Glycolytic preconditioning in astrocytes mitigates trauma-induced neurodegeneration

  1. Rene Solano Fonseca
  2. Patrick Metang
  3. Nathan Egge
  4. Yingjian Liu
  5. Kielen R Zuurbier
  6. Karthigayini Sivaprakasam
  7. Shawn Shirazi
  8. Ashleigh Chuah
  9. Sonja LB Arneaud
  10. Genevieve Konopka
  11. Dong Qian
  12. Peter M Douglas  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  2. University of Texas at Dallas, United States
  3. University of California Berkeley, United States

Abstract

Concussion is associated with a myriad of deleterious immediate and long-term consequences. Yet the molecular mechanisms and genetic targets promoting the selective vulnerability of different neural subtypes to dysfunction and degeneration remain unclear. Translating experimental models of blunt force trauma in C. elegans to concussion in mice, we identify a conserved neuroprotective mechanism in which reduction of mitochondrial electron flux through complex IV suppresses trauma-induced degeneration of the highly vulnerable dopaminergic neurons. Reducing cytochrome C oxidase function elevates mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species, which signal through the cytosolic hypoxia inducing transcription factor, Hif1a, to promote hyperphosphorylation and inactivation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase, PDHE1α. This critical enzyme initiates the Warburg shunt, which drives energetic reallocation from mitochondrial respiration to astrocyte-mediated glycolysis in a neuroprotective manner. These studies demonstrate a conserved process in which glycolytic preconditioning suppresses Parkinson-like hypersensitivity of dopaminergic neurons to trauma-induced degeneration via redox signaling and the Warburg effect.

Data availability

All datasets are submitted to GEO and will be made available to the public upon publication of the article.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rene Solano Fonseca

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Patrick Metang

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Nathan Egge

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yingjian Liu

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Kielen R Zuurbier

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Karthigayini Sivaprakasam

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Shawn Shirazi

    Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Ashleigh Chuah

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Sonja LB Arneaud

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1123-3876
  10. Genevieve Konopka

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    Genevieve Konopka, Reviewing Editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3363-7302
  11. Dong Qian

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Peter M Douglas

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    For correspondence
    peter.douglas@utsouthwestern.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0734-1049

Funding

Welch Foundation (I-2061-20210327)

  • Peter M Douglas

National Institutes of Health (R01AG061338)

  • Peter M Douglas

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR150089)

  • Peter M Douglas

Clayton Foundation for Research

  • Peter M Douglas

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse studies were approved by the UT Southwestern Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols (#2016-101750) and performed in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines.

Copyright

© 2021, Solano Fonseca et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,750
    views
  • 270
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rene Solano Fonseca
  2. Patrick Metang
  3. Nathan Egge
  4. Yingjian Liu
  5. Kielen R Zuurbier
  6. Karthigayini Sivaprakasam
  7. Shawn Shirazi
  8. Ashleigh Chuah
  9. Sonja LB Arneaud
  10. Genevieve Konopka
  11. Dong Qian
  12. Peter M Douglas
(2021)
Glycolytic preconditioning in astrocytes mitigates trauma-induced neurodegeneration
eLife 10:e69438.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69438

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69438

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.

    1. Cell Biology
    Yue Miao, Yongtao Du ... Mei Ding
    Research Article

    The spatiotemporal transition of small GTPase Rab5 to Rab7 is crucial for early-to-late endosome maturation, yet the precise mechanism governing Rab5-to-Rab7 switching remains elusive. USP8, a ubiquitin-specific protease, plays a prominent role in the endosomal sorting of a wide range of transmembrane receptors and is a promising target in cancer therapy. Here, we identified that USP8 is recruited to Rab5-positive carriers by Rabex5, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rab5. The recruitment of USP8 dissociates Rabex5 from early endosomes (EEs) and meanwhile promotes the recruitment of the Rab7 GEF SAND-1/Mon1. In USP8-deficient cells, the level of active Rab5 is increased, while the Rab7 signal is decreased. As a result, enlarged EEs with abundant intraluminal vesicles accumulate and digestive lysosomes are rudimentary. Together, our results reveal an important and unexpected role of a deubiquitinating enzyme in endosome maturation.