Projected resurgence of COVID-19 in the United States in July-December 2021 resulting from the increased transmissibility of the Delta variant and faltering vaccination

  1. Shaun Truelove  Is a corresponding author
  2. Claire P Smith
  3. Michelle Qin
  4. Luke C Mullany
  5. Rebecca K Borchering
  6. Justin Lessler
  7. Katriona Shea
  8. Emily Howerton
  9. Lucie Contamin
  10. John Levander
  11. Jessica Salerno
  12. Harry Hochheiser
  13. Matt Kinsey
  14. Kate Tallaksen
  15. Shelby Wilson
  16. Lauren Shin
  17. Kaitlin Rainwater-Lovett
  18. Joseph C Lemairtre
  19. Juan Dent Hulse
  20. Joshua Kaminsky
  21. Elizabeth C Lee
  22. Javier Perez-Saez
  23. Alison Hill
  24. Dean Karlen
  25. Matteo Chinazzi
  26. Jessica T Davis
  27. Kunpeng Mu
  28. Xinyue Xiong
  29. Ana Pastore y Piontti
  30. Alessandro Vespignani
  31. Ajitesh Srivastava
  32. Przemyslaw Porebski
  33. Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  34. Aniruddha Adiga
  35. Bryan Lewis
  36. Brian Klahn
  37. Joseph Outten
  38. Mark Orr
  39. Galen Harrison
  40. Benjamin Hurt
  41. Jiangzhuo Chen
  42. Anil Vullikanti
  43. Madhav Marathe
  44. Stefan Hoops
  45. Parantapa Bhattacharya
  46. Dustin Machi
  47. Shi Chen
  48. Rajib Paul
  49. Daniel Janies
  50. Jean-Claude Thill
  51. Marta Galanti
  52. Teresa K Yamana
  53. Sen Pei
  54. Jeffrey L Shaman
  55. Jessica M Healy
  56. Rachel B Slayton
  57. Matthew Biggerstaff
  58. Michael A Johansson
  59. Michael C Runge
  60. Cecile Viboud
  1. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  2. Harvard University, United States
  3. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, United States
  4. Pennsylvania State University, United States
  5. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
  6. University of Pittsburgh, United States
  7. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
  8. University of Victoria, Canada
  9. Northeastern University, United States
  10. University of Southern California, United States
  11. University of Virginia, United States
  12. University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United States
  13. Columbia University Medical Center, United States
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
  15. United States Geological Survey, United States
  16. National Institutes of Health, United States

Abstract

In Spring 2021, the highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant began to cause increases in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in parts of the United States. At the time, with slowed vaccination uptake, this novel variant was expected to increase the risk of pandemic resurgence in the US in summer and fall 2021. As part of the COVID-10 Scenario Modeling Hub, an ensemble of nine mechanistic models produced six-month scenario projections for July-December 2021 for the United States. These projections estimated substantial resurgences of COVID-19 across the US resulting from the more transmissible Delta variant, projected to occur across most of the US, coinciding with school and business reopening. The scenarios revealed that reaching higher vaccine coverage in July—December 2021 reduced the size and duration of the projected resurgence substantially, with the expected impacts was largely concentrated in a subset of states with lower vaccination coverage. Despite accurate projection of COVID-19 surges occurring and timing, the magnitude was substantially underestimated 2021 by the models compared with the of the reported cases, hospitalizations, and deaths occurring during July-December, highlighting the continued challenges to predict the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination uptake remains critical to limiting transmission and disease, particularly in states with lower vaccination coverage. Higher vaccination goals at the onset of the surge of the new variant were estimated to avert over 1.5 million cases and 21,000 deaths, though may have had even greater impacts, considering the underestimated resurgence magnitude from the model.

