Instructions and experiential learning have similar impacts on pain and pain-related brain responses but produce dissociations in value-based reversal learning

  1. Lauren Y Atlas  Is a corresponding author
  2. Troy C. Dildine
  3. Esther E Palacios-Barrios
  4. Qingbao Yu
  5. Richard C Reynolds
  6. Lauren A Banker
  7. Shara S Grant
  8. Daniel S Pine
  1. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, United States
  2. University of Pittsburgh, United States
  3. National Institute of Mental Health, United States

Abstract

Recent data suggest that interactions between systems involved in higher order knowledge and associative learning drive responses during value-based learning. However, it is unknown how these systems impact subjective responses, such as pain. We tested how instructions and reversal learning influence pain and pain-evoked brain activation. Healthy volunteers (n = 40) were either instructed about contingencies between cues and aversive outcomes or learned through experience in a paradigm where contingencies reversed three times. We measured predictive cue effects on pain and heat-evoked brain responses using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Predictive cues dynamically modulated pain perception as contingencies changed, regardless of whether participants received contingency instructions. Heat-evoked responses in the insula, anterior cingulate, and other regions updated as contingencies changed, and responses in the prefrontal cortex mediated dynamic cue effects on pain, whereas responses in the brainstem's rostroventral medulla (RVM) were shaped by initial contingencies throughout the task. Quantitative modeling revealed that expected value was shaped purely by instructions in the Instructed Group, whereas expected value updated dynamically in the Uninstructed Group as a function of error-based learning. These differences were accompanied by dissociations in the neural correlates of value-based learning in the rostral anterior cingulate, thalamus, and posterior insula, among other regions. These results show how predictions dynamically impact subjective pain. Moreover, imaging data delineate three types of networks involved in pain generation and value-based learning: those that respond to initial contingencies, those that update dynamically during feedback-driven learning as contingencies change, and those that are sensitive to instruction. Together, these findings provide multiple points of entry for therapies designs to impact pain.

Data availability

Pain, SCR, and signature data are available on OSF; neuroimaging data has been uploaded to neurovault.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lauren Y Atlas

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    lauren.atlas@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5693-4169
  2. Troy C. Dildine

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Esther E Palacios-Barrios

    Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Qingbao Yu

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Richard C Reynolds

    National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lauren A Banker

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shara S Grant

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Daniel S Pine

    Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Besthesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (ZIAAT-000030)

  • Lauren Y Atlas

National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH-002782)

  • Daniel S Pine

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joshua Johansen, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Japan

Ethics

Human subjects: Consent was obtained as described in Materials and methods. Data were collected under NIH protocol 15-AT-0132, identifier NCT02446262 at clinicaltrials.gov

Version history

  1. Received: August 25, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: August 27, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: October 25, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 1, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 22, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 756
    views
  • 129
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lauren Y Atlas
  2. Troy C. Dildine
  3. Esther E Palacios-Barrios
  4. Qingbao Yu
  5. Richard C Reynolds
  6. Lauren A Banker
  7. Shara S Grant
  8. Daniel S Pine
(2022)
Instructions and experiential learning have similar impacts on pain and pain-related brain responses but produce dissociations in value-based reversal learning
eLife 11:e73353.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73353

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73353

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zahid Padamsey, Danai Katsanevaki ... Nathalie L Rochefort
    Research Article

    Mammals have evolved sex-specific adaptations to reduce energy usage in times of food scarcity. These adaptations are well described for peripheral tissue, though much less is known about how the energy-expensive brain adapts to food restriction, and how such adaptations differ across the sexes. Here, we examined how food restriction impacts energy usage and function in the primary visual cortex (V1) of adult male and female mice. Molecular analysis and RNA sequencing in V1 revealed that in males, but not in females, food restriction significantly modulated canonical, energy-regulating pathways, including pathways associated waith AMP-activated protein kinase, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, mammalian target of rapamycin, and oxidative phosphorylation. Moreover, we found that in contrast to males, food restriction in females did not significantly affect V1 ATP usage or visual coding precision (assessed by orientation selectivity). Decreased serum leptin is known to be necessary for triggering energy-saving changes in V1 during food restriction. Consistent with this, we found significantly decreased serum leptin in food-restricted males but no significant change in food-restricted females. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that cortical function and energy usage in female mice are more resilient to food restriction than in males. The neocortex, therefore, contributes to sex-specific, energy-saving adaptations in response to food restriction.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jack W Lindsey, Elias B Issa
    Research Article

    Object classification has been proposed as a principal objective of the primate ventral visual stream and has been used as an optimization target for deep neural network models (DNNs) of the visual system. However, visual brain areas represent many different types of information, and optimizing for classification of object identity alone does not constrain how other information may be encoded in visual representations. Information about different scene parameters may be discarded altogether (‘invariance’), represented in non-interfering subspaces of population activity (‘factorization’) or encoded in an entangled fashion. In this work, we provide evidence that factorization is a normative principle of biological visual representations. In the monkey ventral visual hierarchy, we found that factorization of object pose and background information from object identity increased in higher-level regions and strongly contributed to improving object identity decoding performance. We then conducted a large-scale analysis of factorization of individual scene parameters – lighting, background, camera viewpoint, and object pose – in a diverse library of DNN models of the visual system. Models which best matched neural, fMRI, and behavioral data from both monkeys and humans across 12 datasets tended to be those which factorized scene parameters most strongly. Notably, invariance to these parameters was not as consistently associated with matches to neural and behavioral data, suggesting that maintaining non-class information in factorized activity subspaces is often preferred to dropping it altogether. Thus, we propose that factorization of visual scene information is a widely used strategy in brains and DNN models thereof.