Growing acceptance of the theory of evolution in the late 1800s led to an increased interest in studying non-human primates in order to better understand our own biology. It was during this period that the first scientific studies of the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) were performed. The first paper described the “anatomy of advanced pregnancy” in rhesus macaques and was published in 1893 (Hart and Gulland, 1893), and a paper on behavioral cognitive experiments followed in 1902 (Kinnaman, 1902). However, the rhesus macaque really came to the forefront of non-human primate research in 1925 when the Carnegie Science Institute set up a breeding population to study embryology and fertility in a species similar to humans (Wilson, 2012). Rhesus macaques were found to be relatively easy to keep and breed in captivity and, at the time, they were also readily available via export from colonial India. All this led to increased interest in using rhesus macaques in research.

In 1938, the American primatologist Clarence Ray Carpenter released 409 Indian-origin rhesus macaques onto Cayo Santiago, a small island off the coast of Puerto Rico, for behavioral research (Rawlins and Kessler, 1986). This free ranging population has grown to over a thousand individuals, and has produced a wealth of research on rhesus macaque psychology and behavior that is likely unparalleled to our knowledge on any other primate species, with the exception of humans (Box 1).

Today, rhesus macaques make up 65% of the non-human primate research subjects in the United States (Feister, 2018), and they are likely the most studied non-human primate globally. Within their natural range, many populations of rhesus macaques also seem to be thriving. Their success appears to be occurring despite, or perhaps even owing to, the Anthropocene epoch: over the past 100 or so years rhesus macaque habitat has been characterized by rapid agricultural and urban shifts in landscape due to human intervention. Here we will focus on the considerable amount of basic research that has been done on rhesus macaques across fields of evolutionary biology, ecology, psychology and physiology, with special focus on how this research has gleaned insight into the natural history of the species.

Rhesus macaques are Asian monkeys, sharing a common ancestor with humans roughly 25 million years ago (Ma; Perelman et al., 2011). The Macaca genus is a large, geologically recent radiation containing over 20 different species (Fooden, 1976; Roos et al., 2019, Figure 1).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

The phylogenetic history of the macaque genus has been notoriously difficult to ascertain given the rapid diversification and significant introgression between macaque species (Liedigk et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2018; Roos et al., 2019; Osada et al., 2021). For example, based on mitochondrial DNA sequences, Chinese rhesus macaques appear more similar to Taiwanese macaques (Macaca cyclopis) and Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) than to Indian rhesus macaques, contradicting the taxonomic classification of the rhesus macaque species (Roos et al., 2019). However, based on the most complete nuclear genomic data currently available, a phylogeny of rhesus macaques and six of their most closely related sister species indicates that Indian and Chinese rhesus macaques are most closely related to one another, followed by Taiwanese macaques (Macaca cyclopis) and Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata; Figure 1, Osada et al., 2021).

The discordance between phylogenies created using nuclear genomes and mitochondrial genomes is most likely a consequence of the significant ancient admixture between Chinese rhesus macaques and Taiwanese macaques as well as Japanese macaques (Roos et al., 2019; Osada et al., 2021). This admixture likely occurred during glacial episodes which created land bridges between China and Japan, and China and Taiwan, during the Pleistocene and early Holocene (Marmi et al., 2004).

In addition to the Taiwanese and Japanese macaques, there is evidence for admixture of the rhesus macaque genome and many other extant macaque species, including the stump-tailed macaque (Fan et al., 2018), the Tibetan macaque (Macaca thibetana; Fan et al., 2014), and the long-tailed macaque (Higashino et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2011; Bunlungsup et al., 2017; Ito et al., 2020; Satkoski Trask et al., 2013). The high levels of relatively recent admixture between rhesus macaques and other macaque species makes them an excellent system through which we might gain a better understanding of ancient hybridization between different hominin species (Boel et al., 2019; Buck et al., 2021).

Rhesus macaques, a relatively new species with many closely-related competitors, have come to successfully populate a vast range across more than 6000 km and 11 countries within mainland Asia (Figure 2). The effective population size of rhesus macaques across their entire modern-day range is not known, but current effective population sizes of Chinese and Indian rhesus macaques are estimated at 240,000 and 17,000, respectively (Hernandez et al., 2007). These countries represent only a portion of total rhesus macaques, but even those population sizes alone indicate that rhesus macaques have a substantially larger population than other closely related macaque species in Asia (Marmi et al., 2004; Bonhomme et al., 2009). The large population of rhesus macaques is undoubtedly related to the extensive geographic area they occupy, which is the second largest geographic range of any primate species except humans.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Taxonomists have long recognized that rhesus macaques can be subdivided into distinct regional subpopulations (Fooden, 2000; Gibbs et al., 2007; Pocock, 1932; Smith and McDonough, 2005). While it is generally agreed that these populations are not sufficiently distinct to warrant a multi-species designation (Fooden, 2000 Pocock, 1932), the variation between two populations in particular has become the subject of intense research interest in the biomedical field. India, originally the primary source of rhesus macaques for research, suspended exportation in 1978, and research facilities began importing rhesus from China. Researchers then quickly began to recognize the need to understand how differences between the Indian-origin and Chinese-origin rhesus macaques might influence their studies. Wright’s Fst value, a measure of the amount of genetic variance that can be explained by population structure, is 0.14 between Indian- and Chinese-origin rhesus macaques. Relatedly, low levels of apparent admixture suggest that recurrent migration between the two groups has been minimal over the past 1.6 Ma (Hernandez et al., 2007).

Comparative research on these rhesus macaque populations includes attempts to understand how functional genetic variation impacts physiology, immunology, and behavior. There are differences between Chinese-origin and Indian-origin rhesus in disease pathogenesis, blood chemistry, the major histocompatibility complex, and aspects of behavior and temperament (Champoux et al., 1994; Joag et al., 1994; Champoux et al., 1996; Binhua et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2009; Solomon et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2013). These differences have mainly been characterized using captive animals, and are not well understood in the context of ecological variation. Additionally, populations outside of China and India remain understudied by comparison (but see Smith and McDonough, 2005; Hasan et al., 2014; Kyes et al., 2006; Ito et al., 2020).

While the goal of this comparative research between different populations was predominately to understand variation in the translational value of Chinese-origin, Indian-origin, and hybrid rhesus macaques, it provides a thorough empirical basis for understanding the links between functional genomic variation and variation in ecology. Rhesus macaques have levels of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are exceptionally high among model organisms and approximately twice as high as those observed in most human populations (Warren et al., 2020). This extent of genetic diversity can create issues for the broad applicability of study results in the biomedical sciences given the lack of isogenic lines in the species, but is a boon to those interested in mapping genotype to phenotype relationships (Champoux et al., 1996; Smith and McDonough, 2005; Liu et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2009; Xue et al., 2016).

Functional genetic studies on rhesus macaques have been used to identify specific genetic mechanisms underlying a wide variety of physiological and behavioral traits, including the timing of male natal dispersal (Trefilov et al., 2000), the degree of female multimale mating (Trefilov et al., 2005), the oxytocin response and maternal behavior in lactating mothers (Wood et al., 2022), and adaptations to cold climatic conditions at the northern edge of the species range (Liu et al., 2018).

Rhesus macaques persist over a remarkable range of environments: their niche includes both tropical and temperate climates, elevations from sea level to over 4000 meters, and forested, semi-desert, and swamp habitats (Neville, 1968; Lindburg, 1971; Goldstein and Richard, 1989; Richard et al., 1989; Liu et al., 2018). This flexibility in niche is highly unusual among non-human primate species, which often occupy narrow niche ranges. Although they are able to thrive under a variety of conditions, rhesus macaques are found at the highest densities in non-forested habitat (Fooden, 2000), suggesting that their most preferred habitat is an open environment with sparse tree cover (Richard et al., 1989). This is likely a consequence of having evolved alongside frequent Pleistocene glacial episodes, which resulted in rhesus macaques developing their niche within ‘disturbed environments’ - those with only partial or secondary forest growth, and, more recently, in urbanized environments (Saraswat et al., 2015).

Rhesus macaques attain adult lengths of 40–60 cm, and weights of 4–10 kg (Fooden, 2000). Among macaque species they have a low to medium degree of sexual dimorphism in body size, with adult males being on average 51% larger than adult females (Turcotte et al., 2021). In accordance with Bergmann’s rule, which states that organisms at higher latitude should be larger in order to conserve heat, within the rhesus macaque species body size does increase with latitude across their natural range, with average male body size increasing 100% and average female body size increasing 75% from the southernmost point (15 °N) to the northernmost point (35 °N) of their range (Fooden, 2000). One exception to Bergmann’s rule occurs among rhesus macaque populations in the Indochinese hybrid zone, which has seen recent introgression with long-tailed macaques (see Evolutionary History), resulting in smaller body sizes relative to their latitude (Bunlungsup et al., 2017).

Rhesus macaques are generalist omnivores, and have a highly varied and flexible diet (Figure 3). They are primarily vegetarian and their diets typically reflect whatever food sources are predominant in their environment (Lindburg, 1971; Tang et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2014). In tropical and subtropical forests, rhesus macaques have been found to be primarily frugivorous, while in temperate and limestone forests they have been described as generally folivorous (Lindburg, 1977; Richard et al., 1989; Sengupta and Radhakrishna, 2016; Tang et al., 2016). They will also consume larval and adult insects, as well as spiders, fish, crabs, birds’ eggs, and honeycomb (Lindburg, 1971; Fooden, 2000). Geophagy (the ingestion of soil or clay) is common in some populations, potentially to prevent gastrointestinal disorders and as a mineral nutritional supplement (Fooden, 2000; Mahaney et al., 1995).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Generally, rhesus macaques prefer foods that are easily obtained and consumed, but will shift their diet to less appealing or accessible food items (i.e. ‘fallback foods’) readily when necessary (Sengupta and Radhakrishna, 2015; Tang et al., 2016). However, how this variation in diet and habitat influences rhesus macaque life-history, health, and fitness across their natural range is poorly understood (Box 2 Q1).

In very recent times, rhesus macaques have evolved alongside an intense and rapid form of environmental disturbance associated with human agriculture and urbanization. While these same processes have caused the ranges of many other primate species to progressively shrink, rhesus macaques thrive on agricultural and urban land (Richard et al., 1989). In agricultural areas, rhesus macaques have shifted their diet to cultivated crops (Anand et al., 2018; Pirta et al., 1997; Rao et al., 2002), and in more urban areas a considerable portion of rhesus macaque diet is either stolen from humans or is intentionally provisioned by people who offer food for religious or cultural reasons (Sengupta and Radhakrishna, 2020; Sarker et al., 2008; Teas et al., 1980). They likely have developed a preference for anthropogenic food as these are calorie-rich, easily digestible, and abundantly and predictably available (Sengupta and Radhakrishna, 2018). The urban success of the species provides an excellent opportunity for studies of the traits that allow for successful coevolution of a species with human societies (Box 2 Q2), as well as the impact of urban environments and contemporary diets on physiology, health and ecological functions.

