Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1) cooperates with estrogen receptor α (ERα) in the regulation of estrogen action in breast cancer cells

  1. Natalia Vydra  Is a corresponding author
  2. Patryk Janus
  3. Paweł Kuś
  4. Tomasz Stokowy
  5. Katarzyna Mrowiec
  6. Agnieszka Toma-Jonik
  7. Aleksandra Krzywon
  8. Alexander Jorge Cortez
  9. Bartosz Wojtaś
  10. Bartłomiej Gielniewski
  11. Roman Jaksik
  12. Marek Kimmel
  13. Wieslawa Widlak  Is a corresponding author
  1. Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland
  2. Silesian University of Technology, Poland
  3. University of Bergen, Norway
  4. Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
  5. Rice University, United States

Abstract

Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), a key regulator of transcriptional responses to proteotoxic stress, was linked to estrogen (E2) signaling through estrogen receptor α (ERα). We found that an HSF1 deficiency may decrease ERα level, attenuate the mitogenic action of E2, counteract E2-stimulated cell scattering, and reduce adhesion to collagens and cell motility in ER-positive breast cancer cells. The stimulatory effect of E2 on the transcriptome is largely weaker in HSF1-deficient cells, in part due to the higher basal expression of E2-dependent genes, which correlates with the enhanced binding of unliganded ERα to chromatin in such cells. HSF1 and ERα can cooperate directly in E2-stimulated regulation of transcription, and HSF1 potentiates the action of ERα through a mechanism involving chromatin reorganization. Furthermore, HSF1 deficiency may increase the sensitivity to hormonal therapy (4-hydroxytamoxifen) or CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib). Analyses of data from the TCGA database indicate that HSF1 increases the transcriptome disparity in ER-positive breast cancer and can enhance the genomic action of ERα. Moreover, only in ER-positive cancers, an elevated HSF1 level is associated with metastatic disease.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE159802, GSE159724 (scheduled to be released on Oct 21, 2021), and GSE186004 (scheduled to be released on Oct 13, 2022).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Natalia Vydra

    Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
    For correspondence
    natalia.vydra@io.gliwice.pl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Patryk Janus

    Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Paweł Kuś

    Department of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tomasz Stokowy

    Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Katarzyna Mrowiec

    Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Agnieszka Toma-Jonik

    Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Aleksandra Krzywon

    Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4796-5478
  8. Alexander Jorge Cortez

    Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1284-2638
  9. Bartosz Wojtaś

    Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Bartłomiej Gielniewski

    Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Roman Jaksik

    Department of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Marek Kimmel

    Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Wieslawa Widlak

    Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
    For correspondence
    wieslawa.widlak@io.gliwice.pl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8440-9414

Funding

National Science Centre, Poland (2014/13/B/NZ7/02341)

  • Natalia Vydra

National Science Centre, Poland (2015/17/B/NZ3/03760)

  • Wieslawa Widlak

National Science Centre, Poland (2018/29/B/ST7/02550)

  • Marek Kimmel

European Social Fund (POWR.03.02.00-00-I029)

  • Paweł Kuś

European Social Fund (POWR.03.02.00-00-I029)

  • Alexander Jorge Cortez

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Maureen E Murphy, The Wistar Institute, United States

Version history

  1. Received: April 28, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: May 7, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: November 15, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 16, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: December 24, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Vydra et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,656
    views
  • 293
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Natalia Vydra
  2. Patryk Janus
  3. Paweł Kuś
  4. Tomasz Stokowy
  5. Katarzyna Mrowiec
  6. Agnieszka Toma-Jonik
  7. Aleksandra Krzywon
  8. Alexander Jorge Cortez
  9. Bartosz Wojtaś
  10. Bartłomiej Gielniewski
  11. Roman Jaksik
  12. Marek Kimmel
  13. Wieslawa Widlak
(2021)
Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1) cooperates with estrogen receptor α (ERα) in the regulation of estrogen action in breast cancer cells
eLife 10:e69843.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69843

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69843

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Nicholas J Mullen, Surendra K Shukla ... Pankaj K Singh
    Research Article

    Pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis is a druggable metabolic dependency of cancer cells, and chemotherapy agents targeting pyrimidine metabolism are the backbone of treatment for many cancers. Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) is an essential enzyme in the de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway that can be targeted by clinically approved inhibitors. However, despite robust preclinical anticancer efficacy, DHODH inhibitors have shown limited single-agent activity in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. Therefore, novel combination therapy strategies are necessary to realize the potential of these drugs. To search for therapeutic vulnerabilities induced by DHODH inhibition, we examined gene expression changes in cancer cells treated with the potent and selective DHODH inhibitor brequinar (BQ). This revealed that BQ treatment causes upregulation of antigen presentation pathway genes and cell surface MHC class I expression. Mechanistic studies showed that this effect is (1) strictly dependent on pyrimidine nucleotide depletion, (2) independent of canonical antigen presentation pathway transcriptional regulators, and (3) mediated by RNA polymerase II elongation control by positive transcription elongation factor B (P-TEFb). Furthermore, BQ showed impressive single-agent efficacy in the immunocompetent B16F10 melanoma model, and combination treatment with BQ and dual immune checkpoint blockade (anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1) significantly prolonged mouse survival compared to either therapy alone. Our results have important implications for the clinical development of DHODH inhibitors and provide a rationale for combination therapy with BQ and immune checkpoint blockade.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Savvas Nikolaou, Amelie Juin ... Laura M Machesky
    Research Article Updated

    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis, with high rates of metastasis and few treatment options. Hyperactivation of KRAS in almost all tumours drives RAC1 activation, conferring enhanced migratory and proliferative capacity as well as macropinocytosis. Macropinocytosis is well understood as a nutrient scavenging mechanism, but little is known about its functions in trafficking of signalling receptors. We find that CYRI-B is highly expressed in pancreatic tumours in a mouse model of KRAS and p53-driven pancreatic cancer. Deletion of Cyrib (the gene encoding CYRI-B protein) accelerates tumourigenesis, leading to enhanced ERK and JNK-induced proliferation in precancerous lesions, indicating a potential role as a buffer of RAC1 hyperactivation in early stages. However, as disease progresses, loss of CYRI-B inhibits metastasis. CYRI-B depleted tumour cells show reduced chemotactic responses to lysophosphatidic acid, a major driver of tumour spread, due to impaired macropinocytic uptake of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1. Overall, we implicate CYRI-B as a mediator of growth and signalling in pancreatic cancer, providing new insights into pathways controlling metastasis.