Effects of common mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD and its ligand, the human ACE2 receptor on binding affinity and kinetics

  1. Michael I Barton
  2. Stuart A MacGowan
  3. Mikhail A Kutuzov
  4. Omer Dushek
  5. Geoffrey John Barton  Is a corresponding author
  6. P Anton van der Merwe  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, United Kingdom
4 figures, 3 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Spike RBD and ACE2 variants analysed in this study.

(A) Phylogenetic tree illustrating the clades containing the RBD mutations investigated in this study. Constructed using TreeTime (Sagulenko et al., 2018) from the Nextstrain Global (Hadfield et al., 2018) sample of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from the GISAID database (Shu and McCauley, 2017) (accessed 15 April 2021, N = 4017). (B) Alignment illustrating the Spike residues that differ between SARS-CoV-2 variants, with the RBD mutants boxed. The variants are labelled with their clade designation from Nextstrain (Hadfield et al., 2018) and/or PANGO lineage (Rambaut et al., 2020), where relevant. The RBD mutations were collated from CoVariants (Hodcroft, 2021) and Nextstrain. (C) The structure of human ACE2 (green) in complex with SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD (cyan). The area enclosed by the box is shown enlarged on the right, with the residues mutated in this study labelled. Drawn using UCSF Chimera (Pettersen et al., 2004) using coordinates from PDB 6m0j (Lan et al., 2020).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Emergence of the same RBD mutations in multiple SAR2-CoV-2 clades.

The figure highlights the SARS-CoV-2 clades containing RBD mutations investigated in this study. The phylogenetic trees were constructed as in Figure 1A from SARS-CoV-2 sequences accessed on 22 April 2021 (N = 3914). (A) N501Y has emerged independently in the three clades 501Y.V1, 501Y.V2, and 501Y.V3. Mutation to T at this position has also occurred frequently. (B) E484K has also been observed independently of its main progenitor clades 501Y.V2 and 501Y.V3. E484Q and E484G have also been observed. (C) S477N has been observed beyond clades 20 F and 20A.EU2. Mutations to I and R have also been occasionally observed at this position. (D) Mutations of K417 to N and T have been observed almost exclusively in the 20 H.501Y.V2 and 20 J.501Y.V3 clades.

Figure 2 with 2 supplements
SPR analysis.

(A) Overlay of traces showing association and dissociation when WT RBD is injected for 30 s at the indicated concentration over immobilised WT ACE2. The right panel shows an expanded view of the dissociation phase. The blue lines show the fits used for determining the kon and koff. The kon was determined as described in Figure 2—figure supplement 2. The koff (B) and kon (C) values measured at different levels of immobilised ACE2 are shown. (D) The equilibrium KD was determined by plotting the binding at equilibrium against [RBD] injected. Data from experiment shown in (A). (E) The equilibrium KD measured at different levels of immobilised ACE2 are shown.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Protein purification.

Size-exclusion chromatography traces of the indicated ACE2 and RBD proteins and reducing SDS–PAGE of the indicated peak fractions. UK2 refers to the VOC-202102–02 variants. In preparations of RBD, unidentified ~60 kDa contaminants were present at various levels, but always <5% by densitometry.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2
Determining the kon and koff.

Analysis of data from the fits in Figure 2A. (A) A plot of koff obtained for each injection versus [RBD]. (B) A plot of kobs for each injection versus [RBD]. The line shows a constrained fit of the equation kobs = kon*[RBD]+ koff, using the koff obtained in (A). The kon was obtained from the slope.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements
Effect of RBD mutations on binding to WT ACE2.

Overlay of traces showing association and dissociation of N501Y (A) and K417N (B) RBD variants when injected at a range of concentrations over immobilised WT ACE2. The right panels show an expanded view of the dissociation phase. The blue lines show fits used for determining the kon and koff. (C) The fold change relative to WT RBD of the calculated KD, kon, and koff for binding of the indicated RBD variants to immobilised WT ACE2 (error bars show SD, n = 3). Representative sensorgrams from all mutants shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 2, and the mean values from multiple repeats are in Table 1. (D) The blue lines show the measured ΔΔG for indicated RBD variants. The red lines show the predicted ΔΔG for the RBD variants with multiple mutations, which were calculated by adding ΔΔG values for single mutation variants (error bars show SD, n = 3).