Despite this urban and Anthropocene success, the species is not free from threats such as habitat degradation, poaching and indiscriminate use in biomedical research and commercial trade (Radhakrishna and Sinha, 2011). Being categorized as ‘Least Concern’ on the IUCN Red List effectively excludes rhesus macaques from many conservation plans. Hence wild populations of rhesus macaques should be monitored closely to ensure that they do not have the same fate as other so-called ‘common’ macaque species such as the bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata) and the longtailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis), both of which have suffered major declines in their population size over the past few decades (Eudey, 2008; Erinjery et al., 2017).

Rhesus macaques live in multi-male multi-female groups with a polygynandrous mating system. Groups have a female-biased adult sex ratio; on average there is one mature male per three mature females per group (Fooden, 2000). Male rhesus macaques disperse from their natal group to join a neighboring group around the time they reach sexual maturity, but females typically remain in their natal group for their entire lives, such that social groups are stably composed of matrilines (i.e. families of females related through the maternal line; Neville, 1968; Lindburg, 1971; Sade, 1972; Teas et al., 1980; Maestripieri and Hoffman, 2012). Male group membership is not fixed through adulthood, as males will periodically leave one group to join another, and sometimes males will not be affiliated with any group at all (see Box 2 Q3; Lindburg, 1969; Boelkins and Wilson, 1972; Drickamer and Vessey, 1973).

Fooden, 2000 synthesized studies from nine countries across a range of habitat types which included 1188 rhesus macaque groups and found that for non-provisioned and minimally-provisioned wild rhesus macaques the average group size was 32, and the maximum recorded was 250. Food provisioning of wild populations results in a substantial increase in group size, with the average being 77 and the maximum recorded being 1045 individuals (Fooden, 2000). Home ranges between adjacent groups typically overlap, and group fissions will occasionally happen and typically occur along matrilines, with female family members almost always staying together (Lindburg, 1971; Widdig et al., 2006; Sueur et al., 2010).

Rhesus macaques are notable for their high frequency and severity of aggression and absence of reconciliation between conspecifics when compared to other macaque species, which leads to a social organization that can be described as both highly “despotic and nepotistic” (Thierry, 2007).

Steep linear dominance hierarchies are formed within a social group, for both males and females separately (Datta, 1988; Missakian, 1972). For females, dominance rank is relatively stable and is determined first by matrilineal group, and second by age, with younger females outranking their older sisters (Berman, 1986; Missakian, 1972). When males immigrate to a new social group they generally enter at the bottom of the social hierarchy and rise through queuing, such that group tenure-length is the primary determinant of male rank (Manson, 1998; Maestripieri and Hoffman, 2012; Higham and Maestripieri, 2014). This is in striking contrast to many other species of macaque, in which there is top-entry contest competition over dominance where males directly compete for the highest rank within a social group (e.g. crested macaques, Marty et al., 2016; lion-tailed macaques, Kumar et al., 2001). There have been occasional observations of male rhesus macaques rising in dominance rank through coalitionary aggression, but these are thought to be rare (Higham and Maestripieri, 2010).

These steep dominance hierarchies are common in males in most macaque species, but are typically less pronounced among females of many other macaque species (Thierry, 2007). The prevalence of steep linear female dominance hierarchies among female rhesus macaques is posited to be related to a number of other components of social organization within the species, including a high bias in forming social bonds predominantly with kin, influence on maternal care style, and higher degree of modularity in social interactions (Sueur et al., 2011; Thierry, 2007; Thierry et al., 2008). Antagonistic dyadic interactions are common both within and between the sexes, and generally result in a ‘winner’ who asserts dominance through an aggressive behavior (e.g. lunging, biting, or chasing), and a ‘loser’ who responds with a submissive behavior (e.g. cringing, fear-grimacing, or fleeing; Blomquist et al., 2011; Missakian, 1972; Sade, 1967). Once the dominance hierarchy is established, repeated antagonistic interactions typically function to reinforce, but sometimes challenge, the dominance relationship between two individuals.

In both females and males, dominance rank is an important modulator of individual life-history and fitness. In females, higher dominance rank has been associated with greater annual fertility, survival, earlier maturation of up to half a year, and shorter inter-birth interval (Drickamer, 1974; Bercovitch and Berard, 1993; Blomquist, 2009; Blomquist et al., 2011). In males, dominance rank is positively correlated with mating and reproductive success, but this can be highly variable by population and year (Manson, 1992; Bercovitch and Nürnberg, 1997; Berard, 1999; Widdig et al., 2004; Dubuc et al., 2011; Dubuc et al., 2014b). In addition to the competitive processes that shape rhesus macaque society, affiliative social behavior in rhesus macaques is also extremely common and a fundamental component of their social style. Social grooming, or allogrooming, where one individual uses their fingers to remove debris and skin parasites from another is foundational to strong social bonds between conspecifics in rhesus macaques. Individuals that spend a relatively large amount of time in close proximity, in physical contact, and grooming one another are typically characterized as having strong social bonds (Maestripieri and Hoffman, 2012).

Affiliative social relationships have been shown to have considerable influence on individual life-history, health, and fitness. Various measures of social stability, integration, and connectedness have been shown to affect a wide variety of physiological metrics in rhesus macaques, including the sympathetic nervous system, white blood cell count and fecal glucocorticoid concentrations (Capitanio and Cole, 2015; Pavez-Fox et al., 2021; Brent et al., 2011). Strong social bonds may also provide indirect benefits such as receiving coalitionary social support when antagonized by another group member (Kulik et al., 2012; but see O’Hearn et al., 2022). As in a number of other primate species (e.g. Silk, 2007), measures of increased social affiliation are positively related to both reproductive output and survival probability (Brent et al., 2013; Ellis et al., 2019; Brent et al., 2017a).

Early-life social environment, and particularly early-life social adversity, may be particularly important in predicting adulthood sociality, health and fitness. Rhesus macaque early-life adversity is predictive of both sociality variables in adulthood, such as rates of aggression, as well as physiological metrics that may be associated with health and fitness including hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation (Barr et al., 2003; Dettmer et al., 2017) and DNA methylation profile (Massart et al., 2016). Sociality affects diverse physiological systems, and ultimately health, life-history, and fitness in rhesus macaques in significant and long-standing ways (Chiou et al., 2020; Snyder-Mackler et al., 2016). The varied and extensive influence of sociality on rhesus biology provides an excellent system for understanding the underlying evolutionary ecology of the sociality-health-fitness axis (Capitanio and Cole, 2015; Cavigelli and Caruso, 2015; Hawkley and Capitanio, 2015; Kappeler et al., 2015; Nunn et al., 2015).

Reproduction, which encompasses both the production and nourishing of offspring, is limited, and thus shaped, by energy constraints. How energy is allocated in female reproductive effort can be characterized on a spectrum from ‘capital breeders’, where adequate available capital (i.e. energy stores) trigger and fuel reproduction, to ‘income breeders’, where reproductive success is contingent on the incoming flow of resource acquisition at the time of reproduction, rather than stored reserves (Brockman, 2005; Jönsson and Jonsson, 1997). Rhesus macaques are considered ‘relaxed income breeders’ in that they display primarily the characteristics of ‘income breeders’, but they are not ‘strict’ in the sense that endogenous conditions such as body mass do play some role in determining reproductive success (Brockman, 2005; Tian et al., 2013). This characterization provides a basis for understanding many characteristics of their reproductive behavior.

As income breeders, rhesus macaques time birth and lactation with the months of the year where food availability is highest, as they require the highest energetic intake during this time. Consequently, mating occurs approximately in the fall and winter, and the birth season occurs over the spring and summer (Fooden, 2000). Interestingly, a group of rhesus macaques which were breeding seasonally at Cayo Santiago lost seasonality when brought to German Primate Center at Gottingen and housed in controlled temperature and photoperiods. However, in the subsequent years when the group was released into a large outdoor enclosure, seasonality reappeared (Kaumanns et al., 2013).

The combination of large group sizes and reproductive seasonality leads to females within a population displaying synchrony in their fertility cycles and is thought to be the driver of weak direct male-male competition, such as through physical combat, and strong indirect male-male competition, such as through female mate choice (Gogarten and Koenig, 2013; Kutsukake and Nunn, 2009; Ostner et al., 2008). High female fertile phase synchrony lowers the ability for males to monopolize females, creating a relatively weak competitive environment which leads to relatively low male reproductive skew where reproductive success is not monopolized by only one or a small number of males, and selects for limited body and canine size dimorphism and large relative testis volume (Dubuc et al., 2014b; Harcourt et al., 1981; Dubuc et al., 2014a).

Rhesus macaques exhibit strong evidence of direct female mate choice, with females playing an active role in soliciting mating from a preferred partner (Maestripieri and Hoffman, 2012; Bercovitch, 1997). Females prefer to mate with novel males (i.e. those that have recently immigrated to their social group), middle-aged males, and males with darker red faces (Maestripieri and Hoffman, 2012; Dubuc et al., 2014a). Since the highest ranking males in a social group typically have a long tenure within the group and are of an older age class, female choice is likely to be an additional driver of the relatively weak reproductive skew in male rhesus macaques, by increasing the reproductive success of lower ranking males (Bercovitch, 1997).

Females will typically enter multiple ovarian cycles during the mating season, each lasting 30 days. Consortships lasting several hours to several days are formed between a fertile female and a male partner; the pair remains in close proximity during which time the pair engages in multi-mount copulations (Bercovitch, 1997; Higham et al., 2011). Females are likely to have more than one male consort, averaging three to four mating partners within a single fertile period (Manson, 1992; Lindburg, 1971; Bercovitch, 1997). Males with higher dominance rank engage in consorts of longer duration, while lower ranking males will either engage in shorter consorts or ‘sneak’ matings (Bercovitch, 1997; Higham et al., 2011).

In provisioned populations (both captive and free-ranging), females typically have their first offspring between the ages of 3 and 5, and produce one offspring per year until reproduction slows as a result of senescence, typically around age 17 (Lee et al., 2021; Pittet et al., 2017; Wilson et al., 1983). The age-specific demography of reproduction is not well-studied in wild, non-provisioned populations (see Fooden, 2000), however in other macaque species provisioning accelerates development, and the timing and pace of female reproduction (; Fa, 1984). One study of wild negligibly-provisioned Chinese rhesus macaques found the average age of first birth to be 4.9 years old, approximately a year later than the average seen in food-supplemented populations (Tian et al., 2013).

Gestation length in rhesus macaques is approximately 166 days, and sex ratio at birth is not significantly different from 1:1 (Fooden, 2000; Tian et al., 2015). Annual birth rate (births/sexually mature female) varies largely by population, and in wild-feeding populations annual birth rate per female is between 0.43 and 0.91 (Fooden, 2000), with lower birth rates associated with populations at the Northernmost edge of the natural range (e.g. Wenyuan et al., 1993).

