Structure and dynamics of the chromatin remodeler ALC1 bound to a PARylated nucleosome

  1. Luka Bacic
  2. Guillaume Gaullier
  3. Anton Sabantsev
  4. Laura C Lehmann
  5. Klaus Brackmann
  6. Despoina Dimakou
  7. Mario Halic
  8. Graeme Hewitt
  9. Simon Boulton
  10. Sebastian Deindl  Is a corresponding author
  1. Uppsala University, Sweden
  2. St Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
  3. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom

Abstract

The chromatin remodeler ALC1 is recruited to and activated by DNA damage-induced poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chains deposited by PARP1/PARP2/HPF1 upon detection of DNA lesions. ALC1 has emerged as a candidate drug target for cancer therapy as its loss confers synthetic lethality in homologous recombination-deficient cells. However, structure-based drug design and molecular analysis of ALC1 have been hindered by the requirement for PARylation and the highly heterogeneous nature of this post-translational modification. Here, we reconstituted an ALC1 and PARylated nucleosome complex modified in vitro using PARP2 and HPF1. This complex was amenable to cryo-EM structure determination without cross-linking, which enabled visualization of several intermediate states of ALC1 from the recognition of the PARylated nucleosome to the tight binding and activation of the remodeler. Functional biochemical assays with PARylated nucleosomes highlight the importance of nucleosomal epitopes for productive remodeling and reveal that ALC1 preferentially slides nucleosomes away from DNA breaks.

Data availability

The cryo-EM map of the ALC1-nucleosome complex in the active state was deposited at the EMDB with accession code EMD-13065. The model of the ALC1-nucleosome complex in the active state was deposited at the PDB with accession code 7OTQ. The map series from the cryoDRGN graph traversal was deposited at the EMDB with accession code EMD-13070. Raw movies, extracted particles and their coordinates, and cryoDRGN and cryoSPARC job directories were deposited in EMPIAR with accession code EMPIAR-10739.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Luka Bacic

    Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6896-3506
  2. Guillaume Gaullier

    Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3405-6021
  3. Anton Sabantsev

    Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8559-8894
  4. Laura C Lehmann

    Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2518-5606
  5. Klaus Brackmann

    Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Despoina Dimakou

    Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1424-5469
  7. Mario Halic

    St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0061-7372
  8. Graeme Hewitt

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Simon Boulton

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Simon Boulton, is co-founder and VP Science Strategy at Artios Pharma Ltd..
  10. Sebastian Deindl

    Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    For correspondence
    sebastian.deindl@icm.uu.se
    Competing interests
    Sebastian Deindl, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6807-8654

Funding

European Research Council (714068)

  • Sebastian Deindl

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (KAW 019.0306)

  • Sebastian Deindl

Vetenskapsrådet (VR Grant 2019-03534)

  • Sebastian Deindl

Cancerfonden (19 0055 Pj)

  • Sebastian Deindl

Cancer Research UK (FC0010048)

  • Simon Boulton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jerry L Workman, Stowers Institute for Medical Research, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: June 18, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: June 18, 2021
  3. Accepted: September 5, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: September 6, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 24, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Bacic et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,895
    views
  • 532
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Luka Bacic
  2. Guillaume Gaullier
  3. Anton Sabantsev
  4. Laura C Lehmann
  5. Klaus Brackmann
  6. Despoina Dimakou
  7. Mario Halic
  8. Graeme Hewitt
  9. Simon Boulton
  10. Sebastian Deindl
(2021)
Structure and dynamics of the chromatin remodeler ALC1 bound to a PARylated nucleosome
eLife 10:e71420.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71420

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71420

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ramona Weber, Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    Recent findings indicate that the translation elongation rate influences mRNA stability. One of the factors that has been implicated in this link between mRNA decay and translation speed is the yeast DEAD-box helicase Dhh1p. Here, we demonstrated that the human ortholog of Dhh1p, DDX6, triggers the deadenylation-dependent decay of inefficiently translated mRNAs in human cells. DDX6 interacts with the ribosome through the Phe-Asp-Phe (FDF) motif in its RecA2 domain. Furthermore, RecA2-mediated interactions and ATPase activity are both required for DDX6 to destabilize inefficiently translated mRNAs. Using ribosome profiling and RNA sequencing, we identified two classes of endogenous mRNAs that are regulated in a DDX6-dependent manner. The identified targets are either translationally regulated or regulated at the steady-state-level and either exhibit signatures of poor overall translation or of locally reduced ribosome translocation rates. Transferring the identified sequence stretches into a reporter mRNA caused translation- and DDX6-dependent degradation of the reporter mRNA. In summary, these results identify DDX6 as a crucial regulator of mRNA translation and decay triggered by slow ribosome movement and provide insights into the mechanism by which DDX6 destabilizes inefficiently translated mRNAs.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Marwan Anoud, Emmanuelle Delagoutte ... Jean-Paul Concordet
    Research Article

    Tardigrades are microscopic animals renowned for their ability to withstand extreme conditions, including high doses of ionizing radiation (IR). To better understand their radio-resistance, we first characterized induction and repair of DNA double- and single-strand breaks after exposure to IR in the model species Hypsibius exemplaris. Importantly, we found that the rate of single-strand breaks induced was roughly equivalent to that in human cells, suggesting that DNA repair plays a predominant role in tardigrades’ radio-resistance. To identify novel tardigrade-specific genes involved, we next conducted a comparative transcriptomics analysis across three different species. In all three species, many DNA repair genes were among the most strongly overexpressed genes alongside a novel tardigrade-specific gene, which we named Tardigrade DNA damage Response 1 (TDR1). We found that TDR1 protein interacts with DNA and forms aggregates at high concentration suggesting it may condensate DNA and preserve chromosome organization until DNA repair is accomplished. Remarkably, when expressed in human cells, TDR1 improved resistance to Bleomycin, a radiomimetic drug. Based on these findings, we propose that TDR1 is a novel tardigrade-specific gene conferring resistance to IR. Our study sheds light on mechanisms of DNA repair helping cope with high levels of DNA damage inflicted by IR.