Engineering paralog-specific PSD-95 recombinant binders as minimally interfering multimodal probes for advanced imaging techniques

  1. Charlotte Rimbault
  2. Christelle Breillat
  3. Benjamin Compans
  4. Estelle Toulmé
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal
  7. Patrice Mascalchi
  8. Camille Genuer
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz
  10. Isabel Gauthereau
  11. Eric Hosy
  12. Stéphane Claverol
  13. Gregory Giannone
  14. Ingrid Chamma
  15. Cameron D Mackereth
  16. Christel Poujol
  17. Daniel Choquet
  18. Matthieu Sainlos  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, IINS, UMR 5297, France
  2. University of Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, Bordeaux Imaging Center, BIC, UMS 3420, US 4, France
  3. University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux Proteome, France
  4. University of Bordeaux, Inserm U1212, CNRS UMR 5320, IECB, France
8 figures, 1 table and 4 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 3 supplements
Evaluation of the impact of evolved 10FN3 domains binding on the PDZ domains function.

(a) PSD-95 domain organization and binding models of the three clones investigated. (b) Titrations of a monovalent stargazin-derived peptide against PSD-95-12 in the absence or presence of Xph15, …

Figure 1—source data 1

Spreadsheet with the normalized fluorescence polarization data (Figure 1c).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—source data 2

Spreadsheet with the normalized fluorescence polarization data (Figure 1d).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig1-data2-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—source data 3

Spreadsheet with the raw fluorescence lifetime data (Figure 1e).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig1-data3-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—source data 4

Spreadsheet with the raw fluorescence lifetime data (Figure 1f).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig1-data4-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
[15N]-HSQC spectra collected on 200 µM [15N]PSD-95-12 and titrated in with increasing concentrations of a monovalent stargazin-derived peptide (Stg) (a) in the absence of binder or in the presence of 240 µM Xph15 (b), Xph18 (c), or Xph20 (d).

The region in the box corresponds to the selected regions presented in Figure 1b.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Fluorescence polarization titrations.

(a) Direct titration of FITC-labeled stargazin-derived divalent ligand (10 nM) against PSD-95 tandem PDZ domains. Each data point represents the average of three measurements ± SD. The dissociation …

Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 1

Spreadsheet with the normalized fluorescence polarization data (Figure 1—figure supplement 2a).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig1-figsupp2-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 2

Spreadsheet with the normalized fluorescence polarization data (Figure 1—figure supplement 2b).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig1-figsupp2-data2-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 3

Spreadsheet with the normalized fluorescence polarization data (Figure 1—figure supplement 2c).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig1-figsupp2-data3-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 4

Spreadsheet with the normalized fluorescence polarization data (Figure 1—figure supplement 2d).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig1-figsupp2-data4-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 3
Expression regulation system.

The system relies on a competition for the expressed probe between binding to its cytosolic target (favored) or preventing further transcription (unfavored until the target is saturated). Xph/X: …

Figure 2 with 3 supplements
Evaluation of monobodies binding to endogenous PSD-95.

(a–e) Synaptic currents in wild-type mouse neurons infected with adeno-associated viruses expressing either eGFP, Xph15, Xph18, or Xph20 (n = 19, 15, 17, and 16, respectively, from three independent …

Figure 2—source data 1

Spreadsheet with the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) amplitude data (Figure 2b).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—source data 2

Spreadsheet with the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) frequency data (Figure 2c).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-data2-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—source data 3

Spreadsheet with the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) decay data (Figure 2d).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-data3-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—source data 4

Spreadsheet with the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) rise time data (Figure 2e).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-data4-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—source data 5

Spreadsheet with the diffusion distribution data (Figure 2g).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-data5-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—source data 6

Spreadsheet with the percentage of mobile AMPARs data (Figure 2h).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-data6-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—source data 7

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD045002 (Figure 2i).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-data7-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Spontaneous miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents properties based on the analysis of the 100 first events of control non-transfected or Xph15 and Xph18 (fused to eGFP and the expression regulation system) transfected rat culture neurons.

(a) Amplitude (in pA, control: 18.92 ± 2.37 [n = 20]; Xph15: 17.58 ± 1.71 [n = 15]; Xph18: 18.52 ± 2.03 [n = 11]; mean ± SEM with p>0.61 by ordinary one-way ANOVA). (b) Frequency (in Hz, control: …

Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1

Spreadsheet with the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) amplitude data (Figure 2—figure supplement 1a).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-figsupp1-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2

Spreadsheet with the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) frequency data (Figure 2—figure supplement 1b).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-figsupp1-data2-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 3

Spreadsheet with the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) decay time data (Figure 2—figure supplement 1c).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-figsupp1-data3-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 4

Spreadsheet with the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) rise time data (Figure 2—figure supplement 1d).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-figsupp1-data4-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—figure supplement 2
Cumulative distribution of average distribution of instantaneous diffusion coefficients obtained by uPAINT of synaptic AMPAR (Figure 2g).