Environmental perturbation has also been shown to influence female rhesus macaque fertility. For example, on the island population of Cayo Santiago, female reproductive output dropped significantly in years when the island was hit by a hurricane (Morcillo et al., 2020). Additionally, matrilineal overthrows, a rare event in rhesus macaque societies where the highest-ranking matriline is violently overthrown by a lower ranking matriline, has been shown to result in significant infant loss for both the deposed and the attacking matrilines (Ehardt and Bernstein, 1986; Dettmer et al., 2015).

The primary sources of mortality for rhesus macaques are unclear, but are likely to vary by population. For one population at the northernmost limit of the species range, the main source of mortality was starvation or winter exposure to cold temperatures (Wenyuan et al., 1993), but this is not reported in warmer latitudes. Mortality from predation also varies by habitat, with juveniles being the main prey. Recorded predators of rhesus macaques include snakes (Seth and Seth, 1983), hawks and eagles (Lindburg, 1971; Wenyuan et al., 1993), dogs (Lindburg, 1971), and large cats such as tigers and leopards (Lovari et al., 2015). Physical fighting between rhesus macaques can also be deadly, and mortality due to wound complications such as tetanus infection following physical altercations may be a common cause of death (Rawlins and Kessler, 1982).

Annual mortality has been reported between 2% and 10% for adult rhesus macaques, and between 7% and 32% for infants across different wild populations (Fooden, 2000). Males have the highest mortality rate during the mating season, and females have the highest mortality rate during the birth season, reflecting the sex-specific costs of reproduction (Hoffman et al., 2008).

Due to the logistical difficulties inherent in measuring lifespan in long-lived animals in the wild, average and maximum lifespans in wild rhesus macaques are not known with confidence. In captive populations under controlled conditions, rhesus macaques typically live for 25–30 years, and maximum lifespan has been recorded as 40 years (Colman et al., 2009). Under the less controlled conditions of the free-ranging population on Cayo Santiago where rhesus macaques are provisioned and predator-free, but not given medical care, most adult females die between 15 and 25 years of age, with the maximum recorded lifespan being 31 (Hoffman et al., 2010; Maestripieri and Hoffman, 2011; Chiou et al., 2020). Lifespan in the wild is likely to be considerably shorter than under these conditions and may be comparable to the averages of other cercopithecine monkeys of 10–15 years under natural conditions (Maestripieri and Hoffman, 2012).

Rhesus macaques have not only persisted, but flourished, in the Anthropocene. They occupy the largest geographic range of any non-human primate species and display a remarkable level of ecological flexibility. Their persistence across a broad environmental range has long been recognized as a defining feature of the species, as evidenced by their description as ‘weed macaques’ (Maestripieri, 2008; Richard et al., 1989). While urbanization often results in the pushing out of endemic wildlife (McKinney, 2008; Savard et al., 2000), the opposite is true of rhesus macaques, as the species has been known to prefer habitats in urban and agricultural areas, leading to them increasingly being considered a ‘pest’ species (Saraswat et al., 2015; Sharma and Acharya, 2017).

The rhesus macaque remains one of the most intensively studied non-human primates, but fundamental questions about the species remain (Box 2). Given the frequency of use of rhesus macaques as model organisms in biomedical and behavioral research, a greater understanding of rhesus macaque biology in the wild is needed to better understand and contextualize laboratory research. Additionally, much of the current research on the behavior of rhesus macaques under free-ranging settings has occurred on Cayo Santiago, a population free of natural predators, and where monkeys are provisioned (Rawlins and Kessler, 1986; Box 1). Given the vast variation in habitats and diets of rhesus macaques, combined with the considerable ranges of group sizes and large genomic variation, there is likely to be undocumented intra-specific variation in behavioral and other phenotypes. This diversity makes the rhesus macaque an excellent model system for investigating multiple components of ecology and evolution, which has been similarly observed for another Papionin group, the baboons, in a previous article in this same series (Fischer et al., 2019). New initiatives are currently underway to genotype thousands of rhesus macaques, which will open the door to studying novel genotype-phenotype relationships in the premier non-human primate model for human health and disease.

No new data was generated for this article.

1. 1. Anand S
   2. Binoy VV
   3. Radhakrishna S

   (2018) The monkey is not always a God: Attitudinal differences toward crop-raiding macaques and why it matters for conflict mitigation

   Ambio 47:711–720.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1008-5

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Atwell JW
   2. Cardoso GC
   3. Whittaker DJ
   4. Campbell-Nelson S
   5. Robertson KW
   6. Ketterson ED

   (2012) Boldness behavior and stress physiology in a novel urban environment suggest rapid correlated evolutionary adaptation

   Behavioral Ecology 23:960–969.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars059

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Barr CS
   2. Newman TK
   3. Becker ML
   4. Parker CC
   5. Champoux M
   6. Lesch KP
   7. Goldman D
   8. Suomi SJ
   9. Higley JD

   (2003) The utility of the non-human primate; model for studying gene by environment interactions in behavioral research

   Genes, Brain, and Behavior 2:336–340.

   https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1601-1848.2003.00051.x

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Berard J

   (1999) A four-year study of the association between male dominance rank, residency status, and reproductive activity in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

   Primates; Journal of Primatology 40:159–175.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557708

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bercovitch FB
   2. Berard JD

   (1993) Life history costs and consequences of rapid reproductive maturation in female rhesus macaques

   Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32:103–109.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164042

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bercovitch FB

   (1997) Reproductive strategies of rhesus macaques

   Primates 38:247–263.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381613

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bercovitch FB
   2. Nürnberg P

   (1997) Genetic determination of paternity and variation in male reproductive success in two populations of rhesus macaques

   Electrophoresis 18:1701–1705.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150180939

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. Book

   1. Berman C

   (1986)

   Maternal Lineages as Tools for Understanding Infant Social Development and Social Structure

   In: Kessler MJ, Rawlins RG, editors. The Cayo Santiago Macaques: History, Behavior and Biology. New York, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. 73–92.

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Binhua L
   2. Veazey RS
   3. Luckay A
   4. Penedo C
   5. Xu K
   6. Lifson JD
   7. Marx PA

   (2002) SIV(mac) pathogenesis in rhesus macaques of Chinese and Indian origin compared with primary HIV infections in humans

   AIDS 16:1489–1496.

   https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200207260-00005

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Blomquist GE

    (2009) Environmental and genetic causes of maturational differences among rhesus macaque matrilines

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63:1345–1352.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0792-8

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Blomquist GE
    2. Sade DS
    3. Berard JD

    (2011) Rank-related fitness differences and their demographic pathways in semi-free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

    International Journal of Primatology 32:193–208.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-010-9461-z

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Boel C
    2. Curnoe D
    3. Hamada Y

    (2019) Craniofacial shape and nonmetric trait variation in hybrids of the Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) and the Taiwanese macaque (Macaca cyclopis)

    International Journal of Primatology 40:214–243.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-019-00081-2

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Boelkins RC
    2. Wilson AP

    (1972) Intergroup social dynamics of the Cayo Santiago rhesus (Macaca mulatta) with special reference to changes in group membership by males

    Primates; Journal of Primatology 13:125–139.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840875

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Bonhomme M
    2. Cuartero S
    3. Blancher A
    4. Crouau-Roy B

    (2009) Assessing natural introgression in 2 biomedical model species, the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) and the long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis)

    The Journal of Heredity 100:158–169.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esn093

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Brent LJN
    2. Semple S
    3. Dubuc C
    4. Heistermann M
    5. Maclarnon A

    (2011) Social capital and physiological stress levels in free-ranging adult female rhesus macaques

    Physiology & Behavior 102:76–83.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.09.022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Brent LJN
    2. Heilbronner SR
    3. Horvath JE
    4. Gonzalez-Martinez J
    5. Ruiz-Lambides A
    6. Robinson AG
    7. Skene JHP
    8. Platt ML

    (2013) Genetic origins of social networks in rhesus macaques

    Scientific Reports 3:1042.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01042

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Brent LJN
    2. Semple S
    3. Maclarnon A
    4. Ruiz-Lambides A
    5. Gonzalez-Martinez J
    6. Platt ML

    (2014) Personality traits in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) are heritable but do not predict reproductive output

    International Journal of Primatology 35:188–209.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-013-9724-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Brent LJN
    2. Ruiz-Lambides A
    3. Platt ML

    (2017a) Family network size and survival across the lifespan of female macaques

    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284:20170515.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0515

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Brent LJN
    2. Ruiz-Lambides A
    3. Platt ML

    (2017b) Persistent social isolation reflects identity and social context but not maternal effects or early environment

    Scientific Reports 7:17791.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18104-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. Book

    1. Brockman DK

    (2005) Seasonality in primate ecology, reproduction, and life-history: an overview

    In: Brockman DK, Schaik C, editors. Seasonality in Primates: Studies of Living and Extinct Human and Non-Human Primates. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3–21.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542343

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Buck LT
    2. Katz DC
    3. Ackermann RR
    4. Hlusko LJ
    5. Kanthaswamy S
    6. Weaver TD

    (2021) Effects of hybridization on pelvic morphology: A macaque model

    Journal of Human Evolution 159:103049.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103049

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Bunlungsup S
    2. Kanthaswamy S
    3. Oldt RF
    4. Smith DG
    5. Houghton P
    6. Hamada Y
    7. Malaivijitnond S

    (2017) Genetic analysis of samples from wild populations opens new perspectives on hybridization between long-tailed (Macaca fascicularis) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

    American Journal of Primatology 79:e22726.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22726

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Capitanio JP
    2. Cole SW

    (2015) Social instability and immunity in rhesus monkeys: the role of the sympathetic nervous system

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 370:20140104.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0104

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. Book

    1. Capitanio JP
    2. Mason WA

    (2019)

    Personality as Adaptation: Perspectives from Nonhuman Primates

    In: Samuel DB, Lynam DR, editors. Using Basic Personality Research to Inform Personality Pathology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 219–236.

