Local chromatin fiber folding represses transcription and loop extrusion in quiescent cells

  1. Sarah G Swygert  Is a corresponding author
  2. Dejun Lin
  3. Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma
  4. Po-Yen Lin
  5. Dakota R Hunt
  6. Cheng-Fu Kao
  7. Tamar Schlick
  8. William S Noble
  9. Toshio Tsukiyama  Is a corresponding author
  1. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
  2. University of Washington, United States
  3. New York University, United States
  4. Academia Sinica, Taiwan

Abstract

A longstanding hypothesis is that chromatin fiber folding mediated by interactions between nearby nucleosomes represses transcription. However, it has been difficult to determine the relationship between local chromatin fiber compaction and transcription in cells. Further, global changes in fiber diameters have not been observed, even between interphase and mitotic chromosomes. We show that an increase in the range of local inter-nucleosomal contacts in quiescent yeast drives the compaction of chromatin fibers genome-wide. Unlike actively dividing cells, inter-nucleosomal interactions in quiescent cells require a basic patch in the histone H4 tail. This quiescence-specific fiber folding globally represses transcription and inhibits chromatin loop extrusion by condensin. These results reveal that global changes in chromatin fiber compaction can occur during cell state transitions, and establish physiological roles for local chromatin fiber folding in regulating transcription and chromatin domain formation.

Data availability

All genomics data have been deposited to GEO and are available under accession code GSE167020. Genomics and mesoscale modeling analysis scripts are publicly available on GitHub at the following address: https://github.com/sswygert/Local-Chromatin-Fiber-Folding-Represses-Transcription-and-Loop-Extrusion-in-Quiescent-Cells

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sarah G Swygert

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    sarah.g.swygert@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Dejun Lin

    University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma

    New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Po-Yen Lin

    Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dakota R Hunt

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Cheng-Fu Kao

    Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tamar Schlick

    New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. William S Noble

    University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Toshio Tsukiyama

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    ttsukiya@fredhutch.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6478-6207

Funding

National Cancer Institute (T32CA009657)

  • Sarah G Swygert

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM139429)

  • Toshio Tsukiyama

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM120962)

  • Sarah G Swygert

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (K99GM134150)

  • Sarah G Swygert

Academia Sinica (AS-CFII-108-119)

  • Po-Yen Lin

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM055264)

  • Tamar Schlick

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM122562)

  • Tamar Schlick

National Science Foundation (2030277)

  • Tamar Schlick

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK107979)

  • William S Noble

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM111428)

  • Toshio Tsukiyama

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Swygert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,792
    views
  • 483
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sarah G Swygert
  2. Dejun Lin
  3. Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma
  4. Po-Yen Lin
  5. Dakota R Hunt
  6. Cheng-Fu Kao
  7. Tamar Schlick
  8. William S Noble
  9. Toshio Tsukiyama
(2021)
Local chromatin fiber folding represses transcription and loop extrusion in quiescent cells
eLife 10:e72062.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72062

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72062

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology
    Leif Benner, Savannah Muron ... Brian Oliver
    Research Article

    Differentiation of female germline stem cells into a mature oocyte includes the expression of RNAs and proteins that drive early embryonic development in Drosophila. We have little insight into what activates the expression of these maternal factors. One candidate is the zinc-finger protein OVO. OVO is required for female germline viability and has been shown to positively regulate its own expression, as well as a downstream target, ovarian tumor, by binding to the transcriptional start site (TSS). To find additional OVO targets in the female germline and further elucidate OVO’s role in oocyte development, we performed ChIP-seq to determine genome-wide OVO occupancy, as well as RNA-seq comparing hypomorphic and wild type rescue ovo alleles. OVO preferentially binds in close proximity to target TSSs genome-wide, is associated with open chromatin, transcriptionally active histone marks, and OVO-dependent expression. Motif enrichment analysis on OVO ChIP peaks identified a 5’-TAACNGT-3’ OVO DNA binding motif spatially enriched near TSSs. However, the OVO DNA binding motif does not exhibit precise motif spacing relative to the TSS characteristic of RNA polymerase II complex binding core promoter elements. Integrated genomics analysis showed that 525 genes that are bound and increase in expression downstream of OVO are known to be essential maternally expressed genes. These include genes involved in anterior/posterior/germ plasm specification (bcd, exu, swa, osk, nos, aub, pgc, gcl), egg activation (png, plu, gnu, wisp, C(3)g, mtrm), translational regulation (cup, orb, bru1, me31B), and vitelline membrane formation (fs(1)N, fs(1)M3, clos). This suggests that OVO is a master transcriptional regulator of oocyte development and is responsible for the expression of structural components of the egg as well as maternally provided RNAs that are required for early embryonic development.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erik Toraason, Alina Salagean ... Diana E Libuda
    Research Article Updated

    The preservation of genome integrity during sperm and egg development is vital for reproductive success. During meiosis, the tumor suppressor BRCA1/BRC-1 and structural maintenance of chromosomes 5/6 (SMC-5/6) complex genetically interact to promote high fidelity DNA double strand break (DSB) repair, but the specific DSB repair outcomes these proteins regulate remain unknown. Using genetic and cytological methods to monitor resolution of DSBs with different repair partners in Caenorhabditis elegans, we demonstrate that both BRC-1 and SMC-5 repress intersister crossover recombination events. Sequencing analysis of conversion tracts from homolog-independent DSB repair events further indicates that BRC-1 regulates intersister/intrachromatid noncrossover conversion tract length. Moreover, we find that BRC-1 specifically inhibits error prone repair of DSBs induced at mid-pachytene. Finally, we reveal functional interactions of BRC-1 and SMC-5/6 in regulating repair pathway engagement: BRC-1 is required for localization of recombinase proteins to DSBs in smc-5 mutants and enhances DSB repair defects in smc-5 mutants by repressing theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ). These results are consistent with a model in which some functions of BRC-1 act upstream of SMC-5/6 to promote recombination and inhibit error-prone DSB repair, while SMC-5/6 acts downstream of BRC-1 to regulate the formation or resolution of recombination intermediates. Taken together, our study illuminates the coordinated interplay of BRC-1 and SMC-5/6 to regulate DSB repair outcomes in the germline.