Pain: Why sex matters
The immune mechanisms underlying hypersensitivity to pain after nerve injury are different in male and female mice.
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute on Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, United States
- Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, United States
Pain cautions our bodies against harmful stimuli – such as a burning flame or the pointy end of a needle – and protects us when we are injured. These stimuli are detected by sensory neurons, which transmit signals to the spinal cord and brain. Damaging these neurons can lead to persistent and chronic pain, but the mechanisms underlying this are not fully understood.
One important player in controlling pain related to nerve damage is the immune system (Calvo et al., 2012; Scholz and Woolf, 2007). Previous work showed that injured sensory neurons release a protein called CSF1 (short for colony stimulating factor 1), which activates microglia, the main immune cell type in the brain and spinal cord. In this activated state, microglia proliferate, change their form and alter their behavior.
In 2016, a group of scientists discovered that male mice became hypersensitive to touch when their microglia were activated by nerve injury or by injecting CSF1 in to the space around the spinal cord (Guan et al., 2016). However, microglia have also been shown to be sexually dimorphic, playing different roles in disease and pain in males and females (Mogil, 2020). Now, in eLife, Allan Basbaum, Anna Molovsky and colleagues from the University of California, San Francisco – including Julia Kuhn and Ilia Vainchtein as co-first authors – report that microglia and another immune cell population respond differently to pain signals in male and female mice (Kuhn et al., 2021).
To investigate the mechanisms underlying hypersensitivity to touch, the team (which includes some of the researchers involved in the 2016 study) damaged the sciatic nerves of male and female mice lacking the gene for the CSF1 protein in their sensory neurons. Pain was assessed using the Von Frey assay, where mice are placed on an elevated grate and their paws are poked with different sized filaments (Decosterd and Woolf, 2000; Shields et al., 2003). Thick filaments will evoke a pain response that causes the mouse to flinch and withdraw its paw; whereas, thinner filaments only elicit this response when mice are hypersensitive to touch.
As shown previously, male mice deficient in CSF1 were not hypersensitive to touch after nerve injury. Female mice lacking CSF1, however, still withdrew their paws when poked with thinner filaments, suggesting that the mechanism underlying hypersensitivity in females is different to males. To confirm these findings, Kuhn et al. injected CSF1 near the spinal cord and assessed pain in the absence of nerve injury. As expected based on the previous results, the male mice became hypersensitive to touch, whereas the females did not (Figure 1). Further experiments examining the genes expressed by microglia after injection of CSF1 revealed that male mice upregulated different genes compared to females, including genes associated with disease, and the activation and recruitment of immune cells.
Figure 1
The differing effects of CSF1 injection on male and female mice.
When CSF1 is injected into wild-type mice, microglia in the spinal cord become activated (red cells) in male mice (top) but not females (middle). In females, regulatory T-cells (Tregs, blue circles) present in the membrane layers surrounding the spinal cord block CSF1 from activating microglia, which remain in the resting state (green cells); when regulatory T-cells are depleted (Treg KO; bottom), the microglia of female mice respond to CSF1 the same way as in males (bottom). During Von Frey pain assessment tests, female mice with depleted levels of regulatory T-cells and male mice exhibit the paw withdrawal response typical of hypersensitivity (top and bottom); however, female mice do not elicit a hypersensitive pain response. This indicates that regulatory T-cells suppress the activation of microglia and development of a pain response after CSF1 injection, but only in female mice.
Image credit: Figure created using Biorender.com.
Other types of immune cells are known to influence how the central nervous system works under both normal and diseased conditions. To see if any of these might be involved in female pain sensation, Kuhn et al. examined which immune cells were present in the membrane layers surrounding the spinal cords of mice injected with CSF1. Females were found to have more regulatory T-cells, which are potent inflammation suppressors. Kuhn et al. wondered if having a greater number of regulatory T-cells counteracts the effects of CSF1, so they repeated the experiments in female mice in which regulatory T-cells had been depleted. This revealed that without regulatory T-cells, female mice also develop hypersensitivity after CSF1 injection, and their microglia express a more similar pattern of genes to the microglia of males (Figure 1).
