Structure and mechanistic features of the prokaryotic minimal RNase P

  1. Rebecca Feyh
  2. Nadine Bianca Waeber
  3. Simone Prinz
  4. Pietro Ivan Giammarinaro
  5. Gert Bange
  6. Georg Hochberg
  7. Roland Karl Hartmann  Is a corresponding author
  8. Florian Altegoer  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg,, Germany
  2. Department of Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Germany
  3. Center for Synthetic Microbiology and Department of Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany
  4. Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Germany
  5. Philipps-Universitaet Marburg, Germany

Abstract

Endonucleolytic removal of 5'-leader sequences from tRNA precursor transcripts (pre-tRNAs) by RNase P is essential for protein synthesis. Beyond RNA-based RNase P enzymes, protein-only versions of the enzyme exert this function in various Eukarya (there termed PRORPs) and in some bacteria (Aquifex aeolicus and close relatives); both enzyme types belong to distinct subgroups of the PIN domain metallonuclease superfamily. Homologs of Aquifex RNase P (HARPs) are also expressed in some other bacteria and many archaea, where they coexist with RNA-based RNase P and do not represent the main RNase P activity. Here we solved the structure of the bacterial HARP from Halorhodospira halophila by cryo-EM revealing a novel screw-like dodecameric assembly. Biochemical experiments demonstrate that oligomerization is required for RNase P activity of HARPs. We propose that the tRNA substrate binds to an extended spike-helix (SH) domain that protrudes from the screw-like assembly to position the 5'-end in close proximity to the active site of the neighboring dimer. The structure suggests that eukaryotic PRORPs and prokaryotic HARPs recognize the same structural elements of pre-tRNAs (tRNA elbow region and cleavage site). Our analysis thus delivers the structural and mechanistic basis for pre-tRNA processing by the prokaryotic HARP system.

Data availability

Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited within the protein data bank (PDB) and the electron microscopy data bank (EMDB) under accession codes: 7OG5 and EMD-12878. The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rebecca Feyh

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg,, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nadine Bianca Waeber

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg,, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Simone Prinz

    Department of Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Pietro Ivan Giammarinaro

    Chemistry, Center for Synthetic Microbiology and Department of Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0356-8481
  5. Gert Bange

    Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Georg Hochberg

    Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Roland Karl Hartmann

    Philipps-Universitaet Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    roland.hartmann@staff.uni-marburg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Florian Altegoer

    Chemistry, Center for Synthetic Microbiology and Department of Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    altegoer@uni-marburg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6012-9047

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HA 1672/19-1)

  • Roland Karl Hartmann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Feyh et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,064
    views
  • 296
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rebecca Feyh
  2. Nadine Bianca Waeber
  3. Simone Prinz
  4. Pietro Ivan Giammarinaro
  5. Gert Bange
  6. Georg Hochberg
  7. Roland Karl Hartmann
  8. Florian Altegoer
(2021)
Structure and mechanistic features of the prokaryotic minimal RNase P
eLife 10:e70160.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70160

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70160

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mai Nguyen, Elda Bauda ... Cecile Morlot
    Research Article

    Teichoic acids (TA) are linear phospho-saccharidic polymers and important constituents of the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, either bound to the peptidoglycan as wall teichoic acids (WTA) or to the membrane as lipoteichoic acids (LTA). The composition of TA varies greatly but the presence of both WTA and LTA is highly conserved, hinting at an underlying fundamental function that is distinct from their specific roles in diverse organisms. We report the observation of a periplasmic space in Streptococcus pneumoniae by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The thickness and appearance of this region change upon deletion of genes involved in the attachment of TA, supporting their role in the maintenance of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria as a possible universal function. Consequences of these mutations were further examined by super-resolved microscopy, following metabolic labeling and fluorophore coupling by click chemistry. This novel labeling method also enabled in-gel analysis of cell fractions. With this approach, we were able to titrate the actual amount of TA per cell and to determine the ratio of WTA to LTA. In addition, we followed the change of TA length during growth phases, and discovered that a mutant devoid of LTA accumulates the membrane-bound polymerized TA precursor.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.