Allosteric cooperation in ß-lactam binding to a non-classical transpeptidase

  1. Nazia Ahmad
  2. Sanmati Dugad
  3. Varsha Chauhan
  4. Shubbir Ahmed
  5. Kunal Sharma
  6. Sangita Kachhap
  7. Rana Zaidi
  8. William R Bishai
  9. Gyanu Lamichhane  Is a corresponding author
  10. Pankaj Kumar  Is a corresponding author
  1. Jamia Hamdard University, India
  2. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  3. Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, India
  4. Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Abstract

L,D-transpeptidase function predominates in atypical 3®3 transpeptide networking of peptidoglycan (PG) layer in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Prior studies of L,D-transpeptidases have identified only the catalytic site that binds to peptide moiety of the PG substrate or ß-lactam antibiotics. This insight was leveraged to develop mechanism of its activity and inhibition by ß-lactams. Here we report identification of an allosteric site at a distance of 21 Å from the catalytic site that binds the sugar moiety of PG substrates (hereafter referred to as the S-pocket). This site also binds a second ß-lactam molecule and influences binding at the catalytic site. We provide evidence that two ß-lactam molecules bind co-operatively to this enzyme, one non-covalently at the S-pocket and one covalently at the catalytic site. This dual ß-lactam binding phenomenon is previously unknown and is an observation that may offer novel approaches for the structure-based design of new drugs against M. tuberculosis./em>.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 7F71, 7F8P

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nazia Ahmad

    Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sanmati Dugad

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Varsha Chauhan

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shubbir Ahmed

    NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kunal Sharma

    Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sangita Kachhap

    Jerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Rana Zaidi

    Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. William R Bishai

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8734-4118
  9. Gyanu Lamichhane

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    gyanu@jhu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Pankaj Kumar

    Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    pkumar10@jhmi.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9163-3273

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board (CRG/2019/005079)

  • Pankaj Kumar

National Institutes of Health (R33 AI111739)

  • Gyanu Lamichhane

National Institutes of Health (R21 R01 AI155664)

  • Gyanu Lamichhane

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT-RLF/Re-entry/68/2017)

  • Pankaj Kumar

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Laura Dassama, Stanford University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 14, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: September 6, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: April 26, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 27, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: April 29, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: May 11, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Ahmad et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,438
    views
  • 301
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nazia Ahmad
  2. Sanmati Dugad
  3. Varsha Chauhan
  4. Shubbir Ahmed
  5. Kunal Sharma
  6. Sangita Kachhap
  7. Rana Zaidi
  8. William R Bishai
  9. Gyanu Lamichhane
  10. Pankaj Kumar
(2022)
Allosteric cooperation in ß-lactam binding to a non-classical transpeptidase
eLife 11:e73055.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73055

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73055

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Isabelle Petit-Hartlein, Annelise Vermot ... Franck Fieschi
    Research Article

    NADPH oxidases (NOX) are transmembrane proteins, widely spread in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Eukaryotes use the ROS products for innate immune defense and signaling in critical (patho)physiological processes. Despite the recent structures of human NOX isoforms, the activation of electron transfer remains incompletely understood. SpNOX, a homolog from Streptococcus pneumoniae, can serves as a robust model for exploring electron transfers in the NOX family thanks to its constitutive activity. Crystal structures of SpNOX full-length and dehydrogenase (DH) domain constructs are revealed here. The isolated DH domain acts as a flavin reductase, and both constructs use either NADPH or NADH as substrate. Our findings suggest that hydride transfer from NAD(P)H to FAD is the rate-limiting step in electron transfer. We identify significance of F397 in nicotinamide access to flavin isoalloxazine and confirm flavin binding contributions from both DH and Transmembrane (TM) domains. Comparison with related enzymes suggests that distal access to heme may influence the final electron acceptor, while the relative position of DH and TM does not necessarily correlate with activity, contrary to previous suggestions. It rather suggests requirement of an internal rearrangement, within the DH domain, to switch from a resting to an active state. Thus, SpNOX appears to be a good model of active NOX2, which allows us to propose an explanation for NOX2’s requirement for activation.