Structural, mechanistic and physiological insights into phospholipase A-mediated membrane phospholipid degradation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

  1. Florian Bleffert
  2. Joachim Granzin
  3. Muttalip Caliskan
  4. Stephan N Schott-Verdugo
  5. Meike Siebers
  6. Björn Thiele
  7. Laurence G Rahme
  8. Sebastian Felgner
  9. Peter Dörmann
  10. Holger Gohlke  Is a corresponding author
  11. Renu Batra-Safferling  Is a corresponding author
  12. Karl Erich-Jäger
  13. Filip Kovacic  Is a corresponding author
  1. Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
  2. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany
  3. University of Bonn, Germany
  4. Harvard Medical School, United States
  5. Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany

Abstract

Cells steadily adapt their membrane glycerophospholipid (GPL) composition to changing environmental and developmental conditions. While the regulation of membrane homeostasis via GPL synthesis in bacteria has been studied in detail, the mechanisms underlying the controlled degradation of endogenous GPLs remain unknown. Thus far, the function of intracellular phospholipases A (PLAs) in GPL remodeling (Lands cycle) in bacteria is not clearly established. Here, we identified the first cytoplasmic membrane-bound phospholipase A1 (PlaF) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which might be involved in the Lands cycle. PlaF is an important virulence factor, as the P. aeruginosa ΔplaF mutant showed strongly attenuated virulence in Galleria mellonella and macrophages. We present a 2.0-Å-resolution crystal structure of PlaF, the first structure that reveals homodimerization of a single-pass transmembrane (TM) full-length protein. PlaF dimerization, mediated solely through the intermolecular interactions of TM and juxtamembrane regions, inhibits its activity. The dimerization site and the catalytic sites are linked by an intricate ligand-mediated interaction network, which might explain the product (fatty acid) feedback inhibition observed with the purified PlaF protein. We used molecular dynamics simulations and configurational free energy computations to suggest a model of PlaF activation through a coupled monomerization and tilting of the monomer in the membrane, which constrains the active site cavity into contact with the GPL substrates. Thus, these data show the importance of the PlaF mediated GPL remodeling pathway for virulence and could pave the way for the development of novel therapeutics targeting PlaF.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 6I8W.All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file.Sequencing data are embedded in Fig. S1b.Source Data file "Table S1 - lipidome" has been provided for Figure 2. It contains the numerical data used to generate the figure 2c.Source data used to calculate the potentials of mean force and their corresponding simulation trajectory files shown in figure 7 and figure 7-supplementary figure 1 are accessible at the DSpace instance researchdata.hhu.de under DOI: 10.25838/d5p-31.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Florian Bleffert

    Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Joachim Granzin

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Muttalip Caliskan

    Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Stephan N Schott-Verdugo

    Institute for Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Meike Siebers

    Institute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Björn Thiele

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Laurence G Rahme

    Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5374-4332
  8. Sebastian Felgner

    Department of Molecular Bacteriology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0030-2490
  9. Peter Dörmann

    Institute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5845-9370
  10. Holger Gohlke

    Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
    For correspondence
    gohlke@uni-duesseldorf.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8613-1447
  11. Renu Batra-Safferling

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
    For correspondence
    r.batra-safferling@fz-juelich.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Karl Erich-Jäger

    Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Filip Kovacic

    Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
    For correspondence
    f.kovacic@fz-juelich.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0313-427X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (267205415)

  • Holger Gohlke
  • Karl Erich-Jäger
  • Filip Kovacic

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Bleffert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,422
    views
  • 405
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Florian Bleffert
  2. Joachim Granzin
  3. Muttalip Caliskan
  4. Stephan N Schott-Verdugo
  5. Meike Siebers
  6. Björn Thiele
  7. Laurence G Rahme
  8. Sebastian Felgner
  9. Peter Dörmann
  10. Holger Gohlke
  11. Renu Batra-Safferling
  12. Karl Erich-Jäger
  13. Filip Kovacic
(2022)
Structural, mechanistic and physiological insights into phospholipase A-mediated membrane phospholipid degradation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
eLife 11:e72824.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72824

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72824

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mai Nguyen, Elda Bauda ... Cecile Morlot
    Research Article

    Teichoic acids (TA) are linear phospho-saccharidic polymers and important constituents of the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, either bound to the peptidoglycan as wall teichoic acids (WTA) or to the membrane as lipoteichoic acids (LTA). The composition of TA varies greatly but the presence of both WTA and LTA is highly conserved, hinting at an underlying fundamental function that is distinct from their specific roles in diverse organisms. We report the observation of a periplasmic space in Streptococcus pneumoniae by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The thickness and appearance of this region change upon deletion of genes involved in the attachment of TA, supporting their role in the maintenance of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria as a possible universal function. Consequences of these mutations were further examined by super-resolved microscopy, following metabolic labeling and fluorophore coupling by click chemistry. This novel labeling method also enabled in-gel analysis of cell fractions. With this approach, we were able to titrate the actual amount of TA per cell and to determine the ratio of WTA to LTA. In addition, we followed the change of TA length during growth phases, and discovered that a mutant devoid of LTA accumulates the membrane-bound polymerized TA precursor.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.