Quantitative prediction of variant effects on alternative splicing in MAPT using endogenous pre-messenger RNA structure probing

  1. Jayashree Kumar
  2. Lela Lackey
  3. Justin M Waldern
  4. Abhishek Dey
  5. Anthony M Mustoe
  6. Kevin Weeks
  7. David H Mathews
  8. Alain Laederach  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
  2. Clemson University, United States
  3. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  4. University of Rochester, United States

Abstract

Splicing is highly regulated and is modulated by numerous factors. Quantitative predictions for how a mutation will affect precursor messenger RNA (mRNA) structure and downstream function is particularly challenging. Here we use a novel chemical probing strategy to visualize endogenous precursor and mature MAPT mRNA structures in cells. We used these data to estimate Boltzmann suboptimal structural ensembles, which were then analyzed to predict consequences of mutations on precursor mRNA structure. Further analysis of recent cryo-EM structures of the spliceosome at different stages of the splicing cycle revealed that the footprint of the Bact complex with precursor mRNA best predicted alternative splicing outcomes for exon 10 inclusion of the alternatively spliced MAPT gene, achieving 74% accuracy. We further developed a b-regression weighting framework that incorporates splice site strength, RNA structure, and exonic/intronic splicing regulatory elements capable of predicting, with 90% accuracy, the effects of 47 known and six newly discovered mutations on inclusion of exon 10 of MAPT. This combined experimental and computational framework represents a path forward for accurate prediction of splicing-related disease-causing variants.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in SRA under BioProject ID PRJNA762079 and PRJNA812003.DMS Reactivities are available as SNRNASMs at https://bit.ly/2WaDw6FAll data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1,2,4,5 and 6.Modeling and feature generation code is uploaded at https://git.io/JuSW8

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jayashree Kumar

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6914-748X
  2. Lela Lackey

    Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Greenwood, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Justin M Waldern

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Abhishek Dey

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anthony M Mustoe

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kevin Weeks

    Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David H Mathews

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alain Laederach

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    For correspondence
    alain@unc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5088-9907

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 HL111527)

  • Alain Laederach

National Institutes of Health (R35 GM 140844)

  • Alain Laederach

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM076485)

  • David H Mathews

National Institutes of Health (R35 GM122532)

  • Kevin Weeks

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT Scholar)

  • Anthony M Mustoe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Kumar et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,957
    views
  • 444
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jayashree Kumar
  2. Lela Lackey
  3. Justin M Waldern
  4. Abhishek Dey
  5. Anthony M Mustoe
  6. Kevin Weeks
  7. David H Mathews
  8. Alain Laederach
(2022)
Quantitative prediction of variant effects on alternative splicing in MAPT using endogenous pre-messenger RNA structure probing
eLife 11:e73888.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73888

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73888

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Gaetan De Waele, Gerben Menschaert, Willem Waegeman
    Research Article

    Timely and effective use of antimicrobial drugs can improve patient outcomes, as well as help safeguard against resistance development. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is currently routinely used in clinical diagnostics for rapid species identification. Mining additional data from said spectra in the form of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles is, therefore, highly promising. Such AMR profiles could serve as a drop-in solution for drastically improving treatment efficiency, effectiveness, and costs. This study endeavors to develop the first machine learning models capable of predicting AMR profiles for the whole repertoire of species and drugs encountered in clinical microbiology. The resulting models can be interpreted as drug recommender systems for infectious diseases. We find that our dual-branch method delivers considerably higher performance compared to previous approaches. In addition, experiments show that the models can be efficiently fine-tuned to data from other clinical laboratories. MALDI-TOF-based AMR recommender systems can, hence, greatly extend the value of MALDI-TOF MS for clinical diagnostics. All code supporting this study is distributed on PyPI and is packaged at https://github.com/gdewael/maldi-nn.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Sanjarbek Hudaiberdiev, Ivan Ovcharenko
    Research Article

    Enhancers and promoters are classically considered to be bound by a small set of transcription factors (TFs) in a sequence-specific manner. This assumption has come under increasing skepticism as the datasets of ChIP-seq assays of TFs have expanded. In particular, high-occupancy target (HOT) loci attract hundreds of TFs with often no detectable correlation between ChIP-seq peaks and DNA-binding motif presence. Here, we used a set of 1003 TF ChIP-seq datasets (HepG2, K562, H1) to analyze the patterns of ChIP-seq peak co-occurrence in combination with functional genomics datasets. We identified 43,891 HOT loci forming at the promoter (53%) and enhancer (47%) regions. HOT promoters regulate housekeeping genes, whereas HOT enhancers are involved in tissue-specific process regulation. HOT loci form the foundation of human super-enhancers and evolve under strong negative selection, with some of these loci being located in ultraconserved regions. Sequence-based classification analysis of HOT loci suggested that their formation is driven by the sequence features, and the density of mapped ChIP-seq peaks across TF-bound loci correlates with sequence features and the expression level of flanking genes. Based on the affinities to bind to promoters and enhancers we detected five distinct clusters of TFs that form the core of the HOT loci. We report an abundance of HOT loci in the human genome and a commitment of 51% of all TF ChIP-seq binding events to HOT locus formation thus challenging the classical model of enhancer activity and propose a model of HOT locus formation based on the existence of large transcriptional condensates.