Inducible and reversible inhibition of miRNA-mediated gene repression in vivo

  1. Gaspare La Rocca  Is a corresponding author
  2. Bryan King
  3. Bing Shui
  4. Xiaoyi Li
  5. Minsi Zhang
  6. Kemal M Akat
  7. Paul Ogrodowski
  8. Chiara Mastroleo
  9. Kevin Chen
  10. Vincenzo Cavalieri
  11. Yilun Ma
  12. Viviana Anelli
  13. Doron Betel
  14. Joana Vidigal
  15. Thomas Tuschl
  16. Gunter Meister
  17. Craig B Thompson
  18. Tullia Lindsten
  19. Kevin Haigis
  20. Andrea Ventura  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  2. Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, United States
  3. Louis V. Gerstner Jr. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  4. Laboratory of RNA Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, United States
  5. Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Italy
  6. Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, United States
  7. Center of Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Italy
  8. Hem/Oncology, Medicine and Institution for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, United States
  9. Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, United States
  10. Regensburg Center for Biochemistry, University of Regensburg, Germany
  11. Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Decision letter

  1. Ashish Lal
    Reviewing Editor; National Institutes of Health, United States
  2. Kevin Struhl
    Senior Editor; Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. Joshua T Mendell
    Reviewer; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Acceptance summary:

In this manuscript, the authors have extensively characterized a new tool for studying the phenotypic roles of miRNA-mediated regulation in mice. Analysis of this model has convincingly demonstrated that miRNA activity is dispensable for homeostasis in most adult tissues, with the notable exception of heart and skeletal muscle. This work provides an extremely useful tool for the study of miRNAs in vivo and provides new insights into the roles of miRNAs in adult mammalian tissues.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Inducible and reversible inhibition of miRNA-mediated gene repression in vivo" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, including Ashish Lal as the Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen by Kevin Struhl as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Joshua T Mendell (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

In this manuscript the authors developed an inducible and reversible system for inhibition of miRNA-mediated gene repression in vivo. The authors demonstrate the use of this system by investigating the consequences of inhibition of miRNA activity in adult animals. Interestingly, they found that global loss if miRNA function has different effects on different tissues and organs and in some tissues the effect is context dependent. Overall, this work is novel, interesting and data presented is solid. The results are presented in a clear and straightforward way. While most aspects of this work are very intriguing and supported well by solid experiments, a few additional analyses would provide additional information that would be interesting to readers.

1. An overall histopathologic analysis of P0 T6B mice exposed to dox between E13.5-E18.5 could be interesting to see if the development of any tissues are particularly sensitive to inhibition of miRNA-mediated silencing during this window. This would be straightforward if fixed P0 mice are available, although this analysis could be the subject of a future study if tissues are not readily available.

2. Figure 2 – supplement 2 shows T6B activation in lung in CAG-T6B but not R26-T6B animals. Does activation of the transgene in CAG-T6B mice result in any noticeable abnormalities in adult lung?

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70948.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1. An overall histopathologic analysis of P0 T6B mice exposed to dox between E13.5-E18.5 could be interesting to see if the development of any tissues are particularly sensitive to inhibition of miRNA-mediated silencing during this window. This would be straightforward if fixed P0 mice are available, although this analysis could be the subject of a future study if tissues are not readily available.

We agree with the Reviewer that a detailed characterization of the consequences of acute miRNA inhibition on mouse development is of great interest. We have asked the MSKCC mouse pathology service to carry out a pathologic analysis of the embryos described in Figure 3B and Figure 3—figure supplement 1. The results of this analysis confirmed the observed general delay in development of the T6B mice compared to wild type controls, but did not highlight any specific developmental defect that can be detected by histologic analysis of H and E stained sections.

We have initiated a series of more detailed studies, comparing different timing of T6B induction during embryonic development, and examining the effect of miRNA inhibition on in vitro differentiation trajectories by using single cell RNAseq analysis. We are thrilled about these studies, but they will require considerable time and effort and therefore, if the Editor and the Reviewers agree, we would prefer to present them in a follow-up manuscript.

2. Figure 2 – supplement 2 shows T6B activation in lung in CAG-T6B but not R26-T6B animals. Does activation of the transgene in CAG-T6B mice result in any noticeable abnormalities in adult lung?

We thank the Editor and Reviewers for the opportunity to clarify this aspect of the phenotypic analysis of the CAG-T6B strain that had been superficially described in our previous version of the manuscript. To address this point, we asked an experienced mouse pathologist from the MSKCC animal core to review the lung histology of adult CAG-T6B mice. As described in the revised manuscript, this analysis revealed marked vasculitis of the pulmonary veins (Figure 6—figure supplement 2). The most likely explanation for this phenotype is that these lesions are secondary to the increased pulmonary vein pressure caused by congestive heart failure, but we cannot exclude that a primary effect caused by T6B expression in the lung contributed to this phenotype. Follow-up studies using transgenic animals harboring tissue-restricted expression of rtTA will be needed to conclusively address this important point.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70948.sa2

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gaspare La Rocca
  2. Bryan King
  3. Bing Shui
  4. Xiaoyi Li
  5. Minsi Zhang
  6. Kemal M Akat
  7. Paul Ogrodowski
  8. Chiara Mastroleo
  9. Kevin Chen
  10. Vincenzo Cavalieri
  11. Yilun Ma
  12. Viviana Anelli
  13. Doron Betel
  14. Joana Vidigal
  15. Thomas Tuschl
  16. Gunter Meister
  17. Craig B Thompson
  18. Tullia Lindsten
  19. Kevin Haigis
  20. Andrea Ventura
(2021)
Inducible and reversible inhibition of miRNA-mediated gene repression in vivo
eLife 10:e70948.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70948

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70948