Characterization of sequence determinants of enhancer function using natural genetic variation

  1. Marty G Yang
  2. Emi Ling
  3. Christopher J Cowley
  4. Michael E Greenberg  Is a corresponding author
  5. Thomas Vierbuchen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard University, United States
  2. Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Abstract

Sequence variation in enhancers that control cell type-specific gene transcription contributes significantly to phenotypic variation within human populations. However, it remains difficult to predict precisely the effect of any given sequence variant on enhancer function due to the complexity of DNA sequence motifs that determine transcription factor (TF) binding to enhancers in their native genomic context. Using F1-hybrid cells derived from crosses between distantly related inbred strains of mice, we identified thousands of enhancers with allele-specific TF binding and/or activity. We find that genetic variants located within the central region of enhancers are most likely to alter TF binding and enhancer activity. We observe that the AP-1 family of TFs (Fos/Jun) are frequently required for binding of TEAD TFs and for enhancer function. However, many sequence variants outside of core motifs for AP-1 and TEAD also impact enhancer function, including sequences flanking core TF motifs and AP-1 half sites. Taken together, these data represent one of the most comprehensive assessments of allele-specific TF binding and enhancer function to date and reveal how sequence changes at enhancers alter their function across evolutionary timescales.

Data availability

We submitted our data to GEO, and it is now accessible via GSE193728.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marty G Yang

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Emi Ling

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5287-0284
  3. Christopher J Cowley

    Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michael E Greenberg

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    meg@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Thomas Vierbuchen

    Developmental Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
    For correspondence
    vierbuct@mskcc.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5690-5680

Funding

NIH Office of the Director (T32EY00711030)

  • Marty G Yang

NIH Office of the Director (T32AG000222)

  • Marty G Yang

National Science Foundation (DGE0946799)

  • Emi Ling

National Science Foundation (DGE1144152)

  • Emi Ling

NIH Office of the Director (R01 NS115965)

  • Michael E Greenberg

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen CJ Parker, University of Michigan, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the National Institutes of Health and the Harvard Medical School Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in compliance with the relevant ethical regulations (Protocol # IS00000074-3)

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: December 18, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: December 18, 2021
  3. Accepted: August 30, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 31, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 14, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Yang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,426
    views
  • 464
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marty G Yang
  2. Emi Ling
  3. Christopher J Cowley
  4. Michael E Greenberg
  5. Thomas Vierbuchen
(2022)
Characterization of sequence determinants of enhancer function using natural genetic variation
eLife 11:e76500.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76500

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76500

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Lucie Crhak Khaitova, Pavlina Mikulkova ... Karel Riha
    Research Article

    Heat stress is a major threat to global crop production, and understanding its impact on plant fertility is crucial for developing climate-resilient crops. Despite the known negative effects of heat stress on plant reproduction, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of elevated temperature on centromere structure and chromosome segregation during meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Consistent with previous studies, heat stress leads to a decline in fertility and micronuclei formation in pollen mother cells. Our results reveal that elevated temperature causes a decrease in the amount of centromeric histone and the kinetochore protein BMF1 at meiotic centromeres with increasing temperature. Furthermore, we show that heat stress increases the duration of meiotic divisions and prolongs the activity of the spindle assembly checkpoint during meiosis I, indicating an impaired efficiency of the kinetochore attachments to spindle microtubules. Our analysis of mutants with reduced levels of centromeric histone suggests that weakened centromeres sensitize plants to elevated temperature, resulting in meiotic defects and reduced fertility even at moderate temperatures. These results indicate that the structure and functionality of meiotic centromeres in Arabidopsis are highly sensitive to heat stress, and suggest that centromeres and kinetochores may represent a critical bottleneck in plant adaptation to increasing temperatures.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Allison Coté, Aoife O'Farrell ... Arjun Raj
    Research Article

    Splicing is the stepwise molecular process by which introns are removed from pre-mRNA and exons are joined together to form mature mRNA sequences. The ordering and spatial distribution of these steps remain controversial, with opposing models suggesting splicing occurs either during or after transcription. We used single-molecule RNA FISH, expansion microscopy, and live-cell imaging to reveal the spatiotemporal distribution of nascent transcripts in mammalian cells. At super-resolution levels, we found that pre-mRNA formed clouds around the transcription site. These clouds indicate the existence of a transcription-site-proximal zone through which RNA move more slowly than in the nucleoplasm. Full-length pre-mRNA undergo continuous splicing as they move through this zone following transcription, suggesting a model in which splicing can occur post-transcriptionally but still within the proximity of the transcription site, thus seeming co-transcriptional by most assays. These results may unify conflicting reports of co-transcriptional versus post-transcriptional splicing.