Error bars indicate cell-to-cell variability.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1

Spreadsheet with the cumulative diffusion distribution data.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig2-figsupp2-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—figure supplement 3
Rat hippocampal culture transduced with adeno-associated viruses expressing either eGFP or Xph20-eGFP at 3 d in vitro (DIV) and imaged and lysed at 16 DIV for proteomics analysis (scale bar 40 µm).
Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Evaluation of monobodies as intrabody fluorescent reporter probes.

(a) Representative epifluorescence images of the eGFP-fused binding modules vs immunostaining of endogenous PSD-95 domain. For the zoomed regions, top: binding module; middle: antibody staining; …

Figure 3—source data 1

Spreadsheet with the raw object enrichment data (Figure 3b).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 2

Spreadsheet with the raw object colocalization percentage data (Figure 3c).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig3-data2-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 3

Spreadsheet with the raw PSD-95-positive objects percentage data (Figure 3d).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig3-data3-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 4

Spreadsheet with the fluorescence recovery data (Figure 3f).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig3-data4-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 5

Spreadsheet with the mobile fraction extracted from the fluorescence recovery data (Figure 3g).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig3-data5-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Regulated vs non-regulated expression of Xph20-FP fusion.

(a) Representative images obtained on neurons transfected with Xph20-eGFP fusion (regulated with a zinc finger and a transcription repressor fusion together with the corresponding zinc finger …

Evaluation of Xph15 and Xph20 intrabodies specificity.

(a) Representative epifluorescence images showing Xph15-eGFP (top) and Xph20-eGFP (bottom) expressed in pyramidal neuron together with a scramble shRNA or the shRNA against PSD-95 both associated to …

Figure 4—source data 1

Spreadsheet with the normalized object average intensity data (Figure 4b).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 4—source data 2

Spreadsheet with the normalized dendrite intensity data (Figure 4c).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig4-data2-v2.xlsx
Figure 4—source data 3

Spreadsheet with the normalized fluorescence intensity data (Figure 4e).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig4-data3-v2.xlsx
Figure 4—source data 4

Spreadsheet with the normalized fluorescence intensity data (Figure 4f).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig4-data4-v2.xlsx
Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Evaluation of probes for stimulated emission depletion (STED) imaging.

(a) Schematic representation of fluorescent protein-fused STED probe. (b) Representative confocal images of a neuron transfected with Xph15-mNeonGreen before and after STED. The yellow box …

Figure 5—source data 1

Spreadsheet with the fluorescence intensity ratio data (Figure 5d).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Stimulated emission depletion (STED) imaging.

(a) Representative image obtained on fixed neurons transfected with Xph20-eGFP fusion and immunolabeled with an antibody against MAP2 to identify dendritic shaft. Zoom region obtained by confocal …

Figure 6 with 1 supplement
Evaluation of mEos3.2-derived probes for photoactivation localization microscopy (PALM) and spt-PALM applications.

(a) Schematic representation of mEos3.2-fused probe. (b) Representative epifluorescence and PALM images of Xph20-mEos3.2 in fixed culture neurons. Left: epifluorescence image obtained from the …

Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Evaluation of mEos3.2-derived probes for photoactivation localization microscopy (PALM) applications.

(a, b) Representative spt-PALM images of fixed culture neurons expressing Xph20-mEos3.2. Super-resolution intensity map obtained by sptPALM from a sequence of 4000 images of sparse single molecules …

Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1

Spreadsheet with the diffusion distribution data (Figure 6—figure supplement 1c).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig6-figsupp1-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2

Spreadsheet with the mobile fraction percentage data (Figure 6—figure supplement 1d).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig6-figsupp1-data2-v2.xlsx
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 3

Spreadsheet with the frequency distribution of single detection data (Figure 6—figure supplement 1e).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69620/elife-69620-fig6-figsupp1-data3-v2.xlsx
Figure 7 with 1 supplement
Evaluation of SNAP-tag-derived probes for DNA-PAINT super-resolution microscopy.

(a) Probe design and labeling scheme (BG: benzylguanine). (b) Reconstructed DNA-PAINT image (10 Hz, 32,000 frames) of Xph20-SNAP-tag in the dendrites of a 14 day in vitro (DIV) hippocampal primary …

Figure 7—figure supplement 1
DNA-PAINT imaging.

(a) Representative DNA-PAINT image obtained on neurons co-transfected with a soluble GFP marker and Xph20-SNAP-tag, not incubated with BG-docking strand and in the presence of Cy3-imaging strand. (b)…

Figure 8 with 3 supplements
Application of the ReMoRa method for the synaptic targeting of calcium reporters.

