1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Pain: Why sex matters

  1. Josette J Wlaschin
  2. Sangeetha Hareendran
  3. Claire E Le Pichon  Is a corresponding author
  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute on Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, United States
  2. Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, United States
Insight
  • Cited 0
  • Views 969
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2021;10:e74935 doi: 10.7554/eLife.74935

Abstract

The immune mechanisms underlying hypersensitivity to pain after nerve injury are different in male and female mice.

Main text

Pain cautions our bodies against harmful stimuli – such as a burning flame or the pointy end of a needle – and protects us when we are injured. These stimuli are detected by sensory neurons, which transmit signals to the spinal cord and brain. Damaging these neurons can lead to persistent and chronic pain, but the mechanisms underlying this are not fully understood.

One important player in controlling pain related to nerve damage is the immune system (Calvo et al., 2012; Scholz and Woolf, 2007). Previous work showed that injured sensory neurons release a protein called CSF1 (short for colony stimulating factor 1), which activates microglia, the main immune cell type in the brain and spinal cord. In this activated state, microglia proliferate, change their form and alter their behavior.

In 2016, a group of scientists discovered that male mice became hypersensitive to touch when their microglia were activated by nerve injury or by injecting CSF1 in to the space around the spinal cord (Guan et al., 2016). However, microglia have also been shown to be sexually dimorphic, playing different roles in disease and pain in males and females (Mogil, 2020). Now, in eLife, Allan Basbaum, Anna Molovsky and colleagues from the University of California, San Francisco – including Julia Kuhn and Ilia Vainchtein as co-first authors – report that microglia and another immune cell population respond differently to pain signals in male and female mice (Kuhn et al., 2021).

To investigate the mechanisms underlying hypersensitivity to touch, the team (which includes some of the researchers involved in the 2016 study) damaged the sciatic nerves of male and female mice lacking the gene for the CSF1 protein in their sensory neurons. Pain was assessed using the Von Frey assay, where mice are placed on an elevated grate and their paws are poked with different sized filaments (Decosterd and Woolf, 2000; Shields et al., 2003). Thick filaments will evoke a pain response that causes the mouse to flinch and withdraw its paw; whereas, thinner filaments only elicit this response when mice are hypersensitive to touch.

As shown previously, male mice deficient in CSF1 were not hypersensitive to touch after nerve injury. Female mice lacking CSF1, however, still withdrew their paws when poked with thinner filaments, suggesting that the mechanism underlying hypersensitivity in females is different to males. To confirm these findings, Kuhn et al. injected CSF1 near the spinal cord and assessed pain in the absence of nerve injury. As expected based on the previous results, the male mice became hypersensitive to touch, whereas the females did not (Figure 1). Further experiments examining the genes expressed by microglia after injection of CSF1 revealed that male mice upregulated different genes compared to females, including genes associated with disease, and the activation and recruitment of immune cells.

The differing effects of CSF1 injection on male and female mice.

When CSF1 is injected into wild-type mice, microglia in the spinal cord become activated (red cells) in male mice (top) but not females (middle). In females, regulatory T-cells (Tregs, blue circles) present in the membrane layers surrounding the spinal cord block CSF1 from activating microglia, which remain in the resting state (green cells); when regulatory T-cells are depleted (Treg KO; bottom), the microglia of female mice respond to CSF1 the same way as in males (bottom). During Von Frey pain assessment tests, female mice with depleted levels of regulatory T-cells and male mice exhibit the paw withdrawal response typical of hypersensitivity (top and bottom); however, female mice do not elicit a hypersensitive pain response. This indicates that regulatory T-cells suppress the activation of microglia and development of a pain response after CSF1 injection, but only in female mice.

Image credit: Figure created using Biorender.com.

Other types of immune cells are known to influence how the central nervous system works under both normal and diseased conditions. To see if any of these might be involved in female pain sensation, Kuhn et al. examined which immune cells were present in the membrane layers surrounding the spinal cords of mice injected with CSF1. Females were found to have more regulatory T-cells, which are potent inflammation suppressors. Kuhn et al. wondered if having a greater number of regulatory T-cells counteracts the effects of CSF1, so they repeated the experiments in female mice in which regulatory T-cells had been depleted. This revealed that without regulatory T-cells, female mice also develop hypersensitivity after CSF1 injection, and their microglia express a more similar pattern of genes to the microglia of males (Figure 1).

This study demonstrates that the immune system plays different roles in the pain pathways of male and female mice after nerve injury. In male mice, microglia are the major immune cell type driving pain induced by CSF1 injection, while regulatory T-cells repress this pathway in females. This work highlights the need to include males and females in scientific research, and the importance of considering sex-specific approaches for pain management. It also opens up interesting questions for future investigation. For example, it is unclear how regulatory T-cells are recruited in females after CSF1 injection, and the mechanisms underlying pain hypersensitivity in female mice remain to be discovered.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Josette J Wlaschin

    Josette J Wlaschin is in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute on Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, and the Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1532-3905
  2. Sangeetha Hareendran

    Sangeetha Hareendran is in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute on Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9070-8023
  3. Claire E Le Pichon

    Claire E Le Pichon is in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute on Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

    For correspondence
    claire.lepichon@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9274-3615

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: December 2, 2021 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2021, Wlaschin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 969
    Page views
  • 84
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Cathy S Chen et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Sex-based modulation of cognitive processes could set the stage for individual differences in vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders. While value-based decision making processes in particular have been proposed to be influenced by sex differences, the overall correct performance in decision making tasks often show variable or minimal differences across sexes. Computational tools allow us to uncover latent variables that define different decision making approaches, even in animals with similar correct performance. Here, we quantify sex differences in mice in the latent variables underlying behavior in a classic value-based decision making task: a restless two-armed bandit. While male and female mice had similar accuracy, they achieved this performance via different patterns of exploration. Male mice tended to make more exploratory choices overall, largely because they appeared to get ‘stuck’ in exploration once they had started. Female mice tended to explore less but learned more quickly during exploration. Together, these results suggest that sex exerts stronger influences on decision making during periods of learning and exploration than during stable choices. Exploration during decision making is altered in people diagnosed with addictions, depression, and neurodevelopmental disabilities, pinpointing the neural mechanisms of exploration as a highly translational avenue for conferring sex-modulated vulnerability to neuropsychiatric diagnoses.

    1. Neuroscience
    Lingjun Ding et al.
    Tools and Resources

    Neural circuits are made of a vast diversity of neuronal cell types. While immense progress has been made in classifying neurons based on morphological, molecular, and functional properties, understanding how this heterogeneity contributes to brain function during natural behavior has remained largely unresolved. In the present study, we combined the juxtacellular recording and labeling technique with optogenetics in freely moving mice. This allowed us to selectively target molecularly defined cell classes for in vivo single-cell recordings and morphological analysis. We validated this strategy in the CA1 region of the mouse hippocampus by restricting Channelrhodopsin expression to Calbindin-positive neurons. Directly versus indirectly light-activated neurons could be readily distinguished based on the latencies of light-evoked spikes, with juxtacellular labeling and post hoc histological analysis providing ‘ground-truth’ validation. Using these opto-juxtacellular procedures in freely moving mice, we found that Calbindin-positive CA1 pyramidal cells were weakly spatially modulated and conveyed less spatial information than Calbindin-negative neurons – pointing to pyramidal cell identity as a key determinant for neuronal recruitment into the hippocampal spatial map. Thus, our method complements current in vivo techniques by enabling optogenetic-assisted structure–function analysis of single neurons recorded during natural, unrestrained behavior.