A genetic compensatory mechanism regulated by Jun and Mef2d modulates the expression of distinct class IIa Hdacs to ensure peripheral nerve myelination and repair

Abstract

The class IIa histone deacetylases (HDACs) have pivotal roles in the development of different tissues. Of this family, Schwann cells express Hdac4, 5 and 7 but not Hdac9. Here we show that a transcription factor regulated genetic compensatory mechanism within this family of proteins, blocks negative regulators of myelination ensuring peripheral nerve developmental myelination and remyelination after injury. Thus, when Hdac4 and 5 are knocked-out from Schwann cells in mice, a JUN-dependent mechanism induces the compensatory overexpression of Hdac7 permitting, although with a delay, the formation of the myelin sheath. When Hdac4,5 and 7 are simultaneously removed, the Myocyte-specific enhancer-factor d (MEF2D) binds to the promoter and induces the de novo expression of Hdac9, and although several melanocytic lineage genes are misexpressed and Remak bundle structure is disrupted, myelination proceeds after a long delay. Thus, our data unveil a finely tuned compensatory mechanism within the class IIa Hdac family, coordinated by distinct transcription factors, that guarantees the ability of Schwann cells to myelinate during development and remyelinate after nerve injury.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sergio Velasco-Aviles

    Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante UMH-CSIC, Alicante, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nikiben Patel

    Laboratorio 117, Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante UMH-CSIC, San Juan, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0129-7622
  3. Angeles Casillas-Bajo

    Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante UMH-CSIC, Alicante, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Laura Frutos-Rincón

    Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante UMH-CSIC, Alicante, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Enrique Velasco-Serna

    Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante UMH-CSIC, Alicante, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Juana Gallar

    Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante UMH-CSIC, Alicante, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Peter Arthur-Farraj

    Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1239-9392
  8. Jose A Gomez-Sanchez

    Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante UMH-CSIC, Alicante, Spain
    For correspondence
    j.gomez@umh.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6746-1800
  9. Hugo Cabedo

    Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante UMH-CSIC, Alicante, Spain
    For correspondence
    hugo.cabedo@umh.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1322-6290

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BFU2016-75864R)

  • Hugo Cabedo

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PID2019-109762RB-I00)

  • Hugo Cabedo

ISABIAL (UGP18-257)

  • Hugo Cabedo

ISABIAL (UGP-2019-128)

  • Hugo Cabedo

Conselleria de Cultura, Educación y Ciencia, Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO 2018/114)

  • Juana Gallar
  • Hugo Cabedo

Conselleria de Cultura, Educación y Ciencia, Generalitat Valenciana (ACIF/2 017/169)

  • Laura Frutos-Rincón

Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (FPU16/00283)

  • Enrique Velasco-Serna

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Klaus-Armin Nave, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal work was conducted according to European Union guidelines and with protocols approved by the Comité de Bioética y Bioseguridad del Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, Universidad Hernández de Elche and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (http://in.umh.es/). Reference number for the aproved protocol: 2017/VSC/PEA/00022 tipo 2.

Version history

  1. Received: August 9, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: September 21, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: January 24, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 25, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 17, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: November 14, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Velasco-Aviles et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,505
    views
  • 240
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sergio Velasco-Aviles
  2. Nikiben Patel
  3. Angeles Casillas-Bajo
  4. Laura Frutos-Rincón
  5. Enrique Velasco-Serna
  6. Juana Gallar
  7. Peter Arthur-Farraj
  8. Jose A Gomez-Sanchez
  9. Hugo Cabedo
(2022)
A genetic compensatory mechanism regulated by Jun and Mef2d modulates the expression of distinct class IIa Hdacs to ensure peripheral nerve myelination and repair
eLife 11:e72917.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72917

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72917

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Camille Dantzer, Justine Vaché ... Violaine Moreau
    Research Article

    Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced encouraging results in cancer patients. However, the majority of ß-catenin-mutated tumors have been described as lacking immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy. The mechanisms by which oncogenic ß-catenin affects immune surveillance remain unclear. Herein, we highlighted the involvement of ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway and, by extension, in immune/cancer cell communication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses expression of SDC4 and RAB27A, two main actors in exosome biogenesis, in both liver cancer cell lines and HCC patient samples. Using nanoparticle tracking analysis and live-cell imaging, we further demonstrated that activated ß-catenin represses exosome release. Then, we demonstrated in 3D spheroid models that activation of β-catenin promotes a decrease in immune cell infiltration through a defect in exosome secretion. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that oncogenic ß-catenin plays a key role in exosome biogenesis. Our study gives new insight into the impact of ß-catenin mutations on tumor microenvironment remodeling, which could lead to the development of new strategies to enhance immunotherapeutic response.

    1. Cell Biology
    Zhongyun Xie, Yongping Chai ... Wei Li
    Research Article

    Asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs) generate two daughter cells with identical genetic information but distinct cell fates through epigenetic mechanisms. However, the process of partitioning different epigenetic information into daughter cells remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex is asymmetrically segregated into the surviving daughter cell rather than the apoptotic one during ACDs in Caenorhabditis elegans. The absence of NuRD triggers apoptosis via the EGL-1-CED-9-CED-4-CED-3 pathway, while an ectopic gain of NuRD enables apoptotic daughter cells to survive. We identify the vacuolar H+–adenosine triphosphatase (V-ATPase) complex as a crucial regulator of NuRD’s asymmetric segregation. V-ATPase interacts with NuRD and is asymmetrically segregated into the surviving daughter cell. Inhibition of V-ATPase disrupts cytosolic pH asymmetry and NuRD asymmetry. We suggest that asymmetric segregation of V-ATPase may cause distinct acidification levels in the two daughter cells, enabling asymmetric epigenetic inheritance that specifies their respective life-versus-death fates.