Adaptation of the periplasm to maintain spatial constraints essential for cell envelope processes and cell viability

  1. Eric Mandela
  2. Christopher J Stubenrauch
  3. David Ryoo
  4. Hyea Hwang
  5. Eli J Cohen
  6. Von Vergel L Torres
  7. Pankaj Deo
  8. Chaille T Webb
  9. Cheng Huang
  10. Ralf B Schittenhelm
  11. Morgan Beeby
  12. James C Gumbart  Is a corresponding author
  13. Trevor Lithgow  Is a corresponding author
  14. Iain D Hay  Is a corresponding author
  1. Monash University, Australia
  2. Georgia Institute of Technology, United States
  3. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  4. The University of Auckland, New Zealand

Abstract

The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria consists of two membranes surrounding a periplasm and peptidoglycan layer. Molecular machines spanning the cell envelope depend on spatial constraints and load-bearing forces across the cell envelope and surface. The mechanisms dictating spatial constraints across the cell envelope remain incompletely defined. In Escherichia coli, the coiled-coil lipoprotein Lpp contributes the only covalent linkage between the outer membrane and the underlying peptidoglycan layer. Using proteomics, molecular dynamics and a synthetic lethal screen we show that lengthening Lpp to the upper limit does not change the spatial constraint, but is accommodated by other factors which thereby become essential for viability. Our findings demonstrate E. coli expressing elongated Lpp does not simply enlarge the periplasm in response, but the bacteria accommodate by a combination of tilting Lpp and reducing the amount of the covalent bridge. By genetic screening we identified all of the genes in E. coli that become essential in order to enact this adaptation, and by quantitative proteomics discovered that very few proteins need to be up- or down-regulated in steady-state levels in order to accommodate the longer Lpp. We observed increased levels of factors determining cell stiffness, a decrease in membrane integrity, an increase membrane vesiculation and a dependance on otherwise non-essential tethers to maintain lipid transport and peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Further this has implications for understanding how spatial constraint across the envelope controls processes such as flagellum-driven motility, cellular signaling and protein translocation.

Data availability

All data generated from this study is supplied in the relevant supplemental files

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eric Mandela

    Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Christopher J Stubenrauch

    Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4388-3184
  3. David Ryoo

    Interdisciplinary Bioengineering Graduate Program, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hyea Hwang

    School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Eli J Cohen

    Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Von Vergel L Torres

    Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3387-1112
  7. Pankaj Deo

    Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6947-5317
  8. Chaille T Webb

    Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Cheng Huang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ralf B Schittenhelm

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Morgan Beeby

    Department of Life Sciencesa, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6413-9835
  12. James C Gumbart

    School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States
    For correspondence
    gumbart@physics.gatech.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1510-7842
  13. Trevor Lithgow

    Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    trevor.lithgow@monash.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Iain D Hay

    School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
    For correspondence
    iain.hay@auckland.ac.nz
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8797-6038

Funding

Australian Research Council (FL130100038)

  • Trevor Lithgow
  • Iain D Hay

United States National Institute of Health (R01-GM123169)

  • James C Gumbart

United States National Institute of Health (R01-AI052293)

  • James C Gumbart

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Petra Anne Levin, Washington University in St. Louis, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: January 13, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: September 1, 2021
  3. Accepted: January 21, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 27, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 8, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Mandela et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,792
    views
  • 284
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eric Mandela
  2. Christopher J Stubenrauch
  3. David Ryoo
  4. Hyea Hwang
  5. Eli J Cohen
  6. Von Vergel L Torres
  7. Pankaj Deo
  8. Chaille T Webb
  9. Cheng Huang
  10. Ralf B Schittenhelm
  11. Morgan Beeby
  12. James C Gumbart
  13. Trevor Lithgow
  14. Iain D Hay
(2022)
Adaptation of the periplasm to maintain spatial constraints essential for cell envelope processes and cell viability
eLife 11:e73516.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73516

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73516

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ian Lorimer
    Insight

    Establishing a zebrafish model of a deadly type of brain tumor highlights the role of the immune system in the early stages of the disease.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jaebin Kim, Edwin Bustamante ... Scott H Soderling
    Research Article

    One of the most extensively studied members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases, Rac1 is an intracellular signal transducer that remodels actin and phosphorylation signaling networks. Previous studies have shown that Rac1-mediated signaling is associated with hippocampal-dependent working memory and longer-term forms of learning and memory and that Rac1 can modulate forms of both pre- and postsynaptic plasticity. How these different cognitive functions and forms of plasticity mediated by Rac1 are linked, however, is unclear. Here, we show that spatial working memory in mice is selectively impaired following the expression of a genetically encoded Rac1 inhibitor at presynaptic terminals, while longer-term cognitive processes are affected by Rac1 inhibition at postsynaptic sites. To investigate the regulatory mechanisms of this presynaptic process, we leveraged new advances in mass spectrometry to identify the proteomic and post-translational landscape of presynaptic Rac1 signaling. We identified serine/threonine kinases and phosphorylated cytoskeletal signaling and synaptic vesicle proteins enriched with active Rac1. The phosphorylated sites in these proteins are at positions likely to have regulatory effects on synaptic vesicles. Consistent with this, we also report changes in the distribution and morphology of synaptic vesicles and in postsynaptic ultrastructure following presynaptic Rac1 inhibition. Overall, this study reveals a previously unrecognized presynaptic role of Rac1 signaling in cognitive processes and provides insights into its potential regulatory mechanisms.