A guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) mediated brake on photosynthesis is required for acclimation to nitrogen limitation in Arabidopsis

  1. Shanna Romand
  2. Hela Abdelkefi
  3. Cécile Lecampion
  4. Mohamed Belaroussi
  5. Melanie Dussenne
  6. Brigitte Ksas
  7. Sylvie Citerne
  8. Jose Caius
  9. Stefano D'Alessandro
  10. Hatem Fakhfakh
  11. Stefano Caffarri
  12. Michel Havaux
  13. Benjamin Field  Is a corresponding author
  1. Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, France
  2. University of Carthage, Tunisia
  3. Université Paris-Saclay, UMR1318, INRAE, France
  4. Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, France
  5. University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia

Abstract

Guanosine pentaphosphate and tetraphosphate (together referred to as ppGpp) are hyperphosphorylated nucleotides found in bacteria and the chloroplasts of plants and algae. In plants and algae artificial ppGpp accumulation can inhibit chloroplast gene expression, and influence photosynthesis, nutrient remobilisation, growth, and immunity. However, it is so far unknown whether ppGpp is required for abiotic stress acclimation in plants. Here, we demonstrate that ppGpp biosynthesis is necessary for acclimation to nitrogen starvation in Arabidopsis. We show that ppGpp is required for remodeling the photosynthetic electron transport chain to downregulate photosynthetic activity and for protection against oxidative stress. Furthermore, we demonstrate that ppGpp is required for coupling chloroplastic and nuclear gene expression during nitrogen starvation. Altogether, our work indicates that ppGpp is a pivotal regulator of chloroplast activity for stress acclimation in plants.

Data availability

All data presented in this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-5 (+ supplements).Sequencing data have been deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive under accession number PRJEB46181.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shanna Romand

    LGBP Team, Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Hela Abdelkefi

    LGBP Team, Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Cécile Lecampion

    LGBP Team, Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7862-517X
  4. Mohamed Belaroussi

    LGBP Team, Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Melanie Dussenne

    LGBP Team, Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Brigitte Ksas

    Faculty of Sciences, University of Carthage, Bizerte, Tunisia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sylvie Citerne

    Institut JeanPierre Bourgin, Université Paris-Saclay, UMR1318, INRAE, Versailles, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jose Caius

    Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Orsay, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Stefano D'Alessandro

    LGBP Team, Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hatem Fakhfakh

    Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Immunology and Biotechnology, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Stefano Caffarri

    LGBP Team, Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Michel Havaux

    SAVE Team, Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance,, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Benjamin Field

    LGBP Team, Aix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Marseille, France
    For correspondence
    ben.field@univ-amu.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2142-4606

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE13-0005)

  • Benjamin Field

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-EUR-0007)

  • Sylvie Citerne
  • Jose Caius

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Shinji Masuda, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: September 20, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: October 28, 2021
  3. Accepted: February 14, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: February 14, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: March 1, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Romand et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,912
    views
  • 342
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shanna Romand
  2. Hela Abdelkefi
  3. Cécile Lecampion
  4. Mohamed Belaroussi
  5. Melanie Dussenne
  6. Brigitte Ksas
  7. Sylvie Citerne
  8. Jose Caius
  9. Stefano D'Alessandro
  10. Hatem Fakhfakh
  11. Stefano Caffarri
  12. Michel Havaux
  13. Benjamin Field
(2022)
A guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) mediated brake on photosynthesis is required for acclimation to nitrogen limitation in Arabidopsis
eLife 11:e75041.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75041

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75041

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology
    Yuanyuan Bu, Xingye Dong ... Shenkui Liu
    Research Article

    Urea is intensively utilized as a nitrogen fertilizer in agriculture, originating either from root uptake or from catabolism of arginine by arginase. Despite its extensive use, the underlying physiological mechanisms of urea, particularly its adverse effects on seed germination and seedling growth under salt stress remains unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that salt stress induces excessive hydrolysis of arginine-derived urea, leading to an increase in cytoplasmic pH within seed radical cells, which, in turn, triggers salt-induced inhibition of seed germination (SISG) and hampers seedling growth. Our findings challenge the long-held belief that ammonium accumulation and toxicity are the primary causes of SISG, offering a novel perspective on the mechanism underlying these processes. This study provides significant insights into the physiological impact of urea hydrolysis under salt stress, contributing to a better understanding of SISG.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.