Data availability

All model output data are available on the project github at https://github.com/midas-network/covid19-scenario-modeling-hub. Code and data specific to this manuscript has been consolidated into a repository at https://github.com/midas-network/covid19-scenario-modeling-hub/tree/master/paper-source-code/round-7. All data used are publicly available.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shaun Truelove

    Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    shauntruelove@jhu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0538-0607
  2. Claire P Smith

    Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Michelle Qin

    Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Luke C Mullany

    Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Rebecca K Borchering

    Eberly College of Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4309-2913
  6. Justin Lessler

    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    Justin Lessler, has served as an expert witness on cases where the likely length of the pandemic was of issue..
  7. Katriona Shea

    Eberly College of Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Emily Howerton

    Eberly College of Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Lucie Contamin

    University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. John Levander

    University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Jessica Salerno

    University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Harry Hochheiser

    University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8793-9982
  13. Matt Kinsey

    Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Kate Tallaksen

    Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Shelby Wilson

    Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Lauren Shin

    Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Kaitlin Rainwater-Lovett

    Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8707-7339
  18. Joseph C Lemairtre

    École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Juan Dent Hulse

    Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3154-0731
  20. Joshua Kaminsky

    Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  21. Elizabeth C Lee

    Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  22. Javier Perez-Saez

    Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  23. Alison Hill

    Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  24. Dean Karlen

    University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  25. Matteo Chinazzi

    Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  26. Jessica T Davis

    Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  27. Kunpeng Mu

    Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  28. Xinyue Xiong

    Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  29. Ana Pastore y Piontti

    Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  30. Alessandro Vespignani

    Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  31. Ajitesh Srivastava

    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  32. Przemyslaw Porebski

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8012-5791
  33. Srinivasan Venkatramanan

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  34. Aniruddha Adiga

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  35. Bryan Lewis

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0793-6082
  36. Brian Klahn

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  37. Joseph Outten

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  38. Mark Orr

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  39. Galen Harrison

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  40. Benjamin Hurt

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  41. Jiangzhuo Chen

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  42. Anil Vullikanti

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  43. Madhav Marathe

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  44. Stefan Hoops

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  45. Parantapa Bhattacharya

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  46. Dustin Machi

    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  47. Shi Chen

    University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  48. Rajib Paul

    University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  49. Daniel Janies

    University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  50. Jean-Claude Thill

    University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6651-8123
  51. Marta Galanti

    Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9060-1250
  52. Teresa K Yamana

    Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8349-3151
  53. Sen Pei

    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7072-2995
  54. Jeffrey L Shaman

    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    Jeffrey L Shaman, and Columbia University disclose partial ownership of SK Analytics. Discloses consulting for BNI..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7216-7809
  55. Jessica M Healy

    COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  56. Rachel B Slayton

    COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  57. Matthew Biggerstaff

    COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  58. Michael A Johansson

    COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  59. Michael C Runge

    Eastern Ecological Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Laurel, United States
    Competing interests
    Michael C Runge, reports stock ownership in Becton Dickinson & Co., which manufactures medical equipment used in COVID testing, vaccination, and treatment..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8081-536X
  60. Cecile Viboud

    Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3243-4711

Funding

National Science Foundation (2127976)

  • Shaun Truelove
  • Claire P Smith
  • Juan Dent Hulse
  • Joshua Kaminsky
  • Elizabeth C Lee
  • Alison Hill

California Department of Public Health

  • Shaun Truelove
  • Claire P Smith
  • Justin Lessler
  • Juan Dent Hulse
  • Joshua Kaminsky
  • Elizabeth C Lee
  • Javier Perez-Saez

Johns Hopkins University

  • Shaun Truelove
  • Claire P Smith
  • Justin Lessler
  • Juan Dent Hulse
  • Joshua Kaminsky
  • Elizabeth C Lee
  • Javier Perez-Saez
  • Alison Hill

National Institutes of Health (R01GM140564)

  • Justin Lessler

Swiss National Science Foundation (200021--172578))

  • Joseph C Lemairtre

National Institutes of Health (R01GM109718)

