Bacterial Blooms: The social life of cyanobacteria
Cyanobacteria are ancient and extremely versatile organisms that can be found in nearly every ecosystem on Earth, in particular lakes, rivers and oceans. Like plants and algae, they produce oxygen and use sunlight as an energy source.
Some cyanobacteria – even single-celled ones – show striking collective behaviours and form colonies (or ‘blooms’) that can float on water and have important ecological roles. For instance, billions of years ago, communities of marine Paleoproterozoic cyanobacteria could have helped create the biosphere as we know it by burying carbon compounds and allowing the initial build-up of oxygen in the atmosphere (Kamennaya et al., 2018). On the other hand, toxic cyanobacterial blooms are an increasingly issue for society, as their toxins can be harmful to animals (Huisman et al., 2018). Extreme blooms can also deplete water of oxygen and reduce sunlight and visibility, thereby compromising the feeding and mating behavior of light-reliant species.
It has been unclear why and how cyanobacteria form communities. Aggregation must divert resources away from the core business of making more cyanobacteria, as it generally involves the production of copious quantities of extracellular material. In addition, cells in the centre of dense aggregates can also suffer from both shading and shortage of nutrients (Conradi et al., 2019; Enomoto and Ikeuchi, 2020). So, what advantage does this communal life bring for cyanobacteria?
Now, in eLife, Masahiko Ikeuchi of the University of Tokyo and colleagues – including Kaisei Maeda as first author – report new insights into how cyanobacteria form blooms (Maeda et al., 2021). Using the widely studied cyanobacterium Synechocystis, they identified a set of genes that regulate the production and export of sulphated polysaccharides, chains of sugar molecules modified with sulphate groups that can often be found in marine algae and animal tissue. Many bacteria generate extracellular polysaccharides, but sulphated ones have only been seen in cyanobacteria.
Maeda et al. showed that the sulphated polysaccharide in Synechocystis, which they named Synechan, helps the cyanobacterium to form buoyant aggregates by trapping oxygen bubbles in the slimy web of cells and polysaccharides. This suggests that a major purpose for the production of Synechan is buoyancy.
Previous studies on Synechocystis have shown that type IV pili, which decorate the surface of cyanobacteria, also play a role in forming blooms (Allen et al., 2019; Conradi et al., 2019). These retractable and adhesive protein fibres are important for motility, adhesion to substrates and DNA uptake (Schuergers and Wilde, 2015). The formation of blooms may require both type IV pili and Synechan – for example, the pili may help to export the polysaccharide outside the cell. Indeed, the activity of these protein fibres may be connected to the production of extracellular polysaccharides in filamentous cyanobacteria (Khayatan et al., 2015). A more obvious answer would be that pili help to build the aggregates by binding the cells with each other or with the extracellular polysaccharide. As with other kinds of bacteria (Adams et al., 2019), certain components of the pili may allow cyanobacteria from the same species to recognise each other and make initial contacts, which are then stabilised by building a mass of extracellular polysaccharide.
The ‘bubble flotation’ mechanism identified by Maeda et al. joins a range of known strategies that enable cyanobacteria to control their buoyancy, such as using gas vesicles or accumulating carbohydrate ballasts (Figure 1; Kromkamp and Walsby, 1990). Type IV pili on their own could also control the position of marine cyanobacteria in the water column by regulating viscous drag (Aguilo-Ferretjans et al., 2021). Extracellular polysaccharide appears to be a multipurpose asset for cyanobacteria, from floatation device to food storage, defence mechanism and mobility aid (Khayatan et al., 2015). Cyanobacteria can make surprisingly complex and diverse lifestyle choices, and the role of slime in their social life calls for further exploration.
It remains to be seen if Synechan production in nature would serve to segregate cyanobacteria away from other species, including dangerous predators; or whether it may help to build a floating microbial community where multiple, metabolically diverse species can cooperate. We know so little about the real life of Synechocystis outside the laboratory that both ideas are equally possible.
References
-
Cyanobacterial bloomsNature Reviews Microbiology 16:471–483.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0040-1
-
A computer model of buoyancy and vertical migration in cyanobacteriaJournal of Plankton Research 12:161–183.https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/12.1.161
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2021, Mullineaux and Wilde
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,159
- views
-
- 218
- downloads
-
- 2
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Zika virus (ZIKV) infection causes significant human disease that, with no approved treatment or vaccine, constitutes a major public health concern. Its life cycle entirely relies on the cytoplasmic fate of the viral RNA genome (vRNA) through a fine-tuned equilibrium between vRNA translation, replication, and packaging into new virions, all within virus-induced replication organelles (vROs). In this study, with an RNA interference (RNAi) mini-screening and subsequent functional characterization, we have identified insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 (IGF2BP2) as a new host dependency factor that regulates vRNA synthesis. In infected cells, IGF2BP2 associates with viral NS5 polymerase and redistributes to the perinuclear viral replication compartment. Combined fluorescence in situ hybridization-based confocal imaging, in vitro binding assays, and immunoprecipitation coupled to RT-qPCR showed that IGF2BP2 directly interacts with ZIKV vRNA 3’ nontranslated region. Using ZIKV sub-genomic replicons and a replication-independent vRO induction system, we demonstrated that IGF2BP2 knockdown impairs de novo vRO biogenesis and, consistently, vRNA synthesis. Finally, the analysis of immunopurified IGF2BP2 complex using quantitative mass spectrometry and RT-qPCR revealed that ZIKV infection alters the protein and RNA interactomes of IGF2BP2. Altogether, our data support that ZIKV hijacks and remodels the IGF2BP2 ribonucleoprotein complex to regulate vRO biogenesis and vRNA neosynthesis.
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
The sustained success of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a pathogen arises from its ability to persist within macrophages for extended periods and its limited responsiveness to antibiotics. Furthermore, the high incidence of resistance to the few available antituberculosis drugs is a significant concern, especially since the driving forces of the emergence of drug resistance are not clear. Drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can emerge through de novo mutations, however, mycobacterial mutation rates are low. To unravel the effects of antibiotic pressure on genome stability, we determined the genetic variability, phenotypic tolerance, DNA repair system activation, and dNTP pool upon treatment with current antibiotics using Mycobacterium smegmatis. Whole-genome sequencing revealed no significant increase in mutation rates after prolonged exposure to first-line antibiotics. However, the phenotypic fluctuation assay indicated rapid adaptation to antibiotics mediated by non-genetic factors. The upregulation of DNA repair genes, measured using qPCR, suggests that genomic integrity may be maintained through the activation of specific DNA repair pathways. Our results, indicating that antibiotic exposure does not result in de novo adaptive mutagenesis under laboratory conditions, do not lend support to the model suggesting antibiotic resistance development through drug pressure-induced microevolution.