Viscoelastic properties of suspended cells measured with shear flow deformation cytometry

  1. Richard Gerum
  2. Elham Mirzahossein
  3. Mar Eroles
  4. Jennifer Elsterer
  5. Astrid Mainka
  6. Andreas Bauer
  7. Selina Sonntag
  8. Alexander Winterl
  9. Johannes Bartl
  10. Lena Fischer
  11. Shada Abuhattum
  12. Ruchi Goswami
  13. Salvatore Girardo
  14. Jochen Guck
  15. Stefan Schrüfer
  16. Nadine Ströhlein
  17. Mojtaba Nosratlo
  18. Harald Herrmann
  19. Dorothea Schultheis
  20. Felix Rico
  21. Sebastian Johannes Müller
  22. Stephan Gekle
  23. Ben Fabry  Is a corresponding author
  1. York University, Canada
  2. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
  3. Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, U1006 INSERM, France
  4. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Germany
  5. University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
  6. University of Bayreuth, Germany

Abstract

Numerous cell functions are accompanied by phenotypic changes in viscoelastic properties, and measuring them can help elucidate higher-level cellular functions in health and disease. We present a high-throughput, simple and low-cost microfluidic method for quantitatively measuring the elastic (storage) and viscous (loss) modulus of individual cells. Cells are suspended in a high-viscosity fluid and are pumped with high pressure through a 5.8 cm long and 200 μm wide microfluidic channel. The fluid shear stress induces large, near ellipsoidal cell deformations. In addition, the flow profile in the channel causes the cells to rotate in a tank-treading manner. From the cell deformation and tank treading frequency, we extract the frequency-dependent viscoelastic cell properties based on a theoretical framework developed by R. Roscoe that describes the deformation of a viscoelastic sphere in a viscous fluid under steady laminar flow. We confirm the accuracy of the method using atomic force microscopy-calibrated polyacrylamide beads and cells. Our measurements demonstrate that suspended cells exhibit power-law, soft glassy rheological behavior that is cell cycle-dependent and mediated by the physical interplay between the actin filament and intermediate filament networks.

Data availability

The software is available on GitHub, the data are available on Dryad.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Richard Gerum

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    Richard Gerum, is inventor in a patent application on this method (EP22150396.4) alongside SG and BF..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5893-2650
  2. Elham Mirzahossein

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Mar Eroles

    Turing centre for living systems, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, U1006 INSERM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3571-0769
  4. Jennifer Elsterer

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Astrid Mainka

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Andreas Bauer

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Selina Sonntag

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Alexander Winterl

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Johannes Bartl

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Lena Fischer

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Shada Abuhattum

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Ruchi Goswami

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Salvatore Girardo

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Jochen Guck

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Stefan Schrüfer

    Institute of Polymer Materials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Nadine Ströhlein

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Mojtaba Nosratlo

    Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Harald Herrmann

    Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Dorothea Schultheis

    Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Felix Rico

    Turing centre for living systems, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, U1006 INSERM, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7757-8340
  21. Sebastian Johannes Müller

    Department of Physics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6020-4991
  22. Stephan Gekle

    Department of Physics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
    Competing interests
    Stephan Gekle, is an inventor in a patent application on this method (EP22150396.4)..
  23. Ben Fabry

    Institute of Polymer Materials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    ben.fabry@fau.de
    Competing interests
    Ben Fabry, is an inventor in a patent application on this method (EP22150396.4)..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1737-0465

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR-SFB 225 subprojects A01,A07 and B07)

  • Elham Mirzahossein

European Union's Horizon 2020 (No 812772)

  • Mar Eroles

European Union's Horizon 2020 (No 953121)

  • Mar Eroles

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Alphee Michelot, Institut de Biologie du Développement, France