(a) Schematic representation of calcium signaling probe. (b) Comparison of the expression profile of targeted and regulated (Xph20-GCaMP7f, bottom panel) vs parental calcium sensor (GCaMP7f, top …

Figure 8—figure supplement 1
Engineered calcium reporters expression.

(a, b) Maximum projection of the fluorescence movies collected for hippocampal neurons expressing GCaMP6f (a) or Xph15-GCaMP6f* (non-regulated) (b). In the insets, the blue arrows indicate …

Figure 8—video 1
Spontaneous responses of GCaMP6f.
Figure 8—video 2
Xph15-GCaMP6f expressed in hippocampal Banker cultures and recorded at 50 Hz.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)BL21 CodonPlus (DE3)-RIPLAgilentCat# 230280
Strain, strain background (E. coli)T7 Express lysYNew England BiolabsCat# C3010I
Cell line (simian)COS-7ECACC-87021302
AntibodyAnti-GluA2 ATTO-647N (mouse monoclonal)Gift from Eric Gouaux, coupled in lab.PMID:2392627330 ng/ml
AntibodyAnti-PSD-95 (mouse monoclonal)Thermo FisherCat# MA1-0461:1000
AntibodyGoat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568 (goat polyclonal)Thermo FisherCat# A-110311:1000
AntibodyAnti-MAP2 (chicken polyclonal)Synaptic SystemsCat# 188 0061:2000
AntibodyGoat anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 594 (goat polyclonal)Thermo FisherCat# A-110421:800
Recombinant DNA reagentNumerousSee Supplementary file 2https://www.addgene.org/Matthieu_Sainlos/
Sequence-based reagentNumerousSee Supplementary file 3
Peptide, recombinant proteinPSD-95-12 [61-249]Rimbault et al., 2019PMID:31586061
Peptide, recombinant proteinXph20Rimbault et al., 2019PMID:31586061https://www.addgene.org/Matthieu_Sainlos/
Peptide, recombinant proteinXph18Rimbault et al., 2019PMID:31586061https://www.addgene.org/Matthieu_Sainlos/
Peptide, recombinant proteinXph15Rimbault et al., 2019PMID:31586061https://www.addgene.org/Matthieu_Sainlos/
Peptide, recombinant proteinXph0Rimbault et al., 2019PMID:31586061https://www.addgene.org/Matthieu_Sainlos/
Peptide, recombinant proteinStg15 (Ac-YSLHANTANRRTTPV)Rimbault et al., 2019PMID:31586061
Peptide, recombinant proteinFITC-Stg15 (FITC-PEG-YSLHANTANRRTTPV)Rimbault et al., 2019PMID:31586061
Peptide, recombinant protein[Stg15]2Rimbault et al., 2019PMID:31586061
Peptide, recombinant proteinFITC-[Stg15]2Rimbault et al., 2019PMID:31586061
Commercial assay or kitX-treme GENE HP DNA transfection reagentRoche
Commercial assay or kitEffectene KitQIAGEN
Chemical compound, drugSNAP-Cell 647-SiR (BG-SiR)New England BiolabsCat# S9102S
Software, algorithmPyMOLWarren DeLanoRRID:SCR_000305
Software, algorithmFijiPMID:22743772RRID:SCR_002285
Software, algorithmAdobe IllustratorAdobe SystemsRRID:SCR_010279
Software, algorithmPrism 7.04, 8GraphPadRRID:SCR_002798
Software, algorithmTopSpin v4.0BrukerRRID:SCR_014227
Software, algorithmMetaMorph v7.8.10.0Molecular DevicesRRID:SCR_002368
Software, algorithmLI-FLIM v1.2.12Lambert Instruments
Software, algorithmPOLARstar Omega v5.11BMG Labtech
Software, algorithmNMRPipe v8.6Delaglio et al., 1995PMID:8520220
Software, algorithmSparky v3.113D. Goddard and D. G. Kneller, SPARKY 3, University of California, San FranciscoRRID:SCR_014228
Software, algorithmPOLARstar MARS data analysis software v3.20BMG Labtech
Software, algorithmPatchmasterHeka Elektronik
Software, algorithmSR-TesselerLevet et al., 2015PMID:26344046
Software, algorithmIJ-Macro_FRAP-MMhttps://github.com/fabricecordelieres/IJ-Macro_FRAP-MM
Software, algorithmIJ-Plugin_Metamorph-Companionhttps://github.com/fabricecordelieres/IJ-Plugin_Metamorph-Companion
Software, algorithmPICASSOSchnitzbauer et al., 2017PMID:28518172
OtherSNAPligand-modified DNA oligomerSchnitzbauer et al., 2017PMID:285181725' BG-TTATACATCTA 3'
OtherCy3b-labeled DNA imager strandsSchnitzbauer et al., 2017PMID:285181725' CTAGATGTAT-Cy3b 3'

Additional files

Download links