Glycolytic preconditioning in astrocytes mitigates trauma-induced neurodegeneration

  1. Rene Solano Fonseca
  2. Patrick Metang
  3. Nathan Egge
  4. Yingjian Liu
  5. Kielen R Zuurbier
  6. Karthigayini Sivaprakasam
  7. Shawn Shirazi
  8. Ashleigh Chuah
  9. Sonja LB Arneaud
  10. Genevieve Konopka
  11. Dong Qian
  12. Peter M Douglas  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  2. University of Texas at Dallas, United States
  3. University of California Berkeley, United States

Abstract

Concussion is associated with a myriad of deleterious immediate and long-term consequences. Yet the molecular mechanisms and genetic targets promoting the selective vulnerability of different neural subtypes to dysfunction and degeneration remain unclear. Translating experimental models of blunt force trauma in C. elegans to concussion in mice, we identify a conserved neuroprotective mechanism in which reduction of mitochondrial electron flux through complex IV suppresses trauma-induced degeneration of the highly vulnerable dopaminergic neurons. Reducing cytochrome C oxidase function elevates mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species, which signal through the cytosolic hypoxia inducing transcription factor, Hif1a, to promote hyperphosphorylation and inactivation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase, PDHE1α. This critical enzyme initiates the Warburg shunt, which drives energetic reallocation from mitochondrial respiration to astrocyte-mediated glycolysis in a neuroprotective manner. These studies demonstrate a conserved process in which glycolytic preconditioning suppresses Parkinson-like hypersensitivity of dopaminergic neurons to trauma-induced degeneration via redox signaling and the Warburg effect.

Data availability

All datasets are submitted to GEO and will be made available to the public upon publication of the article.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rene Solano Fonseca

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Patrick Metang

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Nathan Egge

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yingjian Liu

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Kielen R Zuurbier

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Karthigayini Sivaprakasam

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Shawn Shirazi

    Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Ashleigh Chuah

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Sonja LB Arneaud

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1123-3876
  10. Genevieve Konopka

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    Genevieve Konopka, Reviewing Editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3363-7302
  11. Dong Qian

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Peter M Douglas

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    For correspondence
    peter.douglas@utsouthwestern.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0734-1049

Funding

Welch Foundation (I-2061-20210327)

  • Peter M Douglas

National Institutes of Health (R01AG061338)

  • Peter M Douglas

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR150089)

  • Peter M Douglas

Clayton Foundation for Research

  • Peter M Douglas

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse studies were approved by the UT Southwestern Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols (#2016-101750) and performed in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines.

Copyright

© 2021, Solano Fonseca et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,776
    views
  • 275
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rene Solano Fonseca
  2. Patrick Metang
  3. Nathan Egge
  4. Yingjian Liu
  5. Kielen R Zuurbier
  6. Karthigayini Sivaprakasam
  7. Shawn Shirazi
  8. Ashleigh Chuah
  9. Sonja LB Arneaud
  10. Genevieve Konopka
  11. Dong Qian
  12. Peter M Douglas
(2021)
Glycolytic preconditioning in astrocytes mitigates trauma-induced neurodegeneration
eLife 10:e69438.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69438

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69438

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Chun-Wei Chen, Jeffery B Chavez ... Bruce J Nicholson
    Research Article Updated

    Endometriosis is a debilitating disease affecting 190 million women worldwide and the greatest single contributor to infertility. The most broadly accepted etiology is that uterine endometrial cells retrogradely enter the peritoneum during menses, and implant and form invasive lesions in a process analogous to cancer metastasis. However, over 90% of women suffer retrograde menstruation, but only 10% develop endometriosis, and debate continues as to whether the underlying defect is endometrial or peritoneal. Processes implicated in invasion include: enhanced motility; adhesion to, and formation of gap junctions with, the target tissue. Endometrial stromal (ESCs) from 22 endometriosis patients at different disease stages show much greater invasiveness across mesothelial (or endothelial) monolayers than ESCs from 22 control subjects, which is further enhanced by the presence of EECs. This is due to the enhanced responsiveness of endometriosis ESCs to the mesothelium, which induces migration and gap junction coupling. ESC-PMC gap junction coupling is shown to be required for invasion, while coupling between PMCs enhances mesothelial barrier breakdown.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Jisun So, Olivia Strobel ... Hyun Cheol Roh
    Tools and Resources

    Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq), an alternative to single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), encounters technical challenges in obtaining high-quality nuclei and RNA, persistently hindering its applications. Here, we present a robust technique for isolating nuclei across various tissue types, remarkably enhancing snRNA-seq data quality. Employing this approach, we comprehensively characterize the depot-dependent cellular dynamics of various cell types underlying mouse adipose tissue remodeling during obesity. By integrating bulk nuclear RNA-seq from adipocyte nuclei of different sizes, we identify distinct adipocyte subpopulations categorized by size and functionality. These subpopulations follow two divergent trajectories, adaptive and pathological, with their prevalence varying by depot. Specifically, we identify a key molecular feature of dysfunctional hypertrophic adipocytes, a global shutdown in gene expression, along with elevated stress and inflammatory responses. Furthermore, our differential gene expression analysis reveals distinct contributions of adipocyte subpopulations to the overall pathophysiology of adipose tissue. Our study establishes a robust snRNA-seq method, providing novel insights into the biological processes involved in adipose tissue remodeling during obesity, with broader applicability across diverse biological systems.