A WDR35-dependent coat protein complex transports ciliary membrane cargo vesicles to cilia

  1. Tooba Quidwai
  2. Jiaolong Wang
  3. Emma A Hall
  4. Narcis A Petriman
  5. Weihua Leng
  6. Petra Kiesel
  7. Jonathan N Wells
  8. Laura C Murphy
  9. Margaret A Keighren
  10. Joseph A Marsh
  11. Esben Lorentzen
  12. Gaia Pigino
  13. Pleasantine Mill  Is a corresponding author
  1. MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, United Kingdom
  2. Aarhus University, Denmark
  3. MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  4. Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany
  5. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany
  6. The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  7. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  8. Human Technopole, Italy

Abstract

Intraflagellar transport (IFT) is a highly conserved mechanism for motor-driven transport of cargo within cilia, but how this cargo is selectively transported to cilia is unclear. WDR35/IFT121 is a component of the IFT-A complex best known for its role in ciliary retrograde transport. In the absence of WDR35, small mutant cilia form but fail to enrich in diverse classes of ciliary membrane proteins. In Wdr35 mouse mutants, the non-core IFT-A components are degraded and core components accumulate at the ciliary base. We reveal deep sequence homology of WDR35 and other IFT-A subunits to α and ß' COPI coatomer subunits, and demonstrate an accumulation of 'coat-less' vesicles which fail to fuse with Wdr35 mutant cilia. We determine that recombinant non-core IFT-As can bind directly to lipids and provide the first in-situ evidence of a novel coat function for WDR35, likely with other IFT-A proteins, in delivering ciliary membrane cargo necessary for cilia elongation.

Data availability

Source Data (Figures 1B,C; 2B; 3B; as well as Figure 3 Supplement 1C, Figure 7 Supplement-1C) have been uploaded with the submission containing numerical data of all graphs shown in the figures and figure supplements. We have also uploaded the Excel or/and Prism files as source data in addition to the data points which have been referenced, as appropriate in the Figure legends. Source data of raw and full uncropped blots for Figures 3B, C, E and Figure 3 Supplement 1A, as well as Figure 5B, C and Figure 5 Supplement 1 B-D are uploaded as zipped files per figure. For Figure 7F, we have included the ROIs used for calculations uploaded in a single folder including all numerical data of Figure 7 (7B-D,F) graphs at Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m37pvmd33. All analysis tools have been made available on GitHub (https://github.com/IGMM-ImagingFacility/Quidwai2020 WDR35paper), as described in Materials and Methods. Proteomics data files are be uploaded ProteomeXchange (Identifer: PXD022652), with the accession number is available with the paper and is now publically available.Project Name: A WDR35-dependent coatomer transports ciliary membrane proteins from the Golgi to the ciliaProject accession: PXD022652

The following data sets were generated
    1. Mill P
    2. Quidwai T
    3. Murphy L
    4. Pigino G
    (2021) Figure 7- source data 1.
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.5061/dryad.m37pvmd33.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tooba Quidwai

    Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5248-9010
  2. Jiaolong Wang

    Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Emma A Hall

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Narcis A Petriman

    Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3189-7530
  5. Weihua Leng

    Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Petra Kiesel

    Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jonathan N Wells

    Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3700-020X
  8. Laura C Murphy

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Margaret A Keighren

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Joseph A Marsh

    Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Esben Lorentzen

    Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6493-7220
  12. Gaia Pigino

    Human Technopole, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Pleasantine Mill

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Pleasantine.Mill@igmm.ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5218-134X

Funding

European Molecular Biology Laboratory (Short Term Fellowship)

  • Tooba Quidwai

European Commission (H2020,Grant Agreement number 888322)

  • Narcis A Petriman

Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine (Research Prize Fellow)

  • Joseph A Marsh

Novo Nordisk (Grant No. NNF15OC0014164)

  • Jiaolong Wang
  • Narcis A Petriman
  • Esben Lorentzen

Carlsbergfondet (Grant No. CF19-0253)