  • Przemyslaw Porebski
  • Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  • Aniruddha Adiga
  • Bryan Lewis
  • Brian Klahn
  • Joseph Outten
  • Mark Orr
  • Galen Harrison
  • Benjamin Hurt
  • Jiangzhuo Chen
  • Anil Vullikanti
  • Madhav Marathe
  • Stefan Hoops
  • Parantapa Bhattacharya
  • Dustin Machi

Virginia Department of Health (VDH-21-501-0135)

  • Przemyslaw Porebski
  • Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  • Aniruddha Adiga
  • Bryan Lewis
  • Brian Klahn
  • Joseph Outten
  • Mark Orr
  • Galen Harrison
  • Benjamin Hurt
  • Jiangzhuo Chen
  • Anil Vullikanti
  • Madhav Marathe
  • Stefan Hoops
  • Parantapa Bhattacharya
  • Dustin Machi

National Science Foundation (OAC-1916805,CCF-1918656,CCF-2142997,OAC-2027541,TG-BIO210084)

  • Przemyslaw Porebski
  • Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  • Aniruddha Adiga
  • Bryan Lewis
  • Brian Klahn
  • Joseph Outten
  • Mark Orr
  • Galen Harrison
  • Benjamin Hurt
  • Jiangzhuo Chen
  • Anil Vullikanti
  • Madhav Marathe
  • Stefan Hoops
  • Parantapa Bhattacharya
  • Dustin Machi

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (75D30119C05935)

  • Przemyslaw Porebski
  • Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  • Aniruddha Adiga
  • Bryan Lewis
  • Brian Klahn
  • Joseph Outten
  • Mark Orr
  • Galen Harrison
  • Benjamin Hurt
  • Jiangzhuo Chen
  • Anil Vullikanti
  • Madhav Marathe
  • Stefan Hoops
  • Parantapa Bhattacharya
  • Dustin Machi

Defense Threat Reduction Agency (S-D00189-15-TO-01-UVA)

  • Przemyslaw Porebski
  • Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  • Aniruddha Adiga
  • Bryan Lewis
  • Brian Klahn
  • Joseph Outten
  • Mark Orr
  • Galen Harrison
  • Benjamin Hurt
  • Jiangzhuo Chen
  • Anil Vullikanti
  • Madhav Marathe
  • Stefan Hoops
  • Parantapa Bhattacharya
  • Dustin Machi

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (200-2016-91781)

  • Shaun Truelove
  • Claire P Smith
  • Justin Lessler
  • Joseph C Lemairtre
  • Joshua Kaminsky
  • Alison Hill

National Science Foundation (2028301,2126278)

  • Rebecca K Borchering
  • Katriona Shea

University of Virginia

  • Przemyslaw Porebski
  • Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  • Aniruddha Adiga
  • Bryan Lewis
  • Brian Klahn
  • Joseph Outten
  • Mark Orr
  • Galen Harrison
  • Benjamin Hurt
  • Jiangzhuo Chen
  • Anil Vullikanti
  • Madhav Marathe
  • Stefan Hoops
  • Parantapa Bhattacharya
  • Dustin Machi

COVID-19 HPC Consortium

  • Przemyslaw Porebski
  • Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  • Aniruddha Adiga
  • Bryan Lewis
  • Brian Klahn
  • Joseph Outten
  • Mark Orr
  • Galen Harrison
  • Benjamin Hurt
  • Jiangzhuo Chen
  • Anil Vullikanti
  • Madhav Marathe
  • Stefan Hoops
  • Parantapa Bhattacharya
  • Dustin Machi

Amazon Web Services

  • Shaun Truelove
  • Claire P Smith
  • Justin Lessler
  • Joseph C Lemairtre
  • Juan Dent Hulse
  • Joshua Kaminsky
  • Elizabeth C Lee
  • Javier Perez-Saez
  • Alison Hill

Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study (MIDASUP-05)

  • Shi Chen
  • Rajib Paul
  • Daniel Janies
  • Jean-Claude Thill

North Carolina Biotechnology Center

  • Shi Chen
  • Rajib Paul
  • Daniel Janies
  • Jean-Claude Thill

National Institutes of Health (R01AI163023)

