The cellular architecture of memory modules in Drosophila supports stochastic input integration

  1. Omar A Hafez
  2. Benjamin Escribano
  3. Rouven L Ziegler
  4. Jan J Hirtz
  5. Ernst Niebur  Is a corresponding author
  6. Jan Pielage  Is a corresponding author
  1. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  2. University of Kaiserslautern, Germany

Abstract

The ability to associate neutral stimuli with valence information and to store these associations as memories forms the basis for decision making. To determine the underlying computational principles, we build a realistic computational model of a central decision module within the Drosophila mushroom body (MB), the fly's center for learning and memory. Our model combines the electron microscopy-based architecture of one MB output neuron (MBON-α3), the synaptic connectivity of its 948 presynaptic Kenyon cells (KCs), and its membrane properties obtained from patch-clamp recordings. We show that this neuron is electrotonically compact and that synaptic input corresponding to simulated odor input robustly drives its spiking behavior. Therefore, sparse innervation by KCs can efficiently control and modulate MBON activity in response to learning with minimal requirements on the specificity of synaptic localization. This architecture allows efficient storage of large numbers of memories using the flexible stochastic connectivity of the circuit.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed in this study are included in the manuscript.All simulation files and the code and data files needed to replicate the simulations are available as a permanent and freely accessible data collection at the Johns Hopkins University Data Archive:https://doi.org/10.7281/T1/HRK27V.This includes the simulation code itself (python), the structural EM reconstruction of MBON-alpha3 (swc), the EM reconstruction of the related MBON used to model the axon and synaptic terminal structures (swc), the synapse locations as coordinate data (json), and the synapse locations by MBON section (json). Parameter values for model definition and individual simulations are specified within the code files and outlined in each figure legend where appropriate.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Omar A Hafez

    Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Benjamin Escribano

    Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rouven L Ziegler

    Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3050-7692
  4. Jan J Hirtz

    Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ernst Niebur

    Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    niebur@jhu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jan Pielage

    Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
    For correspondence
    pielage@bio.uni-kl.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5115-5884

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01DC020123)

  • Ernst Niebur

National Institutes of Health (R01DA040990)

  • Ernst Niebur

National Institutes of Health (R01EY027544)

  • Ernst Niebur

National Institutes of Health (Medical Scientist Training Program 708 Training Grant T32GM136651)

  • Ernst Niebur

National Science Foundation (1835202)

  • Ernst Niebur

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ 01GQ2105)

  • Jan Pielage

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST 248/293-1)

  • Jan Pielage

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Albert Cardona, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: December 7, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: February 3, 2022
  3. Accepted: March 9, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 14, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 14, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 15, 2023 (version 3)
  7. Version of Record published: April 3, 2023 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2023, Hafez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,540
    views
  • 205
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Omar A Hafez
  2. Benjamin Escribano
  3. Rouven L Ziegler
  4. Jan J Hirtz
  5. Ernst Niebur
  6. Jan Pielage
(2023)
The cellular architecture of memory modules in Drosophila supports stochastic input integration
eLife 12:e77578.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77578

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77578

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Amanda Chu, Nicholas T Gordon ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Article

    Pavlovian fear conditioning has been extensively used to study the behavioral and neural basis of defensive systems. In a typical procedure, a cue is paired with foot shock, and subsequent cue presentation elicits freezing, a behavior theoretically linked to predator detection. Studies have since shown a fear conditioned cue can elicit locomotion, a behavior that - in addition to jumping, and rearing - is theoretically linked to imminent or occurring predation. A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elicited locomotion is that responding is non-associative. We gave rats Pavlovian fear discrimination over a baseline of reward seeking. TTL-triggered cameras captured 5 behavior frames/s around cue presentation. Experiment 1 examined the emergence of danger-specific behaviors over fear acquisition. Experiment 2 examined the expression of danger-specific behaviors in fear extinction. In total, we scored 112,000 frames for nine discrete behavior categories. Temporal ethograms show that during acquisition, a fear conditioned cue suppresses reward seeking and elicits freezing, but also elicits locomotion, jumping, and rearing - all of which are maximal when foot shock is imminent. During extinction, a fear conditioned cue most prominently suppresses reward seeking, and elicits locomotion that is timed to shock delivery. The independent expression of these behaviors in both experiments reveal a fear conditioned cue to orchestrate a temporally organized suite of behaviors.

    1. Neuroscience
    Salima Messaoudi, Ada Allam ... Isabelle Caille
    Research Article

    The fragile X syndrome (FXS) represents the most prevalent form of inherited intellectual disability and is the first monogenic cause of autism spectrum disorder. FXS results from the absence of the RNA-binding protein FMRP (fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein). Neuronal migration is an essential step of brain development allowing displacement of neurons from their germinal niches to their final integration site. The precise role of FMRP in neuronal migration remains largely unexplored. Using live imaging of postnatal rostral migratory stream (RMS) neurons in Fmr1-null mice, we observed that the absence of FMRP leads to delayed neuronal migration and altered trajectory, associated with defects of centrosomal movement. RNA-interference-induced knockdown of Fmr1 shows that these migratory defects are cell-autonomous. Notably, the primary Fmrp mRNA target implicated in these migratory defects is microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B). Knocking down MAP1B expression effectively rescued most of the observed migratory defects. Finally, we elucidate the molecular mechanisms at play by demonstrating that the absence of FMRP induces defects in the cage of microtubules surrounding the nucleus of migrating neurons, which is rescued by MAP1B knockdown. Our findings reveal a novel neurodevelopmental role for FMRP in collaboration with MAP1B, jointly orchestrating neuronal migration by influencing the microtubular cytoskeleton.