Allosteric cooperation in ß-lactam binding to a non-classical transpeptidase

  1. Nazia Ahmad
  2. Sanmati Dugad
  3. Varsha Chauhan
  4. Shubbir Ahmed
  5. Kunal Sharma
  6. Sangita Kachhap
  7. Rana Zaidi
  8. William R Bishai
  9. Gyanu Lamichhane  Is a corresponding author
  10. Pankaj Kumar  Is a corresponding author
  1. Jamia Hamdard University, India
  2. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  3. Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, India
  4. Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Abstract

L,D-transpeptidase function predominates in atypical 3®3 transpeptide networking of peptidoglycan (PG) layer in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Prior studies of L,D-transpeptidases have identified only the catalytic site that binds to peptide moiety of the PG substrate or ß-lactam antibiotics. This insight was leveraged to develop mechanism of its activity and inhibition by ß-lactams. Here we report identification of an allosteric site at a distance of 21 Å from the catalytic site that binds the sugar moiety of PG substrates (hereafter referred to as the S-pocket). This site also binds a second ß-lactam molecule and influences binding at the catalytic site. We provide evidence that two ß-lactam molecules bind co-operatively to this enzyme, one non-covalently at the S-pocket and one covalently at the catalytic site. This dual ß-lactam binding phenomenon is previously unknown and is an observation that may offer novel approaches for the structure-based design of new drugs against M. tuberculosis./em>.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 7F71, 7F8P

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nazia Ahmad

    Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sanmati Dugad

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Varsha Chauhan

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shubbir Ahmed

    NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kunal Sharma

    Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sangita Kachhap

    Jerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Rana Zaidi

    Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. William R Bishai

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8734-4118
  9. Gyanu Lamichhane

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    gyanu@jhu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Pankaj Kumar

    Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    pkumar10@jhmi.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9163-3273

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board (CRG/2019/005079)

  • Pankaj Kumar

National Institutes of Health (R33 AI111739)

  • Gyanu Lamichhane

National Institutes of Health (R21 R01 AI155664)

  • Gyanu Lamichhane

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT-RLF/Re-entry/68/2017)

  • Pankaj Kumar

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Laura Dassama, Stanford University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 14, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: September 6, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: April 26, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 27, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: April 29, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: May 11, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Ahmad et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,501
    views
  • 313
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nazia Ahmad
  2. Sanmati Dugad
  3. Varsha Chauhan
  4. Shubbir Ahmed
  5. Kunal Sharma
  6. Sangita Kachhap
  7. Rana Zaidi
  8. William R Bishai
  9. Gyanu Lamichhane
  10. Pankaj Kumar
(2022)
Allosteric cooperation in ß-lactam binding to a non-classical transpeptidase
eLife 11:e73055.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73055

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73055

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.