  • Marta Galanti
  • Teresa K Yamana
  • Sen Pei
  • Jeffrey L Shaman

Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (NU38OT000297)

  • Marta Galanti
  • Teresa K Yamana
  • Sen Pei
  • Jeffrey L Shaman

Morris-Singer Foundation

  • Marta Galanti
  • Teresa K Yamana
  • Sen Pei
  • Jeffrey L Shaman

Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences

  • Katriona Shea
  • Emily Howerton

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5U24GM132013-02)

  • Lucie Contamin
  • John Levander
  • Jessica Salerno
  • Harry Hochheiser

United States Department of Health and Human Services (75A50121C00003)

  • Luke C Mullany
  • Matt Kinsey
  • Kate Tallaksen
  • Shelby Wilson
  • Lauren Shin
  • Kaitlin Rainwater-Lovett

United States Department of Health and Human Services (6U01IP001137)

  • Jessica T Davis
  • Ana Pastore y Piontti
  • Alessandro Vespignani

United States Department of Health and Human Services (5U01IP0001137)

  • Matteo Chinazzi
  • Kunpeng Mu
  • Xinyue Xiong
  • Alessandro Vespignani

National Science Foundation (2027007)

  • Ajitesh Srivastava

United States Department of Health and Human Services

  • Shaun Truelove
  • Claire P Smith
  • Justin Lessler
  • Juan Dent Hulse
  • Joshua Kaminsky
  • Elizabeth C Lee
  • Javier Perez-Saez
  • Alison Hill

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,795
    views
  • 221
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shaun Truelove
  2. Claire P Smith
  3. Michelle Qin
  4. Luke C Mullany
  5. Rebecca K Borchering
  6. Justin Lessler
  7. Katriona Shea
  8. Emily Howerton
  9. Lucie Contamin
  10. John Levander
  11. Jessica Salerno
  12. Harry Hochheiser
  13. Matt Kinsey
  14. Kate Tallaksen
  15. Shelby Wilson
  16. Lauren Shin
  17. Kaitlin Rainwater-Lovett
  18. Joseph C Lemairtre
  19. Juan Dent Hulse
  20. Joshua Kaminsky
  21. Elizabeth C Lee
  22. Javier Perez-Saez
  23. Alison Hill
  24. Dean Karlen
  25. Matteo Chinazzi
  26. Jessica T Davis
  27. Kunpeng Mu
  28. Xinyue Xiong
  29. Ana Pastore y Piontti
  30. Alessandro Vespignani
  31. Ajitesh Srivastava
  32. Przemyslaw Porebski
  33. Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  34. Aniruddha Adiga
  35. Bryan Lewis
  36. Brian Klahn
  37. Joseph Outten
  38. Mark Orr
  39. Galen Harrison
  40. Benjamin Hurt
  41. Jiangzhuo Chen
  42. Anil Vullikanti
  43. Madhav Marathe
  44. Stefan Hoops
  45. Parantapa Bhattacharya
  46. Dustin Machi
  47. Shi Chen
  48. Rajib Paul
  49. Daniel Janies
  50. Jean-Claude Thill
  51. Marta Galanti
  52. Teresa K Yamana
  53. Sen Pei
  54. Jeffrey L Shaman
  55. Jessica M Healy
  56. Rachel B Slayton
  57. Matthew Biggerstaff
  58. Michael A Johansson
  59. Michael C Runge
  60. Cecile Viboud
(2022)
Projected resurgence of COVID-19 in the United States in July-December 2021 resulting from the increased transmissibility of the Delta variant and faltering vaccination
eLife 11:e73584.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73584

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73584

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Wei Q Deng, Nathan Cawte ... Sonia S Anand
    Research Article

    Background:

    Maternal smoking has been linked to adverse health outcomes in newborns but the extent to which it impacts newborn health has not been quantified through an aggregated cord blood DNA methylation (DNAm) score. Here, we examine the feasibility of using cord blood DNAm scores leveraging large external studies as discovery samples to capture the epigenetic signature of maternal smoking and its influence on newborns in White European and South Asian populations.

