Novel mechanistic insights into the role of Mer2 as the keystone of meiotic DNA break formation

  1. Dorota Rousova
  2. Vaishnavi Nivsarkar
  3. Veronika Altmannova
  4. Vivek B Raina
  5. Saskia K Funk
  6. David Liedtke
  7. Petra Janning
  8. Franziska Müller
  9. Heidi Reichle
  10. Gerben Vader
  11. John Russell Weir  Is a corresponding author
  1. Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Germany
  3. Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

In meiosis, DNA double strand break (DSB) formation by Spo11 initiates recombination and enables chromosome segregation. Numerous factors are required for Spo11 activity, and couple the DSB machinery to the development of a meiosis-specific “axis-tethered loop” chromosome organization. Through in vitro reconstitution and budding yeast genetics we here provide architectural insight into the DSB machinery by focussing on a foundational DSB factor, Mer2. We characterise the interaction of Mer2 with the histone reader Spp1, and show that Mer2 directly associates to nucleosomes, likely highlighting a contribution of Mer2 to tethering DSB factors to chromatin. We reveal the biochemical basis of Mer2 association with Hop1, a HORMA domain-containing chromosomal axis factor. Finally, we identify a conserved region within Mer2 crucial for DSB activity, and show that this region of Mer2 interacts with the DSB factor Mre11. In combination with previous work, we establish Mer2 as a keystone of the DSB machinery by bridging key protein complexes involved in the initiation of meiotic recombination.

Data availability

Source data has been provided for the XL-MS experiments and for the IP-mass spec data

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dorota Rousova

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7395-2596
  2. Vaishnavi Nivsarkar

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Veronika Altmannova

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Vivek B Raina

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Saskia K Funk

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. David Liedtke

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Petra Janning

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Franziska Müller

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Heidi Reichle

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Gerben Vader

    Department of Human Genetics, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. John Russell Weir

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    john.weir@tuebingen.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6904-0284

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Dorota Rousova
  • Vaishnavi Nivsarkar
  • Veronika Altmannova
  • Vivek B Raina
  • Saskia K Funk
  • David Liedtke
  • Petra Janning
  • Franziska Müller
  • Heidi Reichle
  • Gerben Vader
  • John Russell Weir

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WE 6513/2-1)

  • Saskia K Funk
  • John Russell Weir

H2020 European Research Council (638197)

  • Vaishnavi Nivsarkar
  • Vivek B Raina
  • Gerben Vader

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Rousova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,476
    views
  • 437
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dorota Rousova
  2. Vaishnavi Nivsarkar
  3. Veronika Altmannova
  4. Vivek B Raina
  5. Saskia K Funk
  6. David Liedtke
  7. Petra Janning
  8. Franziska Müller
  9. Heidi Reichle
  10. Gerben Vader
  11. John Russell Weir
(2021)
Novel mechanistic insights into the role of Mer2 as the keystone of meiotic DNA break formation
eLife 10:e72330.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72330

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72330

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Raji E Joseph, Thomas E Wales ... Amy H Andreotti
    Research Advance

    Inhibition of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) has proven to be highly effective in the treatment of B-cell malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), autoimmune disorders, and multiple sclerosis. Since the approval of the first BTK inhibitor (BTKi), Ibrutinib, several other inhibitors including Acalabrutinib, Zanubrutinib, Tirabrutinib, and Pirtobrutinib have been clinically approved. All are covalent active site inhibitors, with the exception of the reversible active site inhibitor Pirtobrutinib. The large number of available inhibitors for the BTK target creates challenges in choosing the most appropriate BTKi for treatment. Side-by-side comparisons in CLL have shown that different inhibitors may differ in their treatment efficacy. Moreover, the nature of the resistance mutations that arise in patients appears to depend on the specific BTKi administered. We have previously shown that Ibrutinib binding to the kinase active site causes unanticipated long-range effects on the global conformation of BTK (Joseph et al., 2020). Here, we show that binding of each of the five approved BTKi to the kinase active site brings about distinct allosteric changes that alter the conformational equilibrium of full-length BTK. Additionally, we provide an explanation for the resistance mutation bias observed in CLL patients treated with different BTKi and characterize the mechanism of action of two common resistance mutations: BTK T474I and L528W.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Yingjie Sun, Changheng Li ... Youngnam N Jin
    Research Article

    Identifying target proteins for bioactive molecules is essential for understanding their mechanisms, developing improved derivatives, and minimizing off-target effects. Despite advances in target identification (target-ID) technologies, significant challenges remain, impeding drug development. Most target-ID methods use cell lysates, but maintaining an intact cellular context is vital for capturing specific drug–protein interactions, such as those with transient protein complexes and membrane-associated proteins. To address these limitations, we developed POST-IT (Pup-On-target for Small molecule Target Identification Technology), a non-diffusive proximity tagging system for live cells, orthogonal to the eukaryotic system. POST-IT utilizes an engineered fusion of proteasomal accessory factor A and HaloTag to transfer Pup to proximal proteins upon directly binding to the small molecule. After significant optimization to eliminate self-pupylation and polypupylation, minimize depupylation, and optimize chemical linkers, POST-IT successfully identified known targets and discovered a new binder, SEPHS2, for dasatinib, and VPS37C as a new target for hydroxychloroquine, enhancing our understanding these drugs’ mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we demonstrated the application of POST-IT in live zebrafish embryos, highlighting its potential for broad biological research and drug development.