Viscoelastic properties of suspended cells measured with shear flow deformation cytometry

  1. Richard Gerum
  2. Elham Mirzahossein
  3. Mar Eroles
  4. Jennifer Elsterer
  5. Astrid Mainka
  6. Andreas Bauer
  7. Selina Sonntag
  8. Alexander Winterl
  9. Johannes Bartl
  10. Lena Fischer
  11. Shada Abuhattum
  12. Ruchi Goswami
  13. Salvatore Girardo
  14. Jochen Guck
  15. Stefan Schrüfer
  16. Nadine Ströhlein
  17. Mojtaba Nosratlo
  18. Harald Herrmann
  19. Dorothea Schultheis
  20. Felix Rico
  21. Sebastian Johannes Müller
  22. Stephan Gekle
  23. Ben Fabry  Is a corresponding author
  1. York University, Canada
  2. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
  3. Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, U1006 INSERM, France
  4. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Germany
  5. University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
  6. University of Bayreuth, Germany

Abstract

Numerous cell functions are accompanied by phenotypic changes in viscoelastic properties, and measuring them can help elucidate higher-level cellular functions in health and disease. We present a high-throughput, simple and low-cost microfluidic method for quantitatively measuring the elastic (storage) and viscous (loss) modulus of individual cells. Cells are suspended in a high-viscosity fluid and are pumped with high pressure through a 5.8 cm long and 200 μm wide microfluidic channel. The fluid shear stress induces large, near ellipsoidal cell deformations. In addition, the flow profile in the channel causes the cells to rotate in a tank-treading manner. From the cell deformation and tank treading frequency, we extract the frequency-dependent viscoelastic cell properties based on a theoretical framework developed by R. Roscoe that describes the deformation of a viscoelastic sphere in a viscous fluid under steady laminar flow. We confirm the accuracy of the method using atomic force microscopy-calibrated polyacrylamide beads and cells. Our measurements demonstrate that suspended cells exhibit power-law, soft glassy rheological behavior that is cell cycle-dependent and mediated by the physical interplay between the actin filament and intermediate filament networks.

Data availability

The software is available on GitHub, the data are available on Dryad.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Richard Gerum

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    Richard Gerum, is inventor in a patent application on this method (EP22150396.4) alongside SG and BF..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5893-2650
  2. Elham Mirzahossein

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Mar Eroles

    Turing centre for living systems, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, U1006 INSERM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3571-0769
  4. Jennifer Elsterer

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Astrid Mainka

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Andreas Bauer

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Selina Sonntag

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Alexander Winterl

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Johannes Bartl

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Lena Fischer

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Shada Abuhattum

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Ruchi Goswami

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Salvatore Girardo

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Jochen Guck

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Stefan Schrüfer

    Institute of Polymer Materials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Nadine Ströhlein

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Mojtaba Nosratlo

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Harald Herrmann

    Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Dorothea Schultheis

    Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Felix Rico

    Turing centre for living systems, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, U1006 INSERM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7757-8340
  21. Sebastian Johannes Müller

    Department of Physics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6020-4991
  22. Stephan Gekle

    Department of Physics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
    Competing interests
    Stephan Gekle, is an inventor in a patent application on this method (EP22150396.4)..
  23. Ben Fabry

    Institute of Polymer Materials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    ben.fabry@fau.de
    Competing interests
    Ben Fabry, is an inventor in a patent application on this method (EP22150396.4)..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1737-0465

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR-SFB 225 subprojects A01,A07 and B07)

  • Elham Mirzahossein

European Union's Horizon 2020 (No 812772)

  • Mar Eroles

European Union's Horizon 2020 (No 953121)

  • Mar Eroles

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Gerum et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,001
    views
  • 703
    downloads
  • 36
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Richard Gerum
  2. Elham Mirzahossein
  3. Mar Eroles
  4. Jennifer Elsterer
  5. Astrid Mainka
  6. Andreas Bauer
  7. Selina Sonntag
  8. Alexander Winterl
  9. Johannes Bartl
  10. Lena Fischer
  11. Shada Abuhattum
  12. Ruchi Goswami
  13. Salvatore Girardo
  14. Jochen Guck
  15. Stefan Schrüfer
  16. Nadine Ströhlein
  17. Mojtaba Nosratlo
  18. Harald Herrmann
  19. Dorothea Schultheis
  20. Felix Rico
  21. Sebastian Johannes Müller
  22. Stephan Gekle
  23. Ben Fabry
(2022)
Viscoelastic properties of suspended cells measured with shear flow deformation cytometry
eLife 11:e78823.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78823

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78823

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Weihua Wang, Junqiao Xing ... Zhangfeng Hu
    Research Article

    Existence of cilia in the last eukaryotic common ancestor raises a fundamental question in biology: how the transcriptional regulation of ciliogenesis has evolved? One conceptual answer to this question is by an ancient transcription factor regulating ciliary gene expression in both uni- and multicellular organisms, but examples of such transcription factors in eukaryotes are lacking. Previously, we showed that an ancient transcription factor X chromosome-associated protein 5 (Xap5) is required for flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas. Here, we show that Xap5 and Xap5-like (Xap5l) are two conserved pairs of antagonistic transcription regulators that control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis. Male mice lacking either Xap5 or Xap5l display infertility, as a result of meiotic prophase arrest and sperm flagella malformation, respectively. Mechanistically, Xap5 positively regulates the ciliary gene expression by activating the key regulators including Foxj1 and Rfx families during the early stage of spermatogenesis. In contrast, Xap5l negatively regulates the expression of ciliary genes via repressing these ciliary transcription factors during the spermiogenesis stage. Our results provide new insights into the mechanisms by which temporal and spatial transcription regulators are coordinated to control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis.

    1. Cell Biology
    Hyunggu Hahn, Carole Daly ... Alex RB Thomsen
    Research Article

    Chemokine receptors are GPCRs that regulate the chemotactic migration of a wide variety of cells including immune and cancer cells. Most chemokine receptors contain features associated with the ability to stimulate G protein signaling during β-arrestin-mediated receptor internalization into endosomes. As endosomal signaling of certain non-GPCR receptors plays a major role in cell migration, we chose to investigate the potential role of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling on mechanisms governing this function. Applying a combination of pharmacological and cell biological approaches, we demonstrate that the model chemokine receptor CCR7 recruits G protein and β-arrestin simultaneously upon chemokine stimulation, which enables internalized receptors to activate G protein from endosomes. Furthermore, spatiotemporal-resolved APEX2 proteome profiling shows that endosomal CCR7 uniquely enriches specific Rho GTPase regulators as compared to plasma membrane CCR7, which is directly associated with enhanced activity of the Rho GTPase Rac1 and chemotaxis of immune T cells. As Rac1 drives the formation of membrane protrusions during chemotaxis, our findings suggest an important integrated function of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling in cell migration.