    Methods:

    We first examined the association between individual CpGs and cigarette smoking during pregnancy, and smoking exposure in two White European birth cohorts (n=744). Leveraging established CpGs for maternal smoking, we constructed a cord blood epigenetic score of maternal smoking that was validated in one of the European-origin cohorts (n=347). This score was then tested for association with smoking status, secondary smoking exposure during pregnancy, and health outcomes in offspring measured after birth in an independent White European (n=397) and a South Asian birth cohort (n=504).

    Results:

    Several previously reported genes for maternal smoking were supported, with the strongest and most consistent association signal from the GFI1 gene (6 CpGs with p<5 × 10-5). The epigenetic maternal smoking score was strongly associated with smoking status during pregnancy (OR = 1.09 [1.07, 1.10], p=5.5 × 10-33) and more hours of self-reported smoking exposure per week (1.93 [1.27, 2.58], p=7.8 × 10-9) in White Europeans. However, it was not associated with self-reported exposure (p>0.05) among South Asians, likely due to a lack of smoking in this group. The same score was consistently associated with a smaller birth size (–0.37±0.12 cm, p=0.0023) in the South Asian cohort and a lower birth weight (–0.043±0.013 kg, p=0.0011) in the combined cohorts.

    Conclusions:

    This cord blood epigenetic score can help identify babies exposed to maternal smoking and assess its long-term impact on growth. Notably, these results indicate a consistent association between the DNAm signature of maternal smoking and a small body size and low birth weight in newborns, in both White European mothers who exhibited some amount of smoking and in South Asian mothers who themselves were not active smokers.

    Funding:

    This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Metabolomics Team Grant: MWG-146332.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Patrick E Brown, Sze Hang Fu ... Ab-C Study Collaborators
    Research Article Updated

    Background:

    Few national-level studies have evaluated the impact of ‘hybrid’ immunity (vaccination coupled with recovery from infection) from the Omicron variants of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

    Methods:

    From May 2020 to December 2022, we conducted serial assessments (each of ~4000–9000 adults) examining SARS-CoV-2 antibodies within a mostly representative Canadian cohort drawn from a national online polling platform. Adults, most of whom were vaccinated, reported viral test-confirmed infections and mailed self-collected dried blood spots (DBSs) to a central lab. Samples underwent highly sensitive and specific antibody assays to spike and nucleocapsid protein antigens, the latter triggered only by infection. We estimated cumulative SARS-CoV-2 incidence prior to the Omicron period and during the BA.1/1.1 and BA.2/5 waves. We assessed changes in antibody levels and in age-specific active immunity levels.

    Results:

    Spike levels were higher in infected than in uninfected adults, regardless of vaccination doses. Among adults vaccinated at least thrice and infected more than 6 months earlier, spike levels fell notably and continuously for the 9-month post-vaccination. In contrast, among adults infected within 6 months, spike levels declined gradually. Declines were similar by sex, age group, and ethnicity. Recent vaccination attenuated declines in spike levels from older infections. In a convenience sample, spike antibody and cellular responses were correlated. Near the end of 2022, about 35% of adults above age 60 had their last vaccine dose more than 6 months ago, and about 25% remained uninfected. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection rose from 13% (95% confidence interval 11–14%) before omicron to 78% (76–80%) by December 2022, equating to 25 million infected adults cumulatively. However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) weekly death rate during the BA.2/5 waves was less than half of that during the BA.1/1.1 wave, implying a protective role for hybrid immunity.

    Conclusions:

    Strategies to maintain population-level hybrid immunity require up-to-date vaccination coverage, including among those recovering from infection. Population-based, self-collected DBSs are a practicable biological surveillance platform.

    Funding:

    Funding was provided by the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Pfizer Global Medical Grants, and St. Michael’s Hospital Foundation. PJ and ACG are funded by the Canada Research Chairs Program.