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: January 12, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: March 21, 2022
  3. Accepted: August 30, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: September 2, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: October 14, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Gerum et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,799
    Page views
  • 547
    Downloads
  • 13
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Richard Gerum
  2. Elham Mirzahossein
  3. Mar Eroles
  4. Jennifer Elsterer
  5. Astrid Mainka
  6. Andreas Bauer
  7. Selina Sonntag
  8. Alexander Winterl
  9. Johannes Bartl
  10. Lena Fischer
  11. Shada Abuhattum
  12. Ruchi Goswami
  13. Salvatore Girardo
  14. Jochen Guck
  15. Stefan Schrüfer
  16. Nadine Ströhlein
  17. Mojtaba Nosratlo
  18. Harald Herrmann
  19. Dorothea Schultheis
  20. Felix Rico
  21. Sebastian Johannes Müller
  22. Stephan Gekle
  23. Ben Fabry
(2022)
Viscoelastic properties of suspended cells measured with shear flow deformation cytometry
eLife 11:e78823.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78823

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Herschel S Dhekne, Francesca Tonelli ... Suzanne R Pfeffer
    Research Advance Updated

    Activating mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) cause Parkinson’s disease. LRRK2 phosphorylates a subset of Rab GTPases, particularly Rab10 and Rab8A, and we showed previously that these phosphoRabs play an important role in LRRK2 membrane recruitment and activation (Vides et al., 2022). To learn more about LRRK2 pathway regulation, we carried out an unbiased, CRISPR-based genome-wide screen to identify modifiers of cellular phosphoRab10 levels. A flow cytometry assay was developed to detect changes in phosphoRab10 levels in pools of mouse NIH-3T3 cells harboring unique CRISPR guide sequences. Multiple negative and positive regulators were identified; surprisingly, knockout of the Rab12 gene was especially effective in decreasing phosphoRab10 levels in multiple cell types and knockout mouse tissues. Rab-driven increases in phosphoRab10 were specific for Rab12, LRRK2-dependent and PPM1H phosphatase-reversible, and did not require Rab12 phosphorylation; they were seen with wild type and pathogenic G2019S and R1441C LRRK2. As expected for a protein that regulates LRRK2 activity, Rab12 also influenced primary cilia formation. AlphaFold modeling revealed a novel Rab12 binding site in the LRRK2 Armadillo domain, and we show that residues predicted to be essential for Rab12 interaction at this site influence phosphoRab10 and phosphoRab12 levels in a manner distinct from Rab29 activation of LRRK2. Our data show that Rab12 binding to a new site in the LRRK2 Armadillo domain activates LRRK2 kinase for Rab phosphorylation and could serve as a new therapeutic target for a novel class of LRRK2 inhibitors that do not target the kinase domain.

    1. Cell Biology
    Ling-Yun Zhou, Chen-Xi Jin ... Hao Wu
    Research Article Updated

    The MRTF–SRF pathway has been extensively studied for its crucial role in driving the expression of a large number of genes involved in actin cytoskeleton of various cell types. However, the specific contribution of MRTF–SRF in hair cells remains unknown. In this study, we showed that hair cell-specific deletion of Srf or Mrtfb, but not Mrtfa, leads to similar defects in the development of stereocilia dimensions and the maintenance of cuticular plate integrity. We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based hair cell RNA-Seq analysis to investigate the mechanistic underpinnings of the changes observed in Srf and Mrtfb mutants, respectively. Interestingly, the transcriptome analysis revealed distinct profiles of genes regulated by Srf and Mrtfb, suggesting different transcriptional regulation mechanisms of actin cytoskeleton activities mediated by Srf and Mrtfb. Exogenous delivery of calponin 2 using Adeno-associated virus transduction in Srf mutants partially rescued the impairments of stereocilia dimensions and the F-actin intensity of cuticular plate, suggesting the involvement of Cnn2, as an Srf downstream target, in regulating the hair bundle morphology and cuticular plate actin cytoskeleton organization. Our study uncovers, for the first time, the unexpected differential transcriptional regulation of actin cytoskeleton mediated by Srf and Mrtfb in hair cells, and also demonstrates the critical role of SRF–CNN2 in modulating actin dynamics of the stereocilia and cuticular plate, providing new insights into the molecular mechanism underlying hair cell development and maintenance.