Vocal communication is tied to interpersonal arousal coupling in caregiver-infant dyads

  1. Sam Wass  Is a corresponding author
  2. Emily Phillips
  3. Celia Smith
  4. Elizabeth OOB Fatimehin
  5. Louise Goupil
  1. University of East London, United Kingdom
  2. King's College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

It has been argued that a necessary condition for the emergence of speech in humans is the ability to vocalize irrespectively of underlying affective states, but when and how this happens during development remains unclear. To examine this, we used wearable microphones and autonomic sensors to collect multimodal naturalistic datasets from 12-month-olds and their caregivers. We observed that, across the day, clusters of vocalisations occur during elevated infant and caregiver arousal. This relationship is stronger in infants than caregivers: caregivers vocalizations show greater decoupling with their own states of arousal, and their vocal production is more influenced by the infant's arousal than their own. Different types of vocalisation elicit different patterns of change across the dyad. Cries occur following reduced infant arousal stability and lead to increased child-caregiver arousal coupling, and decreased infant arousal. Speech-like vocalisations also occur at elevated arousal, but lead to longer-lasting increases in arousal, and elicit more parental verbal responses. Our results suggest that: 12-month-old infants' vocalisations are strongly contingent on their arousal state (for both cries and speech-like vocalisations), whereas adults' vocalisations are more flexibly tied to their own arousal; that cries and speech-like vocalisations alter the intra-dyadic dynamics of arousal in different ways, which may be an important factor driving speech development; and that this selection mechanism which drives vocal development is anchored in our stress physiology.

Data availability

Due to the personally identifiable nature of this data (home voice recordings from infants) the raw data is not publicly accessible. Researchers who wish to access the raw data should email the lead author s.v.wass@uel.ac.uk. Permission to access the raw data will be granted as long as the applicant can guarantee that certain privacy guidelines (e.g. storing the data only on secure, encrypted servers, and a guarantee not to share it with anyone else) can be provided. In order to allow access to the raw data the name of the applicant will also need to be added to our current ethics approval from the University of East London. This is expected to be routine, as long as the applicant is able to provide these guarantees. De-identified versions of the data - i.e. the processed Autonomic Nervous System data, and the raw coding showing the timings of when vocalisations were recorded, is available here: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.612jm6473. The code used to conduct the analyses is available here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7409281. A readme file in the Data folder explains how to run the analyses to reproduce the results that we report in the paper. For any queries, please contact the lead author s.v.wass@uel.ac.uk.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sam Wass

    Department of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    s.v.wass@uel.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7421-3493
  2. Emily Phillips

    Department of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Celia Smith

    Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Elizabeth OOB Fatimehin

    Department of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5179-9583
  5. Louise Goupil

    Department of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N017560/1)

  • Sam Wass

European Research Council (JDIL 845859)

  • Louise Goupil

European Research Council (ONACSA 853251)

  • Sam Wass

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ruth de Diego-Balaguer, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain

Ethics

Human subjects: The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University of East London (Approval number: EXP 1617 04). Informed consent, and intent to publish, were obtained in the usual manner.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: July 6, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: January 27, 2022
  3. Accepted: December 5, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: December 20, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 11, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Wass et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 635
    Page views
  • 123
    Downloads
  • 4
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sam Wass
  2. Emily Phillips
  3. Celia Smith
  4. Elizabeth OOB Fatimehin
  5. Louise Goupil
(2022)
Vocal communication is tied to interpersonal arousal coupling in caregiver-infant dyads
eLife 11:e77399.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77399

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77399

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Amir Hossein Kayvanjoo, Iva Splichalova ... Elvira Mass
    Research Article Updated

    During embryogenesis, the fetal liver becomes the main hematopoietic organ, where stem and progenitor cells as well as immature and mature immune cells form an intricate cellular network. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) reside in a specialized niche, which is essential for their proliferation and differentiation. However, the cellular and molecular determinants contributing to this fetal HSC niche remain largely unknown. Macrophages are the first differentiated hematopoietic cells found in the developing liver, where they are important for fetal erythropoiesis by promoting erythrocyte maturation and phagocytosing expelled nuclei. Yet, whether macrophages play a role in fetal hematopoiesis beyond serving as a niche for maturing erythroblasts remains elusive. Here, we investigate the heterogeneity of macrophage populations in the murine fetal liver to define their specific roles during hematopoiesis. Using a single-cell omics approach combined with spatial proteomics and genetic fate-mapping models, we found that fetal liver macrophages cluster into distinct yolk sac-derived subpopulations and that long-term HSCs are interacting preferentially with one of the macrophage subpopulations. Fetal livers lacking macrophages show a delay in erythropoiesis and have an increased number of granulocytes, which can be attributed to transcriptional reprogramming and altered differentiation potential of long-term HSCs. Together, our data provide a detailed map of fetal liver macrophage subpopulations and implicate macrophages as part of the fetal HSC niche.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Smrithi Prem, Bharati Dev ... Emanuel DiCicco-Bloom
    Research Article Updated

    Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is defined by common behavioral characteristics, raising the possibility of shared pathogenic mechanisms. Yet, vast clinical and etiological heterogeneity suggests personalized phenotypes. Surprisingly, our iPSC studies find that six individuals from two distinct ASD subtypes, idiopathic and 16p11.2 deletion, have common reductions in neural precursor cell (NPC) neurite outgrowth and migration even though whole genome sequencing demonstrates no genetic overlap between the datasets. To identify signaling differences that may contribute to these developmental defects, an unbiased phospho-(p)-proteome screen was performed. Surprisingly despite the genetic heterogeneity, hundreds of shared p-peptides were identified between autism subtypes including the mTOR pathway. mTOR signaling alterations were confirmed in all NPCs across both ASD subtypes, and mTOR modulation rescued ASD phenotypes and reproduced autism NPC-associated phenotypes in control NPCs. Thus, our studies demonstrate that genetically distinct ASD subtypes have common defects in neurite outgrowth and migration which are driven by the shared pathogenic mechanism of mTOR signaling dysregulation.