Structural, mechanistic and physiological insights into phospholipase A-mediated membrane phospholipid degradation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

  1. Florian Bleffert
  2. Joachim Granzin
  3. Muttalip Caliskan
  4. Stephan N Schott-Verdugo
  5. Meike Siebers
  6. Björn Thiele
  7. Laurence G Rahme
  8. Sebastian Felgner
  9. Peter Dörmann
  10. Holger Gohlke  Is a corresponding author
  11. Renu Batra-Safferling  Is a corresponding author
  12. Karl Erich-Jäger
  13. Filip Kovacic  Is a corresponding author
  1. Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
  2. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany
  3. University of Bonn, Germany
  4. Harvard Medical School, United States
  5. Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany

Abstract

Cells steadily adapt their membrane glycerophospholipid (GPL) composition to changing environmental and developmental conditions. While the regulation of membrane homeostasis via GPL synthesis in bacteria has been studied in detail, the mechanisms underlying the controlled degradation of endogenous GPLs remain unknown. Thus far, the function of intracellular phospholipases A (PLAs) in GPL remodeling (Lands cycle) in bacteria is not clearly established. Here, we identified the first cytoplasmic membrane-bound phospholipase A1 (PlaF) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which might be involved in the Lands cycle. PlaF is an important virulence factor, as the P. aeruginosa ΔplaF mutant showed strongly attenuated virulence in Galleria mellonella and macrophages. We present a 2.0-Å-resolution crystal structure of PlaF, the first structure that reveals homodimerization of a single-pass transmembrane (TM) full-length protein. PlaF dimerization, mediated solely through the intermolecular interactions of TM and juxtamembrane regions, inhibits its activity. The dimerization site and the catalytic sites are linked by an intricate ligand-mediated interaction network, which might explain the product (fatty acid) feedback inhibition observed with the purified PlaF protein. We used molecular dynamics simulations and configurational free energy computations to suggest a model of PlaF activation through a coupled monomerization and tilting of the monomer in the membrane, which constrains the active site cavity into contact with the GPL substrates. Thus, these data show the importance of the PlaF mediated GPL remodeling pathway for virulence and could pave the way for the development of novel therapeutics targeting PlaF.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 6I8W.All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file.Sequencing data are embedded in Fig. S1b.Source Data file "Table S1 - lipidome" has been provided for Figure 2. It contains the numerical data used to generate the figure 2c.Source data used to calculate the potentials of mean force and their corresponding simulation trajectory files shown in figure 7 and figure 7-supplementary figure 1 are accessible at the DSpace instance researchdata.hhu.de under DOI: 10.25838/d5p-31.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Florian Bleffert

    Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Joachim Granzin

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Muttalip Caliskan

    Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Stephan N Schott-Verdugo

    Institute for Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Meike Siebers

    Institute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Björn Thiele

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Laurence G Rahme

    Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5374-4332
  8. Sebastian Felgner

    Department of Molecular Bacteriology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0030-2490
  9. Peter Dörmann

    Institute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5845-9370
  10. Holger Gohlke

    Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
    For correspondence
    gohlke@uni-duesseldorf.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8613-1447
  11. Renu Batra-Safferling

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
    For correspondence
    r.batra-safferling@fz-juelich.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Karl Erich-Jäger

    Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Filip Kovacic

    Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    For correspondence
    f.kovacic@fz-juelich.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0313-427X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (267205415)

  • Holger Gohlke
  • Karl Erich-Jäger
  • Filip Kovacic

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Bleffert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,239
    views
  • 391
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Florian Bleffert
  2. Joachim Granzin
  3. Muttalip Caliskan
  4. Stephan N Schott-Verdugo
  5. Meike Siebers
  6. Björn Thiele
  7. Laurence G Rahme
  8. Sebastian Felgner
  9. Peter Dörmann
  10. Holger Gohlke
  11. Renu Batra-Safferling
  12. Karl Erich-Jäger
  13. Filip Kovacic
(2022)
Structural, mechanistic and physiological insights into phospholipase A-mediated membrane phospholipid degradation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
eLife 11:e72824.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72824

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72824

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marina Dajka, Tobias Rath ... Benesh Joseph
    Research Article

    Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) confer resistance against harsh conditions, including antibiotics, in Gram-negative bacteria. The lipopolysaccharide transport (Lpt) complex, consisting of seven proteins (A-G), exports LPS across the cellular envelope. LptB2FG forms an ATP-binding cassette transporter that transfers LPS to LptC. How LptB2FG couples ATP binding and hydrolysis with LPS transport to LptC remains unclear. We observed the conformational heterogeneity of LptB2FG and LptB2FGC in micelles and/or proteoliposomes using pulsed dipolar electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Additionally, we monitored LPS binding and release using laser-induced liquid bead ion desorption mass spectrometry. The β-jellyroll domain of LptF stably interacts with the LptG and LptC β-jellyrolls in both the apo and vanadate-trapped states. ATP binding at the cytoplasmic side is allosterically coupled to the selective opening of the periplasmic LptF β-jellyroll domain. In LptB2FG, ATP binding closes the nucleotide binding domains, causing a collapse of the first lateral gate as observed in structures. However, the second lateral gate, which forms the putative entry site for LPS, exhibits a heterogeneous conformation. LptC binding limits the flexibility of this gate to two conformations, likely representing the helix of LptC as either released from or inserted into the transmembrane domains. Our results reveal the regulation of the LPS entry gate through the dynamic behavior of the LptC transmembrane helix, while its β-jellyroll domain is anchored in the periplasm. This, combined with long-range ATP-dependent allosteric gating of the LptF β-jellyroll domain, may ensure efficient and unidirectional transport of LPS across the periplasm.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Jaskamaljot Kaur Banwait, Liana Islam, Aaron L Lucius
    Research Article

    Escherichia coli ClpB and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp104 are AAA+ motor proteins essential for proteome maintenance and thermal tolerance. ClpB and Hsp104 have been proposed to extract a polypeptide from an aggregate and processively translocate the chain through the axial channel of its hexameric ring structure. However, the mechanism of translocation and if this reaction is processive remains disputed. We reported that Hsp104 and ClpB are non-processive on unfolded model substrates. Others have reported that ClpB is able to processively translocate a mechanically unfolded polypeptide chain at rates over 240 amino acids (aa) per second. Here, we report the development of a single turnover stopped-flow fluorescence strategy that reports on processive protein unfolding catalyzed by ClpB. We show that when translocation catalyzed by ClpB is challenged by stably folded protein structure, the motor enzymatically unfolds the substrate at a rate of ~0.9 aa s−1 with a kinetic step-size of ~60 amino acids at sub-saturating [ATP]. We reconcile the apparent controversy by defining enzyme catalyzed protein unfolding and translocation as two distinct reactions with different mechanisms of action. We propose a model where slow unfolding followed by fast translocation represents an important mechanistic feature that allows the motor to rapidly translocate up to the next folded region or rapidly dissociate if no additional fold is encountered.