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Cavigelli SA
    2. Caruso MJ

    (2015) Sex, social status and physiological stress in primates: the importance of social and glucocorticoid dynamics

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 370:20140103.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0103

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Champoux M
    2. Suomi SJ
    3. Schneider ML

    (1994)

    Temperament differences between captive Indian and Chinese-Indian hybrid rhesus macaque neonates

    Laboratory Animal Science 44:351–357.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Champoux M
    2. Kriete MF
    3. Higley JD
    4. Suomi SJ

    (1996) CBC and serum chemistry differences between Indian-derived and Chinese-Indian hybrid rhesus monkey infants

    American Journal of Primatology 39:79–84.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1996)39:1<79::AID-AJP6>3.0.CO;2-P

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Chiou KL
    2. Montague MJ
    3. Goldman EA
    4. Watowich MM
    5. Sams SN
    6. Song J
    7. Horvath JE
    8. Sterner KN
    9. Ruiz-Lambides AV
    10. Martínez MI
    11. Higham JP
    12. Brent LJN
    13. Platt ML
    14. Snyder-Mackler N

    (2020) Rhesus macaques as a tractable physiological model of human ageing

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 375:20190612.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0612

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Colman RJ
    2. Anderson RM
    3. Johnson SC
    4. Kastman EK
    5. Kosmatka KJ
    6. Beasley TM
    7. Allison DB
    8. Cruzen C
    9. Simmons HA
    10. Kemnitz JW
    11. Weindruch R

    (2009) Caloric restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys

    Science 325:201–204.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173635

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Datta S

    (1988) The acquisition of dominance among free-ranging rhesus monkey siblings

    Animal Behaviour 36:754–772.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80159-3

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Dettmer AM
    2. Woodward RA
    3. Suomi SJ

    (2015) Reproductive consequences of a matrilineal overthrow in rhesus monkeys

    American Journal of Primatology 77:346–352.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22350

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Dettmer AM
    2. Wooddell LJ
    3. Rosenberg KL
    4. Kaburu SSK
    5. Novak MA
    6. Meyer JS
    7. Suomi SJ

    (2017) Associations between early life experience, chronic HPA axis activity, and adult social rank in rhesus monkeys

    Social Neuroscience 12:92–101.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2016.1176952

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Drickamer LC
    2. Vessey SH

    (1973) Group changing in free-ranging male rhesus monkeys

    Primates 14:359–368.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731357

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Drickamer LC

    (1974) A ten-year summary of reproductive data for free-ranging Macaca mulatta

    Folia Primatologica 21:61–80.

    https://doi.org/10.1159/000155596

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Dubuc C
    2. Muniz L
    3. Heistermann M
    4. Engelhardt A
    5. Widdig A

    (2011) Testing the priority-of-access model in a seasonally breeding primate species

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:1615–1627.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1172-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Dubuc C
    2. Allen WL
    3. Maestripieri D
    4. Higham JP

    (2014a) Is male rhesus macaque red color ornamentation attractive to females?

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68:1215–1224.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1732-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Dubuc C
    2. Ruiz-Lambides A
    3. Widdig A

    (2014b) Variance in male lifetime reproductive success and estimation of the degree of polygyny in a primate

    Behavioral Ecology 25:878–889.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru052

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Ehardt CL
    2. Bernstein IS

    (1986) Matrilineal overthrows in rhesus monkey groups

    International Journal of Primatology 7:157–181.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692316

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Ellis S
    2. Snyder-Mackler N
    3. Ruiz-Lambides A
    4. Platt ML
    5. Brent LJN

    (2019) Deconstructing sociality: the types of social connections that predict longevity in a group-living primate

    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286:20191991.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1991

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Erinjery JJ
    2. Kumar S
    3. Kumara HN
    4. Mohan K
    5. Dhananjaya T
    6. Sundararaj P
    7. Kent R
    8. Singh M

    (2017) Losing its ground: A case study of fast declining populations of a “least-concern” species, the bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata)

    PLOS ONE 12:e0182140.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182140

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Eudey AA

    (2008) The crab-eating macaque (Macaca fascicularis): widespread and rapidly declining

    Primate Conservation 23:129–132.

    https://doi.org/10.1896/052.023.0115

    • Google Scholar
42. Book

    1. Fa JE

    (1984) Structure and Dynamics of the Barbary Macaque Population in Gibraltar

    In: Fa JE, editors. The Barbary Macaque: A Case Study in Conservation. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp. 263–306.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2785-1_11

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Fan Z
    2. Zhao G
    3. Li P
    4. Osada N
    5. Xing J
    6. Yi Y
    7. Du L
    8. Silva P
    9. Wang H
    10. Sakate R
    11. Zhang X
    12. Xu H
    13. Yue B
    14. Li J

    (2014) Whole-genome sequencing of tibetan macaque (Macaca thibetana)

    Molecular Biology and Evolution 31:1475–1489.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu104

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Fan Z
    2. Zhou A
    3. Osada N
    4. Yu J
    5. Jiang J
    6. Li P
    7. Du L
    8. Niu L
    9. Deng J
    10. Xu H
    11. Xing J
    12. Yue B
    13. Li J

    (2018) Ancient hybridization and admixture in macaques (genus Macaca) inferred from whole genome sequences

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 127:376–386.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.03.038

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. Website

    1. Feister AJ

    (2018) Nonhuman primate evaluation and analysis part 1: analysis of future demand and supplyPrimate Evaluation and Analysis Part 1: Analysis of Future Demand and Supply

    Accessed March 2, 2022.

    https://orip.nih.gov/nonhuman-primate-evaluation-and-analysis-part-1-analysis-future-demand-and-supply
46. 1. Fischer J
    2. Higham JP
    3. Alberts SC
    4. Barrett L
    5. Beehner JC
    6. Bergman TJ
    7. Carter AJ
    8. Collins A
    9. Elton S
    10. Fagot J
    11. Ferreira da Silva MJ
    12. Hammerschmidt K
    13. Henzi P
    14. Jolly CJ
    15. Knauf S
    16. Kopp GH
    17. Rogers J
    18. Roos C
    19. Ross C
    20. Seyfarth RM
    21. Silk J
    22. Snyder-Mackler N
    23. Staedele V
    24. Swedell L
    25. Wilson ML
    26. Zinner D

    (2019) Insights into the evolution of social systems and species from baboon studies

    eLife 8:e50989.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50989

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Fooden J

    (1976) Provisional classifications and key to living species of macaques (primates: Macaca)

    Folia Primatologica 25:225–236.

    https://doi.org/10.1159/000155715

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. Book

    1. Fooden J

    (2000) Systematic Review of the Rhesus Macaque, Macaca Mulatta (Zimmermann, 1780)

    Chicago, IL: Field Museum of Natural History.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7192

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Gibbs RA
    2. Rogers J
    3. Katze MG
    4. Bumgarner R
    5. Weinstock GM
    6. Mardis ER
    7. Remington KA
    8. Strausberg RL
    9. Venter JC
    10. Wilson RK
    11. Batzer MA
    12. Bustamante CD
    13. Eichler EE
    14. Hahn MW
    15. Hardison RC
    16. Makova KD
    17. Miller W
    18. Milosavljevic A
    19. Palermo RE
    20. Siepel A
    21. Sikela JM
    22. Attaway T
    23. Bell S
    24. Bernard KE
    25. Buhay CJ
    26. Chandrabose MN
    27. Dao M
    28. Davis C
    29. Delehaunty KD
    30. Ding Y
    31. Dinh HH
    32. Dugan-Rocha S
    33. Fulton LA
    34. Gabisi RA
    35. Garner TT
    36. Godfrey J
    37. Hawes AC
    38. Hernandez J
    39. Hines S
    40. Holder M
    41. Hume J
    42. Jhangiani SN
    43. Joshi V
    44. Khan ZM
    45. Kirkness EF
    46. Cree A
    47. Fowler RG
    48. Lee S
    49. Lewis LR
    50. Li Z
    51. Liu Y-S
    52. Moore SM
    53. Muzny D
    54. Nazareth LV
    55. Ngo DN
    56. Okwuonu GO
    57. Pai G
    58. Parker D
    59. Paul HA
    60. Pfannkoch C
    61. Pohl CS
    62. Rogers Y-H
    63. Ruiz SJ
    64. Sabo A
    65. Santibanez J
    66. Schneider BW
    67. Smith SM
    68. Sodergren E
    69. Svatek AF
    70. Utterback TR
    71. Vattathil S
    72. Warren W
    73. White CS
    74. Chinwalla AT
    75. Feng Y
    76. Halpern AL
    77. Hillier LW
    78. Huang X
    79. Minx P
    80. Nelson JO
    81. Pepin KH
    82. Qin X
    83. Sutton GG
    84. Venter E
    85. Walenz BP
    86. Wallis JW
    87. Worley KC
    88. Yang S-P
    89. Jones SM
    90. Marra MA
    91. Rocchi M
    92. Schein JE
    93. Baertsch R
    94. Clarke L
    95. Csürös M
    96. Glasscock J
    97. Harris RA
    98. Havlak P
    99. Jackson AR
    100. Jiang H
    101. Liu Y
    102. Messina DN
    103. Shen Y
    104. Song HX-Z
    105. Wylie T
    106. Zhang L
    107. Birney E
    108. Han K
    109. Konkel MK
    110. Lee J
    111. Smit AFA
    112. Ullmer B
    113. Wang H
    114. Xing J
    115. Burhans R
    116. Cheng Z
    117. Karro JE
    118. Ma J
    119. Raney B
    120. She X
    121. Cox MJ
    122. Demuth JP
    123. Dumas LJ
    124. Han S-G
    125. Hopkins J
    126. Karimpour-Fard A
    127. Kim YH
    128. Pollack JR
    129. Vinar T
    130. Addo-Quaye C
    131. Degenhardt J
    132. Denby A
    133. Hubisz MJ
    134. Indap A
    135. Kosiol C
    136. Lahn BT
    137. Lawson HA
    138. Marklein A
    139. Nielsen R
    140. Vallender EJ
    141. Clark AG
    142. Ferguson B
    143. Hernandez RD
    144. Hirani K
    145. Kehrer-Sawatzki H
    146. Kolb J
    147. Patil S
    148. Pu L-L
    149. Ren Y
    150. Smith DG
    151. Wheeler DA
    152. Schenck I
    153. Ball EV
    154. Chen R
    155. Cooper DN
    156. Giardine B
    157. Hsu F
    158. Kent WJ
    159. Lesk A
    160. Nelson DL
    161. O’brien WE
    162. Prüfer K
    163. Stenson PD
    164. Wallace JC
    165. Ke H
    166. Liu X-M
    167. Wang P
    168. Xiang AP
    169. Yang F
    170. Barber GP
    171. Haussler D
    172. Karolchik D
    173. Kern AD
    174. Kuhn RM
    175. Smith KE
    176. Zwieg AS
    177. Rhesus Macaque Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium

    (2007) Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome

    Science 316:222–234.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139247

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Gogarten JF
    2. Koenig A

    (2013) Reproductive seasonality is a poor predictor of receptive synchrony and male reproductive skew among nonhuman primates

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67:123–134.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1432-2

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Goldstein SJ
    2. Richard AF

    (1989) Ecology of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in northwest Pakistan

    International Journal of Primatology 10:531–567.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02739364

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Harcourt AH
    2. Harvey PH
    3. Larson SG
    4. Short RV

    (1981) Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates

    Nature 293:55–57.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/293055a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Hart DB
    2. Gulland GL

    (1893)

    The anatomy of advanced pregnancy in Macacus rhesus studied by frozen sections, by casts, and microscopically

    Transactions Edinburgh Obstetrical Society 18:71–84.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Hasan MK
    2. Feeroz MM
    3. Jones-Engel L
    4. Engel GA
    5. Kanthaswamy S
    6. Smith DG

    (2014) Diversity and molecular phylogeny of mitochondrial DNA of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in Bangladesh

    American Journal of Primatology 76:1094–1104.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22296

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Hawkley LC
    2. Capitanio JP

    (2015) Perceived social isolation, evolutionary fitness and health outcomes: a lifespan approach

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 370:20140114.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0114