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Mass transport controls for RBD.

The koff (A) and kon (B) for E484K/N501Y (UK2) RBD binding WT ACE2 at a range of surface immobilisations (n = 12). UK2 refers to VOC-202102–02.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Representative SPR data for RBD variants binding to WT ACE2.

Binding traces for the indicated RBD variants injected at different concentrations over immobilised WT ACE2. The right panels show an expanded view of the dissociation phase. The blue lines show fits used for determining the kon and koff. UK2 refers to the VOC-202102–02 variant.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Effect of mutations in ACE2.

(A) The fold change relative to WT ACE2 of the calculated KD, kon, and koff for the interaction of WT RBD and the indicated ACE2 variants (error bars show SD, n = 3). (B, C) Show the difference (ΔΔΔG) between the measured and predicted ΔΔG for S19P (B) and K26R (C) ACE2 variants binding to the indicated RBD variants, calculated from data in Table 2. The predicted ΔΔG values for each variant RBD/variant ACE2 interaction were calculated from the sum of the ΔΔG for the ACE2 variant binding WT RBD and the ΔΔG for the RBD variant binding WT ACE2 (Table 2).

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Representative SPR data for WT RBD binding ACE2 variants.

Binding traces for the WT RBD injected at different concentrations over the indicated immobilised ACE2 variants. The right panels show an expanded view of the dissociation phase. The blue lines show fits used for determining the kon and koff.

Tables

Table 1
Affinity and kinetic data for RBD variants and ACE2 variants.

Mean and SD of the koff, kon, calculated KD, and equilibrium KD values for all RBD variants binding all ACE2 variants. For most measurements n = 3, the exceptions were RBD WT/ACE2 WT equilibrium KD measurements (n = 24) and other RBD WT measurements (n = 6). UK2 refers to the VOC-202102–02 variant.

koff (s–1)SDkon (µM–1 s–1)SDKD calc. (nM)SDKD equi. (nM)SD
RBD over WT ACE2
WT0.06680.001130.900.0574.44.062.67.7
K417N0.1770.004160.490.053642934910
K417T0.1260.005100.550.042302322619
S477N0.03480.000370.810.0342.92.142.63.0
E484K0.08180.001831.540.0353.11.752.62.0
N501Y (Alpha)0.01110.000171.590.047.00.255.52.4
K417N/E484K0.2510.007991.020.072472325123
K417T/E484K0.1680.005731.100.05153121478.6
E484K/N501Y (UK2)0.01180.000372.330.105.10.363.72.7
K417N/E484K/N501Y (Beta)0.02910.000761.460.0620.00.7017.43.1
K417T/E484K/N501Y (Gamma)0.02110.000211.560.0713.50.4512.23.4
RBD over S19P ACE2
WT0.02980.000391.500.1220.01.330.52.2
K417N0.07820.002840.720.041082.81298.2
K417T0.05210.001960.690.0275.84.787.87.0
S477N0.02570.000161.050.0724.61.730.32.7
E484K0.03250.000312.020.0816.20.5520.81.3
N501Y (Alpha)0.00510.000042.310.092.20.093.50.4
K417N/E484K0.09610.001981.280.1175.67.191.36.5
K417T/E484K0.06600.002551.450.0345.52.553.81.5
E484K/N501Y (UK2)0.00510.000083.100.101.70.053.40.4
K417N/E484K/N501Y (Beta)0.01220.000092.160.035.70.0710.41.2
K417T/E484K/N501Y (Gamma)0.00850.000072.110.054.00.076.11.3
RBD over K26R ACE2
S477N0.02400.000091.070.0522.61.133.41.3
WT0.05000.000621.600.1631.42.648.82.5
K417N0.1540.007890.880.071758.123715
K417T0.1010.000790.810.1212717.41542.8
S477N0.02400.000091.070.0522.61.133.41.3
E484K0.05870.001092.030.0328.91.035.91.5
N501Y (Alpha)0.00810.000022.340.093.50.157.51.5
K417N/E484K0.1910.004811.480.151309.416611
K417T/E484K0.1350.004071.530.0288.03.91050.7
E484K/N501Y (UK2)0.00850.000183.060.232.80.176.40.3
K417N/E484K/N501Y (Beta)0.02340.000402.130.0511.00.2818.72.0
K417T/E484K/N501Y (Gamma)0.01640.000282.210.067.40.3315.30.8
Table 2
ΔΔG for RBD variants binding to ACE2 variants.

