A DCL3 dicing code within Pol IV-RDR2 transcripts diversifies the siRNA pool guiding RNA-directed DNA methylation

  1. Andrew Loffer
  2. Jasleen Singh
  3. Akihito Fukudome
  4. Vibhor Mishra
  5. Feng Wang
  6. Craig S Pikaard  Is a corresponding author
  1. Indiana University Bloomington, United States
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Indiana University, United States

Abstract

In plants, selfish genetic elements including retrotransposons and DNA viruses are transcriptionally silenced by RNA-directed DNA methylation. Guiding the process are short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) cut by DICER-LIKE 3 (DCL3) from double-stranded precursors of ~30 bp that are synthesized by NUCLEAR RNA POLYMERASE IV (Pol IV) and RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 (RDR2). We show that Pol IV's choice of initiating nucleotide, RDR2's initiation 1-2 nt internal to Pol IV transcript ends and RDR2's terminal transferase activity collectively yield a code that influences which precursor end is diced and whether 24 or 23 nt siRNAs are produced. By diversifying the size, sequence, and strand specificity of siRNAs derived from a given precursor, alternative patterns of DCL3 dicing allow for maximal siRNA coverage at methylated target loci.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for all figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrew Loffer

    Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jasleen Singh

    Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Akihito Fukudome

    Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8924-1035
  4. Vibhor Mishra

    Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Feng Wang

    Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Craig S Pikaard

    Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    For correspondence
    cpikaard@indiana.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8204-7459

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM077590)

  • Craig S Pikaard

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Investigator:Pikaard)

  • Akihito Fukudome
  • Vibhor Mishra
  • Feng Wang
  • Craig S Pikaard

Indiana University Foundation (Carlos O. Miller Graduate Student Fellowship)

  • Andrew Loffer
  • Jasleen Singh

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Loffer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,213
    views
  • 207
    downloads
  • 26
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrew Loffer
  2. Jasleen Singh
  3. Akihito Fukudome
  4. Vibhor Mishra
  5. Feng Wang
  6. Craig S Pikaard
(2022)
A DCL3 dicing code within Pol IV-RDR2 transcripts diversifies the siRNA pool guiding RNA-directed DNA methylation
eLife 11:e73260.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73260

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73260

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Shamayita Roy, Hemanta Adhikary ... Damien D'Amours
    Research Article

    The R-loop is a common transcriptional by-product that consists of an RNA-DNA duplex joined to a displaced strand of genomic DNA. While the effects of R-loops on health and disease are well established, there is still an incomplete understanding of the cellular processes responsible for their removal from eukaryotic genomes. Here, we show that a core regulator of chromosome architecture -the Smc5/6 complex- plays a crucial role in the removal of R-loop structures formed during gene transcription. Consistent with this, budding yeast mutants defective in the Smc5/6 complex and enzymes involved in R-loop resolution show strong synthetic interactions and accumulate high levels of RNA-DNA hybrid structures in their chromosomes. Importantly, we demonstrate that the Smc5/6 complex acts on specific types of RNA-DNA hybrid structures in vivo and promotes R-loop degradation by the RNase H2 enzyme in vitro. Collectively, our results reveal a crucial role for the Smc5/6 complex in the removal of toxic R-loops formed at highly transcribed genes and telomeres.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Linda S Rubio, Suman Mohajan, David S Gross
    Research Article

    In insects and mammals, 3D genome topology has been linked to transcriptional states yet whether this link holds for other eukaryotes is unclear. Using both ligation proximity and fluorescence microscopy assays, we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Heat Shock Response (HSR) genes dispersed across multiple chromosomes and under the control of Heat Shock Factor (Hsf1) rapidly reposition in cells exposed to acute ethanol stress and engage in concerted, Hsf1-dependent intergenic interactions. Accompanying 3D genome reconfiguration is equally rapid formation of Hsf1-containing condensates. However, in contrast to the transience of Hsf1-driven intergenic interactions that peak within 10–20 min and dissipate within 1 hr in the presence of 8.5% (v/v) ethanol, transcriptional condensates are stably maintained for hours. Moreover, under the same conditions, Pol II occupancy of HSR genes, chromatin remodeling, and RNA expression are detectable only later in the response and peak much later (>1 hr). This contrasts with the coordinate response of HSR genes to thermal stress (39°C) where Pol II occupancy, transcription, histone eviction, intergenic interactions, and formation of Hsf1 condensates are all rapid yet transient (peak within 2.5–10 min and dissipate within 1 hr). Therefore, Hsf1 forms condensates, restructures the genome and transcriptionally activates HSR genes in response to both forms of proteotoxic stress but does so with strikingly different kinetics. In cells subjected to ethanol stress, Hsf1 forms condensates and repositions target genes before transcriptionally activating them.