The transcription factor Xrp1 orchestrates both reduced translation and cell competition upon defective ribosome assembly or function

  1. Marianthi Kiparaki  Is a corresponding author
  2. Chaitali Khan
  3. Virginia Folgado-Marco
  4. Jacky Chuen
  5. Panagiotis Moulos  Is a corresponding author
  6. Nicholas E Baker  Is a corresponding author
  1. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  2. Alexander Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Center, Greece

Abstract

Ribosomal Protein (Rp) gene haploinsufficiency affects translation rate, can lead to protein aggregation, and causes cell elimination by competition with wild type cells in mosaic tissues. We find that the modest changes in ribosomal subunit levels observed were insufficient for these effects, which all depended on the AT-hook, bZip domain protein Xrp1. Xrp1 reduced global translation through PERK-dependent phosphorylation of eIF2α. eIF2α phosphorylation was itself sufficient to enable cell competition of otherwise wild type cells, but through Xrp1 expression, not as the downstream effector of Xrp1. Unexpectedly, many other defects reducing ribosome biogenesis or function (depletion of TAF1B, eIF2, eIF4G, eIF6, eEF2, eEF1α1, or eIF5A), also increased eIF2α phosphorylation and enabled cell competition. This was also through the Xrp1 expression that was induced in these depletions. In the absence of Xrp1, translation differences between cells were not themselves sufficient to trigger cell competition. Xrp1 is shown here to be a sequence-specific transcription factor that regulates transposable elements as well as single-copy genes. Thus, Xrp1 is the master regulator that triggers multiple consequences of ribosomal stresses, and is the key instigator of cell competition.

Data availability

mRNA-Seq data were analyzed from datasets available from GEO with accession numbers GSE112864 and GSE124924. All other data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 2-figure supplement 1, Figure 8-figure supplement 4, Figure 10 and Figure 10-figure supplement 1.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marianthi Kiparaki

    Genetics Department, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    For correspondence
    kiparaki@fleming.gr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chaitali Khan

    Genetics Department, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Virginia Folgado-Marco

    Genetics Department, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jacky Chuen

    Genetics Department, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Panagiotis Moulos

    Alexander Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Center, Vari, Greece
    For correspondence
    moulos@fleming.gr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nicholas E Baker

    Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    For correspondence
    nicholas.baker@einsteinmed.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4250-3488

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (research project grant GM120451)

  • Nicholas E Baker

NIH Office of the Director (instrumentation grant S10OD023591)

  • Nicholas E Baker

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA013330)

  • Nicholas E Baker

Ministry of Economy & Development, Greece (Research Infrastructure Grant Bio-Imaging GR MIS 5002755)

  • Marianthi Kiparaki

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Kiparaki et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,478
    views
  • 481
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marianthi Kiparaki
  2. Chaitali Khan
  3. Virginia Folgado-Marco
  4. Jacky Chuen
  5. Panagiotis Moulos
  6. Nicholas E Baker
(2022)
The transcription factor Xrp1 orchestrates both reduced translation and cell competition upon defective ribosome assembly or function
eLife 11:e71705.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71705

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71705

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Chengfang Pan, Ying Liu ... Changlong Hu
    Research Article

    Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is an endogenous inhibitor of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and plays an important role in pancreatic β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanism by which PGE2 inhibits GSIS. Our results showed that PGE2 inhibited Kv2.2 channels via increasing PKA activity in HEK293T cells overexpressed with Kv2.2 channels. Point mutation analysis demonstrated that S448 residue was responsible for the PKA-dependent modulation of Kv2.2. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of PGE2 on Kv2.2 was blocked by EP2/4 receptor antagonists, while mimicked by EP2/4 receptor agonists. The immune fluorescence results showed that EP1–4 receptors are expressed in both mouse and human β-cells. In INS-1(832/13) β-cells, PGE2 inhibited voltage-gated potassium currents and electrical activity through EP2/4 receptors and Kv2.2 channels. Knockdown of Kcnb2 reduced the action potential firing frequency and alleviated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in INS-1(832/13) β-cells. PGE2 impaired glucose tolerance in wild-type mice but did not alter glucose tolerance in Kcnb2 knockout mice. Knockout of Kcnb2 reduced electrical activity, GSIS and abrogated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in mouse islets. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that PGE2 inhibits GSIS in pancreatic β-cells through the EP2/4-Kv2.2 signaling pathway. The findings highlight the significant role of Kv2.2 channels in the regulation of β-cell repetitive firing and insulin secretion, and contribute to the understanding of the molecular basis of β-cell dysfunction in diabetes.

    1. Cell Biology
    Weihua Wang, Junqiao Xing ... Zhangfeng Hu
    Research Article

    Existence of cilia in the last eukaryotic common ancestor raises a fundamental question in biology: how the transcriptional regulation of ciliogenesis has evolved? One conceptual answer to this question is by an ancient transcription factor regulating ciliary gene expression in both uni- and multicellular organisms, but examples of such transcription factors in eukaryotes are lacking. Previously, we showed that an ancient transcription factor X chromosome-associated protein 5 (Xap5) is required for flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas. Here, we show that Xap5 and Xap5-like (Xap5l) are two conserved pairs of antagonistic transcription regulators that control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis. Male mice lacking either Xap5 or Xap5l display infertility, as a result of meiotic prophase arrest and sperm flagella malformation, respectively. Mechanistically, Xap5 positively regulates the ciliary gene expression by activating the key regulators including Foxj1 and Rfx families during the early stage of spermatogenesis. In contrast, Xap5l negatively regulates the expression of ciliary genes via repressing these ciliary transcription factors during the spermiogenesis stage. Our results provide new insights into the mechanisms by which temporal and spatial transcription regulators are coordinated to control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis.