Heritability and cross-species comparisons of human cortical functional organization asymmetry

  1. Bin Wan  Is a corresponding author
  2. Şeyma Bayrak
  3. Ting Xu
  4. H Lina Schaare
  5. Richard AI Bethlehem
  6. Boris C Bernhardt
  7. Sofie Louise Valk  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
  2. Child Mind Institute, United States
  3. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  4. McGill University, Canada

Abstract

The human cerebral cortex is symmetrically organized along large-scale axes but also presents inter-hemispheric differences in structure and function. The quantified contralateral homologous difference, i.e., asymmetry, is a key feature of the human brain left-right axis supporting functional processes, such as language. Here, we assessed whether the asymmetry of cortical functional organization is heritable and phylogenetically conserved between humans and macaques. Our findings indicate asymmetric organization along an axis describing a functional trajectory from perceptual/action to abstract cognition. Whereas language network showed leftward asymmetric organization, frontoparietal network showed rightward asymmetric organization in humans. These asymmetries were heritable in humans and showed a similar spatial distribution with macaques, in the case of intra-hemispheric asymmetry of functional hierarchy. This suggests (phylo)genetic conservation. However, both language and frontoparietal networks showed a qualitatively larger asymmetry in humans relative to macaques. Overall, our findings suggest a genetic basis for asymmetry in intrinsic functional organization, linked to higher-order cognitive functions uniquely developed in humans.

Data availability

All human data analyzed in this manuscript were obtained from the open-access HCP youngadult sample (HCP; www.humanconnectome.org/), UK Biobank (UKB,https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/). Macaque data came from PRIME-DE(http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/indiPRIME.html). Full statistical scripts can be found at https://bit.ly/3sAJ1bP.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bin Wan

    Otto Hahn Group Cognitive Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    For correspondence
    wanb.psych@outlook.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9077-3354
  2. Şeyma Bayrak

    Otto Hahn Group Cognitive Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ting Xu

    Child Mind Institute, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. H Lina Schaare

    Otto Hahn Group Cognitive Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Richard AI Bethlehem

    Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0714-0685
  6. Boris C Bernhardt

    McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9256-6041
  7. Sofie Louise Valk

    Otto Hahn Group Cognitive Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    For correspondence
    valk@cbs.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2998-6849

Funding

Max Planck Gesellschaft

  • Sofie Louise Valk

Sick Kids Foundation (NI17-039)

  • Boris C Bernhardt

National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery-1304413)

  • Boris C Bernhardt

Canadian Institute of Health Research (FDN154298)

  • Boris C Bernhardt

Azrieli Center for Autism Research

  • Boris C Bernhardt

Canada First Research Excellence Fund

  • Boris C Bernhardt
  • Sofie Louise Valk

International Max Planck Research School on Neuroscience of Communication: Function, Structure, and Plasticity

  • Bin Wan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Saad Jbabdi, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Ethics

Human subjects: The current research complies with all relevant ethical regulations as set by The Independent Research Ethics Committee at the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University of Duesseldorf (study number 2018-317).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: November 4, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: January 20, 2022
  3. Accepted: July 28, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 29, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: August 11, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: August 16, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Wan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,952
    views
  • 754
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bin Wan
  2. Şeyma Bayrak
  3. Ting Xu
  4. H Lina Schaare
  5. Richard AI Bethlehem
  6. Boris C Bernhardt
  7. Sofie Louise Valk
(2022)
Heritability and cross-species comparisons of human cortical functional organization asymmetry
eLife 11:e77215.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77215

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77215

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Alina Tetereva, Narun Pat
    Research Article

    One well-known biomarker candidate that supposedly helps capture fluid cognition is Brain Age, or a predicted value based on machine-learning models built to predict chronological age from brain MRI. To formally evaluate the utility of Brain Age for capturing fluid cognition, we built 26 age-prediction models for Brain Age based on different combinations of MRI modalities, using the Human Connectome Project in Aging (n=504, 36–100 years old). First, based on commonality analyses, we found a large overlap between Brain Age and chronological age: Brain Age could uniquely add only around 1.6% in explaining variation in fluid cognition over and above chronological age. Second, the age-prediction models that performed better at predicting chronological age did NOT necessarily create better Brain Age for capturing fluid cognition over and above chronological age. Instead, better-performing age-prediction models created Brain Age that overlapped larger with chronological age, up to around 29% out of 32%, in explaining fluid cognition. Third, Brain Age missed around 11% of the total variation in fluid cognition that could have been explained by the brain variation. That is, directly predicting fluid cognition from brain MRI data (instead of relying on Brain Age and chronological age) could lead to around a 1/3-time improvement of the total variation explained. Accordingly, we demonstrated the limited utility of Brain Age as a biomarker for fluid cognition and made some suggestions to ensure the utility of Brain Age in explaining fluid cognition and other phenotypes of interest.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jonathan AC Menzies, André Maia Chagas ... Claudio R Alonso
    Research Article

    Movement is a key feature of animal systems, yet its embryonic origins are not fully understood. Here, we investigate the genetic basis underlying the embryonic onset of movement in Drosophila focusing on the role played by small non-coding RNAs (microRNAs, miRNAs). To this end, we first develop a quantitative behavioural pipeline capable of tracking embryonic movement in large populations of fly embryos, and using this system, discover that the Drosophila miRNA miR-2b-1 plays a role in the emergence of movement. Through the combination of spectral analysis of embryonic motor patterns, cell sorting and RNA in situs, genetic reconstitution tests, and neural optical imaging we define that miR-2b-1 influences the emergence of embryonic movement by exerting actions in the developing nervous system. Furthermore, through the combination of bioinformatics coupled to genetic manipulation of miRNA expression and phenocopy tests we identify a previously uncharacterised (but evolutionarily conserved) chloride channel encoding gene – which we term Movement Modulator (Motor) – as a genetic target that mechanistically links miR-2b-1 to the onset of movement. Cell-specific genetic reconstitution of miR-2b-1 expression in a null miRNA mutant background, followed by behavioural assays and target gene analyses, suggest that miR-2b-1 affects the emergence of movement through effects in sensory elements of the embryonic circuitry, rather than in the motor domain. Our work thus reports the first miRNA system capable of regulating embryonic movement, suggesting that other miRNAs are likely to play a role in this key developmental process in Drosophila as well as in other species.