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Hernandez RD
    2. Hubisz MJ
    3. Wheeler DA
    4. Smith DG
    5. Ferguson B
    6. Rogers J
    7. Nazareth L
    8. Indap A
    9. Bourquin T
    10. McPherson J
    11. Muzny D
    12. Gibbs R
    13. Nielsen R
    14. Bustamante CD

    (2007) Demographic histories and patterns of linkage disequilibrium in Chinese and Indian rhesus macaques

    Science 316:240–243.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140462

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Higashino A
    2. Sakate R
    3. Kameoka Y
    4. Takahashi I
    5. Hirata M
    6. Tanuma R
    7. Masui T
    8. Yasutomi Y
    9. Osada N

    (2012) Whole-genome sequencing and analysis of the Malaysian cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) genome

    Genome Biology 13:R58.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-7-r58

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Higham JP
    2. Maestripieri D

    (2010) Revolutionary coalitions in male rhesus macaques

    Behaviour 147:1889–1908.

    https://doi.org/10.1163/000579510X539709

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Higham JP
    2. Heistermann M
    3. Maestripieri D

    (2011) The energetics of male–male endurance rivalry in free-ranging rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta

    Animal Behaviour 81:1001–1007.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.001

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Higham JP
    2. Maestripieri D

    (2014) The costs of reproductive success in male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) on Cayo Santiago

    International Journal of Primatology 35:661–676.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-014-9789-x

    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Hoffman CL
    2. Ruiz-Lambides AV
    3. Davila E
    4. Maldonado E
    5. Gerald MS
    6. Maestripieri D

    (2008) Sex differences in survival costs of reproduction in a promiscuous primate

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62:1711–1718.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0599-z

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Hoffman CL
    2. Higham JP
    3. Mas-Rivera A
    4. Ayala JE
    5. Maestripieri D

    (2010) Terminal investment and senescence in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) on Cayo Santiago

    Behavioral Ecology 21:972–978.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq098

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Ito T
    2. Kanthaswamy S
    3. Bunlungsup S
    4. Oldt RF
    5. Houghton P
    6. Hamada Y
    7. Malaivijitnond S

    (2020) Secondary contact and genomic admixture between rhesus and long-tailed macaques in the Indochina Peninsula

    Journal of Evolutionary Biology 33:1164–1179.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13681

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Jaman MF
    2. Huffman MA

    (2013) The effect of urban and rural habitats and resource type on activity budgets of commensal rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in Bangladesh

    Primates; Journal of Primatology 54:49–59.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-012-0330-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Jiang J
    2. Kanthaswamy S
    3. Capitanio JP

    (2013) Degree of Chinese ancestry affects behavioral characteristics of infant rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

    Journal of Medical Primatology 42:20–27.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/jmp.12026

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Joag SV
    2. Stephens EB
    3. Adams RJ
    4. Foresman L
    5. Narayan O

    (1994) Pathogenesis of SIVmac infection in Chinese and Indian rhesus macaques: effects of splenectomy on virus burden

    Virology 200:436–446.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1994.1207

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Jönsson KI
    2. Jonsson KI

    (1997) Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction

    Oikos 78:57.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/3545800

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Kaburu SSK
    2. Marty PR
    3. Beisner B
    4. Balasubramaniam KN
    5. Bliss-Moreau E
    6. Kaur K
    7. Mohan L
    8. McCowan B

    (2019) Rates of human-macaque interactions affect grooming behavior among urban-dwelling rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

    American Journal of Physical Anthropology 168:92–103.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23722

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Kamrul H
    2. Abdul A
    3. Rabiul A
    4. Yoshi K
    5. Lisa JE
    6. Randall K
    7. Sharmin A
    8. Sajeda B
    9. Mostafa F

    (2013) Distribution of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in Bangladesh: Inter-population variation in group size and composition

    Primate Conservation 26:125–132.

    https://doi.org/10.1896/052.026.0103

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Kanthaswamy S
    2. Oldt RF
    3. Ng J
    4. Ruiz-Lambides AV
    5. Maldonado E
    6. Martínez MI
    7. Sariol CA

    (2017)

    Population genetic structure of the cayo santiago colony of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

    Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 56:396–401.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Kappeler PM
    2. Cremer S
    3. Nunn CL

    (2015) Sociality and health: impacts of sociality on disease susceptibility and transmission in animal and human societies

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 370:20140116.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0116

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Kaumanns W
    2. Singh M
    3. Schwibbe M

    (2013)

    Environmental change and housing conditions result in disappearance and return of reproductive seasonality in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

    Current Science 105:517–521.

    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Kinnaman AJ

    (1902) Mental life of two Macacus rhesus monkeys in captivity

    The American Journal of Psychology 13:98–148.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1412207

    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Kulik L
    2. Muniz L
    3. Mundry R
    4. Widdig A

    (2012) Patterns of interventions and the effect of coalitions and sociality on male fitness

    Molecular Ecology 21:699–714.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05250.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Kumar M
    2. Singh M
    3. Kumara HN
    4. Sharma AK
    5. Bertsch C

    (2001)

    Male migration in lion-tailed macaques

    Primate Report 59:5–18.

    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Kumar S
    2. Stecher G
    3. Suleski M
    4. Hedges SB

    (2017) Timetree: A resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times

    Molecular Biology and Evolution 34:1812–1819.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx116

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. Book

    1. Kutsukake N
    2. Nunn CL

    (2009) The Causes and Consequences of Reproductive Skew in Male Primates

    In: Hager R, Jones CB, editors. Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates: Proximate and Ultimate Causes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 165–195.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511641954

    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Kyes RC
    2. Jones-Engel L
    3. Chalise MK
    4. Engel G
    5. Heidrich J
    6. Grant R
    7. Bajimaya SS
    8. McDonough J
    9. Smith DG
    10. Ferguson B

    (2006) Genetic characterization of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in Nepal

    American Journal of Primatology 68:445–455.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20240

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Lapiedra O
    2. Chejanovski Z
    3. Kolbe JJ

    (2017) Urbanization and biological invasion shape animal personalities

    Global Change Biology 23:592–603.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13395

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Lee DS
    2. Kang YHR
    3. Ruiz-Lambides AV
    4. Higham JP

    (2021) The observed pattern and hidden process of female reproductive trajectories across the life span in a non-human primate

    The Journal of Animal Ecology 90:2901–2914.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13590

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Liedigk R
    2. Roos C
    3. Brameier M
    4. Zinner D

    (2014) Mitogenomics of the Old World monkey tribe Papionini

    BMC Evolutionary Biology 14:176.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-014-0176-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Lindburg DG

    (1969) Rhesus monkeys: mating season mobility of adult males

    Science 166:1176–1178.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.166.3909.1176

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. Book

    1. Lindburg DG

    (1971) The Rhesus monkey in North India: an ecological and behavioral study

    In: Rosenblum LA, editors. Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Research. New York, NY: Academic Press. pp. 1–106.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-534002-1.50007-9

    • Google Scholar
84. Book

    1. Lindburg DG

    (1977)

    Feeding Ecology and Diet Composition of Rhesus Macaques in a Siwalik forest in northern India

    In: Clutton-Brock TH, editors. Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes. London: Academic Press. pp. 223–249.

    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Liu Q
    2. Yang GB
    3. Zhao H
    4. Wei Q
    5. Xing H
    6. Qin C
    7. Shao YM

    (2008) Disease progression patterns of SHIV-KB9 in rhesus macaques of Chinese origin in comparison with Indian macaques

    Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 21:302–307.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-3988(08)60046-X

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Liu Z
    2. Tan X
    3. Orozco-terWengel P
    4. Zhou X
    5. Zhang L
    6. Tian S
    7. Yan Z
    8. Xu H
    9. Ren B
    10. Zhang P
    11. Xiang Z
    12. Sun B
    13. Roos C
    14. Bruford MW
    15. Li M

    (2018) Population genomics of wild Chinese rhesus macaques reveals a dynamic demographic history and local adaptation, with implications for biomedical research

    GigaScience 7:giy106.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Lovari S
    2. Pokheral CP
    3. Jnawali SR
    4. Fusani L
    5. Ferretti F

    (2015) Coexistence of the tiger and the common leopard in a prey‐rich area: the role of prey partitioning

    Journal of Zoology 295:122–131.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12192

    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Ma X
    2. Tang LH
    3. Qu LB
    4. Ma J
    5. Chen L

    (2009) Identification of 17 novel major histocompatibility complex-A alleles in a population of Chinese-origin rhesus macaques

    Tissue Antigens 73:184–187.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0039.2008.01168.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Madlon-Kay S
    2. Brent LJN
    3. Montague MJ
    4. Heller KA
    5. Platt ML

    (2017) Using machine learning to discover latent social phenotypes in free-ranging macaques

    Brain Sciences 7:91.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7070091

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. Book

    1. Maestripieri D

    (2008)

    Macachiavellian Intelligence: How Rhesus Macaques and Humans Have Conquered the World

    Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Maestripieri D
    2. Hoffman CL

    (2011) Chronic stress, allostatic load, and aging in nonhuman primates

    Development and Psychopathology 23:1187–1195.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579411000551

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. Book

    1. Maestripieri D
    2. Hoffman CL

    (2012) Behavior and Social Dynamics of Rhesus Macaques on Cayo Santiago

    In: Wang Q, editors. Bones, Genetics, and Behavior of Rhesus Macaques. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 247–262.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1046-1_12

    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Mahaney WC
    2. Stambolic A
    3. Knezevich M
    4. Hancock RGV
    5. Aufreiter S
    6. Sanmugadas K
    7. Kessler MJ
    8. Grynpas MD

    (1995) Geophagy amongst rhesus macaques on Cayo Santiago, Puerto Rico

    Primates 36:323–333.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382856

    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Manson JH

    (1992) Measuring female mate choice in Cayo Santiago rhesus macaques

    Animal Behaviour 44:405–416.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(92)90051-A

    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Manson JH

    (1998) Evolved psychology in a novel environment: Male macaques and the “seniority rule.”

    Human Nature 9:97–117.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-998-1000-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Marmi J
    2. Bertranpetit J
    3. Terradas J
    4. Takenaka O
    5. Domingo-Roura X

    (2004) Radiation and phylogeography in the Japanese macaque, Macaca fuscata

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30:676–685.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00247-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Marty PR
    2. Hodges K
    3. Agil M
    4. Engelhardt A

    (2016) Determinants of immigration strategies in male crested macaques (Macaca nigra)

    Scientific Reports 6:32028.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32028

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Massart R
    2. Nemoda Z
    3. Suderman MJ
    4. Sutti S
    5. Ruggiero AM
    6. Dettmer AM
    7. Suomi SJ
    8. Szyf M

    (2016) Early life adversity alters normal sex-dependent developmental dynamics of DNA methylation

    Development and Psychopathology 28:1259–1272.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416000833

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. McKinney ML

    (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals

    Urban Ecosystems 11:161–176.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4

    • Google Scholar
100. 1. McMillan C
     2. Duggleby C

     (1981) Interlineage genetic differentiation among rhesus macaques on Cayo Santiago

     American Journal of Physical Anthropology 56:305–312.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330560311

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. 1. Miranda AC
     2. Schielzeth H
     3. Sonntag T
     4. Partecke J

     (2013) Urbanization and its effects on personality traits: a result of microevolution or phenotypic plasticity?