This study demonstrates that the immune system plays different roles in the pain pathways of male and female mice after nerve injury. In male mice, microglia are the major immune cell type driving pain induced by CSF1 injection, while regulatory T-cells repress this pathway in females. This work highlights the need to include males and females in scientific research, and the importance of considering sex-specific approaches for pain management. It also opens up interesting questions for future investigation. For example, it is unclear how regulatory T-cells are recruited in females after CSF1 injection, and the mechanisms underlying pain hypersensitivity in female mice remain to be discovered.
References
-
The role of the immune system in the generation of neuropathic painThe Lancet. Neurology 11:629–642.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70134-5
-
Qualitative sex differences in pain processing: emerging evidence of a biased literatureNature Reviews. Neuroscience 21:353–365.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0310-6
-
The neuropathic pain triad: neurons, immune cells and gliaNature Neuroscience 10:1361–1368.https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1992
Article and author information
Author details
Josette J Wlaschin
Sangeetha Hareendran
Claire E Le Pichon
Publication history
Copyright
© 2021, Wlaschin et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,563
- views
-
- 134
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Pain: Why sex matters
eLife 10:e74935.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74935
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Avoiding distraction by salient yet irrelevant stimuli is critical when accomplishing daily tasks. One possible mechanism to accomplish this is by suppressing stimuli that may be distracting such that they no longer compete for attention. While the behavioral benefits of distractor suppression are well established, its neural underpinnings are not yet fully understood. In a functional MRI (fMRI) study, we examined whether and how sensory responses in early visual areas show signs of distractor suppression after incidental learning of spatial statistical regularities. Participants were exposed to an additional singleton task where, unbeknownst to them, one location more frequently contained a salient distractor. We analyzed whether visual responses in terms of fMRI BOLD were modulated by this distractor predictability. Our findings indicate that implicit spatial priors shape sensory processing even at the earliest stages of cortical visual processing, evident in early visual cortex as a suppression of stimuli at locations which frequently contained distracting information. Notably, while this suppression was spatially (receptive field) specific, it did extend to nearby neutral locations and occurred regardless of whether distractors, nontarget items, or targets were presented at this location, suggesting that suppression arises before stimulus identification. Crucially, we observed similar spatially specific neural suppression even if search was only anticipated, but no search display was presented. Our results highlight proactive modulations in early visual cortex, where potential distractions are suppressed preemptively, before stimulus onset, based on learned expectations. Combined, our study underscores how the brain leverages implicitly learned prior knowledge to optimize sensory processing and attention allocation.
-
- Neuroscience
To navigate real-world listening conditions, the auditory system relies on the integration of multiple sources of information. However, to avoid inappropriate cross-talk between inputs, highly connected neural systems need to strike a balance between integration and segregation. Here, we develop a novel approach to examine how repeated neurochemical modules in the mouse inferior colliculus lateral cortex (LC) allow controlled integration of its multimodal inputs. The LC had been impossible to study via imaging because it is buried in a sulcus. Therefore, we coupled two-photon microscopy with the use of a microprism to reveal the first-ever sagittal views of the LC to examine neuronal responses with respect to its neurochemical motifs under anesthetized and awake conditions. This approach revealed marked differences in the acoustic response properties of LC and neighboring non-lemniscal portions of the inferior colliculus. In addition, we observed that the module and matrix cellular motifs of the LC displayed distinct somatosensory and auditory responses. Specifically, neurons in modules demonstrated primarily offset responses to acoustic stimuli with enhancement in responses to bimodal stimuli, whereas matrix neurons showed onset response to acoustic stimuli and suppressed responses to bimodal stimulation. Thus, this new approach revealed that the repeated structural motifs of the LC permit functional integration of multimodal inputs while retaining distinct response properties.
