An entropic safety catch controls Hepatitis C virus entry and antibody resistance

  1. Lenka Stejskal
  2. Mphatso D Kalemera
  3. Charlotte B Lewis
  4. Machaela Palor
  5. Lucas Walker
  6. Tina Daviter
  7. William D Lees
  8. David S Moss
  9. Myrto Kremyda-Vlachou
  10. Zisis Zisis Kozlakidis
  11. Giulia Gallo
  12. Dalan Bailey
  13. William Rosenberg
  14. Christopher JR Illingworth
  15. Adrian J Shepherd
  16. Joe Grove  Is a corresponding author
  1. University College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
  3. Birkbeck, University of London, United Kingdom
  4. World Health Organization, France
  5. The Pirbright Institute, United Kingdom
  6. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Abstract

E1 and E2 (E1E2), the fusion proteins of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), are unlike that of any other virus yet described, and the detailed molecular mechanisms of HCV entry/fusion remain unknown. Hypervariable region-1 (HVR-1) of E2 is a putative intrinsically disordered protein tail. Here, we demonstrate that HVR-1 has an autoinhibitory function that suppresses the activity of E1E2 on free virions; this is dependent on its conformational entropy. Thus, HVR-1 is akin to a safety catch that prevents premature triggering of E1E2 activity. Crucially, this mechanism is turned off by host receptor interactions at the cell surface to allow entry. Mutations that reduce conformational entropy in HVR-1, or genetic deletion of HVR-1, turn off the safety catch to generate hyper-reactive HCV that exhibits enhanced virus entry but is thermally unstable and acutely sensitive to neutralising antibodies. Therefore, the HVR-1 safety catch controls the efficiency of virus entry and maintains resistance to neutralising antibodies. This discovery provides an explanation for the ability of HCV to persist in the face of continual immune assault and represents a novel regulatory mechanism that is likely to be found in other viral fusion machinery.

Data availability

The underlying data for this manuscript are provided as a Source Data file. Full molecular dynamic simulation trajectories are available here: https://zenodo.org/record/4309544

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lenka Stejskal

    Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mphatso D Kalemera

    Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9461-1117
  3. Charlotte B Lewis

    University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Machaela Palor

    Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lucas Walker

    Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tina Daviter

    Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. William D Lees

    Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. David S Moss

    Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Myrto Kremyda-Vlachou

    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zisis Zisis Kozlakidis

    International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Giulia Gallo

    The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Dalan Bailey

    Virus Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Guildford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5640-2266
  13. William Rosenberg

    Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2732-2304
  14. Christopher JR Illingworth

    Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0030-2784
  15. Adrian J Shepherd

    Biological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0194-8613
  16. Joe Grove

    University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Joe.Grove@glasgow.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5390-7579

Funding

Wellcome Trust (107653/Z/15/Z)

  • Joe Grove

Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12014)

  • Joe Grove

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Fully consented blood samples (for IgG isolation) were collected from HCV+ patients under ethical approval: "Characterising and modifying immune responses in chronic viral hepatitis"; IRAS Number 43993; REC number 11/LO/0421.

Copyright

© 2022, Stejskal et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,106
    views
  • 240
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lenka Stejskal
  2. Mphatso D Kalemera
  3. Charlotte B Lewis
  4. Machaela Palor
  5. Lucas Walker
  6. Tina Daviter
  7. William D Lees
  8. David S Moss
  9. Myrto Kremyda-Vlachou
  10. Zisis Zisis Kozlakidis
  11. Giulia Gallo
  12. Dalan Bailey
  13. William Rosenberg
  14. Christopher JR Illingworth
  15. Adrian J Shepherd
  16. Joe Grove
(2022)
An entropic safety catch controls Hepatitis C virus entry and antibody resistance
eLife 11:e71854.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71854

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71854

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Malik Zohaib Ali, Taru S Dutt ... Mercedes Gonzalez Juarrero
    Research Article

    The Nix-TB clinical trial evaluated a new 6 month regimen containing three oral drugs; bedaquiline (B), pretomanid (Pa), and linezolid (L) (BPaL regimen) for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). This regimen achieved remarkable results as almost 90% of the multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant TB participants were cured but many patients also developed severe adverse events (AEs). The AEs were associated with the long-term administration of the protein synthesis inhibitor linezolid. Spectinamide 1599 is also a protein synthesis inhibitor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with an excellent safety profile, but it lacks oral bioavailability. Here, we propose to replace L in the BPaL regimen with spectinamide (S) administered via inhalation and we demonstrate that inhaled spectinamide 1599, combined with BPa ––BPaS regimen––has similar efficacy to that of the BPaL regimen while simultaneously avoiding the L-associated AEs. The BPaL and BPaS regimens were compared in the BALB/c and C3HeB/FeJ murine chronic TB efficacy models. After 4-weeks of treatment, both regimens promoted equivalent bactericidal effects in both TB murine models. However, treatment with BPaL resulted in significant weight loss and the complete blood count suggested the development of anemia. These effects were not similarly observed in mice treated with BPaS. BPaL and BPa, but not the BPaS treatment, also decreased myeloid to erythroid ratio suggesting the S in the BPaS regimen was able to recover this effect. Moreover, the BPaL also increased concentration of proinflammatory cytokines in bone marrow compared to mice receiving BPaS regimen. These combined data suggest that inhaled spectinamide 1599 combined with BPa is an effective TB regimen without L-associated AEs.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Yan Chen, Ruizhi Yang ... Zhao Shan
    Research Article

    The balanced gut microbiota in intestinal mucus layer plays an instrumental role in the health of the host. However, the mechanisms by which the host regulates microbial communities in the mucus layer remain largely unknown. Here, we discovered that the host regulates bacterial colonization in the gut mucus layer by producing a protein called Chitinase 3-like protein 1 (Chi3l1). Intestinal epithelial cells are stimulated by the gut microbiota to express Chi3l1. Once expressed, Chi3l1 is secreted into the mucus layer where it interacts with the gut microbiota, specifically through a component of bacterial cell walls called peptidoglycan. This interaction between Chi3l1 and bacteria is beneficial for the colonization of bacteria in the mucus, particularly for Gram-positive bacteria like Lactobacillus. Moreover, a deficiency of Chi3l1 leads to an imbalance in the gut microbiota, which exacerbates colitis induced by dextran sodium sulfate. By performing fecal microbiota transplantation from Villin-cre mice or replenishing Lactobacillus in IECChil1 mice, we were able to restore their colitis to the same level as that of Villin-cre mice. In summary, this study shows a ‘scaffold model’ for microbiota homeostasis by interaction between intestinal Chi3l1 and bacteria cell wall interaction, and it also highlights that an unbalanced gut microbiota in the intestinal mucus contributes to the development of colitis.