The normalization model predicts responses during object-based attention in the human visual cortex

  1. Narges Doostani
  2. Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh
  3. Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran
  2. University of Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
  3. National Institute of Mental Health, United States

Abstract

Divisive normalization of the neural responses by the activity of the neighboring neurons has been proposed as a fundamental operation in the nervous system based on its success in predicting neural responses recorded in primate electrophysiology studies. Nevertheless, experimental evidence for the existence of this operation in the human brain is still scant. Here, using functional MRI, we explored the role of normalization across the visual hierarchy in the human visual cortex. Using stimuli form the two categories of human bodies and houses, we presented objects in isolation or in clutter and asked participants to attend or ignore the stimuli. Focusing on the primary visual area V1, the object-selective regions LO and pFs, the body-selective region EBA, and the scene-selective region PPA, we first modeled single-voxel responses using a weighted sum, a weighted average, and a normalization model and demonstrated that although the weighted sum and weighted average models also made acceptable predictions in some conditions, the response to multiple stimuli could generally be better described by a model that takes normalization into account. We then explored the observed effects of attention on cortical responses and demonstrated that these effects were predicted by the normalization model, but not by the weighted sum or the weighted average models. Our results thus provide evidence that the normalization model can predict responses to objects across shifts of visual attention, suggesting the role of normalization as a fundamental operation in the human brain.

Data availability

fMRI data have been deposited in OSF under DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8CH9Q.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Narges Doostani

    School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5775-6595
  2. Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh

    School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam

    Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    maryam.vaziri-pashkam@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1830-2501

Funding

National Institutes of Health (ZIA-MH002035)

  • Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Marisa Carrasco, New York University, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants gave written consent prior to their participation in the experiment. Imaging was performed according to safety guidelines approved by the ethics committee of the Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences with the reference number 98/60.1/2184.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: May 23, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: November 20, 2021
  3. Accepted: April 25, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 26, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: May 9, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: May 30, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,068
    views
  • 145
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Narges Doostani
  2. Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh
  3. Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam
(2023)
The normalization model predicts responses during object-based attention in the human visual cortex
eLife 12:e75726.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75726

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75726

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Tianhao Chu, Zilong Ji ... Si Wu
    Research Article

    Hippocampal place cells in freely moving rodents display both theta phase precession and procession, which is thought to play important roles in cognition, but the neural mechanism for producing theta phase shift remains largely unknown. Here, we show that firing rate adaptation within a continuous attractor neural network causes the neural activity bump to oscillate around the external input, resembling theta sweeps of decoded position during locomotion. These forward and backward sweeps naturally account for theta phase precession and procession of individual neurons, respectively. By tuning the adaptation strength, our model explains the difference between ‘bimodal cells’ showing interleaved phase precession and procession, and ‘unimodal cells’ in which phase precession predominates. Our model also explains the constant cycling of theta sweeps along different arms in a T-maze environment, the speed modulation of place cells’ firing frequency, and the continued phase shift after transient silencing of the hippocampus. We hope that this study will aid an understanding of the neural mechanism supporting theta phase coding in the brain.

    1. Neuroscience
    Josue M Regalado, Ariadna Corredera Asensio ... Priyamvada Rajasethupathy
    Research Article

    Learning requires the ability to link actions to outcomes. How motivation facilitates learning is not well understood. We designed a behavioral task in which mice self-initiate trials to learn cue-reward contingencies and found that the anterior cingulate region of the prefrontal cortex (ACC) contains motivation-related signals to maximize rewards. In particular, we found that ACC neural activity was consistently tied to trial initiations where mice seek to leave unrewarded cues to reach reward-associated cues. Notably, this neural signal persisted over consecutive unrewarded cues until reward-associated cues were reached, and was required for learning. To determine how ACC inherits this motivational signal we performed projection-specific photometry recordings from several inputs to ACC during learning. In doing so, we identified a ramp in bulk neural activity in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-to-ACC projections as mice received unrewarded cues, which continued ramping across consecutive unrewarded cues, and finally peaked upon reaching a reward-associated cue, thus maintaining an extended motivational state. Cellular resolution imaging of OFC confirmed these neural correlates of motivation, and further delineated separate ensembles of neurons that sequentially tiled the ramp. Together, these results identify a mechanism by which OFC maps out task structure to convey an extended motivational state to ACC to facilitate goal-directed learning.