Allosteric cooperation in ß-lactam binding to a non-classical transpeptidase

  1. Nazia Ahmad
  2. Sanmati Dugad
  3. Varsha Chauhan
  4. Shubbir Ahmed
  5. Kunal Sharma
  6. Sangita Kachhap
  7. Rana Zaidi
  8. William R Bishai
  9. Gyanu Lamichanne  Is a corresponding author
  10. Pankaj Kumar  Is a corresponding author
  1. Jamia Hamdard University, India
  2. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  3. Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, India
  4. Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Abstract

L,D-transpeptidase function predominates in atypical 3®3 transpeptide networking of peptidoglycan (PG) layer in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Prior studies of L,D-transpeptidases have identified only the catalytic site that binds to peptide moiety of the PG substrate or ß-lactam antibiotics. This insight was leveraged to develop mechanism of its activity and inhibition by ß-lactams. Here we report identification of an allosteric site at a distance of 21 Å from the catalytic site that binds the sugar moiety of PG substrates (hereafter referred to as the S-pocket). This site also binds a second ß-lactam molecule and influences binding at the catalytic site. We provide evidence that two ß-lactam molecules bind co-operatively to this enzyme, one non-covalently at the S-pocket and one covalently at the catalytic site. This dual ß-lactam binding phenomenon is previously unknown and is an observation that may offer novel approaches for the structure-based design of new drugs against M. tuberculosis./em>.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 7F71, 7F8P

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nazia Ahmad

    1Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sanmati Dugad

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Varsha Chauhan

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shubbir Ahmed

    NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kunal Sharma

    1Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sangita Kachhap

    Jerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Rana Zaidi

    1Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. William R Bishai

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8734-4118
  9. Gyanu Lamichanne

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    gyanu@jhu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Pankaj Kumar

    Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    pkumar10@jhmi.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9163-3273

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board (CRG/2019/005079)

  • Pankaj Kumar

National Institutes of Health (R33 AI111739)

  • Gyanu Lamichanne

National Institutes of Health (R21 AI137720)

  • Gyanu Lamichanne

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT-RLF/Re-entry/68/2017)

  • Pankaj Kumar

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Laura Dassama, Stanford University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 14, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: September 6, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: April 26, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 27, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: April 29, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: May 11, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Ahmad et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,455
    views
  • 305
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nazia Ahmad
  2. Sanmati Dugad
  3. Varsha Chauhan
  4. Shubbir Ahmed
  5. Kunal Sharma
  6. Sangita Kachhap
  7. Rana Zaidi
  8. William R Bishai
  9. Gyanu Lamichanne
  10. Pankaj Kumar
(2022)
Allosteric cooperation in ß-lactam binding to a non-classical transpeptidase
eLife 11:e73055.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73055

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73055

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.