Glycolytic preconditioning in astrocytes mitigates trauma-induced neurodegeneration

  1. Rene Solano Fonseca
  2. Patrick Metang
  3. Nathan Egge
  4. Yingjian Liu
  5. Kielen R Zuurbier
  6. Karthigayini Sivaprakasam
  7. Shawn Shirazi
  8. Ashleigh Chuah
  9. Sonja LB Arneaud
  10. Genevieve Konopka
  11. Dong Qian
  12. Peter M Douglas  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  2. University of Texas at Dallas, United States
  3. University of California Berkeley, United States

Abstract

Concussion is associated with a myriad of deleterious immediate and long-term consequences. Yet the molecular mechanisms and genetic targets promoting the selective vulnerability of different neural subtypes to dysfunction and degeneration remain unclear. Translating experimental models of blunt force trauma in C. elegans to concussion in mice, we identify a conserved neuroprotective mechanism in which reduction of mitochondrial electron flux through complex IV suppresses trauma-induced degeneration of the highly vulnerable dopaminergic neurons. Reducing cytochrome C oxidase function elevates mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species, which signal through the cytosolic hypoxia inducing transcription factor, Hif1a, to promote hyperphosphorylation and inactivation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase, PDHE1α. This critical enzyme initiates the Warburg shunt, which drives energetic reallocation from mitochondrial respiration to astrocyte-mediated glycolysis in a neuroprotective manner. These studies demonstrate a conserved process in which glycolytic preconditioning suppresses Parkinson-like hypersensitivity of dopaminergic neurons to trauma-induced degeneration via redox signaling and the Warburg effect.

Data availability

All datasets are submitted to GEO and will be made available to the public upon publication of the article.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rene Solano Fonseca

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Patrick Metang

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Nathan Egge

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yingjian Liu

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Kielen R Zuurbier

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Karthigayini Sivaprakasam

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Shawn Shirazi

    Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Ashleigh Chuah

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Sonja LB Arneaud

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1123-3876
  10. Genevieve Konopka

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    Genevieve Konopka, Reviewing Editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3363-7302
  11. Dong Qian

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Peter M Douglas

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    For correspondence
    peter.douglas@utsouthwestern.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0734-1049

Funding

Welch Foundation (I-2061-20210327)

  • Peter M Douglas

National Institutes of Health (R01AG061338)

  • Peter M Douglas

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR150089)

  • Peter M Douglas

Clayton Foundation for Research

  • Peter M Douglas

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse studies were approved by the UT Southwestern Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols (#2016-101750) and performed in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Scott F Leiser, University of Michigan, United States

Version history

  1. Received: April 15, 2021
  2. Accepted: August 24, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 2, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 17, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Solano Fonseca et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,511
    Page views
  • 238
    Downloads
  • 10
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rene Solano Fonseca
  2. Patrick Metang
  3. Nathan Egge
  4. Yingjian Liu
  5. Kielen R Zuurbier
  6. Karthigayini Sivaprakasam
  7. Shawn Shirazi
  8. Ashleigh Chuah
  9. Sonja LB Arneaud
  10. Genevieve Konopka
  11. Dong Qian
  12. Peter M Douglas
(2021)
Glycolytic preconditioning in astrocytes mitigates trauma-induced neurodegeneration
eLife 10:e69438.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69438

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Samarpan Maiti, Kaushik Bhattacharya ... Didier Picard
    Research Article

    Cells are exposed to a wide variety of internal and external stresses. Although many studies have focused on cellular responses to acute and severe stresses, little is known about how cellular systems adapt to sublethal chronic stresses. Using mammalian cells in culture, we discovered that they adapt to chronic mild stresses of up to two weeks, notably proteotoxic stresses such as heat, by increasing their size and translation, thereby scaling the amount of total protein. These adaptations render them more resilient to persistent and subsequent stresses. We demonstrate that Hsf1, well known for its role in acute stress responses, is required for the cell size increase, and that the molecular chaperone Hsp90 is essential for coupling the cell size increase to augmented translation. We term this translational reprogramming the ‘rewiring stress response’, and propose that this protective process of chronic stress adaptation contributes to the increase in size as cells get older, and that its failure promotes aging.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Medicine
    Thao DV Le, Dianxin Liu ... Julio E Ayala
    Research Article Updated

    The canonical target of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), Protein Kinase A (PKA), has been shown to stimulate mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) by phosphorylating the mTOR-regulating protein Raptor at Ser791 following β-adrenergic stimulation. The objective of these studies is to test whether GLP-1R agonists similarly stimulate mTORC1 via PKA phosphorylation of Raptor at Ser791 and whether this contributes to the weight loss effect of the therapeutic GLP-1R agonist liraglutide. We measured phosphorylation of the mTORC1 signaling target ribosomal protein S6 in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells expressing GLP-1R (CHO-Glp1r) treated with liraglutide in combination with PKA inhibitors. We also assessed liraglutide-mediated phosphorylation of the PKA substrate RRXS*/T* motif in CHO-Glp1r cells expressing Myc-tagged wild-type (WT) Raptor or a PKA-resistant (Ser791Ala) Raptor mutant. Finally, we measured the body weight response to liraglutide in WT mice and mice with a targeted knock-in of PKA-resistant Ser791Ala Raptor. Liraglutide increased phosphorylation of S6 and the PKA motif in WT Raptor in a PKA-dependent manner but failed to stimulate phosphorylation of the PKA motif in Ser791Ala Raptor in CHO-Glp1r cells. Lean Ser791Ala Raptor knock-in mice were resistant to liraglutide-induced weight loss but not setmelanotide-induced (melanocortin-4 receptor-dependent) weight loss. Diet-induced obese Ser791Ala Raptor knock-in mice were not resistant to liraglutide-induced weight loss; however, there was weight-dependent variation such that there was a tendency for obese Ser791Ala Raptor knock-in mice of lower relative body weight to be resistant to liraglutide-induced weight loss compared to weight-matched controls. Together, these findings suggest that PKA-mediated phosphorylation of Raptor at Ser791 contributes to liraglutide-induced weight loss.