  • Jiaolong Wang
  • Narcis A Petriman
  • Esben Lorentzen

European Commission (H2020 Grant No. 819826)

  • Weihua Leng
  • Petra Kiesel
  • Gaia Pigino

European Commission (H2020 No. 866355)

  • Tooba Quidwai
  • Emma A Hall
  • Pleasantine Mill

Medical Research Council (Core unit funding No. MC_UU_12018/26)

  • Tooba Quidwai
  • Emma A Hall
  • Laura C Murphy
  • Margaret A Keighren
  • Pleasantine Mill

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: We followed international, national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals. Animal experiments were carried out under UK Home Office Project Licenses PPL 60/4424, PB0DC8431 and P18921CDE in facilities at the University of Edinburgh (PEL 60/2605) and were approved by the University of Edinburgh animal welfare and ethical review body.

Copyright

© 2021, Quidwai et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,679
    views
  • 547
    downloads
  • 36
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tooba Quidwai
  2. Jiaolong Wang
  3. Emma A Hall
  4. Narcis A Petriman
  5. Weihua Leng
  6. Petra Kiesel
  7. Jonathan N Wells
  8. Laura C Murphy
  9. Margaret A Keighren
  10. Joseph A Marsh
  11. Esben Lorentzen
  12. Gaia Pigino
  13. Pleasantine Mill
(2021)
A WDR35-dependent coat protein complex transports ciliary membrane cargo vesicles to cilia
eLife 10:e69786.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69786

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69786

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Naoki Yamawaki, Hande Login ... Asami Tanimura
    Research Article

    The claustrum complex is viewed as fundamental for higher-order cognition; however, the circuit organization and function of its neuroanatomical subregions are not well understood. We demonstrated that some of the key roles of the CLA complex can be attributed to the connectivity and function of a small group of neurons in its ventral subregion, the endopiriform (EN). We identified a subpopulation of EN neurons by their projection to the ventral CA1 (ENvCA1-proj. neurons), embedded in recurrent circuits with other EN neurons and the piriform cortex. Although the ENvCA1-proj. neuron activity was biased toward novelty across stimulus categories, their chemogenetic inhibition selectively disrupted the memory-guided but not innate responses of mice to novelty. Based on our functional connectivity analysis, we suggest that ENvCA1-proj. neurons serve as an essential node for recognition memory through recurrent circuits mediating sustained attention to novelty, and through feed-forward inhibition of distal vCA1 neurons shifting memory-guided behavior from familiarity to novelty.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Sarah De Beuckeleer, Tim Van De Looverbosch ... Winnok H De Vos
    Research Article

    Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology is revolutionizing cell biology. However, the variability between individual iPSC lines and the lack of efficient technology to comprehensively characterize iPSC-derived cell types hinder its adoption in routine preclinical screening settings. To facilitate the validation of iPSC-derived cell culture composition, we have implemented an imaging assay based on cell painting and convolutional neural networks to recognize cell types in dense and mixed cultures with high fidelity. We have benchmarked our approach using pure and mixed cultures of neuroblastoma and astrocytoma cell lines and attained a classification accuracy above 96%. Through iterative data erosion, we found that inputs containing the nuclear region of interest and its close environment, allow achieving equally high classification accuracy as inputs containing the whole cell for semi-confluent cultures and preserved prediction accuracy even in very dense cultures. We then applied this regionally restricted cell profiling approach to evaluate the differentiation status of iPSC-derived neural cultures, by determining the ratio of postmitotic neurons and neural progenitors. We found that the cell-based prediction significantly outperformed an approach in which the population-level time in culture was used as a classification criterion (96% vs 86%, respectively). In mixed iPSC-derived neuronal cultures, microglia could be unequivocally discriminated from neurons, regardless of their reactivity state, and a tiered strategy allowed for further distinguishing activated from non-activated cell states, albeit with lower accuracy. Thus, morphological single-cell profiling provides a means to quantify cell composition in complex mixed neural cultures and holds promise for use in the quality control of iPSC-derived cell culture models.