Oregon National Primate Research Center, United States
  3. Novo Nordisk Research Center, United States

Abstract

The ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMH) controls diverse behaviors and physiologic functions, suggesting the existence of multiple VMH neural subtypes with distinct functions. Combing Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification with RNA sequencing (TRAP-seq) data with snRNA-seq data, we identified 24 mouse VMH neuron clusters. Further analysis, including snRNA-seq data from macaque tissue, defined a more tractable VMH parceling scheme consisting of 6 major genetically- and anatomically-differentiated VMH neuron classes with good cross-species conservation. In addition to two major ventrolateral classes, we identified three distinct classes of dorsomedial VMH neurons. Consistent with previously-suggested unique roles for leptin receptor (Lepr)-expressing VMH neurons, Lepr expression marked a single dorsomedial class. We also identified a class of glutamatergic VMH neurons that resides in the tuberal region, anterolateral to the neuroanatomical core of the VMH. This atlas of conserved VMH neuron populations provides an unbiased starting point for the analysis of VMH circuitry and function.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE172207

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alison H Affinati

    Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Paul V Sabatini

    Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6613-566X
  3. Cadence True

    Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Abigail J Tomlinson

    Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Melissa Kirigiti

    Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Sarah R Lindsley

    Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Chien Li

    Obesity, Novo Nordisk Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    Chien Li, is an employee of Novo Nordisk A/S.
  8. David P Olson

    Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Paul Kievit

    Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Martin G Myers Jr

    Departments of Internal Medicine and Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    mgmyers@umich.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9468-2046
  11. Alan C Rupp

    Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    ruppa@med.umich.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5363-4494

Funding

National Institutes of Health (dk056731)

  • Martin G Myers Jr

Novo Nordisk

  • Martin G Myers Jr

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mice used in this study were maintained in accordance with University of Michigan Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), Association for the Assessment and Approval of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines under protocol number PRO00007438 (PI Myers).Nonhuman primate tissue was obtained post-mortem from the Tissue Distribution Program at ONPRC. Animal care is in accordance with the recommendations described in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and animal facilities at the Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC) are accredited by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. ONPRC does not provide protocol numbers for security reasons.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ana Domingos, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: April 2, 2021
  2. Accepted: May 14, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 21, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: May 24, 2021 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: June 7, 2021 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2021, Affinati et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,070
    Page views
  • 233
    Downloads
  • 13
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alison H Affinati
  2. Paul V Sabatini
  3. Cadence True
  4. Abigail J Tomlinson
  5. Melissa Kirigiti
  6. Sarah R Lindsley
  7. Chien Li
  8. David P Olson
  9. Paul Kievit
  10. Martin G Myers Jr
  11. Alan C Rupp
(2021)
Cross-Species analysis defines the conservation of anatomically-segregated VMH neuron populations
eLife 10:e69065.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69065

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Connon I Thomas, Melissa A Ryan ... Benjamin Scholl
    Research Article

    Postsynaptic mitochondria are critical for the development, plasticity, and maintenance of synaptic inputs. However, their relationship to synaptic structure and functional activity is unknown. We examined a correlative dataset from ferret visual cortex with in vivo two-photon calcium imaging of dendritic spines during visual stimulation and electron microscopy reconstructions of spine ultrastructure, investigating mitochondrial abundance near functionally and structurally characterized spines. Surprisingly, we found no correlation to structural measures of synaptic strength. Instead, we found that mitochondria are positioned near spines with orientation preferences that are dissimilar to the somatic preference. Additionally, we found that mitochondria are positioned near groups of spines with heterogeneous orientation preferences. For a subset of spines with a mitochondrion in the head or neck, synapses were larger and exhibited greater selectivity to visual stimuli than those without a mitochondrion. Our data suggest mitochondria are not necessarily positioned to support the energy needs of strong spines, but rather support the structurally and functionally diverse inputs innervating the basal dendrites of cortical neurons.

    1. Neuroscience
    Weiwei Qui, Chelsea R Hutch ... Darleen Sandoval
    Research Article

    Several discrete groups of feeding-regulated neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (nucleus tractus solitarius; NTS) suppress food intake, including avoidance-promoting neurons that express Cck (NTSCck cells) and distinct Lepr- and Calcr-expressing neurons (NTSLepr and NTSCalcr cells, respectively) that suppress food intake without promoting avoidance. To test potential synergies among these cell groups we manipulated multiple NTS cell populations simultaneously. We found that activating multiple sets of NTS neurons (e.g., NTSLepr plus NTSCalcr (NTSLC), or NTSLC plus NTSCck (NTSLCK)) suppressed feeding more robustly than activating single populations. While activating groups of cells that include NTSCck neurons promoted conditioned taste avoidance (CTA), NTSLC activation produced no CTA despite abrogating feeding. Thus, the ability to promote CTA formation represents a dominant effect but activating multiple non-aversive populations augments the suppression of food intake without provoking avoidance. Furthermore, silencing multiple NTS neuron groups augmented food intake and body weight to a greater extent than silencing single populations, consistent with the notion that each of these NTS neuron populations plays crucial and cumulative roles in the control of energy balance. We found that silencing NTSLCK neurons failed to blunt the weight-loss response to vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and that feeding activated many non-NTSLCK neurons, however, suggesting that as-yet undefined NTS cell types must make additional contributions to the restraint of feeding.