     Global Change Biology 19:2634–2644.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12258

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Missakian EA

     (1972) Genealogical and cross-genealogical dominance relations in a group of free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) on Cayo Santiago

     Primates; Journal of Primatology 13:169–180.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840878

     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Morcillo DO
     2. Steiner UK
     3. Grayson KL
     4. Ruiz-Lambides AV
     5. Hernández-Pacheco R

     (2020) Hurricane-induced demographic changes in a non-human primate population

     Royal Society Open Science 7:200173.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200173

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Neville MK

     (1968) Ecology and activity of Himalayan foothill rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

     Ecology 49:110–123.

     https://doi.org/10.2307/1933566

     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Nunn CL
     2. Craft ME
     3. Gillespie TR
     4. Schaller M
     5. Kappeler PM

     (2015) The sociality-health-fitness nexus: synthesis, conclusions and future directions

     Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 370:20140115.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0115

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Osada N
     2. Matsudaira K
     3. Hamada Y
     4. Malaivijitnond S
     5. Niimura YTE

     (2021) Testing sex-biased admixture origin of macaque species using autosomal and X-chromosomal genomic sequences

     Genome Biology and Evolution 13:evaa209.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa209

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Ostner J
     2. Nunn CL
     3. Schülke O

     (2008) Female reproductive synchrony predicts skewed paternity across primates

     Behavioral Ecology 19:1150–1158.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn093

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
108. 1. O’Hearn WJ
     2. Ruiz-Lambides A
     3. Platt ML
     4. Brent LJN

     (2022) No evidence that grooming is exchanged for coalitionary support in the short- or long-term via direct or generalized reciprocity in unrelated rhesus macaques

     Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 76:53.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03160-2

     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Pavez-Fox MA
     2. Negron-Del Valle JE
     3. Thompson IJ
     4. Walker CS
     5. Bauman SE
     6. Gonzalez O
     7. Compo N
     8. Ruiz-Lambides A
     9. Martinez MI
     10. Platt ML
     11. Montague MJ
     12. Higham JP
     13. Snyder-Mackler N
     14. Brent LJN
     15. Cayo Biobank Research Unit

     (2021) Sociality predicts individual variation in the immunity of free-ranging rhesus macaques

     Physiology & Behavior 241:113560.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113560

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Perelman P
     2. Johnson WE
     3. Roos C
     4. Seuánez HN
     5. Horvath JE
     6. Moreira MAM
     7. Kessing B
     8. Pontius J
     9. Roelke M
     10. Rumpler Y
     11. Schneider MPC
     12. Silva A
     13. O’Brien SJ
     14. Pecon-Slattery J

     (2011) A molecular phylogeny of living primates

     PLOS Genetics 7:e1001342.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001342

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Pirta RS
     2. Gadgil M
     3. Kharshikar AV

     (1997) Management of the rhesus monkey Macaca mulatta and Hanuman langur Presbytis entellus in Himachal Pradesh, India

     Biological Conservation 79:97–106.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(95)00131-X

     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Pittet F
     2. Johnson C
     3. Hinde K

     (2017) Age at reproductive debut: Developmental predictors and consequences for lactation, infant mass, and subsequent reproduction in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

     American Journal of Physical Anthropology 164:457–476.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23286

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Pocock RL

     (1932)

     The rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

     Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 35:530–551.

     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Radhakrishna S
     2. Sinha A

     (2011) Less than wild? Commensal primates and wildlife conservation

     Journal of Biosciences 36:749–753.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-011-9145-7

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Rao KS
     2. Maikhuri RK
     3. Nautiyal S
     4. Saxena KG

     (2002) Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India

     Journal of Environmental Management 66:317–327.

     https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0587

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
116. 1. Rawlins RG
     2. Kessler MJ

     (1982) A five-year study of tetanus in the Cayo Santiago rhesus monkey colony: Behavioral description and epizootiology

     American Journal of Primatology 3:23–39.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350030103

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
117. Book

     1. Rawlins RG
     2. Kessler MJ

     (1986)

     The History of the Cayo Santiago Colony

     In: Rawlins RG, Kessler MJ, editors. The Cayo Santiago Macaques: History, Behavior, and Biology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. 13–46.

     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Richard AF
     2. Goldstein SJ
     3. Dewar RE

     (1989) Weed macaques: The evolutionary implications of macaque feeding ecology

     International Journal of Primatology 10:569–594.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02739365

     • Google Scholar
119. 1. Roos C
     2. Kothe M
     3. Alba DM
     4. Delson E
     5. Zinner D

     (2019) The radiation of macaques out of Africa: Evidence from mitogenome divergence times and the fossil record

     Journal of Human Evolution 133:114–132.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.05.017

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
120. 1. Sade DS

     (1967)

     Social Communication Among Primates

     Determinants of Dominance in a Group of Free-Ranging Rhesus Monkeys, Social Communication Among Primates, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

     • Google Scholar
121. 1. Sade DS

     (1972) Sociometrics of Macaca mulatta. I. Linkages and cliques in grooming matrices

     Folia Primatologica 18:196–223.

     https://doi.org/10.1159/000155480

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
122. 1. Saraswat R
     2. Sinha A
     3. Radhakrishna S

     (2015) A god becomes A pest? Human-rhesus macaque interactions in Himachal Pradesh, northern India

     European Journal of Wildlife Research 61:435–443.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-015-0913-9

     • Google Scholar
123. 1. Sarker G
     2. Kabir M
     3. Feeroz M
     4. Hasan M

     (2008)

     Food and feeding behaviour of rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) at Barmi, Gazipur, Bangladesh

     Bangladesh Journal of Life Sciences 20:1–8.

     • Google Scholar
124. 1. Satkoski Trask JA
     2. Garnica WT
     3. Smith DG
     4. Houghton P
     5. Lerche N
     6. Kanthaswamy S

     (2013) Single-nucleotide polymorphisms reveal patterns of allele sharing across the species boundary between rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and cynomolgus (M. fascicularis) macaques

     American Journal of Primatology 75:135–144.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22091

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
125. 1. Savard JPL
     2. Clergeau P
     3. Mennechez G

     (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems

     Landscape and Urban Planning 48:131–142.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00037-2

     • Google Scholar
126. 1. Sengupta A
     2. Radhakrishna S

     (2015) Fruit trait preference in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and its implications for seed dispersal

     International Journal of Primatology 36:999–1013.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-015-9869-6

     • Google Scholar
127. 1. Sengupta A
     2. Radhakrishna S

     (2016) Influence of fruit availability on fruit consumption in a generalist primate, the rhesus macaque Macaca mulatta

     International Journal of Primatology 37:703–717.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-016-9933-x

     • Google Scholar
128. 1. Sengupta A
     2. Radhakrishna S

     (2018) The hand that feeds the monkey: mutual influence of humans and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in the context of provisioning

     International Journal of Primatology 39:817–830.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-018-0014-1

     • Google Scholar
129. 1. Sengupta A
     2. Radhakrishna S

     (2020) Factors predicting provisioning of macaques by humans at tourist sites

     International Journal of Primatology 41:471–485.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-020-00148-5

     • Google Scholar
130. 1. Seth PK
     2. Seth S

     (1983) Brief report: Population dynamics of free-ranging rhesus monkeys in different ecological conditions in India

     American Journal of Primatology 5:61–67.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350050107

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
131. 1. Seth PK
     2. Seth S

     (1985)

     Ecology and feeding behaviour of the free ranging rhesus monkeys in India

     Indian Anthropologist 15:51–62.

     • Google Scholar
132. 1. Sharma S
     2. Acharya S

     (2017) Human-Rhesus macaque conflict at Pumdivumdi/ Tallokodi, Pokhara, West Nepal

     Banko Janakari 27:46–50.

     https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v27i2.21222

     • Google Scholar
133. 1. Silk JB

     (2007) Social components of fitness in primate groups

     Science 317:1347–1351.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140734

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
134. 1. Singh SD

     (1968a) Social interactions between the rural and urban monkeys, Macaca mulatta

     Primates; Journal of Primatology 9:69–74.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01795886

     • Google Scholar
135. 1. Singh SD

     (1968b) Effect of urban environment on visual curiosity behavior in rhesus monkeys

     Psychonomic Science 11:83–84.

     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328145

     • Google Scholar
136. 1. Singh SD

     (1969) Urban monkeys

     Scientific American 221:108–115.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0769-108

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
137. 1. Smith DG
     2. McDonough J

     (2005) Mitochondrial DNA variation in Chinese and Indian rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

     American Journal of Primatology 65:1–25.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20094

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
138. 1. Snyder-Mackler N
     2. Sanz J
     3. Kohn JN
     4. Brinkworth JF
     5. Morrow S
     6. Shaver AO
     7. Grenier JC
     8. Pique-Regi R
     9. Johnson ZP
     10. Wilson ME
     11. Barreiro LB
     12. Tung J

     (2016) Social status alters immune regulation and response to infection in macaques

     Science 354:1041–1045.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3580

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
139. 1. Solomon C
     2. Southwood S
     3. Hoof I
     4. Rudersdorf R
     5. Peters B
     6. Sidney J
     7. Pinilla C
     8. Marcondes MCG
     9. Ling B
     10. Marx P
     11. Sette A
     12. Mothé BR

     (2010) The most common Chinese rhesus macaque MHC class I molecule shares peptide binding repertoire with the HLA-B7 supertype

     Immunogenetics 62:451–464.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-010-0450-3

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
140. 1. Sueur C
     2. Petit O
     3. Deneubourg JL

     (2010) Short-term group fission processes in macaques: a social networking approach

     The Journal of Experimental Biology 213:1338–1346.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.039016

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
141. 1. Sueur C
     2. Petit O
     3. De Marco A
     4. Jacobs AT
     5. Watanabe K
     6. Thierry B

     (2011) A comparative network analysis of social style in macaques

     Animal Behaviour 82:845–852.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.020

     • Google Scholar
142. 1. Tang C
     2. Huang L
     3. Huang Z
     4. Krzton A
     5. Lu C
     6. Zhou Q

     (2016) Forest seasonality shapes diet of limestone-living rhesus macaques at Nonggang, China

     Primates 57:83–92.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-015-0498-7

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
143. Book

     1. Teas J
     2. Richie T
     3. Taylor H
     4. Southwick C

     (1980)

     Population patterns and behavioral ecology of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in Nepal

     In: Teas J, editors. The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. pp. 247–298.

