Quantitative prediction of variant effects on alternative splicing in MAPT using endogenous pre-messenger RNA structure probing

  1. Jayashree Kumar
  2. Lela Lackey
  3. Justin M Waldern
  4. Abhishek Dey
  5. Anthony M Mustoe
  6. Kevin Weeks
  7. David H Mathews
  8. Alain Laederach  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
  2. Clemson University, United States
  3. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  4. University of Rochester, United States

Abstract

Splicing is highly regulated and is modulated by numerous factors. Quantitative predictions for how a mutation will affect precursor messenger RNA (mRNA) structure and downstream function is particularly challenging. Here we use a novel chemical probing strategy to visualize endogenous precursor and mature MAPT mRNA structures in cells. We used these data to estimate Boltzmann suboptimal structural ensembles, which were then analyzed to predict consequences of mutations on precursor mRNA structure. Further analysis of recent cryo-EM structures of the spliceosome at different stages of the splicing cycle revealed that the footprint of the Bact complex with precursor mRNA best predicted alternative splicing outcomes for exon 10 inclusion of the alternatively spliced MAPT gene, achieving 74% accuracy. We further developed a b-regression weighting framework that incorporates splice site strength, RNA structure, and exonic/intronic splicing regulatory elements capable of predicting, with 90% accuracy, the effects of 47 known and six newly discovered mutations on inclusion of exon 10 of MAPT. This combined experimental and computational framework represents a path forward for accurate prediction of splicing-related disease-causing variants.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in SRA under BioProject ID PRJNA762079 and PRJNA812003.DMS Reactivities are available as SNRNASMs at https://bit.ly/2WaDw6FAll data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1,2,4,5 and 6.Modeling and feature generation code is uploaded at https://git.io/JuSW8

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jayashree Kumar

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6914-748X
  2. Lela Lackey

    Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Greenwood, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Justin M Waldern

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Abhishek Dey

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anthony M Mustoe

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kevin Weeks

    Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David H Mathews

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alain Laederach

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    For correspondence
    alain@unc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5088-9907

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 HL111527)

  • Alain Laederach

National Institutes of Health (R35 GM 140844)

  • Alain Laederach

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM076485)

  • David H Mathews

National Institutes of Health (R35 GM122532)

  • Kevin Weeks

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT Scholar)

  • Anthony M Mustoe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Kumar et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,998
    views
  • 449
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jayashree Kumar
  2. Lela Lackey
  3. Justin M Waldern
  4. Abhishek Dey
  5. Anthony M Mustoe
  6. Kevin Weeks
  7. David H Mathews
  8. Alain Laederach
(2022)
Quantitative prediction of variant effects on alternative splicing in MAPT using endogenous pre-messenger RNA structure probing
eLife 11:e73888.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73888

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73888

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Daniel Hui, Scott Dudek ... Marylyn D Ritchie
    Research Article

    Apart from ancestry, personal or environmental covariates may contribute to differences in polygenic score (PGS) performance. We analyzed the effects of covariate stratification and interaction on body mass index (BMI) PGS (PGSBMI) across four cohorts of European (N = 491,111) and African (N = 21,612) ancestry. Stratifying on binary covariates and quintiles for continuous covariates, 18/62 covariates had significant and replicable R2 differences among strata. Covariates with the largest differences included age, sex, blood lipids, physical activity, and alcohol consumption, with R2 being nearly double between best- and worst-performing quintiles for certain covariates. Twenty-eight covariates had significant PGSBMI–covariate interaction effects, modifying PGSBMI effects by nearly 20% per standard deviation change. We observed overlap between covariates that had significant R2 differences among strata and interaction effects – across all covariates, their main effects on BMI were correlated with their maximum R2 differences and interaction effects (0.56 and 0.58, respectively), suggesting high-PGSBMI individuals have highest R2 and increase in PGS effect. Using quantile regression, we show the effect of PGSBMI increases as BMI itself increases, and that these differences in effects are directly related to differences in R2 when stratifying by different covariates. Given significant and replicable evidence for context-specific PGSBMI performance and effects, we investigated ways to increase model performance taking into account nonlinear effects. Machine learning models (neural networks) increased relative model R2 (mean 23%) across datasets. Finally, creating PGSBMI directly from GxAge genome-wide association studies effects increased relative R2 by 7.8%. These results demonstrate that certain covariates, especially those most associated with BMI, significantly affect both PGSBMI performance and effects across diverse cohorts and ancestries, and we provide avenues to improve model performance that consider these effects.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Cesare V Parise, Marc O Ernst
    Research Article

    Audiovisual information reaches the brain via both sustained and transient input channels, representing signals’ intensity over time or changes thereof, respectively. To date, it is unclear to what extent transient and sustained input channels contribute to the combined percept obtained through multisensory integration. Based on the results of two novel psychophysical experiments, here we demonstrate the importance of the transient (instead of the sustained) channel for the integration of audiovisual signals. To account for the present results, we developed a biologically inspired, general-purpose model for multisensory integration, the multisensory correlation detectors, which combines correlated input from unimodal transient channels. Besides accounting for the results of our psychophysical experiments, this model could quantitatively replicate several recent findings in multisensory research, as tested against a large collection of published datasets. In particular, the model could simultaneously account for the perceived timing of audiovisual events, multisensory facilitation in detection tasks, causality judgments, and optimal integration. This study demonstrates that several phenomena in multisensory research that were previously considered unrelated, all stem from the integration of correlated input from unimodal transient channels.