Stability of motor representations after paralysis

  1. Charles Guan  Is a corresponding author
  2. Tyson Aflalo  Is a corresponding author
  3. Carey Y Zhang
  4. Elena Amoruso
  5. Emily R Rosario
  6. Nader Pouratian
  7. Richard A Andersen
  1. California Institute of Technology, United States
  2. University College London, United Kingdom
  3. Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, United States
  4. University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Abstract

Neural plasticity allows us to learn skills and incorporate new experiences. What happens when our lived experiences fundamentally change, such as after a severe injury? To address this question, we analyzed intracortical population activity in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) of a tetraplegic adult as she controlled a virtual hand through a brain-computer interface (BCI). By attempting to move her fingers, she could accurately drive the corresponding virtual fingers. Neural activity during finger movements exhibited robust representational structure similar to fMRI recordings of able-bodied individuals' motor cortex, which has previously been shown to reflect able-bodied usage patterns. The finger representational structure was consistent throughout multiple sessions, even though the structure contributed to BCI decoding errors. Within individual BCI movements, the representational structure was dynamic, first resembling muscle activation patterns and then resembling the anticipated sensory consequences. Our results reveal that motor representations in PPC reflect able-bodied motor usage patterns even after paralysis, and BCIs can re-engage these representations to restore lost motor functions.

Data availability

Data is available on the BRAIN Initiative DANDI Archive at https://dandiarchive.org/dandiset/000147

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Charles Guan

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    For correspondence
    cguan@caltech.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Tyson Aflalo

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    For correspondence
    taflalo@caltech.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0101-2455
  3. Carey Y Zhang

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Elena Amoruso

    Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Emily R Rosario

    Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nader Pouratian

    5David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Richard A Andersen

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Eye Institute (R01EY015545)

  • Charles Guan
  • Tyson Aflalo
  • Emily R Rosario
  • Nader Pouratian
  • Richard A Andersen

National Eye Institute (UG1EY032039)

  • Charles Guan
  • Tyson Aflalo
  • Emily R Rosario
  • Nader Pouratian
  • Richard A Andersen

Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Brain-machine Interface Center at Caltech

  • Tyson Aflalo
  • Richard A Andersen

Boswell Foundation

  • Richard A Andersen

Amazon AI4Science Fellowship

  • Charles Guan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All procedures were approved by the California Institute of Technology, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, and the University of California, Los Angeles Institutional Review Boards. NS consented to the surgical procedure as well as to the subsequent clinical studies after understanding their nature, objectives, and potential risks.

Copyright

© 2022, Guan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,637
    views
  • 339
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Charles Guan
  2. Tyson Aflalo
  3. Carey Y Zhang
  4. Elena Amoruso
  5. Emily R Rosario
  6. Nader Pouratian
  7. Richard A Andersen
(2022)
Stability of motor representations after paralysis
eLife 11:e74478.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74478

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74478

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Célian Bimbard, Flóra Takács ... Philip Coen
    Tools and Resources

    Electrophysiology has proven invaluable to record neural activity, and the development of Neuropixels probes dramatically increased the number of recorded neurons. These probes are often implanted acutely, but acute recordings cannot be performed in freely moving animals and the recorded neurons cannot be tracked across days. To study key behaviors such as navigation, learning, and memory formation, the probes must be implanted chronically. An ideal chronic implant should (1) allow stable recordings of neurons for weeks; (2) allow reuse of the probes after explantation; (3) be light enough for use in mice. Here, we present the ‘Apollo Implant’, an open-source and editable device that meets these criteria and accommodates up to two Neuropixels 1.0 or 2.0 probes. The implant comprises a ‘payload’ module which is attached to the probe and is recoverable, and a ‘docking’ module which is cemented to the skull. The design is adjustable, making it easy to change the distance between probes, the angle of insertion, and the depth of insertion. We tested the implant across eight labs in head-fixed mice, freely moving mice, and freely moving rats. The number of neurons recorded across days was stable, even after repeated implantations of the same probe. The Apollo implant provides an inexpensive, lightweight, and flexible solution for reusable chronic Neuropixels recordings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Georgin Jacob, RT Pramod, SP Arun
    Research Article

    Most visual tasks involve looking for specific object features. But we also often perform property-based tasks where we look for specific property in an image, such as finding an odd item, deciding if two items are same, or if an object has symmetry. How do we solve such tasks? These tasks do not fit into standard models of decision making because their underlying feature space and decision process is unclear. Using well-known principles governing multiple object representations, we show that displays with repeating elements can be distinguished from heterogeneous displays using a property we define as visual homogeneity. In behavior, visual homogeneity predicted response times on visual search, same-different and symmetry tasks. Brain imaging during visual search and symmetry tasks revealed that visual homogeneity was localized to a region in the object-selective cortex. Thus, property-based visual tasks are solved in a localized region in the brain by computing visual homogeneity.