     • Google Scholar
144. 1. Testard C
     2. Larson SM
     3. Watowich MM
     4. Kaplinsky CH
     5. Bernau A
     6. Faulder M
     7. Marshall HH
     8. Lehmann J
     9. Ruiz-Lambides A
     10. Higham JP
     11. Montague MJ
     12. Snyder-Mackler N
     13. Platt ML
     14. Brent LJN

     (2021) Rhesus macaques build new social connections after a natural disaster

     Current Biology 31:2299–2309.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.029

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
145. 1. Thierry B

     (2007) Unity in diversity: Lessons from macaque societies

     Evolutionary Anthropology 16:224–238.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20147

     • Google Scholar
146. 1. Thierry B
     2. Aureli F
     3. Nunn CL
     4. Petit O
     5. Abegg C
     6. de Waal FBM

     (2008) A comparative study of conflict resolution in macaques: insights into the nature of trait covariation

     Animal Behaviour 75:847–860.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.006

     • Google Scholar
147. 1. Tian JD
     2. Wang ZL
     3. Lu JQ
     4. Wang BS
     5. Chen JR

     (2013) Reproductive parameters of female Macaca mulatta tcheliensis in the temperate forest of Mount Taihangshan, Jiyuan, China

     American Journal of Primatology 75:605–612.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22147

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
148. 1. Tian J
     2. Wang B
     3. Wang Z
     4. Liu J
     5. Lu J

     (2015) Effects of social and climatic factors on birth sex ratio in Macaca mulatta in Mount Taihangshan area

     Integrative Zoology 10:199–206.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12118

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
149. 1. Trefilov A
     2. Berard J
     3. Krawczak M
     4. Schmidtke J

     (2000) Natal dispersal in rhesus macaques is related to serotonin transporter gene promoter variation

     Behavior Genetics 30:295–301.

     https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026597300525

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
150. 1. Trefilov A
     2. Croucher PJP
     3. Krawczak M
     4. Schmidtke J

     (2005) Genetic influence on reproductive behavior in female rhesus macaques

     Twin Research and Human Genetics 8:551–552.

     https://doi.org/10.1375/183242705774860114

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
151. 1. Turcotte CM
     2. Mann EHJ
     3. Stock MK
     4. Villamil CI
     5. Montague MJ
     6. Dickinson E
     7. Bauman Surratt S
     8. Martinez M
     9. Williams SA
     10. Antón SC
     11. Higham JP

     (2021) The ontogeny of sexual dimorphism in free-ranging rhesus macaques

     American Journal of Biological Anthropology 177:314–327.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24442

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
152. 1. Warren WC
     2. Harris RA
     3. Haukness M
     4. Fiddes IT
     5. Murali SC
     6. Fernandes J
     7. Dishuck PC
     8. Storer JM
     9. Raveendran M
     10. Hillier LW
     11. Porubsky D
     12. Mao Y
     13. Gordon D
     14. Vollger MR
     15. Lewis AP
     16. Munson KM
     17. DeVogelaere E
     18. Armstrong J
     19. Diekhans M
     20. Walker JA
     21. Tomlinson C
     22. Graves-Lindsay TA
     23. Kremitzki M
     24. Salama SR
     25. Audano PA
     26. Escalona M
     27. Maurer NW
     28. Antonacci F
     29. Mercuri L
     30. Maggiolini FAM
     31. Catacchio CR
     32. Underwood JG
     33. O’Connor DH
     34. Sanders AD
     35. Korbel JO
     36. Ferguson B
     37. Kubisch HM
     38. Picker L
     39. Kalin NH
     40. Rosene D
     41. Levine J
     42. Abbott DH
     43. Gray SB
     44. Sanchez MM
     45. Kovacs-Balint ZA
     46. Kemnitz JW
     47. Thomasy SM
     48. Roberts JA
     49. Kinnally EL
     50. Capitanio JP
     51. Skene JHP
     52. Platt M
     53. Cole SA
     54. Green RE
     55. Ventura M
     56. Wiseman RW
     57. Paten B
     58. Batzer MA
     59. Rogers J
     60. Eichler EE

     (2020) Sequence diversity analyses of an improved rhesus macaque genome enhance its biomedical utility

     Science 370:eabc6617.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc6617

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
153. 1. Watowich M
     2. Chiou K
     3. Montague MJ
     4. Simons ND
     5. Horvath JE
     6. Ruiz-Lambides AV
     7. Martínez MI
     8. Higham JP
     9. Brent LJN
     10. Platt M
     11. Snyder-Mackler N

     (2022) Natural disaster and immunological aging in a nonhuman primate

     PNAS 119:e2121663119.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2121663119

     • Google Scholar
154. 1. Wenyuan Q
     2. Yongzu Z
     3. Manry D
     4. Southwick CH

     (1993) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in the Taihang mountains, Jiyuan county, Henan, China

     International Journal of Primatology 14:607–621.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215450

     • Google Scholar
155. 1. Widdig A
     2. Bercovitch FB
     3. Streich WJ
     4. Sauermann U
     5. Nürnberg P
     6. Krawczak M

     (2004) A longitudinal analysis of reproductive skew in male rhesus macaques

     Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271:819–826.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2666

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
156. 1. Widdig A
     2. Nürnberg P
     3. Bercovitch FB
     4. Trefilov A
     5. Berard JB
     6. Kessler MJ
     7. Schmidtke J
     8. Streich WJ
     9. Krawczak M

     (2006) Consequences of group fission for the patterns of relatedness among rhesus macaques

     Molecular Ecology 15:3825–3832.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03039.x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
157. 1. Widdig A
     2. Kessler MJ
     3. Bercovitch FB
     4. Berard JD
     5. Duggleby C
     6. Nürnberg P
     7. Rawlins RG
     8. Sauermann U
     9. Wang Q
     10. Krawczak M
     11. Schmidtke J

     (2016) Genetic studies on the Cayo Santiago rhesus macaques: A review of 40 years of research

     American Journal of Primatology 78:44–62.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22424

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
158. 1. Widdig A
     2. Muniz L
     3. Minkner M
     4. Barth Y
     5. Bley S
     6. Ruiz-Lambides A
     7. Junge O
     8. Mundry R
     9. Kulik L

     (2017) Low incidence of inbreeding in a long-lived primate population isolated for 75 years

     Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71:18.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2236-6

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
159. 1. Wilson ME
     2. Walker ML
     3. Gordon TP

     (1983) Consequences of first pregnancy in rhesus monkeys

     American Journal of Physical Anthropology 61:103–110.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330610111

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
160. 1. Wilson EK

     (2012) Modeling man: the monkey colony at the Carnegie Institution of Washington’s Department of Embryology, 1925-1971

     Journal of the History of Biology 45:213–251.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9282-8

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
161. 1. Wood EK
     2. Baron Z
     3. Schwandt ML
     4. Lindell SG
     5. Barr CS
     6. Suomi SJ
     7. Higley JD

     (2022) Variation in the mu-opioid receptor (OPRM1) and offspring sex are associated with maternal behavior in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

     Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 16:721958.

     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.721958

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
162. 1. Xue C
     2. Raveendran M
     3. Harris RA
     4. Fawcett GL
     5. Liu X
     6. White S
     7. Dahdouli M
     8. Rio Deiros D
     9. Below JE
     10. Salerno W
     11. Cox L
     12. Fan G
     13. Ferguson B
     14. Horvath J
     15. Johnson Z
     16. Kanthaswamy S
     17. Kubisch HM
     18. Liu D
     19. Platt M
     20. Smith DG
     21. Sun B
     22. Vallender EJ
     23. Wang F
     24. Wiseman RW
     25. Chen R
     26. Muzny DM
     27. Gibbs RA
     28. Yu F
     29. Rogers J

     (2016) The population genomics of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) based on whole-genome sequences

     Genome Research 26:1651–1662.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.204255.116

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
163. 1. Yan G
     2. Zhang G
     3. Fang X
     4. Zhang Y
     5. Li C
     6. Ling F
     7. Cooper DN
     8. Li Q
     9. Li Y
     10. van Gool AJ
     11. Du H
     12. Chen J
     13. Chen R
     14. Zhang P
     15. Huang Z
     16. Thompson JR
     17. Meng Y
     18. Bai Y
     19. Wang J
     20. Zhuo M
     21. Wang T
     22. Huang Y
     23. Wei L
     24. Li J
     25. Wang Z
     26. Hu H
     27. Yang P
     28. Le L
     29. Stenson PD
     30. Li B
     31. Liu X
     32. Ball EV
     33. An N
     34. Huang Q
     35. Zhang Y
     36. Fan W
     37. Zhang X
     38. Li Y
     39. Wang W
     40. Katze MG
     41. Su B
     42. Nielsen R
     43. Yang H
     44. Wang J
     45. Wang X
     46. Wang J

     (2011) Genome sequencing and comparison of two nonhuman primate animal models, the cynomolgus and Chinese rhesus macaques

     Nature Biotechnology 29:1019–1023.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1992

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
164. 1. Zhou Q
     2. Wei H
     3. Tang H
     4. Huang Z
     5. Krzton A
     6. Huang C

     (2014) Niche separation of sympatric macaques, Macaca assamensis and M. mulatta, in limestone habitats of Nonggang, China

     Primates; Journal of Primatology 55:125–137.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-013-0385-z

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "The Natural history of Model Organisms: The rhesus macaque as a success story of the Anthropocene" to eLife for consideration as a Feature Article. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by myself, Helena Pérez Valle, as a member of the eLife Features Team. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Amanda Dettmer and Yafei Mao.

The reviewers and editors have discussed the reviews and we have drafted this decision letter to help you prepare a revised submission.

The eLife Features Editor will also contact you separately about some editorial issues that you will need to address.

Summary:

This article is a thorough and accessible review of the natural history of the rhesus macaques. In particular, the review provides important updates for the 2020s, mainly focusing on the macaques' evolutionary history, diversity, ecology, and social organization, but also describing research into the genetics and epigenetics of the species. The authors do a commendable job at presenting multiple components of rhesus macaque life history in a digestible, engaging and logical way, thus making a strong argument for this species' success during the Anthropocene.

Essential revisions:

1. Please include a figure showing a time calibrate tree diagram (phylogeny) in the "Evolutionary History" section of the manuscript to better describe the divergence of different macaques and their split time.

2. Please rework the section "Evolutionary History" so that, rather than listing divergence dates and different species or higher taxa (e.g. Papionini), it serves other parts of the article. Please emphasize the following:

a) how rhesus macaques are part of a large, geologically recent radiation of macaques.

b) how rhesus macaques are an unusually successful species even compared to their closest relatives within the genus.

c) how rhesus macaques have a history of hybridization that anthropologists might use to consider hominin hybridization/ancient admixture.

3. In the section on "Reproduction", starting at line 396, please expand your discussion about the effects of environmental perturbation on female rhesus fertility by also describing the influences of troop conflict (specifically, severe aggression/fighting and overthrows) on female fertility/reproduction and group fitness. For this discussion, the authors can look towards the following references (some are in other species but all are in cercopithecine primates):

Chance MRA, Emory GR, Payne RG. 1977. Status referents in long-tailed macaques [Macaca fascicularis]: precursors and effects of a female rebellion. Primates 3:611-632.

Dettmer, A. M., Woodward, R. A., and Suomi, S. J. 2015. Reproductive consequences of a matrilineal overthrow in rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 77(3), 346-352.