Mean and SD of ΔΔG (n = 3, kcal/mol) were determined as described in Materials and methods using the calculated KD values in Table 1. UK2 refers to the VOC-202102–02 variant.

Ace2 wtAce2 s19pAce2 k26r
RBD variantΔΔGSDΔΔGSDΔΔGSD
WT0.000.000.790.050.520.06
K417N–0.960.06–0.230.04–0.520.04
K417T–0.680.07–0.010.05–0.320.09
S477N0.330.040.670.050.720.04
E484K0.200.040.920.040.570.04
N501Y (Alpha)1.430.042.130.041.860.04
K417N/E484K–0.720.07–0.010.07–0.340.06
K417T/E484K–0.430.060.300.05–0.100.04
E484K/N501Y (UK2)1.620.052.300.041.980.05
K417N/E484K/N501Y (Beta)0.790.041.560.031.160.04
K417T/E484K/N501Y (Gamma)1.030.041.760.031.390.04
Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Transfected construct (human)ACE2 WTOxford Protein Production Facility-UKpOPINTTGneo_ACE2-BAP T
Transfected construct (human)ACE2 S19P; ACE2 K26RThis paperAvailable from authors
Transfected construct (SARS-CoV-2)RBD WTBEI Resources, NIHNR-52309pCAGG plasmid
Transfected construct (SARS-CoV-2)RBD K417N; RBD RBD K417T; RBD S477N; RBD E484K; RBD N501Y; RBD K417N/E484K; RBD K417T/E484K; RBD beta; RBD gammaThis paperpCAGG plasmid. Available from authors
Transfected construct (human)pTT3-BirA-FLAGAddgeneRRID:Addgene_64395Cotranfected for in-cell biotinylation
Peptide, recombinant proteinACE2 WT; ACE2 S19P; ACE2 K26RThis paperExpressed in HEK293 cells and purified
Peptide, recombinant proteinRBD WT; RBD K417N; RBD K417T; RBD S477N; RBD E484K; RBD N501Y; RBD K417N/E484K; RBD K417T/E484K; RBD beta; RBD gammaThis paperExpressed in HEK293 cells and purified
Antibodyanti-human ACE2 (mouse monoclonal)NOVUS BiologicalsAC384 (5 µg/mL)
Cell line (human)FreeStyle HEK293F CellsThermoFisher ScientificRRID:CVCL_D603
Chemical compound, drugFreeStyle MAX ReagentThermoFisher16447100
Chemical compound, drugFreeStyle 293 Expression MediumThermoFisher12338018
commercial assay or kitQuikChange II XLAgilent200,521
Commercial assay or kitAmine coupling kitCytivaBR100050
Software, algorithmGraphPadPrismVersion 9
OtherCM5 sensor chipsCytiva29149603

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael I Barton
  2. Stuart A MacGowan
  3. Mikhail A Kutuzov
  4. Omer Dushek
  5. Geoffrey John Barton
  6. P Anton van der Merwe
(2021)
Effects of common mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD and its ligand, the human ACE2 receptor on binding affinity and kinetics
eLife 10:e70658.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70658