Ehardt CL, Bernstein IS. 1986. Matrilineal overthrows in rhesus monkey groups. International Journal of Primatology 2:157-181.

Nash LT. 1974. Parturition in a feral baboon [Papio anubis]. Primates 2-3:279-285.

Ruiz-Lamibdes AV, Aure B, Caraballo G, Platt ML, Brent LJ. 2013. Matrilineal overthrow followed by high mortality levels in free‐ranging rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 75:98-99.

Wilson ME, Gordon TP, Bernstein IS. 1977. Timing of births and reproductive success in rhesus monkey social groups. Journal of Medical Primatology 4:202-212.

4. In figure 1, please show the geographic distributions of other macaque species to highlight the wide range of rhesus macaques' habitats. If possible, also include apes' geographic distribution as a comparison.

5. Please include a figure plotting a world map with the primate centers that keep rhesus macaques, to show the impact of this species in biomedical research.

6. If possible, please expand the discussion regarding rhesus macaques' comparatively large natural range by providing information regarding the population size or effective population size (change in population size) of rhesus macaques compared to other non-human primates during the Anthropocene.

7. In reference to lines 93-96, lines 150-154, and lines 170-176, please provide a quantitative description of the genetic differences between Chinese macaques, Indian macaques and Cayo macaques; for example, please mention what the Fst value between the different groups is.

8. Please include a discussion of whether genetic evidence supports the population bottleneck of Cayo macaques, based on the Cayo macaque history.

9. Please provide specific examples of genotype-phenotype relationships in rhesus macaques when they are mentioned them in the article.

Essential revisions:

1. Please include a figure showing a time calibrate tree diagram (phylogeny) in the "Evolutionary History" section of the manuscript to better describe the divergence of different macaques and their split time.

We have added a phylogeny of the 24 species currently recognized under the Macaca genus as Figure 1 of the paper. This phylogeny was constructed using TimeTree, a public knowledge-base for information on time-calibrated phylogenies (timetree.org; Kumar et al., 2017). The phylogeny produced using Timetree accurately reflects the most recent peer-reviewed phylogenies constructed for rhesus macaques (e.g. Osada et al., 2021), while also including the complete genus.

2. Please rework the section "Evolutionary History" so that, rather than listing divergence dates and different species or higher taxa (e.g. Papionini), it serves other parts of the article. Please emphasize the following:

a) how rhesus macaques are part of a large, geologically recent radiation of macaques.

b) how rhesus macaques are an unusually successful species even compared to their closest relatives within the genus.

c) how rhesus macaques have a history of hybridization that anthropologists might use to consider hominin hybridization/ancient admixture.

We have substantially reworked this section in order to highlight all three of these points (Lines 130 – 202). We have removed specifics about divergence dates for different species. We address each point by: (a) discussing the large, geologically recent radiation of macaques, and by naming the most closely related macaque species, for which we now provide a phylogeny as Figure 1; (b) highlighting studies which support the claim that rhesus macaque effective population size is larger than other closely related macaque species (Line 183 – 188) and; (c) explicitly stating this point at the end of the third paragraph of this section (Line 173).

3. In the section on "Reproduction", starting at line 396, please expand your discussion about the effects of environmental perturbation on female rhesus fertility by also describing the influences of troop conflict (specifically, severe aggression/fighting and overthrows) on female fertility/reproduction and group fitness. For this discussion, the authors can look towards the following references (some are in other species but all are in cercopithecine primates):

Chance MRA, Emory GR, Payne RG. 1977. Status referents in long-tailed macaques [Macaca fascicularis]: precursors and effects of a female rebellion. Primates 3:611-632.

Dettmer, A. M., Woodward, R. A., and Suomi, S. J. 2015. Reproductive consequences of a matrilineal overthrow in rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 77(3), 346-352.

Ehardt CL, Bernstein IS. 1986. Matrilineal overthrows in rhesus monkey groups. International Journal of Primatology 2:157-181.

Nash LT. 1974. Parturition in a feral baboon [Papio anubis]. Primates 2-3:279-285.

Ruiz-Lamibdes AV, Aure B, Caraballo G, Platt ML, Brent LJ. 2013. Matrilineal overthrow followed by high mortality levels in free‐ranging rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 75:98-99.

Wilson ME, Gordon TP, Bernstein IS. 1977. Timing of births and reproductive success in rhesus monkey social groups. Journal of Medical Primatology 4:202-212.

We appreciate the reviewer(s) for providing these references and suggestions. We have added a description of matrilineal take-overs, and specifically cited Ehardt and Bernstein (1986) and Dettmer et al., (2014) as examples of how these events can influence female reproduction, starting at line 484 in the revised version.

4. In figure 1, please show the geographic distributions of other macaque species to highlight the wide range of rhesus macaques' habitats. If possible, also include apes' geographic distribution as a comparison.

We have redone this figure (now Figure 2 in the revised manuscript) using range estimates provided by ICUN Red List for rhesus macaques and 9 of their most closely related sister species (representing a monophyletic group, see Figure 1). One species from this monophyletic group is excluded from the species range map, Macaca leucogenys, a species only discovered in 2015 for which the ICUN Red List does not yet have available range estimates. Since there are 24 macaque species, many with overlapping ranges, we felt a figure including all macaques would be difficult to read and interpret, and so we’ve decided to include only these 9 species most closely related to rhesus macaques here.

5. Please include a figure plotting a world map with the primate centers that keep rhesus macaques, to show the impact of this species in biomedical research.

Unfortunately we do not feel that we are able to do this. There are hundreds of primate centers keeping rhesus macaques globally, across a large number of countries, both within and outside of their natural range. We do not feel that we are able to identify all of these. We are unaware of complete lists of these centers that are publicly available, even on a within-country level. We also note that the locations of captive primate centers are sometimes purposefully hidden from public records for security reasons. (This is the case for some centers holding primates in the US, for example.)

6. If possible, please expand the discussion regarding rhesus macaques' comparatively large natural range by providing information regarding the population size or effective population size (change in population size) of rhesus macaques compared to other non-human primates during the Anthropocene.

We have added details on the effective population size of rhesus macaques starting at line 183. Specifically we write:

“The effective population of rhesus macaques across their entire modern-day range is not known, but current effective population sizes of Chinese and Indian rhesus macaques are estimated at 240,000 and 17,000, respectively (Hernandez et al., 2007).”

We were able to find two relevant studies which compared either effective population size or genetic diversity (interpretable as a proxy for effective population size) between rhesus macaques and a closely related species. Specifically we’ve added, starting at line 185:

“These countries represent only a portion of total rhesus macaques, but even those population sizes alone indicate that rhesus macaques have a substantially larger population than other closely related macaque species in Asia (Marmi et al., 2004; Bonhomme et al., 2009).”

For reasons specific to each of these studies we do not feel it’s appropriate or possible to provide direct numerical comparisons of effective population sizes. Bonhomme et al., (2009) used mitochondrial DNA to estimate effective population sizes of long-tailed and rhesus macaques. Their study found that rhesus have a larger effective population size than long-tailed macaques, however, including the precise numbers reported in the paper would not be appropriate here since effective population size estimated with mitochondrial genome is not going to be comparable to the estimates of effective population size using nuclear genomes (as done in Hernandez et al., 2007, above). Marmi et al., (2004) compared genetic diversity in Japanese and rhesus macaques and determined that the Chinese rhesus macaques have higher genetic diversity, however they do not specifically estimate effective population size.

7. In reference to lines 93-96, lines 150-154, and lines 170-176, please provide a quantitative description of the genetic differences between Chinese macaques, Indian macaques and Cayo macaques; for example, please mention what the Fst value between the different groups is.

We have added Fst estimates for comparisons between Indian and Chinese rhesus macaques starting at line 215. We are unfortunately not aware of any studies quantifying genetic difference (e.g. Fst) between the Cayo Santiago population and wild macaques. However, we have added discussion on the population bottleneck and genetic diversity of the Cayo Santiago population compared with Indian rhesus macaques (see our response below to comment 8, or line 75-83 of the revised manuscript).

8. Please include a discussion of whether genetic evidence supports the population bottleneck of Cayo macaques, based on the Cayo macaque history.

We have added new sentences about the population bottleneck on Cayo Santiago and current genetic diversity. Specifically, we write that:

“The population dipped in the 1950s causing a bottleneck whereby all individuals alive today are the descendants of 15 females which were alive in 1956 (McMillan and Duggleby, 1981). Today the population size is maintained at approximately 1500 individuals. Unsurprisingly, given the relatively small founder population and subsequent population bottleneck, the Cayo Santiago population is less genetically diverse then wild Indian rhesus macaques (Sreetharan et al., 2016). However, despite the reduced genetic diversity, there is no evidence of inbreeding depression in the population with individuals seemingly outbred by disassortative mating (Widdig et al., 2017).” (Line 75-83).

9. Please provide specific examples of genotype-phenotype relationships in rhesus macaques when they are mentioned them in the article.

We have added a brief description of four studies of genotype-phenotype relationships pertaining to both rhesus macaque behavior and physiology, starting at line 241. Specifically, we write that:

“Functional genetic studies on rhesus macaques have been used to identify specific genetic mechanisms underlying a wide variety of physiological and behavioral traits, including the timing of male natal dispersal (Trefilov et al., 2000), the degree of female multimale mating (Trefilov et al., 2005), the oxytocin response and maternal behavior in lactating mothers (Wood et al., 2022), and adaptations to cold climatic conditions at the Northern edge of the species range (Liu et al., 2018). “

Author details

1. Eve B Cooper

   Eve B Cooper is in the Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

   For correspondence

   eve.cooper@nyu.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3804-6285

2. Lauren JN Brent

   Lauren JN Brent is in the Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom

   Contribution

   Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1202-1939

3. Noah Snyder-Mackler

   Noah Snyder-Mackler is in the School of Life Sciences, Center for Evolution and Medicine, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, and the ASU-Banner Neurodegenerative Disease Research Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, United States

   Contribution

   Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3026-6160

4. Mewa Singh

   Mewa Singh is in the Biopsychology Laboratory, University of Mysore, Mysuru, India

   Contribution

   Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9198-0192

5. Asmita Sengupta

   Asmita Sengupta is at the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru, India, and the National Institute for Advanced Studies, Bengaluru, India

   Contribution

   Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2477-7290

6. Sunil Khatiwada

   Sunil Khatiwada is in the Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Magdalenka, Poland

   Contribution

   Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1807-7375

7. Suchinda Malaivijitnond

   Suchinda Malaivijitnond is in the Department of Biology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand and in the National Primate Research Center of Thailand, Chulalongkorn University, Saraburi, Thailand

   Contribution

   Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0897-2632

8. Zhou Qi Hai

   Zhou Qi Hai is in the Key Laboratory of Ecology and Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China

   Contribution

   Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2832-5005

9. James P Higham

   James P Higham is in the Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York, United States

   Contribution

   Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1133-2030

• 4,844

  views

• 429

  downloads

• 34

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.